|
Softpanorama |
May the source be with you, but remember the KISS principle ;-)
|
Dr. Nikolai Bezroukov
Contents
This paper is written first for my own consumption -- in order to understand better what browser to use. I created a list strong points for each browser. But after several refinements it seems that the material can benefit others as well. Please take into account that this is still quite raw notes written mainly for the personal consumption.
We will discuss the latest versions of the browsers (IE 5.0 vs. NS 4.51). These versions are definitely preferable to older stable releases (IE 4.01 and NS 4.06). For example, one annoying problem with IE4 was that it does not show URL of the link in focus (a current reference) on the bottom like Netscape Communicator does. Corrected in IE5.
As with any product the real issues are adherence to standards, performance and reliability. I don't think that the difference between IE and NS is so big in any of these issues that one can be considered superior enough to another to abandon weaker competitor completely. At least if your desktop is Windows. In this paper I will argue that for professional it just makes no sense to use only one browser. Both clearly need improvement is certain areas and generally can be considered as more or less equal in strength and weaknesses.
I use both IE and Netscape. In each browser, I have found things that annoy me, and also features that I wish the other browser had. I use each for different purposes. For example if I need to copy fragment of page into mine I use IE, but I usually load Netscape for browsing. I think that Netscape Navigator is more convenient than IE for browsing (bookmarks, personal folder, etc.).
Until recently I used predominantly Netscape and only recently started to understand that IE4 is better than Netscape in several important for me areas and started to change to the second browser on a regular basis, although I still automatically open Netscape first (habits are difficult to change, you know ;-). But I use IE5 for several months now, so I now have a little bit experience with this version too. The IE5 is a paragon of the component model. When you use IE5, you're actually using is about 70 COM components working together. No matter how ecumenical you are about free software, you can't deny this is a good idea; it makes debugging easier and makes the code more reusable.
It will be interesting to see what of the best features will migrate from IE to Netscape when Communicator 5.0 comes out.
IMHO IE 5.0 is a mixture of both bright (history pane organization, search pane, etc) and very stupid technical decisions (bookmarks organization)
History feature is really superior .
Better saving Netscape 4.x lets you store a page in either text or HTML format; but when you save a page in HTML, you get placeholders where the graphics should be. With IE5 you can neatly store a Web page by saving it as a Complete page. You can keep pictures, texts, Java applets, and even Shockwave programs for as long as you like. Alternatively, you can save any page as an Archive, converting all the page's files into a single file. That way you can save the page to a floppy or e-mail the page to a friend without any hassle.
Better bars with more fuctionality
If you get onto the Internet via a dial-up connection, you know all too well how slow surfing can get--and you may be tired of firing up your modem for a quick peek at a favorite site. IE 5.0 can help by making offline browsing and saving Web pages considerably easier. IE5 adds a handy synchronization feature and two new ways to save a Web page on your hard drive. IYou can also save newsgroup discussions offline. When you hit upon a Web page you like and add it to your Favorites, you're asked if you want to make the page available offline. Click the Customize button, and up pops the Offline Favorite Wizard. Using the Wizard function, you can set how often Internet Explorer checks the site (daily, weekly, or at other intervals), what it downloads (including images and linked pages), and how it notifies you. You can also modify how many levels into a site you want to go, or limit the total size (in megabytes) of the download. Better yet, I can schedule automated return visits to the page to see if anything has changed.
As a Microsoft product IE is far from being open. Some examples of Microsoft initiatives which are extending Internet protocols in a proprietary ways and affect IE include:
During cut to the clipboard and paste to HTML editor IE preserves HTML formatting and URLs (plain text in Netscape). That' probably the most important single feature that Netscape is missing. Starting with version 4.52. you can move text from editor to NS Messanger preserving HTML formatting, but still no luck with external programs.
In its default setting a new windows inherits your home page -- not to the page that was current -- wrong inheritance (IE has correct semantic); Can be changes via preferences, though.
Working with history is an important activity for serious users. Netscape is too primitive in this respect. It has less convenient access to history (A really bad decision was to put history in Communicator/Tools submenu (who is the author ? ;-) -- IE solution with side by side windows is nicer and it provides for more productive browsing.
Did they fix the bug with Netscape reloading the page whenever you resize the browser?
I have had both browsers crash a lot. But as far as can recollect Netscape looks more buggy. For example earlier versions of Netscape 4 had have a very nasty bug: Netscape regularly crashed my Windows 95 system causing a reboot. I went to Netscape's home page and found no documentation on the problem. I sent an e-mail to tech support that was never replied to. Later I accidentally had found an answer in one of the newsgroups -- you need to remove lost clusters from the disk and remove history file. After that everything was fine.
I discovers a very strange "feature" of NS 4.51 has the Windows95 environment. This feature is pretty consistent for all versions starting with 4.06 or 4.07. All of them do not start properly after installation (you click the icon and communicator does not start at all) until one removes old user directory. It starts OK without user directory. Moreover in case of 4.51 after it created a new user directory is does not start properly after rebooting. A very strange bug and I spend some time trying to bypass it. It was resolved in 4.6...
During installation Internet Explorer is performing a partial upgrade to the Windows operating system. That can affect other applications. Although I never have problems (sometimes I just noticed that existing bugs just disappeared) other reported about problems with Corel products after upgrade.
None of the browser is much superior and the best way is use them both. Existence of strong competitor guarantee quick advancement of the state of the art. From my (somewhat superficial) experience as a user I feel that currently IE5.0 more or less close in its adherence to standards to NS. Currently with Office 2000 integration, improved support for HTML and XML and FrontPage integration into Office it looks like IE5 is ready to fight for its market share with NS 4.51 on technical grounds too.
It would be interesting to see how AOL (current owner of Netscape browser products) will play the game with NS v.5.
Linux Today Dave Whitinger -- The Battle That Could Lose Us The War
Story Why I'm Abandoning Netscape
Face-Off Internet Explorer vs. Communicator
ZDNet Products Internet Browsers
The 5.0 browsers will begin a whole new ball game, but which browser should you use right now? For most of us, the answer is Internet Explorer 4.01. Performance is close, and both browsers have addressed major weaknesses, but in the end, IE's smoother interface and greater flexibility make it a winner.
Microsoft archrival Netscape could benefit by using the Microsoft tools, since it could then focus its programming efforts on profitable server software. But Netscape, cherishing its independence, will continue writing browsers from scratch. Julie Herendeen, Netscape's director of client marketing, says that while it is technically feasible to use IE components, the company has no intention of doing so. The reason: By conceding fundamental design decisions to Microsoft, Herendeen says, Netscape ''would no longer have a role in driving standards for the Internet. It's a good thing to have at least two major voices, and it's very important for Netscape to continue to be involved.''
Support for Internet Standards
Internet Explorer will continue in its tradition of providing the leading support for standards among Internet browsers. With Internet Explorer 4.0, Microsoft was the leader in support for these key standards technologies:
- The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) recommendation for Dynamic HTML (support for DOM and ECMA262 scripting)
- HTML 4.0
- Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) 1.0, CSS Positioning
- XML, with a parser, object model and data source object model consistent with W3C´s recommendation
- HTTP 1.1
- PICS
- PNG
Internet Explorer 5.0 will offer enhanced support for each of these technologies and will additionally introduce support for these new and upcoming standardsbased technologies:
- CSS Level 2
- Dynamic Properties (recently submitted to W3C)
- Dynamic HTML Behaviors (recently submitted to W3C)
IE4
Copyright © 1996-2008 by Dr. Nikolai Bezroukov. www.softpanorama.org was created as a service to the UN Sustainable Development Networking Programme (SDNP) in the author free time. Submit comments This document is an industrial compilation designed and created exclusively for educational use and is placed under the copyright of the Open Content License(OPL). Original materials copyright belong to respective owners. Quotes are made for educational purposes only in compliance with the fair use doctrine.
Standard disclaimer: The statements, views and opinions presented on this web page are those of the author and are not endorsed by, nor do they necessarily reflect, the opinions of the author present and former employers, SDNP or any other organization the author may be associated with. We do not warrant the correctness of the information provided or its fitness for any purpose.
Created: May 16, 1997; Last modified: February 28, 2008