|Home||Switchboard||Unix Administration||Red Hat||TCP/IP Networks||Neoliberalism||Toxic Managers|
May the source be with you, but remember the KISS principle ;-)
Skepticism and critical thinking is not panacea, but can help to understand the world better
Skepticism > Political Skeptic > Fifth Column of Neoliberal Globalization > Color revolutions
|News||Color revolutions||Recommended Links||Neoliberalism as a New Form of Corporatism||Neoconservatism as a stage of development of Neoliberalism||Neocolonialism as Financial Imperialism|
|The Far Right Forces in Ukraine||Suppression of Russian language and culture in Ukraine||Ukraine's oligarchs||Galicia -- Ukrainian Benghazi, Lvov declares autonomy from Ukraine on February 19||Russian Ukrainian Gas wars||Ukrainian orange revolution|
|Events of November 30 and aftermath||SBU raid on Kiev Batkivshchina office||Revolt of diplomats||Nulandgate||EU-brokered agreement on ending crisis||To whom EuroMaidan Sharp-shooters belong?|
|Forming Provisional government||Accession of Crimea to Russia||Odessa Massacre of May 2, 2014||Mariupol, May 9 events||Presidential Elections of May 25. 2014||Poroshenko presidency|
|Compradors||Fifth column||NGOs as braintrust of color revolutions||Resurgence of ideology of neo-fascism||Totalitarian Decisionism & Human Rights: The Re-emergence of Nazi Law||Inside "democracy promotion" hypocrisy fair|
|Delegitimization of Ruling Party||Neoliberal Propaganda||Opposition as a way to get rid of feeling of inferiority||Human right activists or globalism fifth column||Exploiting "Revolutionary Romantics" as polit-technology||The art of manufacturing of prisoners of consciousness|
|Two Party System as polyarchy||The Guardian Slips Beyond the Reach of Embarrassment||Fighting Russophobia||Foreign Agents Registration Act||Russian Fifth column Humor||Etc|
NOTE: Due to size EuroMaidan101 was moved to a separate page.
At the same time opposition despite its victory is not an all-Ukrainian force, but a regional force politically by-and-large representing three or four Western oblast of Ukraine and (outside oligarchs who sides with this coup d'état such as Igor Kolomoisky) having rather insignificant representation in East and South of Ukraine. Actually Party of Regions does not represent those provinces too. That makes Eastern regions more like a colonial part of Ukraine under the rule of Western Ukrainian nationalists and Eastern Ukraine oligarchs
And the power of Yulia Timoshenko Batkivshchina Party which probably mostly represents the moderate
wing of nationalists is strengthened by the fact that most population does not consider the Party
of Region representing their interests iether. Again, politically East and South of Ukraine have
semi-colonial status and they do not have any real political representation in Parliament. Only
oligarchs and nationalists are two political forces well represented.
That's why Yanukovich was a rabid Eurointegrators all first three years of his rule. Now
those facilities completely lost efficiency due to aged, worn out equipment and because all
the rents oligarchs extracted from them were appropriated for their own enrichment. Almost none
of those facilities were modernized during years of Ukrainian independence. As prices on natural
resources and, especially, energy, increased those facilities became less competitive or non-competitive
even with similar facilities in Russia and Belorussia.
Svoboda Party is successful only to the extent it is radical . If they had not attacked opponents,
led sometimes caricature, but an effective fight for establishing nationalists as Ukrainian
national symbols (Stepan Bendera, etc), not to publicly promoted neo-Nazi ideology, no level
of funding from the West would help them to achieve them the level of political success they
got. Initially it was not the number of voters ( votes came later ), but radicalism of their
position which launched them into mainstream of political life. They won new voters not despite
but due to radicalism, as the contract with principless and corrupt fat cats from Party of Region
who were "warming chairs of MP" for oligarchs, or even more principles political functionaries
from Batkivshchina, who were increasingly willing to compromise with authorities, increasingly
becoming part of the "the system opposition" devoted to power grab, not any principles.
And of course there is a large politically ambivalent part of the country who can't decide or don't care which way the country should move -- to EU or to Russia. They just want stability and are against any abrupt changes.
So any description of EuroMaidan probably would suffer from "confirmation basis" depending which
of three forces is closer to the author heart. An this page in no exception.
This role of ultra-nationalists as pro-EU Party is pretty unique as this is probably the only case when European nationalists are the driving force behind EU integration efforts. At the same the current conditions of Association Agreement are appalling is we take into account economic interests of the country: they are one way street concessions -- EU imposes strict conditions on Ukraine but it opens neither labor market nor regular goods market to Ukrainians in return.
So it looks like Azarov government also consisted completely of pro-West fifth column as in retrospect
it is clear that only traitors of their own country can negotiate such an unfavorable conditions
(aka "sell the country"). The same is true for Yanukovich who the first three year of his Presidency
was the "Euro integrator in chief" and squashed any dissent in Party of Region as to eurointegration
benefits. So abrupt 180 degree turn by Yanukovich definitely destabilized the political situation
ion the country and Yanukovich is 100% guilty of this. Russian pressure here was only secondary
factor and any same politicians should take into account the reaction of the major trading partner
in advance. But it looks like Yanukovich never ever even read the agreement (which was prepared
in English) and got translation from Russians when Putin's government realized the damage it will
make to Russia-Ukraine economic ties. But this level of incompetence is beyond any imagination so
real reasons for abrupt turn are still the mystery.
The tragedy of Ukrainian situation while the Yanukovich regime is bad, partially criminal (as was previous regime of Yushchenko) and (as any neoliberal regime) is legitimately hated by large swats of population, the next regime probably will be worse. Especially if it come after civil war. Yanukovich definitely proved to be unapt: when Medvedev calls you a 'doormat' you know you're a loser.
But generally nationalists are less competent then technocratic elite which Yanukovich regime partially represented. Azarov actually produced an impression of a competent prime minister who operated in a very difficult, desperate economic circumstances but still managed to make the crisis less pronounced (although his SNAFU with EU association agreement is unexplainable). You need to listen to couple of his interviews and debates with opposition (for example, owner of 5th TV channel, chocolate magnate Poroshenko) to understand his. His replacement can well be much worse.
While the conclusion of those who are following what is happening in Ukraine is that the West
has won the proxy war with Russia, it seems the time has come to analyze what they really ended
We should probably view color revolutions as a new type of warfare which was developed mainly by
USA and GB. In essence it is a scheme of replacing the government in the country with neoliberal
regime friendly to Western interests (neocolonialism) instead of occupying it with foreign troops
as with regular colonialism. The key instrument is "bombing country with dollars" -- large scale
support of fifth column (aka "emerging civil society") and subservient fed by grant "independent
press". Those elements proved to be very effective tools for implementing neoliberal, globalist
coup d'état against many weak post Soviet national state (which BTW can be a neoliberal one,
like Yanukovich government was -- it is a typical crony capitalism government; for some reason somebody
decided that it's not enough pro-Western). The key goal is always opening markets for Western transnational
corporations and banks.
The importance of the intelligentsia in a revolutionary movement is in direct proportion to the general backwardness-economic, social and cultural-of the masses from whose midst it arises.
... ... ...
The revolutionary intelligentsia has proved itself a much more cohesive factor in the emergent nations of today than in Tsarist Russia. ...As the only non-specialized section of society, the intelligentsia is the obvious source of a “professional revolutionary elite” which appears to represent the interests of the “nation” as against conflicting sectional and class interests. In addition, it is the section of society most imbued with the national culture, the peasants and workers having neither the leisure nor education for it.
The intelligentsia is also sensitive to their countries’ technical lag. Participating as it does in the scientific and technical world of the twentieth century, it is stifled by the backwardness of its own nation. This feeling is accentuated by the “intellectual unemployment” endemic in these countries. Given the general economic backwardness, the only hope for most students is a government job, but there are not nearly enough of these to go round. 
The spiritual life of the intellectuals is also in a crisis. In a crumbling order where the traditional pattern is disintegrating, they feel insecure, rootless, lacking in firm values. Dissolving cultures give rise to a powerful urge for a new integration that must be total and dynamic if it is to fill the social and spiritual vacuum, that must combine religious fervor with militant nationalism.
...the big changes since have introduced new elements in their attitude – a feeling of guilt, of “debt” towards the “dark” masses, and at the same time a feeling of divorcement from, and superiority to them. The intelligentsia are anxious to belong without being assimilated, without ceasing to remain apart and above. They are in search of a dynamic movement which will unify the nation, and open up broad new vistas for it, but at the same time will give themselves power.
They are great believers in efficiency, including efficiency in social engineering. They hope for reform from above and would dearly love to hand the new world over to a grateful people, rather than see the liberating struggle of a self-conscious and freely associated people result in a new world for themselves. They care a lot for measures to drag their nation out of stagnation...
Dominance of neoliberal agenda and viewpoints in national media and "ability to form a narrative"
of events for color revolution is like air superiority in conventional war.
The Orange Revolution was definitely one of the classic instances of color revolutions. But when we are discussing similarities of it with EuroMaidan several questions arise:
To answer to these questions it makes sense to analyze and compare Orange revolution with EuroMaidan.
Groupthink : Two Party System as Polyarchy : Corruption of Regulators : Bureaucracies : Understanding Micromanagers and Control Freaks : Toxic Managers : Harvard Mafia : Diplomatic Communication : Surviving a Bad Performance Review : Insufficient Retirement Funds as Immanent Problem of Neoliberal Regime : PseudoScience : Who Rules America : Neoliberalism : The Iron Law of Oligarchy : Libertarian Philosophy
War and Peace : Skeptical Finance : John Kenneth Galbraith :Talleyrand : Oscar Wilde : Otto Von Bismarck : Keynes : George Carlin : Skeptics : Propaganda : SE quotes : Language Design and Programming Quotes : Random IT-related quotes : Somerset Maugham : Marcus Aurelius : Kurt Vonnegut : Eric Hoffer : Winston Churchill : Napoleon Bonaparte : Ambrose Bierce : Bernard Shaw : Mark Twain Quotes
Vol 25, No.12 (December, 2013) Rational Fools vs. Efficient Crooks The efficient markets hypothesis : Political Skeptic Bulletin, 2013 : Unemployment Bulletin, 2010 : Vol 23, No.10 (October, 2011) An observation about corporate security departments : Slightly Skeptical Euromaydan Chronicles, June 2014 : Greenspan legacy bulletin, 2008 : Vol 25, No.10 (October, 2013) Cryptolocker Trojan (Win32/Crilock.A) : Vol 25, No.08 (August, 2013) Cloud providers as intelligence collection hubs : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2010 : Inequality Bulletin, 2009 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2008 : Copyleft Problems Bulletin, 2004 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2011 : Energy Bulletin, 2010 : Malware Protection Bulletin, 2010 : Vol 26, No.1 (January, 2013) Object-Oriented Cult : Political Skeptic Bulletin, 2011 : Vol 23, No.11 (November, 2011) Softpanorama classification of sysadmin horror stories : Vol 25, No.05 (May, 2013) Corporate bullshit as a communication method : Vol 25, No.06 (June, 2013) A Note on the Relationship of Brooks Law and Conway Law
Fifty glorious years (1950-2000): the triumph of the US computer engineering : Donald Knuth : TAoCP and its Influence of Computer Science : Richard Stallman : Linus Torvalds : Larry Wall : John K. Ousterhout : CTSS : Multix OS Unix History : Unix shell history : VI editor : History of pipes concept : Solaris : MS DOS : Programming Languages History : PL/1 : Simula 67 : C : History of GCC development : Scripting Languages : Perl history : OS History : Mail : DNS : SSH : CPU Instruction Sets : SPARC systems 1987-2006 : Norton Commander : Norton Utilities : Norton Ghost : Frontpage history : Malware Defense History : GNU Screen : OSS early history
The Peter Principle : Parkinson Law : 1984 : The Mythical Man-Month : How to Solve It by George Polya : The Art of Computer Programming : The Elements of Programming Style : The Unix Hater’s Handbook : The Jargon file : The True Believer : Programming Pearls : The Good Soldier Svejk : The Power Elite
Most popular humor pages:
Manifest of the Softpanorama IT Slacker Society : Ten Commandments of the IT Slackers Society : Computer Humor Collection : BSD Logo Story : The Cuckoo's Egg : IT Slang : C++ Humor : ARE YOU A BBS ADDICT? : The Perl Purity Test : Object oriented programmers of all nations : Financial Humor : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2008 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2010 : The Most Comprehensive Collection of Editor-related Humor : Programming Language Humor : Goldman Sachs related humor : Greenspan humor : C Humor : Scripting Humor : Real Programmers Humor : Web Humor : GPL-related Humor : OFM Humor : Politically Incorrect Humor : IDS Humor : "Linux Sucks" Humor : Russian Musical Humor : Best Russian Programmer Humor : Microsoft plans to buy Catholic Church : Richard Stallman Related Humor : Admin Humor : Perl-related Humor : Linus Torvalds Related humor : PseudoScience Related Humor : Networking Humor : Shell Humor : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2011 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2012 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2013 : Java Humor : Software Engineering Humor : Sun Solaris Related Humor : Education Humor : IBM Humor : Assembler-related Humor : VIM Humor : Computer Viruses Humor : Bright tomorrow is rescheduled to a day after tomorrow : Classic Computer Humor
The Last but not Least Technology is dominated by two types of people: those who understand what they do not manage and those who manage what they do not understand ~Archibald Putt. Ph.D
Copyright © 1996-2018 by Dr. Nikolai Bezroukov. www.softpanorama.org was initially created as a service to the (now defunct) UN Sustainable Development Networking Programme (SDNP) in the author free time and without any remuneration. This document is an industrial compilation designed and created exclusively for educational use and is distributed under the Softpanorama Content License. Original materials copyright belong to respective owners. Quotes are made for educational purposes only in compliance with the fair use doctrine.
FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to advance understanding of computer science, IT technology, economic, scientific, and social issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided by section 107 of the US Copyright Law according to which such material can be distributed without profit exclusively for research and educational purposes.
This is a Spartan WHYFF (We Help You For Free) site written by people for whom English is not a native language. Grammar and spelling errors should be expected. The site contain some broken links as it develops like a living tree...
|You can use PayPal to make a contribution, supporting development of this site and speed up access. In case softpanorama.org is down you can use the at softpanorama.info|
The statements, views and opinions presented on this web page are those of the author (or referenced source) and are not endorsed by, nor do they necessarily reflect, the opinions of the author present and former employers, SDNP or any other organization the author may be associated with. We do not warrant the correctness of the information provided or its fitness for any purpose.
Last modified: March, 19, 2019