Softpanorama

May the source be with you, but remember the KISS principle ;-)
Home Switchboard Unix Administration Red Hat TCP/IP Networks Neoliberalism Toxic Managers
(slightly skeptical) Educational society promoting "Back to basics" movement against IT overcomplexity and  bastardization of classic Unix

Divide and conquer strategy

News Neocolonialism as financial imperialism Recommended Links IMF as the key institution for neoliberal debt enslavement The Grand Chessboard Greece debt enslavement Ukraine debt enslavement
American Exceptionalism Media-Military-Industrial Complex Mayberry Machiavellians Neo Trotskyism aka Neoconservatism "Fight with Corruption" as a smoke screen for neoliberal penetration into host countries Developing Countries Hit Hardest by Brain Drain Predator state
The Iron Law of Oligarchy Elite Theory Two Party System as polyarchy Economics of Energy   Super Imperialism New American Militarism
Neoliberalism  Disaster capitalism Predator state  Inside "democracy promotion" hypocrisy fair Right to protect Financial Sector Induced Systemic Instability Casino Capitalism
Neoliberal Brainwashing -- Journalism in the Service of the Powerful Few In Foreign Events Coverage The Guardian Presstitutes Slip Beyond the Reach of Embarrassment Political skeptic John Kenneth Galbraith Financial Humor Humor Etc

In politics and sociology, divide and conquer is gaining and maintaining power by breaking up larger concentrations of power into pieces that individually have less power than the one implementing the strategy. The concept refers to a strategy that breaks up existing power structures and prevents smaller power groups from linking up.

Traiano Boccalini cites "divide et impera" in La bilancia politica, 1,136 and 2,225 as a common principle in politics. The use of this technique is meant to empower the sovereign to control subjects, populations, or factions of different interests, who collectively might be able to oppose his rule.

Machiavelli identifies a similar application to military strategy, advising in Book VI of The Art of War[1] (Dell'arte della guerra),[2] that a Captain should endeavor with every art to divide the forces of the enemy, either by making him suspicious of his men in whom he trusted, or by giving him cause that he has to separate his forces, and, because of this, become weaker.

The maxim divide et impera has been attributed to Philip II of Macedon, and together with the maxim divide ut regnes were utilised by the Roman ruler Caesar and the French emperor Napoleon.

The strategy, but not the phrase, applies in many ancient cases: the example of Gabinius exists, parting the Jewish nation into five conventions, reported by Flavius Josephus in Book I, 169-170 of The Wars of the Jews (De bello Judaico).[3] Strabo also reports in Geography, 8.7.3[4] that the Achaean League was gradually dissolved under the Roman possession of the whole of Macedonia, owing to them not dealing with the several states in the same way, but wishing to preserve some and to destroy others.

The strategy of division and rule has been attributed to sovereigns ranging from Louis XI to the Habsburgs. Edward Coke denounces it in Chapter I of the Fourth Part of the Institutes, reporting that when it was demanded by the Lords and Commons what might be a principal motive for them to have good success in Parliament, it was answered: "Eritis insuperabiles, si fueritis inseparabiles. Explosum est illud diverbium: Divide, & impera, cum radix & vertex imperii in obedientium consensus rata sunt." [You would be insuperable if you were inseparable. This proverb, Divide and rule, has been rejected, since the root and the summit of authority are confirmed by the consent of the subjects.] On the other hand, in a minor variation, Sir Francis Bacon wrote the phrase "separa et impera" in a letter to James I of 15 February 1615. James Madison made this recommendation in a letter to Thomas Jefferson of 24 October 1787,[5] which summarized the thesis of The Federalist #10:[6] "Divide et impera, the reprobated axiom of tyranny, is under certain (some) qualifications, the only policy, by which a republic can be administered on just principles."

In Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch by Immanuel Kant (1795), Appendix one, Divide et impera is the third of three political maxims, the others being Fac et excusa (Act now, and make excuses later) and Si fecisti, nega (when you commit a crime, deny it).[7]

Elements of this technique involve:

Historically, this strategy was used in many different ways by empires seeking to expand their territories.

The concept is also mentioned as a strategy for market action in economics to get the most out of the players in a competitive market.

Contents

[hide]

In the workplace[edit]

Main article: Psychopathy in the workplace

Clive R. Boddy found that "divide and conquer" was a common strategy by corporate psychopaths used as a smokescreen to help consolidate and advance their grip on power in the corporate hierarchy.[8]

Historical examples[edit]

Africa[edit]

The divide and conquer strategy was used by foreign countries in Africa during the colonial and post-colonial period.

Asia[edit]

Europe[edit]

Indian subcontinent[edit]

The strategy of "Divide and Rule" was employed by most imperial powers in Indian subcontinent. The British and French backed various Indian states in conflicts between each other, both as a means of undermining each other's influence and consolidating their authority.

Middle East[edit]

Mexico[edit]

See also[edit]

References

  1. ^ http://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au
  2. ^ http://www.intratext.com
  3. ^ "Flavius Josephus, The Wars of the Jews, Book I, section 159". Perseus.tufts.edu. Retrieved 2011-08-27.
  4. ^ "Strabo, Geography, Book 8, chapter 7, section 1". Perseus.tufts.edu. Retrieved 2011-08-27.
  5. ^ "Constitutional Government: James Madison to Thomas Jefferson". Press-pubs.uchicago.edu. Retrieved 2011-08-27.
  6. ^ http://www.constitution.org
  7. ^ "Immanuel Kant: Perpetual Peace: Appendix I". Constitution.org. Retrieved 2011-08-27.
  8. ^ Boddy, C. R. Corporate Psychopaths: Organizational Destroyers (2011)
  9. ^ www.historyworld.net
  10. ^ BUELL, PAUL D. (1979). "SINO-KHITAN ADMINISTRATION IN MONGOL BUKHARA". Journal of Asian History. Vol. 13 (No. 2). Harrassowitz Verlag. pp. 137–8. JSTOR 41930343.
  11. ^ "France: The Roman conquest". Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved April 6, 2015. Because of chronic internal rivalries, Gallic resistance was easily broken, though Vercingetorix's Great Rebellion of 52 bce had notable successes.
  12. ^ "Julius Caesar: The first triumvirate and the conquest of Gaul". Encyclopædia Britannica Online. Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved February 15, 2015. Indeed, the Gallic cavalry was probably superior to the Roman, horseman for horseman. Rome's military superiority lay in its mastery of strategy, tactics, discipline, and military engineering. In Gaul, Rome also had the advantage of being able to deal separately with dozens of relatively small, independent, and uncooperative states. Caesar conquered these piecemeal, and the concerted attempt made by a number of them in 52 bce to shake off the Roman yoke came too late.

Top Visited
Switchboard
Latest
Past week
Past month

NEWS CONTENTS

Old News ;-)

[Jun 07, 2021] You're Emotionally And Mentally Abusing Children-- Mom Goes Nuclear On School Board Over CRT, BLM 'Indoctrination' - ZeroHed

Jun 07, 2021 | www.zerohedge.com

"Stop indoctrinating our children. Stop teaching our children to hate the police. Stop teaching our children that if they don't agree with the LGBT community that they're homophobic. You have no idea each child's life," she said, adding "You don't know what their family lifestyle consists of, you don't know the makeup of their life."

https://youtu.be/zxu3wdiXRF0

Ibrahim shut down school board members' objections several times - in between calling out two teachers for posting their political beliefs online. When board members told her she wasn't allowed to reference people by name, Ibrahim claimed those teachers called "for the death of a former president," and that students who don't support Black Lives Matter should be "canceled out."

"Why are we not allowed to say names? Why am I not allowed when they purposefully expose themselves on social media, talking about calling for the death of a former president, or saying that any child who doesn't believe in Black Lives Matter should be canceled out. Is this what my tax dollars are paying for?" she asked.

"You're emotionally abusing our children and mentally abusing them," Ibrahim continued


RDinSC 1 hour ago

Never vote for anyone at any level of political office who does not openly and sincerely oppose CRT and any and all woke indoctrination.

RedDog1 1 hour ago

I'm a super anti-racist. I'm especially against woke neo-racism.

BLOTTO 52 minutes ago (Edited)

Wait until she finds out that Drag Queen Roxy is reading 'The Hips on the DQ go swish swish swish' to the kids at the local library.

Pooper Popper 1 hour ago

She Rocks!!!!!

Bang!!

high5mail 36 minutes ago

When I listen to this woman and look around me at all the fools who buy into the "system" as it is, too scared to do what she is doing, it saddens me at the apathy and cowardice of the general public which will sell their souls for protection on a non deadly virus and take an unproved vaccine to virtue signal.

She is a modern day Joan of Arc. I would stand beside her in an instant. How many others would do that or demand the same things she is demanding? Most are too busy trying to figure out what gender they think they should be or trying on racist social agendas in the "woke" category.

She is a model for the rest of us....

[May 31, 2021] Still More Disturbing Evidence that Black Lives Don't Matter to BLM

Notable quotes:
"... The Black Liberation Movement has made millionaires out of their grifter leaders and enabled the left to remain in power in every city in which rioting occurred. Their local opposition has been cleansed or cowed into submission. The movement continues its success as seen by its adoption by corporations seeking to reduce the power and influence of middle class Americans and by politicians seeking to entrence their power electorally. ..."
May 31, 2021 | turcopolier.com


Posted on May 25, 2021 by Larry Johnson

The continuing hypocrisy of Black Lives Matter was displayed vividly over the past weekend– BLM declared solidarity with Hamas but said nothing about a slew of murders and shootings targeting black communities .

There were at least 11 mass shootings in the country over the weekend that combined left at least 17 people dead and 35 more wounded, according to CNN reporting and an analysis of data from Gun Violence Archive (GVA), local media and police reports.

I found it curious that none of the reporting made any mention about the race of the victims or the perpetrators. Left me wondering so I did some digging. It appears that the majority of these mass shootings involved black Americans as perpetrators or victims.

Chicago, Illinois :

At least 55 people were shot across Chicago over the weekend, 12 of them fatally, including a 15-year-old boy who was shot in the head on the front porch of a home in Lawndale, and three double homicides.

These shootings took place in predominantly black neighborhoods.

  1. A.Pols says: May 26, 2021 at 11:37 am

    Of course. Much political and social capital has been squandered in recent years, all in an attempt to adumbrate the singular reality that the deeply engrained social pathologies in the "black community" have more to do with their failure to thrive than white systemic racism does. We, meaning white America, cannot help them with this no matter how much self abnegation we indulge in. Black America needs to adopt standards of belief and behavior that are socially, culturally, and economically functional and they need to teach their children those values. I have seen this happen with a certain fragment of that demographic, but it needs to happen more widely. This may be offensive to some readers, but there is truth in it. Reply

  2. Deap says: May 26, 2021 at 11:47 am

    Do blacks themselves need to be uniquely empowered (and protected) to speak up against black on black violence? What has prevented the peace-seeking black community members from taking charge of their own neighborhoods.

    What Reign of Terror are they living under that those of us outside these communities do not understand.

    Latino gangs terrorize latino communities as well. The violent tyranny of the few against the decent lives of the many is very, very wrong and should not exist in our country. But it is a daily reality in our rapidly devolving inner city neighborhoods. Reply

    • TV says: May 26, 2021 at 12:30 pm

      These minority neighborhoods can't have it both ways:
      They can't object to successful methods like stop and frisk and then complain
      about crime. "Snitches get stiches" is another "cute" saying encouraging crime.
      After a time trying to help people who won't help themselves and are often openly hostile, the cops grow cynical and less proactive; can you blame them?
      Because it's "racist" to criticize any form of minority behavior, there can not be an honest discussion about solutions to this problem and the beat goes on.
      People (including the self-hating, phony "guilty" white liberals, BTW) who can live in segregated neighborhoods continue to live in segregated neighborhoods.
      I used to live in CT – very liberal blue state – totally segregated; BLM signs on the "right" lawns. Reply

      • Steve+G says: May 26, 2021 at 4:07 pm

        TV
        Yes here in Mpls the same blue haired tattooed
        Nose ring wokes make up a large majority of
        The BLM protests. The obligatory signs festoon
        Whole neighborhoods. Do they march or picket
        The areas where the majority of the shootings occur
        And whose victims are all black? Ha! Too dangerous.
        The near North side aka Nomi has had continuous
        Gunfire for near 1200 days. Now they have running
        Gun battles with "Ak" type fully automatic weapons.
        It's become a tragedy writ large. Not a virtue
        Signal to be seen. Reply

  3. akaPatience says: May 26, 2021 at 12:11 pm

    Yes, it's hard to believe that so many are taken in by the rhetoric of Black Lives Matter when there's evidence on a near-daily basis of black-on-black violence and murder. It's truly a crime that so-called leaders don't decry it and demand a call to action for it to stop, a crime that there's so little public discourse about underclass blacks basically exterminating each other with impunity. It's a taboo subject, and can't be broached without accusations of racism. We only hear righteous outrage when a member of the black underclass is killed by a cop. Reply

  4. Deap says: May 26, 2021 at 12:39 pm

    Why does the charge of "racism" cause so many to immediately recoil and retreat? It is just a word, yet it has risen to weaponized effectiveness.

    What does this word trigger in so many people who will immediately back down and retreat. Pretty powerful tool -until more don't blink and don't stand down at its mere mention.

    Always felt there was an implied threat of "black violence' that accompanied every one of Obama's political moves. We need to cleanse that threat out of our own psyches or else this nation will be held hostage by a mere word. Reply

    • Deap says: May 26, 2021 at 1:25 pm

      Isn't this an interesting bit of Democrat deja vu, including charges of rigged voting machines in 2008 the GOP would use to prevent Obama from winning and thereby triggering a Second Civil War -- "the streets will run with blood .if Obama loses .."

      Thanks to two great political pundits – Erica Jong and Jane Fonda. They did capture the zeitgeist of the times however, and continue to do so. The threat of black violence, if you don't do what we went.

      https://hotair.com/ed-morrissey/2008/11/01/erica-jong-obama-defeat-will-bring-civil-war-n158365

      Fast forward to 2020 – and the world yet again feared "the streets would run with blood", but this if Trump won re-election and Democrat Biden did not win.

      But this time it bloody well appears it was the Democrats who rigged the voting processes. Yet again it appears it is the Democrats accusing the GOP of what they were already doing themselves. Reply

  5. Fred says: May 26, 2021 at 1:03 pm

    The Black Liberation Movement has made millionaires out of their grifter leaders and enabled the left to remain in power in every city in which rioting occurred. Their local opposition has been cleansed or cowed into submission. The movement continues its success as seen by its adoption by corporations seeking to reduce the power and influence of middle class Americans and by politicians seeking to entrence their power electorally.

    Some people who were black were shot by others who were black? Quit saying that, you, you, what's the word: racist!; as none of that has been proved in court. Did any of these 'leaders' care about all those shootings in the Sanctuary City of Chicago when President Hope and Change was in charge? (2016)
    Total shootings 4379 Shot and wounded 3664 Shot and killed: 715
    Assailant race by percentage

    Black 12.6% White 1% Other 6.1% "Unknown" 80.3%

    https://turcopolier.com/obama-a-legacy-of-hope-and-change-part-1-sanctuary-cityby-fred/
    On a bright note Chicago is now run by a Black Lesbian married to a white Woman, who has her own job in the city. Take that Monty Hall, I mean Tamany Hall.
    https://chicago.suntimes.com/2019/6/13/18678185/amy-eshleman-mayor-lightfoot-wife-youth-programs-maggie-daley Reply

  6. Le Comte says: May 26, 2021 at 1:15 pm

    https://www.takimag.com/article/the-future-of-floydism/ Reply

  7. Some Dude says: May 26, 2021 at 2:18 pm

    Whoa: you're saying the left behaves hypocritically and is willing to take losses in order to get what they want?

    Such insight!

    Ethnic hypocrisy is the ancient problem here, but this focus on contemporary black antics obscures the issue and is simply another avoidance strategy.

    The recent missile duel in the eastern Mediterranean has shown that white conservatives are more willing to stand up for the safety of non- or dual-citizens overseas than they are for safety of their own white constituents, whom they refuse even to name.

    Why do you think that is? Reply

  8. blue peacock says: May 26, 2021 at 2:55 pm

    BLM is a private organization. Why is the State Dept flying their flag at US embassies/consulates?

    Is BLM using their new found prominence to self-aggrandize?

    https://www.blackenterprise.com/blm-co-founder-patrisse-khan-cullors-under-fire-for-purchasing-million-dollar-homes/

    How much have black leaders feathered their own nest while using "racism" as a cudgel to further their political ambitions?

    https://www.businessinsider.com/obamas-buy-home-on-marthas-vineyard-report-photos-2019-12?op=1

    There is nothing wrong with Obama with his financial success to buy in predominantly white Martha's Vineyard. The question that blacks should ask however is are those leaders who use racism and race to gain political power doing much to alleviate the social and economic issues they face?

    There are many successful blacks in all walks of life. Why aren't they celebrated and used as role models instead of someone like George Floyd? Reply

    • Deap says: May 26, 2021 at 3:55 pm

      When you first went on the "BLM website" you immediately were linked to ActBlue – a fund-raising arm of the Democrat party. There was no independent or "private" donation link for BLM. Calling BLM "private" in this case would be a stretch for me after that initial experience with BLM.

      So the bigger question is, why is the State Dept etc pushing an arm of the Democrat Party fund-raising machine within government operations? Did BLM formally dissociate completely with ActBlue? Reply

      • TV says: May 26, 2021 at 9:33 pm

        Because the State Dept., like the rest of the Democrat party, has accelerated faster and faster to the left.
        They've been selling out America for decades and now, like the rest of the Democrat party, the last mask has dropped. Reply

  9. Alex says: May 27, 2021 at 7:43 am

    Having grown up in Chicago and still living nearby I would say "predominantly black" neighborhoods is a media fiction, part of the narrative to displace the blame onto others than black. I assure you these are black neighborhoods, once white now ruined for generations. I have sympathy for blacks, so much so that I suggest we organize to supply as much ammo as possible to help them rid the hood of evil doers. Mostly 9mm, drop off crates in front of playgrounds and street corners so they can be easily found. Reply

  10. optimax says: May 27, 2021 at 1:08 pm

    Larry's point that BLM doesn't care about Black lives is graphically shown and described by this Officer Tatum podcast (it's short) of local newscasts, not shown by national news, of Black children murdered by Blacks.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pxZA1Xau5Ao Reply

    • Bill H. says: May 27, 2021 at 8:38 pm

      Not news, really. I've heard and read it many times. But this man is powerful, and he expresses himself in a very moving way. Thanks for the link.

[May 28, 2021] Joe Rogan Warns It keeps going. It keeps going further and further and further down the line and if might get to the point where you capitulate, where you agree to all these demands

May 19, 2021 | www.zerohedge.com

"You can never be woke enough, that's the problem," Rogan stated in a recent conversation with stand-up comedian Joe List about the effect cancel culture is having on comedy.

"It keeps going. It keeps going further and further and further down the line, and if you get to the point where you capitulate, where you agree to all these demands, it'll eventually get to straight white men are not allowed to talk ," he added.

"Because it's your privilege to express yourself when other people of colour have been silenced throughout history," Rogan continued, emphasising the justification of woke proponents.

"It will be, you're not allowed to go outside. Because so many people were imprisoned," Rogan continued, adding "I'm not joking, it really will get there. It's that crazy."

Watch:

https://www.youtube.com/embed/hqfv4gDrP2U

Rogan concluded :

"We just gotta be nice to each other, man. And there's a lot of people that are taking advantage of this weirdness in our culture, and then that becomes their thing. Their thing is calling people out for their privilege, calling people out for their position. You know, so, it's f***ing crazy times."

The topic is a continuation of a conversation Rogan had last week with Dave Chappelle , who said he hopes 'we all survive' cancel culture.

The host was immediately proven on point by the woke mob on Twitter who took issue with Rogan believing it's a bad thing that straight white men are being silenced, and some failing to be able to hold more than one thought in their head at once:

* * *

Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/

* * *

In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch. We need you to sign up for our free newsletter here . Support our sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown. Also, we urgently need your financial support here .

[May 28, 2021] Woke insanity -- why is there so little pushback-! by The Saker

May 20, 2021 | www.unz.com
THE SAKER " MAY 13, 2021 " 2,700 WORDS " 295 COMMENTS " REPLY Share to Gab

The Biden Administration has gone out of its way to show itself as absolutely "woke-compatible" and even as a champion of "wokeness" (Foggy Bottom has just allowed US embassies and consulates to fly the "gay pride" flag next to the Stars and Stripes. I bet you they won't do that in Riyadh!). According to the hyper-politically correct Wikipedia , "woke" refers to the " awareness of issues that concern social justice and racial justice ". This definition is, however, misleading because, for example, it clearly is not intended to cover, say, social injustice meted out to poor whites. In other words, wokeness is a one way street. What wokeness does mandate is for my son (who is studying biology) to be told in his class that he is the carrier of "white guilt" even though his ancestors never interacted with blacks, let alone blacks in the USA.

As I have mentioned in the past, I do not consider categories such as "black" or "white" as analytically helpful since they are not properly defined. That, however, does not mean that I am not willing to use them in a specific context where the parties to an ideological dispute refer to themselves, or to others, as black or white. By the way, "Asian" is another useless category as, depending on whom you ask, it would include Pakistanis (who sure ain't yellow) and lump them together with (brown) Indonesians and (yellow) Japanese people. The fact that these categories are used in the western political discourse means that I cannot ignore them solely because I find them ambiguous and misleading. Furthermore, the category "African" whether used with "American" or not, is not helpful either since it would include people otherwise considered white; say Elon Musk, even though nobody thinks of Musk as African-American. Finally, the category black might include Tamils or Australian aborigines, but it is rarely, if ever, used in that sense. Thus, when I will use the words black or white below, it will be in the largely accepted US meaning of "descendants of African slaves" and "descendents of white colonists" even though I am acutely aware of the reality of interbreeding (by rape or by mutual consent) between these two groups and even though the woke ideology blames *all* so-called "whites" for their putative racism and their supposedly "privileged" position in the US society due to its alleged "systemic racism", even when they are new immigrants to the USA.

I don't think that I have tackled the issues of race or racism before, mostly because I am horrified by all the nonsense one can hear as soon as these topics are mentioned. It is, however, indisputable that the woke ideology is the main ideology of the Biden Administration and this is why it cannot simply be ignored. Of course, other ideological trends of the US ruling class (messianism, imperialism, self-worship, capitalism, etc.) have not been abandoned; instead, they have been "wokified" in the sense that the woke ideology is now used to give these traditional US ideologies some kind of politically-correct imprimatur , a kind of "when we do that in the name of wokeness we are doing something morally right" label placed on an otherwise deeply discredited set of "western values".

Of course, there is an apparent paradox here: how can the woke ideology be used to try to give a semblance of respectability to a set of western ideologies when the woke ideology is also rabidly anti-western?! The woke ideology is most definitely anti-western, and not in the sense of condemning the West's thousand years of bloody wars and imperialism, that would at least make some sense, but it is anti-western in the sense that it places an equal sign between, say, J.S. Bach and the rapper "Ice Cube" with a "logic" along the following line: " hey, who are you to say that Bach was more talented than the rapper Ice Cube ?! That is racist!!! " Even mathematics are now considered "racist "! And anybody disputing that is, of course, a racist.

What is missing here is the element of proof. Some kind of rules of evidence which could be appealed to; let's use the modern term to "˜fact check' most of the assumptions made by the supporters of the woke ideology.

For example, in my Swiss high school we had a huge mural declaring that "all races are equal". No evidence for that statement was ever given. In fact, during my entire academic life (1 undergrad and 2 graduate degrees) I have never seen any real evidence for this thesis. (I have seen plenty of evidence disputing this, beginning with US Army IQ tests). By the way, that does not at all mean that I affirm the opposite (that races are somehow unequal), only that in a dogmatic statement like "all races are equal" even the term "equal" is extremely ambiguous and, frankly, meaningless. Let's compare this statement to another famous one by Saint Paul (Galatian 3:26-28 KJV):

"For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus . For as many of you as have been baptized into Christ have put on Christ . There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus . And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise .".

Unlike the vapid "all races are equal", Saint Paul clearly states that all humans are " children of God " and he further explains how this happens when he says " by faith in Christ Jesus ". He then clarifies that " all are one in Christ Jesus " (being " one " in Christ is unambiguous, unlike being " equal "). And Saint Paul concludes by explaining that through Christ there is a new generation of mankind " ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise ". Unlike the woke ideology, Christianity does truly unite all human beings, and Christianity does so without ever denying or obfuscating the very real differences which makes all humans very much un equal to each other, including a total equality in rights and privileges inside the Christian religion. First, Saint Paul mentions our common filiation as children of God through Adam, to which he immediately adds a further common filiation of those who have "put on Christ" by means of baptism. The evidence here, the proof of the statement, is clear: baptism. One can, of course, disagree with Saint Paul, but not accuse him of ambiguity (especially in the light of all the other Apostolic and Patristic statements providing contextual support for this!).

Compare that with the woke ideology which categorically splits mankind into two groups: the oppressed "minorities" and the (always) "white" oppressors, which even contradicts the actual history of Africa which was invaded and colonized by (non-White) Arabs before the Europeans got involved (something which the US blacks who take on Islamic names either don't know or try hard to ignore).

The woke ideology also completely ignores racism internal to the so-called "Blacks". A good friend of mine is a (very dark skinned) lady from Mali who traveled all over our planet and told me one day that the worst anti-African racism she was ever subjected to was in Ethiopia (whose population is just as dark skinned as my lady friend). I also knew a medical doctor from Soweto who told me that there was plenty of hatred between South African blacks which he called "racist hate". Of course, most US blacks know close to nothing about the history of Africa, past or current (Arabs and black Africans still fight each other in many regions of Africa!) and yet they think of themselves as "Africans" which makes absolutely no sense (especially from the point of view of actual Africans, Arab, black or white).

I just used one example (racial equality), but the woke ideology has failed to prove pretty much every one of its key dogmas. "Systemic racism" is another good one which appears to be proven by none, accepted by (almost?) all.

Of course, none of the above proves any single aspect of the woke ideology wrong, but I hasten to add that the burden of proof is upon the party proclaiming a thesis, and not upon those this thesis is being forced upon. Likewise, there is plenty of anecdotal evidence of racism in the United States (including numerous cases of black on white and black on Asian racial violence!), but irrespective of the actual figure of such incidents, the sum of these incidents, however large, does not somehow automatically become evidence of things like "systemic racism" or "white supremacy" (correlation does not imply causation).

Yet, somehow, the proponents of wokeness immediately get offended when their beliefs are challenged and simply accuse any naysayers of "racism". One example: in the new woke-reality, " twerking " is a delightful form of "culture" which cannot be criticized, especially so by whites. To call it a vulgar display of objectified women accompanied by noise which does not rise to any imaginable definition of "music" is, of course, totally crimethink!

Apparently, for the woke-freaks, "diversity" does not include diversity of ideas, of opinions. As Orwell astutely noticed, "some are more equal than others". Wokeness does not even deny that! Hence its "Cancel culture" aspect, along with the violence of the BLM/Antifa mobs.

For some, this is just a big money-making scheme for corporate "America" which is now flooding all its advertisements with the "correct" races in total disregard to that race's real percentage of the population and small money-making scheme for those who hope to get their hands on some free money. As for the US homo-lobby, this is a surefire way to achieve power and influence which they could not otherwise even dream about. In other words, Wokism is about money and power, not justice.

Some might think that this is no big deal, that anti-racism is by definition good, as is the notion that homosexuals should not be deprived of their civil rights on account of their sexual dysfunction. But wokeness has already gone way further than these initial demands and it has now turned into an obligatory form of virtue signaling !

By now most of us have seen new woke-compatible CIA recruitment ads. Frankly, when I saw it I sincerely rejoiced, as a woke-CIA will be far less effective than the one which considered homosexuality a major security risk (blackmail and comorbid psychopathology). But wokeness submission is not just a CIA thing, check out this comparison of recruiting videos (thanks to American Kulak for sending me all the videos below!!!):

https://www.youtube.com/embed/JUijh-phNJY?feature=oembed

And, just for comparison sake, here are a Chinese and a Russian recruitment videos:

https://www.youtube.com/embed/l_qr-4AKM18?feature=oembed

https://www.youtube.com/embed/aqek78JXckw?feature=oembed

Truth be told, I am not exactly heartbroken about the condition of the US armed forces as such, but when I think of the many decent and honorable US officers I had the chance to meet in my life, I do feel sorry for them as I can, I think, imagine their sadness and disgust.

Finally, I have to admit, to my great sadness, that this does not affect only the USA. Pretty much the same form of collective insanity has clearly taken over the EU (with a few countries still trying to resist). Wokism has become a global phenomenon.

Yes, the West went from the genius of Baroque to the insipid vulgarity of YouTube.

And so here is my question: why is there so little pushback?!

Yes, there is the accusation of racism. I get it. But the more people this accusation is applied to, the more meaningless it becomes (the same goes for that old "anti-Semitism" canard!). And, besides, nobody can live an honorable life without ever becoming the target of a false and ugly accusation. All we can do is 1) ignore it 2) flush our mental toilet and 3) resume the struggle.

I also understand that woke-compatibility is a "must" for new hires (you gotta love that "corporate America"!). But what about all those of us who already have a career and who won't be fired just because we push back against an ideology which not only is based on absolutely nothing (it has zero empirical evidence to back its key tenets) but which destroys competence (the famous US meritocracy) and replaces it with what I can only call an extremely intolerant pseudo-diversity which is every bit as intolerant as the major totalitarian ideologies of the 20th century! Why are we silent?

Most of us know about the hidden scandal of the (apparently, neverending) lowering of competency criteria in many professions (ask a firefighter!). But this is now even affecting airlines ! I dread the day when a "diverse" crew will smash an airliner into the ground because "mathematics is racist!". I am sure the skies will still be friendly, but will they be safe?!

I wonder what it would take to finally get some serious reaction to this collective insanity.

So what can we do? I submit that Alexander Solzhenitsyn's advice to the Russian people living under the Soviet system could also be taken as a model by those in the West who don't want their countries to be turned into some wannabe Wakanda:

When violence bursts onto the peaceful human condition, its face is flush with self-assurance, it displays on its banner and proclaims: "I am Violence! Make way, step aside, I will crush you!" But violence ages swiftly, a few years pass""and it is no longer sure of itself. To prop itself up, to appear decent, it will without fail call forth its ally""Lies. For violence has nothing to cover itself with but lies, and lies can only persist through violence. And it is not every day and not on every shoulder that violence brings down its heavy hand: It demands of us only a submission to lies, a daily participation in deceit""and this suffices as our fealty.

And therein we find, neglected by us, the simplest, the most accessible key to our liberation: a personal nonparticipation in lies! Even if all is covered by lies, even if all is under their rule, let us resist in the smallest way: Let their rule hold not through me!

And this is the way to break out of the imaginary encirclement of our inertness, the easiest way for us and the most devastating for the lies. For when people renounce lies, lies simply cease to exist. Like parasites, they can only survive when attached to a person.

We are not called upon to step out onto the square and shout out the truth, to say out loud what we think""this is scary, we are not ready. But let us at least refuse to say what we do not think! ("¦) Our way must be: Never knowingly support lies! Having understood where the lies begin (and many see this line differently)""step back from that gangrenous edge! Let us not glue back the flaking scales of the Ideology, not gather back its crumbling bones, nor patch together its decomposing garb, and we will be amazed how swiftly and helplessly the lies will fall away, and that which is destined to be naked will be exposed as such to the world.

This method of not allowing lies to survive through oneself is absolutely legal, non-violent and does not require any organization or money. Most importantly, this method does not require any unifying ideology. In other words, this method is a moral/ethical defense against any totalitarian ideology. Best of all, it requires no money or power, and it is immediately liberating to anybody using it. It is even compatible with the modern idea of "be the change you want to see in the world".

The alternative is much scarier. As with any totalitarian ideology Wokism can also trigger a strong blowback reaction and there is a very real risk of such a pushback reaction that it could result in the birth of a new form of Fascism which could be even worse than Wokism. And this is why I think that doing nothing and hoping that this will all somehow magically go away is dangerously delusional.

Totalitarian ideologies must be confronted openly and frontally. Nothing else will do and everything else is nothing but surrender.


anonymous [248] " Disclaimer , says: May 14, 2021 at 1:01 am GMT " 6.1 days ago

I'm going to play devil's advocate here. If the entire US military is moving toward robotics and missiles, what difference does it make that the operator is a trans-gender mental lunatic? In fact, some of these depraved folks may perfectly fit the bill for committing massive war crimes. There is no conscience in their mental depravity to begin with.

Alt Right Moderate , says: May 14, 2021 at 7:12 am GMT " 5.8 days ago

Because woke culture warriors are no threat to men with money. Men with money fear macho economic socialists in the Joe Stalin mode, and these people no longer exist. This is what so many people on the conservative/nationalist right don't get. There is no push back because rich whites have nothing to fear from theatrical woke BS.

The only victims are working and lower middle whites, who have no awareness of class politics, are more interested in fixing their cars or riding around on dirt bikes..

Franz , says: May 14, 2021 at 2:59 am GMT " 6.0 days ago

And so here is my question: why is there so little pushback?!

American, like most humans, have to eat. Keep a roof over their heads. Etc.

As far back is the 1950s Europeans considered Americans deeply conformist. Even when they went into non-conforming mode (eg, the beatniks in that decade) they all conformed to the pack.

But now is not then: Jobs for mavericks are now scarce. Lighthouses are automated, no need for lighthouse keepers. The old merchant ships have been replaced by container ships that need few hands on deck or anywhere else. Have a good job, you also have to keep it. And it often takes effort.

All the people from Jimmy the Greek in the last century on are rarely prosecuted. They are almost always fired or forced to resign. Individual economics warns against being the nail that sticks out.

This MIGHT be why Antifa, BLM etc has no problem getting a mob together: Torching a few buildings, blocking traffic, getting white cops fired, is a great way to relieve stress and burn off frustration.

BUT that only works for one side. Others must tread carefully and not push if they can't afford to fall.

War for Blair Mountain , says: May 14, 2021 at 3:05 am GMT " 6.0 days ago
@anonymous serve openly in the US Military"¦.And you can thank Admiral Mike Mullins for this. Mullins knew exactly what he was doing:social engineering the larger American Society-and he enjoyed being interviewed in his US Navy Uniform on the front covers of magazines that serve the interests of the homosexual community. Yes, I am very suspicious that Admiral Mike Mullins is a homosexual who has no problem with Public Libraries allowing Satanic looking Tranny Freaks reading children's books to very young children. This is what Admiral Mike Mullins has unleashed upon American Society. Admiral Mike Mullins would tell Conservative Christian Chaplains who had issues with homosexuals serving openly in the US Military:""˜YOU NEED TO PURSUE ANOTHER CAREER PATH""¦..
Priss Factor , says: " Website May 14, 2021 at 5:01 am GMT " 5.9 days ago

What happens when Jews control the gods.

https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=true&embedId=twitter-widget-2&features=eyJ0ZndfZXhwZXJpbWVudHNfY29va2llX2V4cGlyYXRpb24iOnsiYnVja2V0IjoxMjA5NjAwLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X2hvcml6b25fdHdlZXRfZW1iZWRfOTU1NSI6eyJidWNrZXQiOiJodGUiLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X3R3ZWV0X2VtYmVkX2NsaWNrYWJpbGl0eV8xMjEwMiI6eyJidWNrZXQiOiJjb250cm9sIiwidmVyc2lvbiI6bnVsbH19&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1392897711955972105&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.unz.com%2Ftsaker%2Fwoke-insanity-why-is-there-so-little-pushback%2F&sessionId=24cd0aff0dd5dc140c6801959773ea0628f53953&theme=light&widgetsVersion=82e1070%3A1619632193066&width=500px

Mustapha Mond , says: May 14, 2021 at 5:06 am GMT " 5.9 days ago

"Woke Insanity: Why Is There So Little Pushback?!"

The pushback is slowly coming:

https://www.sott.net/article/452694-120-retired-US-generals-sign-letter-questioning-Bidens-mental-health-2020-election-result-warn-of-tyrannical-govt

Just another serf , says: May 14, 2021 at 5:36 am GMT " 5.9 days ago

I've observed these white people, overwhelmingly female, display an incomprehensibly religious fervor for BLM. I've never seen anything like this in my long lifetime.

These people are worshipping negroes, while at the same time, negroes are slaughtering them.

Something uniquely horrible is unfolding here.

Mulga Mumblebrain , says: May 14, 2021 at 5:55 am GMT " 5.9 days ago

After c.1980, the West, already showing the signs of crumbling due to economic implosion and social, moral and intellectual decay, was led up two garden paths to the certain end about to engulf it.
One was neo-conservatism, a project of formerly Trotsykite Judeofascist supremacists, many former acolytes of the sinister Leo Strauss, who saw the USA as a puppet to destroy their enemies, ie the Soviet, the Arab world and, as Jabotinsky said, "˜"¦anyone who gets in our way'. This was the PNAC crowd who predicted the "˜New Pearl Harbor' of 9/11 because their friends in MOSSAD no doubt told them it was finally in the works, after years of planning and "˜predictive programing' of the US public.This mob thought that the world was theirs to do with as they pleased, after Gorbachev and Yeltsin, but they had not bargained on Putin and on China's meteoric rise, hence their psychopathic loathing of both.
The other dead end was neo-liberal capitalism, another predominately Jewish enterprise, from the University of Chicago yeshiva and Milton Friedman et al. That created the great upward transfer of wealth to the elites, in which Jews were and are massively over-represented, and the steady immiseration of the vast bulk of US citizens, and those in puppet regimes in the UK, the EU and other countries subjected to the economic shock therapy of the economic hit-men of the "˜Washington Consensus'.
After forty years of these twin terrors the USA and much of the West are more unequal than ever, more heavily indebted than ever, their industries defunct and economic activity concentrated on the FIRE parasite rackets, and other forms of rentier extraction, millennial pursuits of various Jewish elites. Israel itself is terminally belligerent and insatiably cruel, and riven by inequality and political and religious fanaticism, but at least they can be united by hatred and blood-lust, as we see today. The USA, in contrast, must rely on "˜Divide and Rule' tactics, of which the deranged wokeism is the latest manifestation, growing out of that other divisive strategy, Identity Politics. Wokeism simply pits the downtrodden against other downtrodden, to the elites' delight. One faction, the Demoncrazy Deep Statists, pits the wokebots against the Reptilian MAGAbots, while both are excited to a racist frenzy by the prospect of annihilation in the Great Clash of Civilizations war with Russia and/or China. All so the plutocrats can keep piling up their loot ad astra.

nokangaroos , says: May 14, 2021 at 6:49 am GMT " 5.8 days ago

Foggy Bottom has just allowed US embassies and consulates to fly the "gay pride" flag next to the stars and stripes. I bet you they won´t do that in Riyadh!

Au contraire

It is precisely intended to be flown in Riyadh, Warszaw, Moscow and Urumqi;
no different from siccing dogs and activist womxyn on the Muzzie helots,
sending incompetent Jews as ambassadors to Germany and Austria
or corporate heavyweights to South America.
The parallels to wokism and Orwell are obvious ""
the more shameless, stupid and obvious the lies they force us to repeat ("2+2=5"),
the better to break our will with.

"" Sending the Soros Barbie to harangue Erdogan was in the same vein,
and it backfired gloriously (I´m a bit conflicted re: Recep Tayyip´s
passive-aggressiveness, but it has something deeply satisfying;
clearly that´s the way to go "¦ it is not coincidence Charles Boycott was
a rent enforcer in Ireland "" maybe we cannot fight, but we can refuse to cooperate.
Tell them what you think of them "" so what if it makes their hair fall out ).

Ukraine Tiger , says: May 14, 2021 at 7:09 am GMT " 5.8 days ago

Stick to talking about the political situation in Ukraine/Russia Saker

eah , says: May 14, 2021 at 7:09 am GMT " 5.8 days ago

>Why Is There So Little Pushback?!

What kind of "˜pushback' do you expect when it's the political and mainstream media establishments doing the "˜pushing'?

There is "˜pushback' by groups and individuals, as well as in alternative media, but this is subject to censorship due to arbitrary ToS (e.g. no "˜misgendering' on Twitter) and by platform providers (with no warning or justification, WordPress deleted the very popular "˜Chateau Heartiste'; he can now be found on Gab ).

When you can lose your job by saying "˜White lives matter', or even "˜All lives matter', people notice.

Wally , says: May 14, 2021 at 7:47 am GMT " 5.8 days ago
@Anonymous

A statistical fact:

On average, blacks murder 500 whites every year .

More facts and statistics:

The Color of Crime : https://www.amren.com/the-color-of-crime/

The Soft Parade , says: May 14, 2021 at 7:51 am GMT " 5.8 days ago

Because deep down inside everybody is some kind of cop, and we're scared.

We're scared of the bigger cop: The fed, the judge, death comes from above, the media, our boss, our marriage, or getting disappeared""and for WHAT? Some clueless idiot who thinks freedom is free?? Poor-bastard real life cops have to get up on stage and show how scared they really are when it comes to doing what is right. Like walking around naked in public with a target on their back. That's why the cops get crazy when you suggest they could do a better job of the scam known as no good deed goes unpunished. Sanity? Got it. The woke public "education systems" are full of queers and demons having rights to your children 8 hours a day enforced by the fed and the judge and the media, and who at the least successfully indoctrinate your child with hopelessness. The chaos is ascendant, overwhelming and despressing in nature Okay people! Everybody on 3 push back "¦one "¦ two. Hello "¦can you hear me in the back ?

The liberals are crazy with unworldy power""shock and awe crazy""but the right wing is crazier to believe that the left wokeness can be overcome on worldy terms. The right wants to think they can pushback, but they are scared because deep down inside, they know the liberals are driven and enforced by powers much bigger than any earthly principal. A dark battlefield saying used to go, "If they've got thermal, we're fucked." Indeed, the liberal left and their enforcers can now see you wherever and whoever you are, and what's worse, you know it. Oh, but let's go out and die. Mission? Sanity? For what?

That's why all the erstwhile tough guys don't push back, and the ones who do, get hated on "¦ "stop it man, you're causing trouble." As for the rest of the poseurs, they have it easy. Without having to actually walk the walk, they get to sit around and criticize the ones who could , but won't push back.

Alt Right Moderate , says: May 14, 2021 at 7:55 am GMT " 5.8 days ago

On the plus side, explicitly left wing governments tend to have a short shelf life. Probably the worst kind of left wing governments are those which are kinda right wing.

Tony Blair got Britain into a pointless war in Iraq and bought in massive numbers of economic migrants. Bill Clinton pushed NAFTA which resulted in a huge surge of Hispanic immigration. However, conservative voters didn't even notice what was happening because they assumed these guys were sensible middle-of the-road politicians. In contrast Biden's and company's in your face woke politics will galvanize the American right and probably achieve little of long term consequence.

Grahamsno(G64) , says: May 14, 2021 at 8:03 am GMT " 5.8 days ago
@Fiendly Neighbourhood Terrorist

The best joke is that these racists seem to be deeply upset at India for its caste system LOL. See the latest Steve thread.

https://www.unz.com/isteve/the-new-america/#new_comments

Smith , says: May 14, 2021 at 8:09 am GMT " 5.8 days ago

This woke nonsense is only in US and its vassal states (Western Europe, Japan).

It's a non-issue in the rest of the world.

Random Anon , says: May 14, 2021 at 8:11 am GMT " 5.8 days ago
@Anonymous ollective guilt for all the world's problems and no right to self determination.

An absurd, barbaric standard which is never applied to any other group.

Little Victoria Rose Smith was beaten and tortured to death by a fat racist black woman spewing BLM propaganda on Twitter. Cannon Hinnant was executed while riding his bicycle in his front yard.

But of course vermin like you don't care about the innocent victims.

You will just dismiss it or pretend it's not happening while venerating slime like the rapist Jacob Blake or home invader George Floyd.

How about this?

I spit on you and everyone like you.

You are the scum of the Earth.

Jeff Stryker , says: May 14, 2021 at 8:18 am GMT " 5.8 days ago
@anonymous

My entire lifetime the USA has thought that it would win wars with military technology"¦and then subsequently was dragged into 20 year long savage guerilla warfare.

"We can just airstrike them" was a common refrain when the Afghanistan war was announced in 2001.

Twenty years later, Biden pulls the last troops out.

"I cannot shoot him"¦he's too gorgeous"

For that matter the thugs that took over USA cities have an IQ of 90 & have zero education. But they have more primitive moral courage.

Technology is far more advanced now than 1992 during the LA Riots"¦and yet the riots were worse.

Hartnell , says: May 14, 2021 at 10:54 am GMT " 5.7 days ago
@Anonymous I only partially agree. White people in general do not personally hate other races. However, they do like to self segregate into their own white communities as you yourself have just pointed out.

In my native UK, you have a lot of "secret segregation" whereby native white Brits live in their own towns and villages away from the ever growing multi-kulti cities. Its quite amazing to actually leave a white British town or village and venture into the cities. It basically feels like living on an Indian reservation in America!

Dont get me started on how segregated all the various groups are in the cities too!

So whilst white people pay lip service to the cult of diversity, they very rarely actually practice it.

Observator , says: May 14, 2021 at 11:47 am GMT " 5.6 days ago

Machiavelli explained how wokeist phenomena can serve the powerful in 1513, "One of the great secrets of the day is to know how to take possession of popular prejudices and passions, in such a way as to introduce a confusion of principles which makes impossible all understanding between those who speak the same language and have the same interests."

What we are seeing today is the latest installment of the never-ending story called "divide and conquer." The traditional goals of progressives are ending militarism, empowering working people, providing a decent social safety net, and most of all, building a functional, genuinely democratic government committed to limiting the corrupting power of great wealth. These goals are race and gender neutral; they are basic human rights for all. They are passionately opposed by society's worst predators, always have been, always will be, until the influence of the predator class has been neutralized, and they are called to account for their crimes.

Today's campaigns of moral absolutism widen the gaps among America's diverse peoples and classes because such division is crucial to maintaining the power of the elites by deflecting attention from their far more dangerous, institutionalized abuses of power. Boutique activism converts ordinary people into partners in advancing those interests, in a dangerous form of psychologically manipulative narrative control.

But "woke", not being based in objective reality, has no legs and will not endure. Universities and other organizations are making a good faith effort to conform, the same way they once excluded women and blacks when discrimination was fashionable. Ultimately the demands of their donors and consumers will prevail, and change, and change again.

nosquat loquat , says: May 14, 2021 at 1:22 pm GMT " 5.6 days ago
@Trinity sianic militarism. When, especially during the Occupy movement, I saw that there were young libertarians who seemed to share many of the same concerns and join in with the lefty Occupiers, it seemed like a positive development that promised a unification, beyond ideology, of intelligent concerned citizens who wanted to clear the air of the rampant criminality of officialdom.

And then, all of a sudden, the SJW phenomenon burst on the scene and it all became about Blacks and trannies and women. What happened?

It has been my feeling all along that the term "woke" was hijacked and applied to these clueless narcissistic Gen-Z-types, who themselves had been infiltrated and manipulated. Who did this? It smells like a psy-op to me.

MLK , says: May 14, 2021 at 1:28 pm GMT " 5.6 days ago

It's a fool's errand trying to make sense of Applied Woke. Most Americans are ill-equipped to do so because we grew up schooled in American common sense.

Say what you will, until recently the US of A got decent grades, impressive ones if grading on a curve, for avoiding last century's bright ideas (e.g. communism; fascism).

That filtered down to the family and individual level, even for immigrants, under the rubric of Assimilation.

Yet as the American Republic (and empire) has hit some rough sledding, coincident unfortunately with the rise of CCP China, there's some bad modeling going on at the moment.

The American ruling, governing and business classes like China's secret sauce. What's not to like as long as you're sitting in the right place or willing to do or say anything to put yourself and your family there.

This author is right to bring up Russia and Christianity. Though, as I've mentioned before, I simply don't understand why those in the best position to inform about the lessons we should be learning from post-Soviet Union Russia don't do so even though the rhythming is so glaringly obvious it's almost a joke at this point.

At best "Biden" is a Yeltsin 1996-99. In other words, as if that isn't bad enough, it doesn't account for his double and technical sleights of hand in the show. What you characterize as "woke-compatible" is Antifa/BLM Brown Shirts integrated into the Democrat/Deep State mix.

The salient struggle at the moment is taking place within these factions over whether, after having succeeded in a monumental election steal, to govern as if 2020 was a "˜One and Done' or that they will have to compete to win in 2022 and 2024.

Official, government and corporate, handling and messaging concerning Woke ideology and the freaks themselves is one of the better indicators because there is simply no way a party competing to win the consent of the governed can engage in a loud and proud endorsement or even acquiescence to their madness.

gent , says: May 14, 2021 at 2:04 pm GMT " 5.5 days ago
@Franz

This MIGHT be why Antifa, BLM etc has no problem getting a mob together: Torching a few buildings, blocking traffic, getting white cops fired, is a great way to relieve stress and burn off frustration.

That may explain the mass protest movements, but the police records out of Portland show Antifa as a roughly even mix of children of the upper class, low level DNC wonks and drug addicts. The three categories often overlap, of course.

[May 28, 2021] DeSantis On Critical Race Theory- -Offensive- To Expect Taxpayers To Pay To Teach Kids To -Hate Their Country

May 23, 2021 | www.zerohedge.com

Authored by Tom Ozimek via The Epoch Times,

Florida's Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis said Friday that he opposes teaching critical race theory in the state's public schools, calling the ideas pushed by its advocates as "based on false history" and "teaching kids to hate their country and to hate each other."


DeSantis made the remarks at a Friday press conference in Pensacola, where he announced the signing of a bill temporarily establishing several statewide tax-free periods on items like storm supplies and back-to-school products.

"It's offensive to the taxpayer that they would be asked to fund critical race theory, that they would be asked to fund teaching kids to hate their country and to hate each other," DeSantis said.

Floridа Gov. Ron DeSantis is seen during a meeting at the governor's office in Tallahassee, Fla., on April 1, 2021. (The Epoch Times)

In a recent interview on NTD's "Focus Talk," Yiatin Chu, an Asian mother of two and co-chair of the New York chapter of the Foundation Against Intolerance and Racism (FAIR), described critical race theory as pushing the idea that disparate outcomes, such as academic competency scores, can be reduced to a single variable""race.

Advocates of the theory, which she said is increasingly being taught at pre-college levels, push the socialist notion of equality of outcome, and blame differences in outcomes on entrenched privilege while dividing people into "oppressors" and their victims, the "oppressed."

Republicans across the nation are trying to prevent the teaching of critical race theory in classrooms.

Recently, South Dakota's Republican Gov. Kristi Noem took aim at both the "1619 Project" and critical race theory and, like DeSantis, voiced opposition to their incorporation in school curriculums.

"The 1619 Project relies upon the concept of Critical Race Theory to further divide students based on the color of their skin," Noem wrote in a series of tweets Friday.

"This is inappropriate and un-American. It has no place in South Dakota, and it certainly has no place in South Dakota classrooms."

In this screenshot from the RNC's livestream of the 2020 Republican National Convention, South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem addresses the virtual convention on Aug. 26, 2020. (Courtesy of the Committee on Arrangements for the 2020 Republican National Committee via Getty Images)

The "1619 Project," inaugurated with a special issue of The New York Times Magazine, attempts to cast the Atlantic slave trade as the dominant factor in the founding of America instead of ideals such as individual liberty and natural rights. The initiative has been widely panned by historians and political scientists, with some critics calling it a bid to rewrite U.S. history through a left-wing lens.

Nikole Hannah-Jones, creator of the 1619 Project, responded to the GOP criticism of the project during an interview with MSNBC on May 3, saying the 1619 curriculum being allowed in schools is a matter of free speech.

"This isn't a project about trying to teach children that our country is evil, but it is a project trying to teach children the truth about what our country was based upon, and it's only in really confronting that truth""slavery was foundational to the United States, we, after the slavery, experienced 100 years of legalized discrimination against black Americans," said Hannah-Jones.

"Mitch McConnell and others like him want for our children to get a propagandistic, nationalistic understanding of history that is not about facts, but it is about how they would want to pretend that our country is."

Proponents of critical race theory have argued that it's needed to demonstrate what they say is "pervasive systemic racism" and facilitate rooting it out.

Critics draw parallels between critical race theory and Marxism, arguing that the concept advocates for the destruction of institutions, such as the Western justice system, free-market economy, and orthodox religions, while demanding that they be replaced with institutions compliant with the critical race theory ideology.

[May 28, 2021] Criminals Who Targeted Auto Shop With White Supremacist Graffiti Turn Out To Be Two Black Men - ZeroHedge

May 27, 2021 | www.zerohedge.com

Criminals Who Targeted Auto Shop With White Supremacist Graffiti Turn Out To Be Two Black Men BY TYLER DURDEN THURSDAY, MAY 27, 2021 - 02:01 PM

Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Summit News,

Criminals who repeatedly targeted an auto shop in Spring Lake, North Carolina by leaving racist graffiti referencing the KKK and Nazis turned out to be two African-American men after the owner caught them on camera.

me title=

Close

https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/core/bridge3.462.0_en.html#goog_1536397325

me scrolling=

Business owner Dwyane Haynesworth (who is black) took action after having a car stole off his lot and then discovering the racist graffiti, which included a drawing of a swastika.

After setting up the security cameras, that same night the criminals returned and broke into more vehicles before smashing windows and attempting to hot wire one of the cars.

The footage revealed the culprits to be two black men.

https://www.wral.com/vandals-captured-on-security-camera-at-spring-lake-auto-shop/19695359/?version=embedded_v2&player_options=%257B%2522embedded_autoplay_next%2522%253Atrue%257D

"By now, police must know to narrow down their list of suspects whenever racist graffiti is left at the scene of a crime. That doesn't fit the modus operandi of Caucasians," writes Dave Blount .

"Leftists who demonize and attempt to defund or otherwise hamstring the police are not siding against whites in favor of blacks, despite the way the liberal establishment frames it. They are siding against Dwyane Haynesworth in favor of punks who pointlessly destroy other people's property."

While the criminals in this instance clearly weaponized the racist graffiti in a bid to deceive authorities, fake hate crimes have become an all too common occurrence in America over the last five years.

Back in 2019, we highlighted the case of Amari Allen, a 12-year-old African-American girl who claimed a group of white boys cutting off her dreadlocks.

The entirety of the mainstream media, as well as lawmakers like Rashida Tlaib, fell for and amplified the story before Allen admitted she made it all up.

The gunman in Boulder who killed 10 people at a supermarket back in March also routinely threatened his classmates with threats of filing fake hate crime charges after violently attacking them, eyewitnesses told the media.

* * *

Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/

* * *

In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch. I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here . Support my sponsor "" Turbo Force "" a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown. Also, I urgently need your financial support here .

[May 28, 2021] Signs of Change by Gregory Hood

Notable quotes:
"... If you find it useful that some counties are leaving Oregon and joining Idaho, or the conflict between the left and the right, democrats vs republicans, or whites vs blacks, or whites vs muslims, or vs lations is meaningful, you are simply doing the bidding of the masters, who thrive on pitting communites against each other, and are responsible for destroying the whole country. The easiest and the most fruitful way to bring about a real, benficial change to America would require bringing the American people, regardless of their color or creed together, to easily get rid of their overbearing masters. Regardless of what you claim to be, the fact that you embrace and advance the destructive strategy of pitting the American people agianst one another, and also spew so much hatred of Muslims, exposes your real agenda! ..."
"... The United States doesn't have "rulers" in as much as it has "owners". Consider ..."
May 24, 2021 | www.unz.com

One of the most promising movements, " Greater Idaho ," just won a huge victory. Five counties voted to leave Oregon and join Idaho. More counties in eastern Oregon may join . Idaho Governor Brad Little admits creating a new state may be difficult but says , "They're looking at Idaho fondly because of our regulatory atmosphere, our values. That doesn't surprise me one bit."

March 7, 2020, Roseburg, Oregon: Mike McCarter, the founder of the Move Oregon's Border and the Greater Idaho Movement, speaks during a rally with about 600 people in a building at the Douglas County Fairgrounds in Roseburg. The conservative movement is attempting to expand the borders of Idaho to include the rural eastern and southern areas of Oregon. The map shows the prospective new border. (Credit Image: © Robin Loznak / ZUMA Wire)

This should be just the beginning. Frederick County in western Virginia could join West Virginia. West Virginia State Senator Charles Trump supports the idea. It could also be a compromise to the DC statehood question. Northern Virginia is a cancerous outgrowth of federal employees. Booting it out of real Virginia and tying it to a DC state would mean greater self-government for both regions.

... ... ...

Existing institutions can be the basis for reform and revolution. From the Parliament that challenged the king in the English Civil War, the Continental Congress that made the American Revolution, and the state legislatures that voted for secession, we see a clear pattern in the way we Anglos operate. We are legalistic, even when it comes to revolution. We don't have the French tradition of mass protests to topple governments. Our revolutions are according to Robert's Rules of Order. Even the January 6 protesters who marched into the Capitol did so because they thought they were saving democracy.


BlackFlag , says: May 20, 2021 at 11:06 pm GMT "¢ 3.2 days ago

It's a clever idea but when have these referendums gone anywhere?

"the Oregon and Idaho legislatures and the U.S. Congress would need to sign off."

Good luck.

anonymouseperson , says: May 21, 2021 at 4:39 am GMT "¢ 2.9 days ago

My advice to any white American is to NOT join the military. Do not serve the empire.

Priss Factor , says: "¢ Website May 21, 2021 at 4:44 am GMT "¢ 2.9 days ago

I can understand the frustrations and rage of certain folks.

If you're a worker on an oil rig, a truck driver, a policeman, or some such jobs, there's bound to be moments when you're angry as hell. So, even though such people say crazy things once a while, I can understand where they're coming from. They need to blow off steam.

But the professor class? These lowlife parasites sit on their asses and talk shi*. They produce nothing and make a living by spreading nonsense. And yet, they act like they are soooooooooo angry with the way of the world. If they really care about the world, why hide in their academic enclaves?
Academia needs a cultural revolution, a real kind, not the bogus "˜woke' kind made up of teachers' pets.

Boomthorkell , says: May 21, 2021 at 6:58 am GMT "¢ 2.8 days ago

Death to the Empire and Freedom for the World.

Hopefully we can reform into a nice looking North American Federation once this mess hits a bloody climax of some sort or another. Greater Idaho sounds wildly fun. I still wish we formed the States Cascadia and Arcadia, personally.

black dog , says: May 21, 2021 at 8:57 am GMT "¢ 2.8 days ago

The empire WILL become weaker if it promotes incompetents to positions of high responsibility and authority and enlists women into the armed forces. An empire cannot sustain itself with sub standard soldiers, administrators, leaders and law makers. This woke crap will destroy itself. Historians in the future will look back and say "what the hell were they thinking?".

Realist , says: May 21, 2021 at 12:42 pm GMT "¢ 2.6 days ago
@BlackFlag

"the Oregon and Idaho legislatures and the U.S. Congress would need to sign off."

Exactly"¦not going to happen.

anonymous [400] "¢ Disclaimer , says: May 21, 2021 at 1:20 pm GMT "¢ 2.6 days ago

If the IQ of officer candidates drops below 110 (it's 120 on average currently for the Marine Corps and has been declining for 40 years) then the positions will be left vacant. Dumb people can't do the job.

Alden , says: May 23, 2021 at 5:09 am GMT "¢ 22.1 hours ago
@E_Perez

Since Cromwell and even more so the overthrow of James 2 by the invader Dutch William 3 the Amsterdam Jew banker puppet Britain has been nothing more than a Jewish banking headquarters.

A.K.Patal , says: May 23, 2021 at 8:57 am GMT "¢ 18.3 hours ago

If you find it useful that some counties are leaving Oregon and joining Idaho, or the conflict between the left and the right, democrats vs republicans, or whites vs blacks, or whites vs muslims, or vs lations is meaningful, you are simply doing the bidding of the masters, who thrive on pitting communites against each other, and are responsible for destroying the whole country. The easiest and the most fruitful way to bring about a real, benficial change to America would require bringing the American people, regardless of their color or creed together, to easily get rid of their overbearing masters. Regardless of what you claim to be, the fact that you embrace and advance the destructive strategy of pitting the American people agianst one another, and also spew so much hatred of Muslims, exposes your real agenda!

Hans Vogel , says: May 23, 2021 at 9:51 am GMT "¢ 17.4 hours ago

Dear Mr. Hood, anything undertaken to change a nation's political organization will always lead to violence. If there is one thing history shows, it is precisely that. If you are trying to change Idaho's state borders, that qualifies as a drastic change in the US political organization, if only because if successful, it would set an example that would find many, many followers, as you are implying yourself.

What the US promotes and condones abroad (secession of Panama from Colombia in 1903, occupation of Cyprus by Turkey in 1980, occupation of the Western Sahara by Morocco in 1976, secession of Kosovo, creation of Southern Sudan, etc., etc.) it does not want to see at home. Of course you are also aware that in the 1860s, Secession has been met with brutal violence.

In this respect, it comes as a relief lo learn that the Deep State is busy trying to turn the US Army and the CIA into open psychiatry wards.

Very interesting that video ad on the girl "raised by two moms." Poor thing: knowing only two dykes (her father must certainly be Hans Brinker), all her life she has been yearning to meet real men. Apparently, she did not find them in college, where the boys are being terrorized by feminists and forced to become faggots. Thus only the army remains as a place where one might still find a few real men, the kind that one sees so finely portrayed in the Russian army ad.

(Come to think of it, that US army ad may also be an attempt at subversion of prevailing policy!)

Biff , says: May 23, 2021 at 9:53 am GMT "¢ 17.3 hours ago

America is in danger, not because of some external threat, but because our rulers are the Republic's greatest enemies.

The United States doesn't have "rulers" in as much as it has "owners". Consider it private property to put things in proper perspective "" then! Stake your claim. Forget the law(they own that too) and the idea of a republic "" owners don't like to share. The banking, tax code, and debt have got you by the balls, and they'll always keep you thumbed under.

Bert , says: May 23, 2021 at 11:02 am GMT "¢ 16.2 hours ago
@follyofwar

As for Greater Idaho or Greater West Virginia, what difference would it make?

You miss the point. These are bubbles rising to the surface. They constitute the first sign of water about to boil.

MG3 , says: May 23, 2021 at 1:26 pm GMT "¢ 13.8 hours ago

No one is in control: The USG is (quite literally) being controlled by whoever wrote the last/biggest check.

[May 28, 2021] Psaki new definition for the term "responsible"

Psaki was always a walking joke, the spokeswoman with the hidden goal to discredit any administration she serves. Gaffes are her trademark: "Psaki is the only person on the face of the earth that makes Biden look intelligent." Logically after her statement Psaki should resign to make way for a minority candidate, preferably to certified descendant of a former slave. Anything less is merely virtue signaling.
Like is the case with pornography normal person sense racism when he sees it. 1619 project does not pass this test. It looks more like "political gangsterism" of some clique, quite similar to Mao's "cultural revolution"
It is interesting to read the list of corporations which finance this "Cultural revolution 2.0" in the USA as an attempt to save neoliberalism and political power of financial oligarchy.
Notable quotes:
"... It's actually a brilliant strategy. They have their own voters completely ignoring everything you mentioned, and they have divided the country over these other problems that are created out of thin air. The two Teams want everyone focused on climate change and racism while they loot the country ... ..."
"... 1619 drivel has one purpose--to divide and sow discord. ..."
"... The Spanish were pouring slaves into the Americas a hundred-plus years - before 1619. And, the United States wasn't even a country until 1789. ..."
May 15, 2021 | www.zerohedge.com

Psaki- Teaching -1619 Project- Critical Race Theory In College Is -Responsible- - ZeroHedge

White House press secretary Jen Psaki on Thursday said it is responsible for colleges to teach the idea that racism is embedded in the American system, dismissing criticism that such teaching aims at indoctrinating American youth.

In a White House press briefing , Psaki was asked about a proposed legislation by Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) that would place an one percent tax on the value of the endowments of the country's wealthiest private colleges, and use that money to support vocational education and training.

The reporter noted that Cotton's proposal would affect institutions that teach "un-American ideas" such as those of critical race theory and the New York Times's "1619 Project," which argue the United States was founded as, and remains, a racist nation.

An outspoken critic of the 1619 Project, Cotton last year introduced the "Saving American History Act of 2020" that would reduce federal funding to public schools where the highly controversial narrative is taught as actual U.S. history. The bill is currently in consideration in the Senate Education and Labor Committee.


Kreditanstalt 4 hours ago (Edited)

I've never understood why, faced with military aggression, raging income inequality, asset-price manipulation, rigged "markets", rigged wages, rigged prices, soaring price inflation, falling living standards, massive debts, public & private...in the last few years the pseudo-non-issues of "man-made climate change" and "racism" have suddenly been pushed and pushed...

It beggars belief.

Pdunne 2 hours ago remove link

1619 certainly presents a different perspective. I suspect some of it is incorrect but that is why people should review it and understand at least the basics of this in American History.

Bringing Africans to American fundamentally changed the country, that is something to be understood.

StephenHopkins 2 hours ago

Irish were slaves, **** were slaves there are slaves for sale right now in Libya. Do something.

Politinaut 2 hours ago

Fundamentally changed? You mean destroyed it. Complete cancer. Our ancestors screwed up, then paid the toll of correction with 650k soldiers and untold white civilian lives lost. One dead white man or woman for every 3 slaves to right our ship.

And yet, the retards on the left want to egg this dead conflict on to line their pockets and destroy the system. I think not.

LetThemEatRand 4 hours ago

It's actually a brilliant strategy. They have their own voters completely ignoring everything you mentioned, and they have divided the country over these other problems that are created out of thin air. The two Teams want everyone focused on climate change and racism while they loot the country ...

TightLiner 3 hours ago

I doubt this woman has ever driven down an MLK Blvd.

GreatUncle 2 hours ago

The woman is a f^7king twat ... critical race theory in itself is indoctrination let alone all the other stuff.

Plus Size Model 3 hours ago

An important part of indoctrination is rewriting the past. Most people just don't know how pervasive slavery has been throughout history. First off, it's not easy to define and life was very very rough up until about the 20th century. Indentured servitude also comes to mind, child labor is terrible and was also prevalent until the 20th century, primitive factory work as well as mining was dangerous and lots were permanently injured or killed, there were press gangs for war, etc.

Completely overlooking antiquity and the east, slavery was ubiquitous almost everywhere up until the 19th century . THIS INCLUDES ALL RACES, NATIONALITIES AND CREEDS .

Here's just a few instances of slavery that have been written out of the history books most here are familiar with.

The Barbary slave trade refers to slave markets on the Barbary Coast of North Africa, which included the Ottoman provinces of Algeria, Tunisia and Tripolitania and the independent sultanate of Morocco, between the 16th and middle of the 18th century. The Ottoman provinces in North Africa were nominally under Ottoman suzerainty, but in reality they were mostly autonomous.

European slaves were acquired by Barbary pirates in slave raids on ships and by raids on coastal towns from Italy to the Netherlands, Ireland and the southwest of Britain, as far north as Iceland and into the eastern Mediterranean.

The Ottoman eastern Mediterranean was the scene of intense piracy. As late as the 18th century, piracy continued to be a "consistent threat to maritime traffic in the Aegean."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbary_slave_trade

For over three centuries, the military of the Crimean Khanate and the Nogai Horde conducted slave raids primarily in lands controlled by Russia and Poland-Lithuania as well as other territories.

Their main purpose was the capture of slaves, most of whom were exported to the Ottoman slave markets in Constantinople or elsewhere in the Middle East. Genoese and Venetians merchants controlled the slave trade from Crimea to Western Europe. The raids were a drain of the human and economic resources of eastern Europe . They largely inhabited the "Wild Fields" "" the steppe and forest-steppe land which extends from a hundred or so miles south of Moscow to the Black Sea and which now contains most of the Russian and Ukrainian population . The campaigns also played an important role in the development of the Cossacks.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crimean%E2%80%93Nogai_slave_raids_in_Eastern_Europe

Here's a video of British miners from 1901. Tell me they don't look like slaves. Lots of them won't even make it to middle age. I'd argue that the majority of them have lung disease. You can see some men are obviously malnourished.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gwBuJTMrUNo

CharlesFilson 4 hours ago

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4JX4bsrj178

ebworthen 4 hours ago

Exactly.

If you are against racism don't build your self-esteem based on your race; be an individual.

AlfieDolittle 3 hours ago

It's utter garbage anyway, the Africans who arrived in 1619 weren't slaves, they were indentured labourers who signed up for 7 years after which they were given a plot of land. This was a common way of working at the time, even for whites.

It was one of their fellow blacks, Anthony Johnson, who challenged indenture in the courts as he wanted to hold on to them for life..

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Johnson_(colonist)

Bubette Salam 3 hours ago (Edited)

1619?

Shouldn't it be the previous year, 1618? Namely when Africans captured and sold their fellow blacks for dirty lucre and a bottle of wine?

Giant Meteor 3 hours ago

Politicians white and black have successfully used all this race baiting to deflect attention away from their own grifting, and glaring failures, of the people they claimed they were helping, for the last 50 plus years.. Today we see the resulting train wreck, and of course the doubling down on the latest insanity ....

On the other hand there is Jen, and her ilk .. the new breed. They are so dumb, they don't even know they're dumb .. This is the promise and legacy of "public education."
The film "Idiocracy" .. was not suppose to be a documentary ..

Giant Meteor 3 hours ago (Edited)

During an interview with conservative Mark Levin, Robert L. Woodson Sr., president and founder of the Woodson Center, said that what is happening today is a "perversion of the civil rights movement," and that claims of "institutional racism" are a "ruse," a "lie" to deflect attention from certain black leaders who have failed to help their communities because they pushed policies that do not work.

Woodson, whose organization works directly with people and groups in neighborhoods nationwide, also denounced the idea that the "legacy of slavery and discrimination" is responsible for problems in some black communities, such as unemployment, crime, and out-of-wedlock births. "That's another lie," he said.

"I don't know what systemic racism is. Maybe someone can explain what that means," Robert Woodson

Woodson, who left the civil rights movement goes on to state ..

"In the past 50 years, $22 trillion has been spent on poverty programs. Seventy percent goes not to the poor but those who serve poor people," he said.

"So many of those people taking office use this money to create a class of people who are running these cities, and now after 50 years of liberal Democrats running the inner cities, where we have all of these inequities that we have, race is being used as a ruse, as a means of deflecting attention away from critical questions such as why are poor blacks failing in systems run by their own people?"

https://thespectator.info/2020/06/10/woodson-to-levin-institutional-racism-is-a-ruse-a-lie-to-deflect-attention/

Robert L. Woodson, Sr. founded the Woodson Center in 1981 to help residents of low-income neighborhoods address the problems of their communities. A former civil rights activist, he has headed the National Urban League Department of Criminal Justice, and has been a resident fellow at the American Enterprise Foundation for Public Policy Research. Referred to by many as "godfather" of the neighborhood empowerment movement, for more than four decades, Woodson has had a special concern for the problems of youth. In response to an epidemic of youth violence that has afflicted urban, rural and suburban neighborhoods alike, Woodson has focused much of the Woodson Center's activities on an initiative to establish Violence-Free Zones in troubled schools and neighborhoods throughout the nation. He is an early MacArthur "genius" awardee and the recipient of the 2008 Bradley Prize, the Presidential Citizens Award, and a 2008 Social Entrepreneurship Award from the Manhattan Institute.

Teach that ...

wellwaddyaknow 3 hours ago remove link

1619 drivel has one purpose--to divide and sow discord.

steamcrane42@netscape.net PREMIUM 1 hour ago remove link

2021: Current Secret "Buzz" words. Remember "multi-culturalism"? This dangerous thinking has mutated to "critical race theory"

mabuhay1 3 hours ago

1619 is a hoax and a sham and needs to be banned from ANY level of education, except as an example of just how far stupid people will attempt to fool others and push their ideology.

Brazillionaire 2 hours ago

Hoax and sham yes. They are not stupid. They're evil.

nsurf9 4 hours ago (Edited)

The Spanish were pouring slaves into the Americas a hundred-plus years - before 1619. And, the United States wasn't even a country until 1789. And, before that, North America was occupied as Spanish, French and British colonies - with a lot of Native Indians.

END 60+ YEARS OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION - SYSTEMIC DISCRIMINATION - NOW !!!!

WorkingClassMan 2 hours ago remove link

EVERY country that was ever founded was built on or with "racism," in mind. That is one of the benefits of a monoracial society--you don't have competing racial factions tearing the unity of a nation apart.

That said, the 13% are really narcissists to think they are important enough to have fought at least two wars over. Overpriced farm equipment that should have been RTS'd from the get-go.

Nik-ole Hanna (or is it Jones?) is an overpaid antiwhite who doesn't know how to check her black privilege. In her paradise of Africa, a country--for example--named Rwanda had two BLACK ethnic groups. To outsiders they just looked the same--black.

But to each other, they were VERY different. And, a few years ago, the Hutus (or is it the Tutsis? I don't care) decided to slaughter the other group. Hundreds of thousands died officially, likely many more. And they had NO racist crackas to get involved.

She should go to Rwanda or Liberia or Somalia or Sudan where slavery still exists! No racist crackas.

[May 28, 2021] The Global Financial Syndicate will use all kind of distractions to mask the MONETARY power and divide the populace

Notable quotes:
"... The Global Financial Syndicate will use all kind of distractions to mask the MONETARY power and divide the populace to continue its control & dominance through monetary imperialism. The world is a playground for "evil spirits." ..."
May 17, 2021 | www.moonofalabama.org

Max , May 16 2021 15:56 utc | 21

One need to understand the STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENT correctly, clearly, and comprehensively to live & light our world. What is your strategic construct of the national and international control system?

The Global Financial Syndicate will use all kind of distractions to mask the MONETARY power and divide the populace to continue its control & dominance through monetary imperialism. The world is a playground for "evil spirits."

How does the Financial Empire increase its control & POWER over a region? It likes turning each region into its suzerainty and an Animal Farm (Top-Down Control Structure - Democracy/Republic/...) internally by controlling its money supply through the central-private banking system.

Global Financial Empire's strategy:

Monetary Power = Lands x Lives x Loans. The key CONTROL elements of the Financial Empire within a suzerainty are:

When it comes to the international realm it seeks following freedoms:

The Global Financial Syndicate controls, finances and corrupts policies such as those in the U$A administration by its financing the substitution of national leaders with employees of the Financial Syndicate, such as Biden, Draghi, Yellen, Juncker, Macron,... Globalization is meant to establish the global financial syndicate's rule everywhere, hierarchically from top to bottom, in contrast to the democratic right of citizens to self-determination and the responsibility of governments towards their citizens.

Who wants to make us all, whether we be nations or individuals, slaves to debt?

Monetary Imperialism – What Next?

[May 28, 2021] Demexit continues: despite all woke hypocrisy Dem Party remains the party of Wall Street and tech oligarchs, not the party of working families

Notable quotes:
"... My life story is very similar to yours -- blue collar upbringing, worked graveyard shift in factories during college, made it all the way to Wall Street --- and I completely agree with you. The Democratic Party might have been the party of the working-class families many years ago, but it's absolutely not that now. ..."
"... The most interesting aspect of party realignment in almost every country is the movement of the Anglo-Saxon elites to the parties of leftist authoritarianism, whether in the UK, US, or Canada. Since elites have always had “fluid” political values, one can only assume that they see tyranny as our destiny. ..."
May 11, 2021 | www.wsj.com

GARY BEAUCHAMP SUBSCRIBER 6 hours ago (Edited)

I am a retired attorney but was reared in a blue collar home. I have not lost the values I learned where my father returned home from work six days a week as a railroad brakeman. Thanks to my pre-law curriculum I am well read in history and literature. My undergrad major was history and my minor literature.

Having acquired a love for reading in college I have read both all my life but it has not changed me from the son my father reared. I worked construction and general labor jobs to help pay for college and law school and am very aware of how hard those jobs are and I have a healthy respect for the men and women who provide us with the essential goods and services we all need.

I therefore have no use for attitude of most on the left and some on the right who have no respect for average working people and small business.

It seems many in Britain have the same outlook. My Dad was very proud I became a lawyer but I am just as proud of the job he performed to give me that chance.

SUBSCRIBER 5 hours ago

I therefore have no use for attitude of most on the left and some on the right who have no respect for average working people and small business. It seems many in Britain have the same outlook.

My life story is very similar to yours -- blue collar upbringing, worked graveyard shift in factories during college, made it all the way to Wall Street --- and I completely agree with you. The Democratic Party might have been the party of the working-class families many years ago, but it's absolutely not that now.

SUBSCRIBER 4 hours ago

Most democrat leaders are career politicians like Obama, Biden, Pelosi and Schumer. They never had a real job and paid any taxes. They love raising taxes for big government and dole out. Can’t wait for midterm election and take back the congress. R

SUBSCRIBER 14 hours ago

The most interesting aspect of party realignment in almost every country is the movement of the Anglo-Saxon elites to the parties of leftist authoritarianism, whether in the UK, US, or Canada. Since elites have always had “fluid” political values, one can only assume that they see tyranny as our destiny.

I hope that they are wrong.

[May 16, 2021] Space Force Commander Demoted Over Book Claiming 'Neo-Marxist Agenda' And Critical Race Theory Infiltrating Military

May 16, 2021 | www.zerohedge.com

A US Space Force commander was reportedly relieved as commander of the 11th Space Warning Squadron "due to loss of trust and confidence in his ability to lead," after he appeared on a podcast to promote his book which claims that the US military has been infiltrated by a neo-Marxist agenda which is transforming military culture and policy.

Lt. Col. Matthew Lohmeier

"Lt. Gen. Stephen Whiting, Space Operations Command commander, relieved Lt. Col. Matthew Lohmeier of command of the 11th Space Warning Squadron, Buckley Air Force Base, Colorado, May 14, due to loss of trust and confidence in his ability to lead," the Space Force told the Washington Examiner in a statement.

"This decision was based on public comments made by Lt. Col. Lohmeier in a recent podcast. Lt. Gen. Whiting has initiated a Command Directed Investigation (CDI) on whether these comments constituted prohibited partisan political activity."

Lohmeier self-published Irresistible Revolution: Marxism's Goal of Conquest & the Unmaking of the American Military this week. The book, according to the description, explores the "impact of a neo-Marxist agenda" and the manner in which the " Black Lives Matter movement, anti-racism, postmodernism, [and] political correctness" affect the national security of the United States.

Lohmeier said that he had informed his superiors, public affairs staff, and lawyers for the military about the book prior to publication , but it was not subject to a pre-publication review.

Department of Defense Directive 1344.10 prohibits active-duty personnel from engaging in "partisan political activities." Service members are, however, permitted to express their personal opinions on political candidates and issues in their personal capacity and when not in uniform . Lohmeier denied intending to participate in partisan politics. -Washington Examiner

"My intent never has been to engage in partisan politics. I have written a book about a particular political ideology (Marxism) in the hope that our Defense Department might return to being politically nonpartisan in the future as it has honorably done throughout history," Lohmeier, and Air Force Academy graduate, told Military.com .

The demotion comes after Lohmeier criticized Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin's diversity and inclusion "agenda."

"I don't demonize the man, but I want to make it clear to both him and every service member this agenda -- it will divide us. It will not unify us," he said, after Austin imposed a 60-day force-wide extremism " stand-down " to determine how to rid the military of extremism following the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.

Lohmeier says he was asked to give his troops extremism training and was given a "70-page" booklet of "talking points." The booklet reportedly began with an overview of the Capitol riot, and included examples of "white nationalists that have been caught at some point in the last decade and punished for it and kicked out of the military, or a radical Islamic terrorist."

"The diversity, inclusion and equity industry and the trainings we are receiving in the military ... is rooted in critical race theory, which is rooted in Marxism," said Lohmeier, who also knocked the Defense Department for saying that the military has "too many white pilots" during a pilot shortage.

Citing a diversity initiative in which service members read So You Want to Talk About Race by Ijeoma Oluo, in which the U.S. is referred to as a "white supremacist nation," Lohmeier told the Information Operation podcast that the young service members are inundated by a "hyperpoliticized work environment where diversity and inclusion initiatives are being pushed constantly."

Lohmeier added that conservatives in the military who are willing to voice their opinions are painted as "extremists." -Washington Examiner

"What you see happening in the U.S. military at the moment is that if you're a conservative, then you're lumped into a group of people who are labeled extremists, if you're willing to voice your views. And if you're aligned with the Left, then it's OK to be an activist online because no one's gonna hold you accountable ," he added.

According to Pentagon spokesman John Kirby, "There were members, sadly, of the active-duty force participating and espousing these radical beliefs," adding "We don't know the full breadth and depth of it."

Of note, Lohmeier's book is currently the #1 seller in Amazon's Military Policy, as well as Communism & Socialism sections .


BarnacleBill 1 hour ago

Yes. America's state of permanent warfare pits its weapons against the dwellers in mud huts everywhere. While the generals and colonels pretend to prepare to defend the country against the latest bogeyman (Russia, the Taliban, North Korea), the lower ranks are ordered to kill hut-dwellers wherever they can find them. Increasingly, this has meant a war against women and children - as practised by Israel this past week, as we see. I noted this new (and safe) war in my personal online journal nearly ten years ago. It's not Pulitzer Prize stuff, but it reports the situation very fairly. Hit the link for the whole two-minute read. I wrote there about today's "grunts", They are sociopaths, pretty much by definition, and we should be very afraid of them. They will be our children's and grandchildren's guardians and torturers .
https://barlowscayman.blogspot.com/2012/10/the-war-against-women.html

techengineer 7 minutes ago

Lohmeier is exactly right.. The are pushing the liberal/marxist dog**** on everyone and the young men and women are eating it up.. And the managers are although don't believe the liberal dog**** don't want to lose their jobs so they play along..

It's disgusting!

GunnerySgtHartman 2 hours ago remove link

This is Obama's politicization of the military bearing fruit. The military appointments made by Obama were purely on ideological grounds; those appointments are now in positions of authority in the Pentagon and are now spreading their evil gospel.

Virgil Krenshaw PREMIUM 2 hours ago

That's why coups (or, in this case, counter coups) are typically executed by colonels not generals.

RedDog1 2 hours ago

The Obama regime finished what the Clinton regime began.

Virgil Krenshaw PREMIUM 2 hours ago (Edited)

When you're criticizing wokism, you're engaging in partisan politics. When you're promoting wokism, you're not being partisan at all.

This is where we are. Horrifying.

Abundance of Caution 2 hours ago

"Interesting times"

Mr. Bones 2 hours ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Critique_of_Pure_Tolerance

Marcuse argues that "the realization of the objective of tolerance" requires "intolerance toward prevailing policies, attitudes, opinions, and the extension of tolerance to policies, attitudes, and opinions which are outlawed or suppressed." He makes the case for "liberating tolerance", which would consist of intolerance to right-wing movements and toleration of left-wing movements. [5]

​​​​Marxists have been working towards this for decades

American Dissident 2 hours ago remove link

Fun Fact: He knew The System would destroy his career for dissent, but he spoke up anyway. It will take men like this for us to win. Lt. Col. Matthew Lohmeier deserves to be honored.

overbet 2 hours ago (Edited)

Buying his book is a good start. Support him and encourage others. Gift it to a liberal.

[May 16, 2021] Irresistible Revolution- Marxism's Goal of Conquest the Unmaking of the American Military- Lohmeier, Matthew- 9781737067320

May 16, 2021 | www.amazon.com

>

Jack Stuart

An Outstanding Rebuttal to CRT from a Frontline U.S. Military Officer

5.0 out of 5 stars An Outstanding Rebuttal to CRT from a Frontline U.S. Military Officer Reviewed in the United States on May 14, 2021 Verified Purchase Critical Race Theory (CRT), the fraudulent spawn of another failed ideology – Marxism – is a mind-cancer invading American society. It has metastasized to the point it is now being taught in the nation's military academies, effectively a "new gospel" of how the world should work. At base, however, it is simply the latest spin on an utterly-failed theory under which over 100 million people – as a conservative estimate – were slaughtered trying to make Marxism "work". And that's in the 20th century, alone. Our children don't know this because our schools don't teach this.

Lt Col Lohmeier demonstrates he, at least, is well aware of Marxism's dangers, no matter how they are disguised and re-gift-wrapped. A clear scholar of Marxism's history and failures, in his outstanding work Lt Col Matthew Lohmeier exposés this "new" ideology, CRT, a mind-virus of the type evolutionary psychologist Gad Saad refers to as "The Parasitic Mind", in the psychologist's book of the same title. Lohmeier recounts how Marxism has morphed from a class-warfare "struggle" – really, a man-made conflict set up to cause differing societal classes to wage war on one another – into the race-based "struggle", CRT. This "new" ideology comes complete with its "intersectionalism" add-on, just to make sure everyone is covered by *some* "oppressed" "group" of one flavor or another. So the Boogey Man is everywhere. Racism is everywhere. Just because you can't see it directly, you know it's there: It's "institutional racism", after all.

Lt Col Lohmeier analyzes such false claims under the searing light of the truth, showing the actual damage caused to today's military and the potential for far worse damages to both our military and our society, if this movement is not stopped dead in its tracks. And Lohmeier has the credibility and facts to back up his analysis: A highly-decorated, current-active-duty, "fast-burner" (early selection to ranks) squadron commander who commands a premier, frontline U.S. Space Force squadron, Lt Col Lohmeier provides a "boots-on-the-ground" look at what's happening to the U.S. military as a result of CRT's brainwashing agenda.

Lt Col Lohmeier has taken the extraordinary step of publishing the book while on active duty, fully aware of the risks such publication might raise. But the message is too critical to wait. Lohmeier "gets" that, knowing the stakes nonetheless.

This book is a wakeup call. Every American should read it – certainly every U.S. military servicemember, at the very least: Forewarned is forearmed. Get this book. Read it. And learn about the fight to come: the fight to save our nation from this Marxist cancer. >


Louis
I lived in the USSR

5.0 out of 5 stars I lived in the USSR Reviewed in the United States on May 11, 2021 Verified Purchase WAKE UP!!! I lived in the USSR. What is taking place in the United States RIGHT NOW is textbook Marxist/communism. The history explained by the author in this book is unimpeachable and accurate. This book will help anyone who reads it quickly and easily gain a clear understanding of what is currently happening in America; and why.
The warning at the end of the book is chilling and true to history.

[May 12, 2021] Cadillac Marxists: woke perversion of Marxism can be very lucrative

Apr 11, 2021 | www.zerohedge.com

thinking1234 31 minutes ago

I don't know if anyone read about this?

"Inside BLM co-founder Patrisse Khan-Cullors' million-dollar real-estate buying binge. Black Lives Matter co-founder Patrisse Khan-Cullors has gone on a real-estate buying binge in recent years, snagging four high-end homes for $3.2 million in the US alone, according to property records.":

https://nypost.com/2021/04/10/inside-blm-co-founder-patrisse-khan-cullors-real-estate-buying-binge/

[May 12, 2021] No doubt the US/UK deep state, now more than ever, are busy trying to sow conflict and division in Eurasia

May 12, 2021 | www.moonofalabama.org

Canadian Cents , May 13 2021 0:38 utc | 76

An interesting read from Pepe Escobar at Saker's site, related to the comments by Max @24 and JB @25:
https://thesaker.is/insider-view-the-tragedy-of-the-us-deep-state/

No doubt the US/UK deep state, now more than ever, are busy trying to sow conflict and division in Eurasia, to divide-and-rule Mackinder's "World Island" and hence the world.

[May 10, 2021] Tim Swain on Twitter- - BREAKING Rep. Mark Green @RepMarkGreen to introduce a bill banning Critical Race Theory from all United States military service academies

May 10, 2021 | twitter.com

Tim Swain @SwainForSenate BREAKING Rep. Mark Green @RepMarkGreen to introduce a bill banning Critical Race Theory from all United States military service academies.
Tim Swain @SwainForSenate · 23h CRT is fighting racism with more racism. We must ban it from every institution in America. Follow me! I'll keep you updated on the fight against CRT! 7 66 426 Americae est magna. @usamagna · 20h Replying to @SwainForSenate and @RepMarkGreen Sadly it will never pass in the dem controlled house.

[May 09, 2021] Wokism and Russiagate

Notable quotes:
"... No, people get their belief systems (religious, political, economic, cultural) from their identity groups. **Then** (if called upon) they apply the intellect to rationalize the beliefs that they **already** hold. ..."
"... Rationalizing the Russiagate nonsense was seemingly inevitable with the 24/7 help of the MSM, and the continuous chirping of Democrat politicians. The intellect was not a lighthouse beacon that led intelligent Democrats through the fog of 24/7/52 issued propaganda, rather; the intellect was the tool that solidified vaporous forms into false-reality. ..."
May 09, 2021 | www.moonofalabama.org

librul , May 5 2021 18:00 utc | 61

re: Wokism

My two cents. People are mimics. It is fascinating when you realize this.

People don't muse, contemplate and chew over the circumstances and issues in their environment and then resolve - "aha! I have got it." That is not where people get their belief systems. For example, a million and more people didn't all independently study the Bible and then realize that their interpretation was fully consistent with those of the Roman Catholics and therefore they should go join the Catholic Church.

No, people get their belief systems (religious, political, economic, cultural) from their identity groups. **Then** (if called upon) they apply the intellect to rationalize the beliefs that they **already** hold.

The epiphany came to me when I observed intelligent people falling for Russiagate. WTF !! I thought intelligent people would get it. Russiagate would be a flash-in-the-pan that would disappear in a few days (or less!). Boy was I wrong. The intellect does not rule, group identity does. Those that identified Democrat (generalizing here, of course) fell in step with the beliefs common to Democrats, including Russiagate.

Rationalizing the Russiagate nonsense was seemingly inevitable with the 24/7 help of the MSM, and the continuous chirping of Democrat politicians. The intellect was not a lighthouse beacon that led intelligent Democrats through the fog of 24/7/52 issued propaganda, rather; the intellect was the tool that solidified vaporous forms into false-reality.

To find one's identity in groups is deeply human. People are dominated by their need to be group-accepted. It is unsurprising that group acceptance and group identity produce what we call fashion - fashion in style, fashion in vocabulary, fashion in beliefs. This applies to Wokism. People are mimics.

You can even get them to wear Pussy Hats.

[May 09, 2021] -You'll Never Be White- - Black Teacher's Racist Rant Highlights Need To Equip All Officers With Body Cameras - ZeroHedge

May 09, 2021 | www.zerohedge.com

Authored by Jonathan Turley,

For years, I and others have argued for body camera (and police interrogation cameras) to be used in every jurisdiction. Despite the obvious value of such cameras, jurisdictions like Los Angeles County have resisted and still do not have this basic protection for both officers and citizens alike. Likewise, prosecutors in cities like Chicago long opposed the filming of officers by citizens .

The recent controversy over a traffic stop in L.A. shows the importance of such body cameras. In the video, an officer pulls over a self-described teacher for using her cellphone while driving and is met with a barrage of racist slurs. The officer was only able to show his side in the encounter because he paid for his own camera. It is absurd that Los Angeles County forces officers to pay for their own cameras to guarantee a record of such encounters. In LA County, it is bring your own camera (BYOC) or engage in policing at your own risk.

me title=

Play Video

https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/core/bridge3.453.0_en.html#goog_1908407270

https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/core/bridge3.453.0_en.html#goog_1736936555 NOW PLAYING

Wall Street Bounces, After Selloff Fed Boosts Liquidity

SoftBank Said to Plan $14 Billion Sale of Alibaba Shares

China’s Companies Have Worst Quarter on Record, Beige Book Says

U.S.-Saudi Oil Alliance Under Consideration, Brouillette Says

ETF Volumes Surge in Current Market Environment

Investors Have Given Up on a V-Shaped Recovery, BNY's Young Cautions

The African-American teacher is shown in the video immediately attacking the hispanic officer with a litany of racist slurs and insults from repeatedly calling him a “murdererâ€...

"Yes, I started to record because you're a murderer," she says.

"You're threatening to kill me and my son," she says at one point in the encounter.

...and then it escalated as the woman is heard telling the deputy,

"You're always going to be a Mexican. You'll never be white, you know that, right?"

"You'll never be white, which is what you really want to be," she says after signing a citation. "You want to be white."

Police say the woman is well known for bringing baseless charges against officers.

Here is the body cam video of the April 23 incident in San Dimas:

https://www.youtube.com/embed/Jwy9lB2q8YE

The officer remains calm despite the litany of insults.

My anger at the video was not just over the racist slurs but the fact that this officer had to equip himself in Los Angeles.

As many of us have argued for 20 years, these cameras protect officers and the public alike . If this officer did not have this videotape, this could have been an incident where there are two wildly different accounts between the driver and the officer. If a harassment claim is filed, the matter would likely be treated as unproven rather than untrue. It would remain on the officer’s record that he was accused for racism and harassment.

Yet, there is no anger at the political leaders in Los Angeles County for the failure to supply this basic piece of equipment. Last year was the first deployment of body cameras in the city for LA sheriffs. Los Angeles police officers began using body cameras in 2015 .

While many politicians are now calling for body cams, it was not long ago that they remained silent on the issue or failed to object (or joined ) as police departments demanded delays in the release of such records. In April 2018, the LAPD began releasing body cam footage to the public from officer-involved shootings.

One of the issues delaying such deployment has been the insistence of officers to have greater control in turning on and off cameras. There should be no such debate in terms of the cameras operating as all times in public movements and encounters

play_arrow

GeneKelly 2 hours ago

She does NOT have the right to say : "You're threatening to kill me and my son," except to the extent that she is prepared to face civil and criminal penalties for slander and false accusations.

Unknown 5 hours ago

The Neoliberal brainwashing worked as planned to divide Americans.

[May 09, 2021] Wokism and black and white mentality of new cultural revolution

Highly recommended!
This one-to-one replay of Red Guards - Wikipedia but with quite different sponsors ;-) "Hóng Wèibīng was a mass student-led paramilitary social movement mobilized and guided by Chairman Mao Zedong in 1966 through 1967, during the first phase of the Chinese Cultural Revolution
Notable quotes:
"... there is an on-going effort to create fads/movements in which the public becomes caught-up and distracts the from reality. ..."
"... The more binary and controversial the better. Red/Blue. I used to be a big fan of sports but have the opinion it is a pointless waste of time and my life is better for that realization. ..."
"... Characteristics of the Woke: They always attack, especially with insults, like "paranoia nonsense". They never address the actual point made, instead they reinterpret the point to make it appear pure evil. Which allows them to attribute the worst possible motivations on the person they are attacking. Naturally they invent things the other person hadn't even mentioned, like climate change. ..."
"... Again the whole woke 'identity' culture that cancels dissent and promotes 'minorities' in positions of power is simply woke fascism. Just as military recruitment is about turning violent video games real for young men, so too is CIA recruitment about inviting the 'woke' for murder and mayhem in the name 'freedom' without which the woke could not wake. ..."
May 09, 2021 | www.moonofalabama.org

jared , May 5 2021 16:50 utc | 49

I think that there is an on-going effort to create fads/movements in which the public becomes caught-up and distracts the from reality.

The more binary and controversial the better. Red/Blue. I used to be a big fan of sports but have the opinion it is a pointless waste of time and my life is better for that realization.

Additionally/tangentially, I feel there is a habit in the English language in particular to create new words to describe things these words are not well define and generate a lot of discussion and heat about things that nobody knows what they are actually talking about and end up arguing the meaning of the words.

People who don't know the new words must try to catch up or be left out of the discussion. I don't direct this at your discussion. I just wonder how we might see things if we were constrained to a limited vocabulary - as I am as a programmer of sorts.

EoinW , May 5 2021 16:57 utc | 52

NonPartisanRinsed | May 5 2021 16:03 utc | 30

Characteristics of the Woke: They always attack, especially with insults, like "paranoia nonsense". They never address the actual point made, instead they reinterpret the point to make it appear pure evil. Which allows them to attribute the worst possible motivations on the person they are attacking. Naturally they invent things the other person hadn't even mentioned, like climate change.

gottlieb , May 5 2021 17:06 utc | 54

Again the whole woke 'identity' culture that cancels dissent and promotes 'minorities' in positions of power is simply woke fascism. Just as military recruitment is about turning violent video games real for young men, so too is CIA recruitment about inviting the 'woke' for murder and mayhem in the name 'freedom' without which the woke could not wake.

psychohistorian , May 5 2021 17:17 utc | 55

I will believe that any of this is worth a shit when Snowden wades in with his opinion...until then its just another distraction

The CIA is why we can't have "wokeism" about the right issue like global private/public finance.....where is Occupy 2.0?

The current wokeism is like the pet rocks of old days.....would want folks to focus that woke on the inherited class structure of the private property West, would we?

[May 09, 2021] I've formed the opinion that the BIC (the Billionaires In Charge) want societies atomised to reduce the likelihood of an anti-neoliberal revolution involving rope, and nooses

Notable quotes:
"... you make the best point: you have to have something seriously "wrong" with your mind to want a job with these spooks in the first place. you can't spell "sociopath" without "c-i-a". ..."
May 09, 2021 | www.moonofalabama.org

Hoarsewhisperer , May 5 2021 16:15 utc | 38

I asked Google (and thus Wikipedia) what cisgender means?

cisgender /sɪsˈdʒɛndə/ adjective

Denoting or relating to a person whose sense of personal identity and gender corresponds with their birth sex.
"this new-found attention to the plight of black trans folks by primarily cisgender allies is timely and necessary"

On the same page as the search result is a teaser headline: "How An (the) Ad About Cisgender Backfired Spectacularly"

I've formed the opinion that the BIC (the Billionaires In Charge) want societies atomised to reduce the likelihood of a revolution involving rope, and nooses. So guess how surprised I'm not that the BIC's loyal servants/savants, the CIA, are attempting to popularise such vacuous tosh as yet another addition to the LBGTQUERTY "landscape?"

the pair , May 5 2021 16:25 utc | 42

you make the best point: you have to have something seriously "wrong" with your mind to want a job with these spooks in the first place. you can't spell "sociopath" without "c-i-a".

both the bold - and to a lesser extent the italics - are terms people use to sound interesting when they're not. especially the tendency toward self-diagnosis that westerners have; "i'm not dumb with no attention span ...i have " ADHD " or "i don't have low self esteem or work-related anxiety based on the inner knowldge of how inept i am...i have " imposter syndrome ".

the woke types tend to be this kind of malleable and empty vessel...which is what the "company" wants.

karlof1 , May 5 2021 16:25 utc | 43

Thanks for bringing this issue to the main page in a brief article, b. I linked to this article, "CIA & The Woke Totalitarian Generation" , on the Week in Review thread, but it generated no additional comment despite its being one of several recent essays on the issue of the contrived Wokeism "culture" that Alastair Crooke's written about on several occasions over the past months and Pepe Escobar made the focus of his most recent essay.

Crooke argues that Wokeism is the peculiar and singular outcome of the American Malaise prominently exposed by Christopher Lasch in his 1994 Revolt of the Elites , which we've seen in the trenches as the war being waged against the State and citizenry by the Neoliberal Rentier Class that was explained well in this Renegade Inc interview from last year .

The Outlaw US Empire is clearly trying hard to get its Neoliberal vassals to adopt the Woke insanity, which proves beyond doubt Putin's assertion that the Liberalism of the West has died or worse evolved into something profane and loathsome.

[May 06, 2021] Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Summit News,

May 06, 2021 | summit.news

'The Who' legend Roger Daltrey says the 'woke' generation is creating a miserable world that serves to stifle the kind of creative freedom he enjoyed in the 60s.

The iconic frontman made the comments during a recent appearance on Zane Lowe's Apple Music 1 podcast.

"I don't know, we might get somewhere because it's becoming so absurd now with AI, all the tricks it can do, and the woke generation, " said Daltrey.

" It's terrifying, the miserable world they're going to create for themselves. I mean, anyone who's lived a life and you see what they're doing, you just know that it's a route to nowhere, " he added.

The singer noted how he was lucky to have lived through an era where freedom of speech was encouraged, not silenced.

"Especially when you've lived through the periods of a life that we've had the privilege to. I mean, we've had the golden era. There's no doubt about that," he said.

https://www.youtube.com/embed/Q-ONJ8UuvhU

Daltrey also slammed the negative impact that social media has had on the world, saying it has undermined truth.

"It's just getting harder to disseminate the truth. It's almost like, now we should turn the whole thing off. Go back to newsprint, go back to word of mouth and start to read books again," he said.

While Daltrey's comments may not be mind-blowing, any celebrity speaking out against the mob that has cannibalized culture is something to be applauded.

Once again, this only tends to happen with older celebrities who have already passed their peak of fame and entered icon status. They are beyond cancellation.

For any up and coming celebrity, or even one who is at the top of their game, to question 'generation woke' is career suicide.

Which makes it all the more ludicrous to continue to see identitarians, notably the LGBT movement, continue to claim they are 'fighting oppression' when their mantras are echoed by every cultural institution, media outlet and corporate entity in the west, while anyone who utters a whimper of dissent is swiftly cancelled.

* * *

Brand new merch now available! Get it at https://www.pjwshop.com/

* * *

In the age of mass Silicon Valley censorship It is crucial that we stay in touch. I need you to sign up for my free newsletter here . Support my sponsor – Turbo Force – a supercharged boost of clean energy without the comedown. Also, I urgently need your financial support here .

[May 05, 2021] Brave New Cancel Culture World by Pepe Escobar

May 05, 2021 | www.unz.com
Brave New Cancel Culture World PEPE ESCOBAR MAY 2, 2021 1,500 WORDS 59 COMMENTS REPLY Tweet Reddit Share Share Email Print More Share to Gab

In 2020, we saw the enshrinement of techno-feudalism – one of the overarching themes of my latest book, Raging Twenties .

In lightning speed, the techno-feudalism virus is metastasizing into an even more lethal, wilderness of mirrors variant, where cancel culture is enforced by Big Tech all across the spectrum, science is routinely debased as fake news in social media, and the average citizen is discombobulated to the point of lobotomy.

Giorgio Agamben has defined it as a new totalitarianism .

Top political analyst Alastair Crooke has attempted a sharp breakdown of the broader configuration.

Geopoliticallly, the Hegemon would even resort to 5G war to maintain its primacy, while seeking moral legitimization via the woke revolution, duly exported to its Western satrapies.

The woke revolution is a culture war – in symbiosis with Big Tech and Big Business – that has smashed the real thing: class war. The atomized working classes, struggling to barely survive, have been left to wallow in anomie.

The great panacea, actually the ultimate "opportunity" offered by Covid-19, is the Great Reset advanced by Herr Schwab of Davos: essentially the replacement of a dwindling manufacturing base by automation, in tandem with a reset of the financial system .

The concomitant wishful thinking envisages a world economy that will "move closer to a cleaner capitalist model". One of its features is a delightfully benign Council for Inclusive Capitalism in partnership with the Catholic Church.

As much as the pandemic – the "opportunity" for the Reset – was somewhat rehearsed by Event 201 in October 2019, additional strategies are already in place for the next steps, such as Cyber Polygon , which warns against the "key risks of digitalization". Don't miss their "technical exercise" on July 9 th , when "participants will hone their practical skills in mitigating a targeted supply chain attack on a corporate ecosystem in real time."

A New Concert of Powers?

Sovereignty is a lethal threat to the ongoing cultural revolution. That concerns the role of the European Union institutions – especially the European Commission – going no holds barred to dissolve the national interests of nation states. And that largely explains the weaponizing, in varying degrees, of Russophobia, Sinophobia and Iranophobia.

The anchoring essay in Raging Twenties analyzes the stakes in Eurasia exactly in terms of the Hegemon pitted against the Three Sovereigns – which are Russia, China and Iran.

It's under this framework, for instance, that a massive, 270-plus page bill, the Strategic Competition Act , has been recently passed at the US Senate. That goes way beyond geopolitical competition, charting a road map to fight China across the full spectrum. It's bound to become law, as Sinophobia is a bipartisan sport in D.C.

Hegemon oracles such as the perennial Henry Kissinger at least are taking a pause from their customary Divide and Rule shenanigans to warn that the escalation of "endless" competition may derail into hot war – especially considering AI and the latest generations of smart weapons.

On the incandescent US-Russia front, where Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov sees the lack of mutual trust, no to mention respect, as much worse than during the Cold War, analyst Glenn Diesen notes how the Hegemon "strives to convert the security dependence of the Europeans into geoeconomic loyalty".

That's at the heart of a make-or-break saga: Nord Stream 2. The Hegemon uses every weapon – including cultural war, where convicted crook Navalny is a major pawn – to derail an energy deal that is essential for Germany's industrial interests. Simultaneously, pressure increases against Europe buying Chinese technology.

Meanwhile, NATO – which lords over the EU – keeps being built up as a global Robocop, via the NATO 2030 project – even after turning Libya into a militia-ridden wasteland and having its collective behind humiliatingly spanked in Afghanistan.

For all the sound and fury of sanction hysteria and declinations of cultural war, the Hegemon establishment is not exactly blind to the West "losing not only its material dominance but also its ideological sway".

So the Council on Foreign Relations – in a sort of Bismarckian hangover – is now proposing a New Concert of Powers to deal with "angry populism" and "illiberal temptations", conducted of course by those malign actors such as "pugnacious Russia" who dare to "challenge the West's authority".

As much as this geopolitical proposal may be couched in benign rhetoric, the endgame remains the same: to "restore US leadership", under US terms. Damn those "illiberals" Russia, China and Iran.

Crooke evokes exactly a Russian and a Chinese example to illustrate where the woke cultural revolution may lead to.

In the case of the Chinese cultural revolution, the end result was chaos, fomented by the Red Guards, which started to wreak their own particular havoc independent of the Communist Party leadership.

And then there's Dostoevsky in The Possessed , which showed how the secular Russian liberals of the 1840s created the conditions for the emergence of the 1860s generation: ideological radicals bent on burning down the house.

No question: "revolutions" always eat their children. It usually starts with a ruling elite imposing their newfound Platonic Forms on others. Remember Robespierre. He formulated his politics in a very Platonic way – "the peaceful enjoyment of liberty and equality, the reign of eternal justice" with laws "engraved in the hearts of all men".

Well, when others disagreed with Robespierre's vision of Virtue, we all know what happened: the Terror. Just like Plato, incidentally, recommended in Laws. So it's fair to expect that the children of the woke revolution will eventually be eaten alive by their zeal.

Canceling freedom of speech

As it stands, it's fair to argue when the "West" started to go seriously wrong – in a cancel culture sense. Allow me to offer the Cynic/Stoic point of view of a 21st century global nomad.

If we need a date, let's start with Rome – the epitome of the West – in the early 5th century. Follow the money. That's the time when income from properties owned by temples were transferred to the Catholic Church – thus boosting its economic power. By the end of the century, even gifts to temples were forbidden.

In parallel, a destruction overdrive was in progress – fueled by Christian iconoclasm, ranging from crosses carved in pagan statues to bathhouses converted into churches. Bathing naked? Quelle horreur!

The devastation was quite something. One of the very few survivors was the fabulous bronze statue of Marcus Aurelius on horseback, in the Campidoglio/ Capitoline Hill (today it's housed in the museum). The statue survived only because the pious mobs thought the emperor was Constantine.

The very urban fabric of Rome was destroyed: rituals, the sense of community, singin' and dancin'. We should remember that people still lower their voices when entering a church.

For centuries we did not hear the voices of the dispossessed. A glaring exception is to be found in an early 6th century text by an Athenian philosopher, quoted by Ramsay MacMullen in Christianity and Paganism in the Fourth to Eight Centuries .

The Greek philosopher wrote that Christians are "a race dissolved in every passion, destroyed by controlled self-indulgence, cringing and womanish in its thinking, close to cowardice, wallowing in all swinishness, debased, content with servitude in security."

If that sounds like a proto-definition of 21st century Western cancel culture, that's because it is.

Things were also pretty bad in Alexandria. A Christian mob killed and dismembered the alluring Hypatia, mathematician and philosopher. That de facto ended the era of great Greek mathematics. No wonder Gibbon turned the assassination of Hypatia into a remarkable set piece in Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire ("In the bloom of beauty, and in the maturity of wisdom, the modest maid refused her lovers and instructed her disciples; the persons most illustrious for their rank or merit were impatient to visit the female philosopher").

Under Justinian – emperor from 527 to 565 – cancel culture went after paganism no holds barred. One of his laws ended imperial toleration of all religions, which was in effect since Constantine in 313.

If you were a pagan, you'd better get ready for the death penalty. Pagan teachers – especially philosophers – were banned. They lost their parrhesia : their license to teach ( here is Foucault's brilliant analysis).

Parrhesia – loosely translated as "frank criticism" – is a tremendously serious issue: for no less than a thousand years, this was the definition of freedom of speech (italics mine).

There you go: first half of the 6th century. This was when freedom of speech was canceled in the West.

The last Egyptian temple – to Isis, in an island in southern Egypt – was shut down in 526. The legendary Plato's Academy – with no less than 900 years of teaching in its curriculum – was shut down in Athens in 529.

Guess where the Greek philosophers chose to go into exile: Persia.

Those were the days – in the early 2nd century – when the greatest Stoic, Epictetus, a freed slave from Phrygia, admirer of both Socrates and Diogenes, was consulted by an emperor, Hadrian; and became the role model of another emperor, Marcus Aurelius.

History tells us that the Greek intellectual tradition simply did not fade away in the West. It was a target of cancel culture.


Realist , says: May 3, 2021 at 3:01 pm GMT • 2.1 days ago

In lightning speed, the techno-feudalism virus is metastasizing into an even more lethal, wilderness of mirrors variant, where cancel culture is enforced by Big Tech all across the spectrum, science is routinely debased as fake news in social media, and the average citizen is discombobulated to the point of lobotomy.

Those that can think for themselves are ahead of the curve.

Excellent points made in this article.

Thomasina , says: May 3, 2021 at 6:59 pm GMT • 2.0 days ago

"If we need a date, let's start with Rome – the epitome of the West – in the early 5th century. Follow the money. That's the time when income from properties owned by temples were transferred to the Catholic Church – thus boosting its economic power."

Yes, then, as now, follow the money.

The current "woke" culture didn't naturally well-up from within the population.

This "thing" has been artificially engineered, manufactured and steered in the direction "the money" forces want it to go.

From Covid to the French Revolution to Rome – all made to LOOK natural, as if they just appeared out of the blue or were a natural progression that couldn't be stopped, but when you pull back the curtain you see the hands of "the money" firmly on the steering wheel.

Some people say the Bible was invented during this time in order to bring down Rome. They're probably right.

Who is "the money"?

anon [907] Disclaimer , says: May 3, 2021 at 11:44 pm GMT • 1.8 days ago

Doesn't the destruction of Carthage count as a "cancellation"?

Franz , says: May 4, 2021 at 12:13 am GMT • 1.8 days ago

History tells us that the Greek intellectual tradition simply did not fade away in the West. It was a target of cancel culture.

Killed then misrepresented: In The Darkening Age , Catherine Nixey rolls out all the details. Christianity's greatest crime was the rise of a level of superstition and fear never before witnessed. Even stone atheists will cringe at the lies -- propagated at the top -- that Church leaders pushed on their victims. It was worse than some of us suspected. Nixey's book is not a fun read.

The Greek philosopher was spot on with his observation:

"a race dissolved in every passion cringing and womanish in its thinking, close to cowardice, wallowing in all swinishness "

If by "womanish in its thinking" he was referring to nothing but emotional (and being Greek it's likely) he was right on the money, then and now. From BLM to the selling of the Covid death vaccinations, emotion has become the West's preferred form of discourse. What killed the Elder Culture now destroys their late-era survivors with a mass nervous breakdown.

MarkU , says: May 4, 2021 at 2:23 am GMT • 1.7 days ago
@UR2

Hey Pepe, study the Punic Wars and try to understand what Rome had against Carthage.

Because the Romans would never demonise their enemies would they? I mean who could imagine that? The Romans were lovely people and would never do anything perverse or barbaric, no honestly.

Meena , says: May 4, 2021 at 2:59 am GMT • 1.6 days ago

Repressive and non-repressive governments ,democratically elected governments and those governments imposed from outside ,all have been cancelling messages that they do not like

animalogic , says: May 4, 2021 at 9:42 am GMT • 1.4 days ago
@Thomasina

"Who is "the money"?"
Pepe gives us the answer --
"The woke revolution is a culture war – in symbiosis with Big Tech and Big Business – that has smashed the real thing: class war. The atomized working classes, struggling to barely survive, have been left to wallow in anomie."
The "woke" are tools to fracture nations, a people, patriotism, social norms, families, morality, the future & anything which could possibly hinder the progress of the 600 odd (multi-billionaire) families who RULE this planet.

anon [307] Disclaimer , says: May 5, 2021 at 5:20 am GMT • 13.2 hours ago

The woke revolution is a culture war – in symbiosis with Big Tech and Big Business – that has smashed the real thing: class war.

this is why it's very important to be deliberately offensive. saying "nigger" is a revolutionary act. but in the age of the beta male, revolutionaries are too few to succeed and are punished.

[May 04, 2021] Rand Paul calls for Republicans to boycott Coca-Cola

May 04, 2021 | www.msn.com

Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) is calling on Republicans to boycott Coca-Cola after the company stated its disapproval for a new voting law in Georgia.

Rand Paul wearing a suit and tie: Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) © Greg Nash Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.)

"If they want to boycott us why don't we boycott them," Paul said during an appearance on Fox News on Tuesday. "This is the only thing that will teach them a lesson. If Coca-Cola wants to only operate in Democrat states and have only Democrats drink them, God love 'em. We'll see how well they do when half the country quits drinking Coca-Cola."

https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=false&embedId=twitter-widget-0&features=eyJ0ZndfZXhwZXJpbWVudHNfY29va2llX2V4cGlyYXRpb24iOnsiYnVja2V0IjoxMjA5NjAwLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X2hvcml6b25fdHdlZXRfZW1iZWRfOTU1NSI6eyJidWNrZXQiOiJodGUiLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfX0%3D&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1379451928623652866&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fthehill.com%2Fhomenews%2Fsenate%2F546704-rand-paul-calls-for-republicans-to-boycott-coca-cola&sessionId=b20c8a04e67870713b00e758c929dbc8378cba5e&theme=light&widgetsVersion=82e1070%3A1619632193066&width=550px

After the controversial bill was passed by Republicans in Georgia late last month, Coca-Cola CEO James Quincey called the measure "unacceptable."

Ad RECOMMENDED White Dress Shirt Microsoft Ads T Shirt Dress For Women Microsoft Ads Cloth Clothes with Clothcture Microsoft Ads Gap Tee Shirt Dres Microsoft Ads Annie Cloth Shirts Microsoft Ads Deals for Fitech Microsoft Ads

"Let me be crystal clear and unequivocal, this legislation is unacceptable, it is a step backward and it does not promote principles we have stood for in Georgia, around broad access to voting, around voter convenience, about ensuring election integrity, and this is frankly just a step backwards," Quincey said.

A slew of other companies followed, including Delta Air Lines, JP Morgan Chase and Major League Baseball, which pulled its annual All-Star Game out of Atlanta over the bill's passage.

Democrats have argued the bill makes it harder for many people, particularly minorities, to vote. Republicans say the bill is needed to beef up election security amid a growing distrust among conservatives with the electoral process following the 2020 elections.

Coca-Cola is headquartered in Atlanta.

Former President Trump last week called on his supporters not to support Coca-Cola and other companies that have voiced opposition to the Georgia elections bill and similar measures being proposed by Republicans around the country.

"For years the Radical Left Democrats have played dirty by boycotting products when anything from that company is done or stated in any way that offends them. Now they are going big time with the WOKE CANCEL CULTURE and our sacred elections," Trump said in a statement over the weekend. "It is finally time for Republicans and Conservatives to fight back- we have more people than they do- by far! Boycott Major League Baseball, Coca-Cola, Delta Airlines, JPMorgan Chase, ViacomCBS, Citigroup, Cisco, UPS and Merck. Don't go back to their products until they relent. We can play a better game than them."

A group of GOP state lawmakers in Georgia wrote a letter to the CEO of the Georgia Beverage Association asking their office no longer be stocked with Coca-Cola products.

"Given Coke's choice to cave to the pressure of an out of control cancel culture, we respectfully request all Coca-Cola Company products be removed from our office suite immediately," the letter reads . "Should Coke choose to read the bill, share its true intentions and accept their role in the dissemination of mistruths, we would welcome a conversation to rebuild a working relationship."

[May 04, 2021] Coca-Cola Under Fire for Legally Questionable Racial Quota System - Washington Free Beacon

May 04, 2021 | freebeacon.com

An anti-discrimination group is challenging Coca-Cola's attempt to impose racial quotas on outside counsel.

Writing on behalf of the Project on Fair Representation, D.C. attorney Boyden Gray accused Coca-Cola of violating the Civil Rights Act with a new rule, which would punish contracted law firms unless a certain percentage of their billed associates are "diverse attorneys."

In the letter , a copy of which was obtained by the Washington Free Beacon , Gray argues that policy violates federal law, which "prohibit[s] all forms of racial discrimination in private contracting." Coca-Cola "appears to be following the view of 'antiracist' activist Ibram X. Kendi," with their new requirement, Gray writes.

Former Coca-Cola counsel Bradley Gayton, who last week was appointed to serve as a strategic consultant to the company's CEO, announced in January that law firms partnering with Coca-Cola would face a 30 percent reduction in payment unless 30 percent of the firm's billed associates and partners came from diverse backgrounds. Half of those associates must also be black.

While the practice may have been implemented with good intentions, quotas "perpetuate" racial categorization, Gray told the Free Beacon.

"Coke's outside counsel policy may be well-intentioned, but racial quotas and the notion of group rights perpetuate pernicious racial categories and rest on a false, offensive, and racist notion that blacks and other racial minorities cannot compete," Gray said. "Federal law prohibits this kind of racially discriminatory balancing. It is not enough for Coke to pause this policy; it needs to publicly revoke it. Coke should disavow race-based contracting, period."

Gray is acting on behalf of the Project on Fair Representation, a nonprofit legal group that fights racial and ethnic discrimination. The group's president, Edward Blum, told the Free Beacon he believes the company must withdraw the rule immediately.

"It is obvious to all observers that Coca-Cola's recently enacted law firm contracting policies are illegal. The company should publicly withdraw these racial quota requirements immediately."

Blum helped organize Students for Fair Admissions' lawsuit against Harvard, which claims the university discriminates against Asian-American applicants. The group recently petitioned the Supreme Court to take up their case. Blum is also the architect of Fisher v. University of Texas , the last case that mounted a frontal attack on affirmative action before the High Court.

Federal law bans race discrimination in private contracting, as Gray's letter notes. Lawsuits regarding contract discrimination go straight to federal court, unlike others that first must go through a years-long agency process. And unlike other anti-discrimination laws, there's no cap on monetary damages under the fair contracting. Coca-Cola could be on the hook for a hefty financial penalty.

The soda company landed in hot water in February after leaked documents from an internal diversity and inclusion training session asked workers to "be less white." Coca-Cola did not respond to the Free Beacon 's request for comment in time for publication.

Kevin Daley contributed to this report.

[May 04, 2021] Woke Vs. Racist -- What's the Difference, by Derek Hunter

Neoliberals policies for minority students in education can be called "the soft bigotry of low expectations."
May 04, 2021 | townhall.com

... ... ...

The idea that someone can't succeed in America because of their skin color, gender, whatever, is as stupid as it is bigoted. Weirdly, it seems to always be espoused by people who've "somehow" beaten the odds. How many times have you seen a black Ivy League professor on TV talking about "systemic racism"? How'd they get a tenured, high six-figure gig, book deals, speaking engagements, and a cable news contributor contract in such a rigged system?

They never answer that question because the only people who'd ask it of them are their colleagues on TV and they're on the same team. But the answer is obvious: they worked for it; they earned it.

The woke crowd doesn't want minorities to realize that, and neither do racists. Both want to keep people down because it serves their needs.

Racists want segregation; wokesters want segregation too. One in the name of bigotry, one in the name of "tolerance." Does the motive really matter if the outcome is the same?

In fact, to listen to the demands of the leftists in the streets, you'd think they were the Klan.

"Black people can't succeed without government help," "They can't get ahead without a government program," "They'll only end up in jail if they don't get handouts." Again, seemingly different motivations, but all those statements could've been uttered by either group.

The infantilizing of black people by the progressive left is actually worse than anything the Klan is doing because the KKK is a non-entity in American life in the 21st century. In my book, I wrote about the size of the KKK. The Southern Poverty Law Center estimates there are between 5,000-8,000 members of the KKK in 2016, down from about 4 million a century earlier. That's a huge drop – to go from millions to a rounding error smaller than the average attendance of a WNBA game as the population tripled should be cause for celebration. But leftists will tell you racists are everywhere and running the show.

[May 03, 2021] Boycott Nike -- 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

May 03, 2021 | heavy.com

Boycott Nike Campaign : 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via E-mail More share options

On Monday, Nike rolled out a new ad campaign featuring Colin Kaepernick, the former 49ers quarterback who gained national attention when he began taking the knee during the national anthem to protest racism and police brutality. Nike’s new ad features a black and white photo of an unsmiling Kaepernick. The words written across his face read “Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything.â€

Kaepernick hasn’t played for the NFL since he became a free agent in 2017, but he continues to be in the public eye. Just last week, a judge ruled that Kaepernick’s lawsuit against the NFL for alleged collusion can go forward. Nike’s new ad campaign has garnered a lot of attention, with people on both sides of the issue reacting intensely. Serena Williams, who also is a Nike spokesperson, tweeted that she is now “prouder than ever†to be part of the “Nike family.â€

At the same time, many people, angry at what they see as Colin Kaepernick’s unpatriotic politics, have announced that they will boycott Nike.

[May 03, 2021] Will Whites Support A Globalist American Empire That Picks Fights Abroad And Wars Against Them At Home by James Kirkpatrick

Looks like an attempt to redirect anger against neolibel elite into racial antimosity does nto work well. A least for this UNZ commentariant. They are not folled by woke nonsense.
In any case it looks like the USA is a divided country.
May 03, 2021 | www.unz.com

Chris Moore , says: Website April 28, 2021 at 1:15 am GMT • 3.1 days ago

Never underestimate the insanity of Zionists, be they full Jews, half-Jews, or soulless Jew-wannabes like Joe "I am a Zionist" Biden. We're in unprecedented territory -- an empire run by Zoglodytes. They'll run it into the ground sooner or later, but just how quickly and at what cost to the humanity is anyone's guess.

Of course, none of it would be possible but for the Anglo-elites doing deals with ((bankers)) in search of post-Imperial easy-living. In fact, that's probably what caused WW2.

Today, gangsters from every creed, race and religion want in on the Zionist action, and happily signal to their criminal lodestar that they're "all in" with virtually unlimited aid, wars and diplomatic support in Congress for the Jewish state.

The New World Order. How do you like it, whitey? You just had to listen to the gold-plated promises of the Jew confidence man. The streets will be paved with gold, right?

White Elephant , says: April 28, 2021 at 8:54 am GMT • 2.8 days ago

Bottom line?

If you're white and in the armed forces/police, you're a moron.

The fact is Americans are nothing but the Jew's bitch, killing for them. There isn't one American, who's defended their country, well, you'll have to go back to the war of independence for that. Every, serving member of the armed forces is a mercenary, paid by the US taxpayer, to kill fire Israel as they establish greater Israel.

So STOP looking at your armed forces as heroes. They aren't, not one, single one! See them for what they are, braindead, brainwashed, fighting machines, WHO DON'T FIGHT FOR YOU! And that's what's worrying. Throughout history every armed force has been turned against its own nation and its just a matter of time with the US. THEY WILL use them against you, to push nationwide vaccination.

The armed forces, like the police, are your enemy and I strongly suggest that if you know anyone in them, or a friend whose family members are in them, tell them to leave ASAP before they institute martial law. Remember, the armed forces don't serve you, so leaving them is doing the people good while staying within is causing them harm.

KenH , says: April 28, 2021 at 4:22 pm GMT • 2.5 days ago

I'm suspicious of Biden's planned withdrawal from Afghanistan. The troops will probably get reassigned to the Middle East or the Polish Border. Trump's "withdrawal" from Syria just amounted to shipping those troops to Iraq.

The Biden administration is a revolutionary one. It is not American and doesn't pretend to be. Like Lenin's early revolutionary Bolshevik government it is comprised of mostly Jews and racial/ethnic minorities who are antagonistic towards the majority population and its history and traditions.

I believe that the Jews, radical blacks and others who are really in charge of the Biden administration have no plans to relinquish power in 2024 even if they lose the election. Since the courts refused to provide a legal remedy for battleground states breaking their own elections laws to massively increase Democrat mail-in ballots then they will just do it again unless Republicans can win the gubernatorial elections in Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania. But that might not be possible with mail-in ballot schemes that were illegally put in place.

beavertales , says: April 28, 2021 at 6:45 pm GMT • 2.4 days ago

Will whites support a globalist regime that picks fights abroad and wars against them at home? The mood of the country is comparable to East German during the 1980's. Resignation and apathy. The last election was a fraud, the media are liars, the courts are political, privacy and free speech aren't being protected, and half the country declares it hates the other half.

Go ahead, try to conjure a false flag to rally Team America

Stan , says: April 28, 2021 at 7:34 pm GMT • 2.3 days ago

There are no signs whites are about to repudiate the Evil Empire. Trace Adkins, Gerald McRaney are on tv advertisements imploring whites to provide financial support to the fools who came back crippled from fighting in Israel's wars.

Nostradamus , says: April 29, 2021 at 2:51 am GMT • 2.0 days ago

"Will Whites Support A Globalist American Empire That Picks Fights Abroad and Wars Against Them At Home?"

The answer is YES, they will.

Why?

Because they've been zombified by 150 years of corporate media whose only purpose is to use subliminal messages 24/7 to control them. Worse of all, they pay monthly fees in order to be zombified!

Wait for the next false flag attack against the US "Interests" at home or abroad and you'll see how the zombies behave.

TG , says: April 30, 2021 at 4:09 am GMT • 23.3 hours ago
@antibeast

Yes, but I would not call the elites "Yanks".

Elites, oligarchs, plutocrats, super-rich, whatever, but don't slime the Yankees.

And while I agree with much of this, don't forget that in the late 1960's the elites imported Mexicans to specifically replace blacks. And then cried a river of tears at how blacks were mysteriously losing ground!!!!

Oh and also: nobody NEEDS cheap labor to run factories. History has shown that without cheap labor factories run perfectly well. It's just that the elites need cheap labor to stay elite

slorter , says: April 30, 2021 at 5:49 am GMT • 21.6 hours ago

The real enemy of the American working class and middle class all of them is neoliberalism ! Coupled with a two party plutocracy that disenfranchises the same Americans who desperately need a more equitable society! Nothing to do with Russia or China we caused it all by ourselves!

Anonymous [397] Disclaimer , says: April 30, 2021 at 6:15 am GMT • 21.2 hours ago

Whites will support a globalist empire. They will also support overseas wars and wars against them at home.

Priss Factor , says: Website April 30, 2021 at 7:09 am GMT • 20.3 hours ago

This is why there needs to be White Liberation from Jewish Supremacism. But Jewish Power tries to preempt this by making a big stink about 'white supremacism'.

No more white support for Jewish supremacist tyranny over Palestinians and mass murder of Arabs/Muslims. If, after 2020, any white person still harbors sentimentality about Jewish Power, he or she is cuck-roach. Useless and worthless.

Ray Caruso , says: April 30, 2021 at 8:19 am GMT • 19.1 hours ago

Currently, an indebted, belligerent, imperialist U.S. is being propped up by naïve, well-meaning whites.

These "well-meaning whites" are the enemy. "Well-meaning whites" have always been the greatest enemy of Whites. A lot of people here consider Jews to be our greatest enemies. But why are they here in such huge numbers and why are they in control? It started with the Powdered-Wig Gang (a.k.a. the Founding Fathers) giving them citizenship on the basis of their shit "Enlightenment" ideology, which held that religion was merely a private matter and of no importance. No country at the time gave Jews citizenship save Poland, which had fallen under their sway and paid an exceedingly high price for it. Then France followed the American example when they had their own powdered-wig revolution.

The tragedy of the US is that nearly every fair-skinned, non-Jewish individual who has any influence here is a "well-meaning White". Generations of brainwashing have done that. Their latest bit of tomfoolery is the belief "Uncle Tim" Scott, a dim, charmless, venal, ugly black mediocrity, will be their savior. By the way, the first time I laid eyes on Uncle Tim, I said myself, "They're going to want to make that fellow president." That's no reason to brag, however, because "well-meaning whites" are nothing if not predictable.

"Well-meaning whites" have no common sense and can't learn from experience. They could not conceive the idea "diversity" is the problem. "Diversity" elected Joe Biden, through bloc-voting by non-Whites and by she-boons in black-dominated counties bringing in suitcases of fake ballots, but guess what: as far as "well-meaning Whites" are concerned, "diversity" in the form of "Uncle Tim" Scott is the solution.

What it comes down to is that if Whites want the White race to survive, then "well-meaning whites", who can accurately be called "liberals", have to go. Whites cannot afford to be sentimental about "well-meaning whites".

animalogic , says: April 30, 2021 at 8:39 am GMT • 18.8 hours ago
@xyzxy the Zio-western imperialists decided ( ie "backed down") not to risk crossing them.
Incidentally JK I don't disagree with this position --
"Rather than feeling anger or shame at this national humiliation, instead I feel something like schadenfreude against them -- along with righteous indignation on behalf of the countless patriots used up and spat out by a System unworthy of their sacrifice."
But perhaps you could spare a few words & emotions for the poor bloody average Afghans who have died in their 100's of 1000's in this vicious, stupid war.
A lack of sympathy for & indeed basic knowledge of, other peoples is part of the reason the US constantly gets stuck in these ridiculous wars. (Had they the "leaders" we have now , the Vietnam War would probably have limped to a halt sometime in the late 80's).
jsigur , says: April 30, 2021 at 8:43 am GMT • 18.7 hours ago

Hmm. Kirkpatrick doesn't seem to realize that 911 was sort of an official beginning to the elites domestic threat problem? There was never a reason to enter Afghanistan because Afghanistan never attacked us and nor did Osama Bin Laden.
As long as ppl believe the official story there will always be a reason the American citizen can support for invading middle east countries
Like the holocaust, it is a lynch pin lie that is the pre-requisite for all sorts claims and behaviors that without them would otherwise not give validation

Paul Greenwood , says: April 30, 2021 at 10:52 am GMT • 16.6 hours ago

I doubt Russia has any regard for Turkey – it has a very long history of wars against them and knows just how treacherous they are.

Russia alone is powerful enough to end life in USA

USA has lost Europe already- Merkel is aligning with China

Americans think Russian gas binds Germany rather than export markets like China and the fact EU needs semiconductors and Asia is where they are produced

No one takes USA seriously any more it is peripheral as in 19th century. You forget Europeans cannot travel to US and frankly fear to do so anyway

USA is disintegrating and is in run-off

Jimmy le Blanc , says: April 30, 2021 at 11:16 am GMT • 16.2 hours ago
@KenH

Biden is just privatizing the war. The mercenary companies and NGOs are writing up their contracts right now.

Jake , says: April 30, 2021 at 11:29 am GMT • 16.0 hours ago
@antibeast

This cannot be said nearly enough. WASP culture is WASP elites hating all 'other' whites and pretending not to hate a few non-WASP white groups when they (the WASPs) can use them against the whites they most hate or fear at the moment. WASPs discard all groups they use as soon as they no longer need them to wage some type war against still other whites.

The Scotch-Irish are probably the best example of what WASPs think of even those who serve them most ruthlessly.

Miro23 , says: April 30, 2021 at 11:44 am GMT • 15.7 hours ago

The mood of the country is comparable to East German during the 1980's. Resignation and apathy.

The last election was a fraud, the media are liars, the courts are political, privacy and free speech aren't being protected, and half the country declares it hates the other half.

Go ahead, try to conjure a false flag to rally Team America.

It does look like resignation and apathy – which is sort of logical – given that all centers of power are in the hands of the totalitarians (same as in the old East Germany).

The totalitarian Communist East German regime actually collapsed when it became caught up in the mass demonstrations of neighbouring countries (Poland Feb. 1989 and Hungary the following month). The Communists didn't have the political will/ability to suppress demonstrations on this scale and ceded power. Two points here are 1) that the public in each country overwhelmingly opposed the government 2) each country was ethnically united (Poles in Poland, Hungarians in Hungary and Germans in East Germany) and viewed their oppression as sourced externally (the Soviet Union).

The US looks different, since the population is split both politically and ethnically. So if anything is going to happen (unlikely) then it's either a civil war, a military coup or a world war (nuclear) removing most major American cities + Israel.

anonymous [349] Disclaimer , says: April 30, 2021 at 12:22 pm GMT • 15.1 hours ago
@anonymouseperson c accountants uncovering the depths of Israel and its fifth column's theft of many tens of billions of our war matériel and of our most guarded military secrets, which were then sold to China in concert with the Greenspan/Goldman Sachs plan to transfer of our industrial intellectual assets and over 50,000 factories to China in preparation for a new order based on joint Israeli-Chinese technocratic hegemony.

My point is that the uninterrupted, elaborate efforts at 9/11 concealment legally constitute, by themselves, sufficient proof of the Pentagon's complicity and guilt in 9/11 and, therefore, make it an alien occupation force that serves Israel, its fifth column, and no other. A war completing the "Bolsheviks" effective extermination of white Christian Russia at the same time as exterminating white Christian America appears to be the objective of International Jewry, whom alone Joe Biden and his Pentagon answer to.

Rich , says: April 30, 2021 at 1:17 pm GMT • 14.2 hours ago
@anonymouseperson

When I was in the US Army, I never met anyone who signed up to 'fight for the Anglo-Zionist empire'. We were there for a variety of reasons, no job, to get training, money for college, adventure or maybe running away from a crazy girlfriend. As the grandson of immigrants, I was probably the most patriotic, the rest of the guys, not so much. Young men will always join the military, whether the military oppresses its people or not. How many Irishmen served in the British military when they had few civil rights back home? In the military, a young White man can learn a trade, learn military tactics, earn money for college and become a real asset to his community. You can also get killed or maimed, but at 18 or 19, we didn't think about that.

lavoisier , says: Website April 30, 2021 at 4:16 pm GMT • 11.2 hours ago

Will Whites Support A Globalist American Empire That Picks Fights Abroad and Wars Against Them At Home?

If they are members of Congress, the military leadership, the police, the FBI, the NSA, the CIA, the MSM, or the leadership of either political party the answer is clearly a resounding YES!!

Brooklyn Dave , says: April 30, 2021 at 5:23 pm GMT • 10.1 hours ago

I believe a large percentage of whites in America have a Stockholm syndrome of some kind going on. The title of the article has rolled two very separate issues into one. As far as continuing to support wars abroad that aren't benefiting the average person of whatever color is not an issue that can be specifically directed at Marxist oriented regimes such as that of Obama/Hillary and now Sleepy Joe & Camel Toe. One can never forget the years of the faux conservative Bushlet regime. Whites as a group more overtly support the military than do other racial groups (even though blacks and Hispanics make up a large percentage of our military). They are very reluctant to criticize American foreign policy as unpatriotic and somehow react to military interventions as if they were a sporting event.

Their concept of patriotism is very puerile. Many never ask the question of who benefits? (bankers, weapons manufacturers and Zionists). As far as the war on whites is concerned, here is where the Stockholm syndrome comes more into play. Our people have been psychologically beaten into submission by accepting whatever the Marxist intelligentsia throws at them.But there is also a cultural flaw primarily among Northern European Protestant whites which consists of being perceived as NICE. Stop being NICE, especially to people who wish you dead. Is this some sort of perversion of Christianity? Maybe. Rather than throwing the whole Gospel message out the window, a recalibration of one's Christianity needs to happen as well. The churches have not been our friend either.

[May 03, 2021] Your Woke Money Is No Good Here by Ted Cruz

Notable quotes:
"... Mr. Cruz, a Republican, is a U.S. senator from Texas. ..."
Apr 28, 2021 | www.wsj.com
Corporations have taken advantage of Republicans for too long. I won’t take their PAC dollars anymore.

... ... ...

In my nine years in the Senate, I’ve received $2.6 million in contributions from corporate political-action committees. Starting today, I no longer accept money from any corporate PAC. I urge my GOP colleagues at all levels to do the same.

For too long, Republicans have allowed the left and their big-business allies to attack our values with no response. We’ve allowed them to ship jobs overseas, attack gun rights, and destroy our energy companies. We’ve let them smear Republicans without paying any price.

As America’s greatest basketball player observed years ago, Republicans buy sneakers, too. We cast votes, too. And we pay attention when CEOs come after our own just so they can look good for a few editorial pages and radical activists.

To them I say: When the time comes that you need help with a tax break or a regulatory change, I hope the Democrats take your calls, because we may not. Starting today, we won’t take your money either.

Mr. Cruz, a Republican, is a U.S. senator from Texas.

[May 03, 2021] The people that once boldly threw off the tyranny of a distant monarch now seem to be meekly submitting to the diktats of ideology that tolerate less independence of thought and action than King George III did The people that once boldly threw off the tyranny of a distant monarch now seem to be meekly submitting to the diktats of ideology that tolerate less independence of thought and action than King George III did

May 03, 2021 | www.wsj.com

The ambassador rose to give the not-so-loyal toast.

He began with the inevitable nod to the two nations' divergent histories, noting that some time earlier, in their great wisdom, his compatriots had decided to go it alone.

"Oh yes!" cried the prince from a sedentary position, fortified, no doubt, by a couple of glasses of the embassy's very good wine. "And how's that working out for you?"

It was a good question then, and it's more apt than ever now given America's current predicament. The people that once boldly threw off the tyranny of a distant monarch now seem to be meekly submitting to the diktats of a regnant class and ideology that tolerate less independence of thought and action than King George III did

[May 03, 2021] Wokeness As Bourgeois Bolshevism, by Rod Dreher

... Today the woke movement questions the very idea of truth. Intermixed with millenarian frenzy and American Puritanism, Maoist mob rule and hyper-liberal culture war, there is a strand that echoes Duranty's crypto-Nietzschean philosophy.
Notable quotes:
"... Live Not By Lies ..."
"... "You have to suffer for the truth because that's what makes you authentic. That's what makes that truth credible. If I'm not willing to suffer, my truth might as well be nothing more than an ideology," she tells me. ..."
"... Suffering is a part of every human's life. We don't know why we suffer. But your suffering is like a seal. If you put that seal on your actions, interestingly enough, people start to wonder about your truth -- that maybe you are right about God. In one sense, it's a mystery, because the Evil One wants to persuade us that there is a life without suffering. First you have to live through it, and then you try to pass on the value of suffering, because suffering has a value. ..."
May 03, 2021 | www.theamericanconservative.com

It is for the cause of helping good and decent people to endure this coming destruction, and to suffer for truth, no matter what the totalitarians throw at them, that I have written Live Not By Lies . A passage that you have not yet seen:

Mária Komáromi teaches in a Catholic school in Budapest. She and her late husband, János, were religious dissidents under the communist regime, and bore many burdens to keep the faith alive.

"You have to suffer for the truth because that's what makes you authentic. That's what makes that truth credible. If I'm not willing to suffer, my truth might as well be nothing more than an ideology," she tells me.

Komáromi elaborates further:

Suffering is a part of every human's life. We don't know why we suffer. But your suffering is like a seal. If you put that seal on your actions, interestingly enough, people start to wonder about your truth -- that maybe you are right about God. In one sense, it's a mystery, because the Evil One wants to persuade us that there is a life without suffering. First you have to live through it, and then you try to pass on the value of suffering, because suffering has a value.

...Suffering for truth has dignity and weight; accepting lies because they make you more comfortable is contemptible. The fact that public intellectuals like Fran Maier and John Gray recognize the totalitarianism within wokeness, and how wokeness in power compels everyone to affirm lies, tells me that neither I, nor the survivors of Soviet communism who talked to me for the book, are being alarmist.

Rod Dreher is a senior editor at The American Conservative . Joanis B9 months ago • edited

It's hard to see such famines, albeit politically determined ones, occurring in the US or Western Europe, considering the way developed economies function today: based on consumption, not national production (largely outside of the agricultural, financial products, service sector, etc, arms industry). What not only USSR and Maoist China, but also British Imperial Ireland and India, had in common was a situation of both extreme poverty and imperial despotism.

So yes Stalin and Mao were horrible, but, honestly, considering what neoliberalism/neoconservatism has done to the world since 9/11, I think most of the world perceives the US to be the greatest aggressor of post Cold War times (and it has nothing to do with Wokism, though Wokism might be a reaction to it).

P.S. I would add, only have facetiously, it's not a good idea to be around when empires implode, whether it be the Russian, Chinese, French (Algeria, Indochina), German, or even the British (certainly in the context of Indian partition).

[May 03, 2021] The CIA Used To Infiltrate The Media... Now The CIA Is The Media by Caitlin Johnstone,

Apr 16, 2021 | www.zerohedge.com

Authored by Caitlin Johnstone,

Back in the good old days, when things were more innocent and simple, the psychopathic Central Intelligence Agency had to covertly infiltrate the news media to manipulate the information Americans were consuming about their nation and the world. Nowadays, there is no meaningful separation between the news media and the CIA at all.

me data-google-container-id=

Analysis: US blinks first on Russia-Ukraine tensions

Journalist Glenn Greenwald just highlighted an interesting point about the reporting by The New York Times on the so-called “Bountygate†story the outlet broke in June of last year about the Russian government trying to pay Taliban-linked fighters to attack US soldiers in Afghanistan.

“One of the NYT reporters who originally broke the Russia bounty story (originally attributed to unnamed ‘intelligence officials’) say today that it was a CIA claim,†Greenwald tweeted .

“So media outlets - again - repeated CIA stories with no questioning: congrats to all.â€

Indeed, NYT’s original story made no mention of CIA involvement in the narrative, citing only “officials,†yet this latest article speaks as though it had been informing its readers of the story’s roots in the lying, torturing , drug-running , warmongering Central Intelligence Agency from the very beginning. The author even writes “The New York Times first reported last summer the existence of the C.I.A.’s assessment,†with the hyperlink leading to the initial article which made no mention of the CIA. It wasn’t until later that The New York Times began reporting that the CIA was looking into the Russian bounties allegations at all.

https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=false&embedId=twitter-widget-0&features=eyJ0ZndfZXhwZXJpbWVudHNfY29va2llX2V4cGlyYXRpb24iOnsiYnVja2V0IjoxMjA5NjAwLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X2hvcml6b25fdHdlZXRfZW1iZWRfOTU1NSI6eyJidWNrZXQiOiJodGUiLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfX0%3D&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1382793565714153472&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fpolitical%2Fcia-used-infiltrate-media-now-cia-media&sessionId=77ef0dadbd05c9f3bcb1de7857a624713a43f3d8&siteScreenName=zerohedge&theme=light&widgetsVersion=ff2e7cf%3A1618526400629&width=550px

This would be the same “Russian bounties†narrative which was discredited all the way back in September when the top US military official in Afghanistan said no satisfactory evidence had surfaced for the allegations, which was further discredited today with a new article by The Daily Beast titled “ U.S. Intel Walks Back Claim Russians Put Bounties on American Troops â€.

The Daily Beast , which has itself uncritically published many articles promoting the CIA “Bountygate†narrative, reports the following:

It was a blockbuster story about Russia’s return to the imperial “Great Game†in Afghanistan. The Kremlin had spread money around the longtime central Asian battlefield for militants to kill remaining U.S. forces. It sparked a massive outcry from Democrats and their #resistance amplifiers about the treasonous Russian puppet in the White House whose admiration for Vladimir Putin had endangered American troops.

But on Thursday, the Biden administration announced that U.S. intelligence only had “low to moderate†confidence in the story after all. Translated from the jargon of spyworld, that means the intelligence agencies have found the story is, at best, unproven â€" and possibly untrue.

https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=false&embedId=twitter-widget-1&features=eyJ0ZndfZXhwZXJpbWVudHNfY29va2llX2V4cGlyYXRpb24iOnsiYnVja2V0IjoxMjA5NjAwLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X2hvcml6b25fdHdlZXRfZW1iZWRfOTU1NSI6eyJidWNrZXQiOiJodGUiLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfX0%3D&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1382769897420296194&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fpolitical%2Fcia-used-infiltrate-media-now-cia-media&sessionId=77ef0dadbd05c9f3bcb1de7857a624713a43f3d8&siteScreenName=zerohedge&theme=light&widgetsVersion=ff2e7cf%3A1618526400629&width=550px

So the mass media aggressively promoted a CIA narrative that none of them ever saw proof of, because there was no proof, because it was an entirely unfounded claim from the very beginning. They quite literally ran a CIA press release and disguised it as a news story.

This allowed the CIA to throw shade and inertia on Trump’s proposed troop withdrawals from Afghanistan and Germany, and to continue ramping up anti-Russia sentiments on the world stage , and may well have contributed to the fact that the agency will officially be among those who are exempt from Biden’s performative Afghanistan “withdrawal†.

In totalitarian dictatorships, the government spy agency tells the news media what stories to run, and the news media unquestioningly publish it. In free democracies, the government spy agency says “Hoo buddy, have I got a scoop for you!†and the news media unquestioningly publish it.

In 1977 Carl Bernstein published an article titled “ The CIA and the Media †reporting that the CIA had covertly infiltrated America’s most influential news outlets and had over 400 reporters who it considered assets in a program known as Operation Mockingbird . It was a major scandal, and rightly so. The news media is meant to report truthfully about what happens in the world, not manipulate public perception to suit the agendas of spooks and warmongers.

Nowadays the CIA collaboration happens right out in the open, and people are too propagandized to even recognize this as scandalous. Immensely influential outlets like The New York Times uncritically pass on CIA disinfo which is then spun as fact by cable news pundits . The sole owner of The Washington Post is a CIA contractor , and WaPo has never once disclosed this conflict of interest when reporting on US intelligence agencies per standard journalistic protocol. Mass media outlets now openly employ intelligence agency veterans like John Brennan, James Clapper, Chuck Rosenberg, Michael Hayden, Frank Figliuzzi, Fran Townsend, Stephen Hall, Samantha Vinograd, Andrew McCabe, Josh Campbell, Asha Rangappa, Phil Mudd, James Gagliano, Jeremy Bash, Susan Hennessey, Ned Price and Rick Francona, as are known CIA assets like NBC’s Ken Dilanian, as are CIA interns like Anderson Cooper and CIA applicants like Tucker Carlson.

https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=false&embedId=twitter-widget-2&features=eyJ0ZndfZXhwZXJpbWVudHNfY29va2llX2V4cGlyYXRpb24iOnsiYnVja2V0IjoxMjA5NjAwLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X2hvcml6b25fdHdlZXRfZW1iZWRfOTU1NSI6eyJidWNrZXQiOiJodGUiLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfX0%3D&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1382777804014641152&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fpolitical%2Fcia-used-infiltrate-media-now-cia-media&sessionId=77ef0dadbd05c9f3bcb1de7857a624713a43f3d8&siteScreenName=zerohedge&theme=light&widgetsVersion=ff2e7cf%3A1618526400629&width=550px

This isn’t Operation Mockingbird. It’s so much worse. Operation Mockingbird was the CIA doing something to the media. What we are seeing now is the CIA openly acting as the media. Any separation between the CIA and the news media, indeed even any pretence of separation, has been dropped.

This is bad. This is very, very bad. Democracy has no meaningful existence if people’s votes aren’t being cast with a clear understanding of what’s happening in their nation and their world, and if their understanding is being shaped to suit the agendas of the very government they’re meant to be influencing with their votes, what you have is the most powerful military and economic force in the history of civilization with no accountability to the electorate whatsoever. It’s just an immense globe-spanning power structure, doing whatever it wants to whoever it wants. A totalitarian dictatorship in disguise.

And the CIA is the very worst institution that could possibly be spearheading the movements of that dictatorship. A little research into the many, many horrific things the CIA has done over the years will quickly show you that this is true; hell, just a glance at what the CIA was up to with the Phoenix Program in Vietnam will.

https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=false&embedId=twitter-widget-3&features=eyJ0ZndfZXhwZXJpbWVudHNfY29va2llX2V4cGlyYXRpb24iOnsiYnVja2V0IjoxMjA5NjAwLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X2hvcml6b25fdHdlZXRfZW1iZWRfOTU1NSI6eyJidWNrZXQiOiJodGUiLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfX0%3D&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1382856410443186179&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fpolitical%2Fcia-used-infiltrate-media-now-cia-media&sessionId=77ef0dadbd05c9f3bcb1de7857a624713a43f3d8&siteScreenName=zerohedge&theme=light&widgetsVersion=ff2e7cf%3A1618526400629&width=550px

There’s a common delusion in our society that depraved government agencies who are known to have done evil things in the past have simply stopped doing evil things for some reason. This belief is backed by zero evidence, and is contradicted by mountains of evidence to the contrary. It’s believed because it is comfortable, and for literally no other reason.

The CIA should not exist at all, let alone control the news media, much less the movements of the US empire. May we one day know a humanity that is entirely free from the rule of psychopaths, from our total planetary behavior as a collective, all the way down to the thoughts we think in our own heads.

May we extract their horrible fingers from every aspect of our being.

* * *

New book: Notes From The Edge Of The Narrative Matrix .

The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for at my website or on Substack , which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My work is entirely reader-supported , so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook , following my antics on Twitter , or throwing some money into my tip jar on Ko-fi , Patreon or Paypal . If you want to read more you can buy my books . For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do with this platform, click here . Everyone, racist platforms excluded, has my permission to republish, use or translate any part of this work (or anything else I’ve written) in any way they like free of charge.

Bitcoin donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

19,360 115

[May 03, 2021] Politics Is Risky Business for CEOs by Harvey Golub

Notable quotes:
"... Mr. Golub was CEO of American Express, 1993-2001. ..."
Apr 12, 2021 | www.wsj.com

It's imprudent to weigh in on issues that don't directly affect the company.

A few CEOs have expressed their point of view about the new Georgia voting law. They have issued statements indicating their opposition on the basis that the law will suppress voting. Other senior executives, retired and active, have joined them. I know most of them by reputation and some personally. They are people of goodwill, who sincerely care about the nation, their companies and their employees and customers. Most have done excellent work as leaders of their companies. All have my respect and I believe have earned the respect of the public. But I believe they are wrong to take public positions on this law.

I believe both that voting ought to be relatively simple for citizens and that verification of eligibility to vote should be strict as a matter of principle. It is clear that any verification of ballot integrity will increase difficulty. In my view, the Georgia law reaches a reasonable trade-off between those two objectives.

But the reason I think CEOs should be silent on this issue isn't because I disagree with their judgment on the merits. It's because I think it is wrong for executives to take a company position on public-policy questions that don't directly affect their business, for four reasons.

First, while these CEOs have the right to their own opinions, they can never speak merely as individuals; they always speak for and represent the companies they head. As CEOs they have the right, and perhaps the obligation, to speak out on matters affecting their organizations, but unless they have asked their boards for approval before speaking, they don't have that right on unrelated matters.

Second, inevitably their announcements on purely political issues will alienate many of their employees and customers. Those positions will always lead to unintended consequences. In the Georgia situation, it immediately prompted Major League Baseball to move the All-Star Game to Denver, which then brought on charges of hypocrisy because of baseball's close ties to two dictatorships -- Cuba and China. It also generated calls to boycott two major Atlanta-based companies. This won't be the end of the backlash.

Third, these and other executives will be pressured in the future to comment, pro or con, on other states' voting laws. That will lead to further charges of hypocrisy, more boycotts, more publicity, more ill will. At the end of the day corporations and the idea of capitalism will be in lower repute.

Fourth, and perhaps most important, there is no limiting principle to this problem. If business heads can be pressured to comment on issues unrelated to their businesses, they will be compelled to weigh in on more current events and issues and will have no basis for refusing to respond. What do you think of catch and release at the border, what do you think of no-bail laws in New York? It will go on and on.

Mr. Golub was CEO of American Express, 1993-2001.

[May 03, 2021] Boycott Nike -- 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

May 03, 2021 | heavy.com

Boycott Nike Campaign : 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share via E-mail More share options

On Monday, Nike rolled out a new ad campaign featuring Colin Kaepernick, the former 49ers quarterback who gained national attention when he began taking the knee during the national anthem to protest racism and police brutality. Nike’s new ad features a black and white photo of an unsmiling Kaepernick. The words written across his face read “Believe in something. Even if it means sacrificing everything.â€

Kaepernick hasn’t played for the NFL since he became a free agent in 2017, but he continues to be in the public eye. Just last week, a judge ruled that Kaepernick’s lawsuit against the NFL for alleged collusion can go forward. Nike’s new ad campaign has garnered a lot of attention, with people on both sides of the issue reacting intensely. Serena Williams, who also is a Nike spokesperson, tweeted that she is now “prouder than ever†to be part of the “Nike family.â€

At the same time, many people, angry at what they see as Colin Kaepernick’s unpatriotic politics, have announced that they will boycott Nike.

[Apr 27, 2021] The Problem Is That Your Ideas Are Stupid -- Bill Maher Blasts Gullible Woke Millennials

Apr 25, 2021 | www.zerohedge.com

Something strange is occurring in the gutter of "liberal comedy"... After four years of constant attacks on anything 'Trumpian' and constant ignorance of anything 'Left', one man has begun to realize that there is plenty of farce on both sides of the aisle and virtue-signaling to your cocktail party co-conspirators just doesn't pay the bills anymore ( cough CNN cough ).

Last week, Comedian Bill Maher used his HBO show to highlight some awkward 'facts' and ask some uncomfortable questions about media and politicians approach to COVID .

This week, he has taken aim at the heart of the problem - American Millennials and Gen Z and their total ignorance of history.

"In India, young people touch old people's feet to show reverence. In Japan, there's a national 'respect for the aged' day.

You know the reason why advertisers in this country love the 18-34 demographic... because it's the most gullible .

A third of people under 35 say they're in favor of abolishing the police ...not defunding, but doing away with a police force altogether... which is less of a policy position and more of a leg tattoo.

36% of Millennials think it might be a good idea to try Communism... but much of the world did try it... I know most of Millennials think that doesn't count because they weren't alive when it happened... but it did happen, and there are people around who remember it. Pining for communism is like pining for BetaMax or MySpace.

So when you say 'you're old, you don't get it', get what? Abolish the police? ...and the Border Patrol? ... and Capitalism? ... and cancel Lincoln?

No, "I get it"... the problem isn't that I don't get what you're saying or that I'm old. The problem is that your ideas are stupid .

If you say "let's eat in the bathroom and shit in the kitchen" , yeah, that's a new idea, but I wouldn't call it interior design.

You think someone 80 is hopeless because they can’t use an iPhone? Maybe the one who is hopeless is the one who can’t stop using it .

You think I'm out of it because I'm not on Twitch? Well maybe I 'get Twitch' but I just think people watching other people play video games is a waste of fucking time .

20% of Gen Z agree with the statement that "society would be better off if all property was owned by the public and managed by the government" and another 29% say 'they don't know if that's a good idea'...

Here's who does know... anyone who wasn't born yesterday!"

Watch the full monologues here (timestamped to begin at 5:13)


Manthong 8 hours ago (Edited)

You know when Bill Maher is right...

I hate when that happens.

But if you listen to the whole piece, he is shilling for a fool who is wholly owned and he is wrapping truth around deception and falsity... very crafty.

But that's what they do.

various2 5 hours ago

Billionaires do not allow their direct peasants millionaires to deviate from left-right allocation. If he utters a word of nationalism, he would be canceled fast.

Billionaires destroy America, and need firmly control over common peasants.

Money printing billionaires bought out all big tech and big media as fast as they become public.

Only Trump was allowed to speak certain limited truths like “China - enemy globalist proxyâ€, “Russia is America’s only ally on a planetâ€.

But that was an experiment in compromise that billionaires failed.

Macho Latte 4 hours ago (Edited)

Maher is part of the problem, not part of the solution. His salary depends on that. The only reason he has "changed" his tune is because he got permission to do it or he was told to do it.

DemonRats: The EVIL that lives among us.

Max Hunter 3 hours ago

He didn't change his tune that much, if you watch the first 5 minutes he is drooling all over Biden and shilling the orangeman bad mantra.

[Apr 27, 2021] ACLU Again Cowardly Abstains From Online Censorship Controversy- This Time Over BLM - ZeroHedge

Apr 27, 2021 | www.zerohedge.com

Authored by Glenn Greenwald via greenwald.substack.com

Enormous sums of money have poured into racial justice groups since the May, 2020 murder of George Floyd by the Minneapolis Police Department. "The foundation widely seen as a steward of the Black Lives Matter movement says it took in just over $90 million last year," according to a February Associated Press review , while at least $5 billion was raised by groups associated with that cause in the first two months alone following Floyd's death.

Two weeks after the Floyd killing, The New York Times said that the "money has come in so fast and so unexpectedly that some groups even began to turn away and redirect donors elsewhere," while "others said they still could not yet account for how much had arrived." Propelled by the emotions and nationwide protest movements that emerged last summer, corporations, oligarchs, celebrities and the general public opened their wallets and began pouring money into BLM coffers and have not stopped doing so.

Where that money has gone has been the topic of numerous media investigations as well as concerns expressed by racial justice advocates. AP noted that BLM's sharing of financial data in February "marks the first time in the movement's nearly eight-year history that BLM leaders have revealed a detailed look at their finances." That newfound transparency was prompted by what AP called "longstanding tensions boil[ing] over between some of the movement's grassroots organizers and national leaders -- the former went public last fall with grievances about financial transparency, decision-making and accountability."

In December, ten local BLM chapters severed ties with the national group amidst questions and suspicions over the handling of activities and finances by one of its co-founders, Patrisse Cullors, who had assumed the title of Executive Director. On April 10, The New York Post published an exposé on what it called Cullors' "million-dollar real estate buying binge." The paper noted that as protests were unfolding around the country, the BLM official was "snagging four high-end homes for $3.2 million in the US alone, according to property records," including a California property valued at $1.4 million. The article also revealed that the self-described Marxist and her partner "were spotted in the Bahamas looking for a unit at the Albany," an "elite enclave laid out on 600 oceanside acres," which "features a private marina and designer golf course." The Post included photos of several of the properties obtained from public real estate listings.

... ... ...

How is it possible that the ACLU is all but invisible on one of the central free speech debates of our time: namely, how much censorship should Silicon Valley tech monopolists be imposing on our political speech? As someone who intensively reports on these controversies, I can barely remember any time when the ACLU spoke up loudly on any of these censorship debates, let alone assumed the central role that any civil liberties group with any integrity would, by definition, assume on this growing controversy.

In lieu of the traditional, iconic and organization-defining willingness -- eagerness -- of the ACLU to defend free speech precisely when it has been most controversial and upsetting to liberals , what we now get instead are cowardly, P.R.-consultant-scripted excuses for staying as far away as possible: "We don't have anyone who is closely plugged into that situation right now so we don't have anything to say at this point in time." That sounds like something Marco Rubio's office says when asked about a Trump tweet or that a corporate headquarters would say to avoid an inflammatory controversy, not the reaction of a stalwart civil liberties group to a publicly debated act of political censorship.

In this particular case, it is not difficult to understand the cause of the ACLU's silence. They obviously cannot defend Facebook's censorship -- affirmatively defending the stifling of political speech is, at least for now, still a bridge too far for the group -- but they are petrified of saying anything that might seem even remotely critical of, let alone adversarial to, BLM activists and organizations. That is because BLM is one of the most cherished left-liberal causes, and the ACLU now relies almost entirely on donations and grants from those who have standard left-liberal politics and want and expect the ACLU to advance that ideological and partisan agenda above its nonpartisan civil liberties principles. Criticizing BLM is a third rail in left-liberal political circles, which is where the ACLU now resides almost entirely, and thus it again cowers in silence as another online act of censorship which advances political liberalism emerges. Indeed, BLM is an organization which the ACLU frequently champions:

https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=false&embedId=twitter-widget-0&features=eyJ0ZndfZXhwZXJpbWVudHNfY29va2llX2V4cGlyYXRpb24iOnsiYnVja2V0IjoxMjA5NjAwLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X2hvcml6b25fdHdlZXRfZW1iZWRfOTU1NSI6eyJidWNrZXQiOiJodGUiLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfX0%3D&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1345883403128856576&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fpolitical%2Faclu-again-cowardly-abstains-online-censorship-controversy-time-over-blm&sessionId=d93f8c4274ab59525c7fefb779e3f7824faf4be4&siteScreenName=zerohedge&theme=light&widgetsVersion=ff2e7cf%3A1618526400629&width=550px

Like so many liberal-left media outlets and advocacy groups, the ACLU was suffering financially before they were saved and then enriched beyond their wildest dreams by Donald Trump and the #Resistance movement he spawned. "The American Civil Liberties Union this week laid off 23 employees, about 7 percent of the organization's national staff," announced The Washington Post in April, 2015. But in the Trump era, the money flowed in almost as quickly and furiously as post-Floyd money to BLM. In February, 2017, said AP , the group "is suddenly awash in donations and new members as it does battle with President Donald Trump over the extent of his constitutional authority, with nearly $80 million in online contributions alone pouring in since the election." So that is the donor base it now serves.

The ACLU's we-know-nothing routine for abstaining from commenting on Facebook's censorship of the BLM article is, for so many reasons, preposterous. The group funds what it calls its Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, and some of its best lawyers oversee it. Clearly they focus on these issues. And the ACLU in general has taken a firm and borderline-absolutist position against online censorship by Silicon Valley monopolies: principles whose application to this particular case would be easy and obvious. The ACLU has a section of its website devoted to "Internet Speech," and its position on such matters is stated explicitly :

The ACLU believes in an uncensored Internet, a vast free-speech zone deserving at least as much First Amendment protection as that afforded to traditional media such as books, newspapers, and magazines .The ACLU has been at the forefront of protecting online freedom of expression in its myriad forms. We brought the first case in which the U.S. Supreme Court declared speech on the Internet equally worthy of the First Amendment's historical protections.

In a July, 2018 article published on the group's site entitled "Facebook Shouldn't Censor Offensive Speech," the group praised Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg's controversial pledge "to keep Facebook from diving deeper into the business of censorship" as "the right call."

Unlike in response to the BLM controversy, the ACLU had no trouble back then recognizing that "what's at stake here is the ability of one platform that serves as a forum for the speech of billions of people to use its enormous power to censor speech on the basis of its own determinations of what is true, what is hateful, and what is offensive." The ACLU's stated policy on these controversies could not have been clearer: "given Facebook's nearly unparalleled status as a forum for political speech and debate, it should not take down anything but unlawful speech, like incitement to violence. " In light of that principle, how is it remotely hard to denounce Facebook's censorship of the Post 's article given that it does not even arguably fall within the scope of those narrow exceptions?

Because the ACLU still employs a few old-school civil libertarians among its hundreds of lawyers and staff, those employees manage to do work and express views that are consistent with the ACLU's old-school civil liberties agenda even when contrary to the interests of liberal politics. But the tactics used by the ACLU in those cases to downplay or hide those aberrations are as transparent as they are craven.

When three Silicon Valley monopolies united to remove the social media app Parler from the internet in January, 2021 after influential Democratic lawmakers demanded it -- one of the most brute acts of monopolistic censorship yet -- an ACLU lawyer, Ben Wizner, was cited in The New York Times as labelling Parler's destruction "troubling," telling the paper: "I think we should recognize the importance of neutrality when we're talking about the infrastructure of the internet." But on the ACLU's highly active and influential Twitter account -- the group's primary platform for promoting its work, expressing its views, and soliciting donations, where it has two million followers and often tweets up to fifty times a day -- the group said absolutely nothing about the removal of an entire social media app from the internet:

... ... ...

4 hours ago

The ACLU was founded in the 1920's by a group of leftist lawyers for the purpose of providing legal support for Communists. That is all one needs to know to understand what they are all about. play_arrow 27 play_arrow


MRob 2 hours ago

Listen to the interview of Ira Glasser with Rogan, he's the former head of the ACLU and guy who really transformed it from a small enterprise to an household name. Listen and it becomes clear he's a frothing at the mouth left wing ideologue, and a fcking hypocrite at that. He entire argument about not enacting laws to ban free speech, is that if you do, you opponents (on the right) will be able to use those laws against you. Which leads to the obvious conclusion - it is OK to restrict your opponents free speech, if they cannot do the same to yours, so the goal is to manoeuvre yourself into that position. As the left has done today. He didnt mention that it was morally unacceptable to ban free speech, and that it leads to totalitarian evils. The concept of a free market of ideas, wasnt discussed once.

At another point in the discussion, he said that everything in politics could be interpreted in multiple ways, that there is never an absolute "correct" everyone will agree on. And then later he said that it was a fact that a vote for Trump was a vote for racism, white supremacism, bigotry etc. An absolute fact, that you just couldnt argue with. WTF. I stopped listening at that point. I was interested to begin with, but by the end, and on further reflection of the discussion, I despise the man with a passion.

Ms. Erable 4 hours ago (Edited) remove link

'Stalwart civil liberties group'?

Back away from the crack pipe, dude. The (((ACLU))) has never been about civil liberties. play_arrow

hegger 3 hours ago (Edited)

So much LGBTQ+ symbolism.

These people create both an individual and a collective identity based solely on what they do with their d1cks/vag1nas in their free time.

That's it. Lizard brain stuff. No greater ideals, no thousand-year philosophy, no plans for the future, no interest in science or the arts.


[Apr 26, 2021] The United States of 2 Americas

Apr 26, 2021 | turcopolier.com

If you haven't noticed, the United States is reorganizing itself into two Americas -- blue and red. Although there is a president of the United States, state governors are in many ways now driving the national narrative in this new America.

The president and the vice president are who they are now because six Republican-controlled states forwarded questionable electoral votes, and Vice President Mike Pence missed a historic opportunity to challenge those votes. The current president and vice president seem trapped in foggy and abstract ideological slogans rather than providing executive leadership. Vague generalities and virtue signaling aren't replacements for executive leadership.

And who are the true executive leaders of the two Americas? Florida and Texas on one side, California and New York on the other side. Their governors essentially dominate the bully pulpit formerly occupied by a sitting president. Many of the rest of the American states have aligned with one side or the other.

The American political conversation has become a modern Dr. Seuss's "Sneetches With Stars" on steroids as Americans are now beginning to group, assemble, and march separately according to our ideologies. Both sides have equal ownership of this behavior -- neither side should be excused or let off the hook on this matter.

Two Americas/Two Systems

A part of this blue/red separation is the manifest " Digital Apartheid " that is being applied by the blue side to the red side to create two social media systems. This Digital Apartheid is pervasive and driven by the new, vicious, lockstep, "social justice" mantra that has taken over the automatons who lead U.S. social media.

We are experiencing an unprecedented shakedown by groups such as Black Lives Matter ( BLM ) and Antifa who broadcast through their relentless bullhorn of social media and old media.

There are now two business systems in America -- blue and red. Many of the businesses that lead major market sectors have now revealed themselves to be de-facto thought police to enforce Social Justice.

MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell is the poster child of this, as he has been targeted for elimination by the self-appointed high priests of "wokism."

We're also finding out there are two financial systems in America, as those with capital now act as the gatekeepers of who receives capital and who is excluded. Bank of America has become "Bank of who I decide to allow access to the capital system." That's a far cry from the intent of its founder, who wanted to make sure all had access. The modern bank staff has now become an appendage of the virtue-signaling synchronized chorus.

There are now two media systems in America. The Hollywood award shows are now a Roman circus of self-loathing, lecturing, and virtue signaling. Few are watching these award shows -- in fact, few are watching legacy media as ratings collapse.

It's curious from an agnostic business perspective how CNN even survives at this point in time. Somehow the citizen's pocketbook is being fleeced by corporations and advertisers who recycle ad revenue through "woke" media to keep them alive when it's patently obvious the viewership has imploded -- but that's the beauty of the new era of crony capitalism (which is a transition phase to socialism).

The citizens of our nation have consciously or unconsciously chosen sides. If you're angry at yourself for not being woke enough and have righteous virtue-signal signs in your yard lauding BLM, you're likely on the blue side. If the drivel of virtue signaling makes no sense to you, you're probably on the red side.

  1. Fred says: April 25, 2021 at 11:07 am

    The author of the article you link too is a bit late to his wokening. It is a digital iron curtain; I commented on that here almost a year ago. His initial comments on " trapped in foggy and abstract ideological slogans rather than providing executive leadership." are off. They are imposing by executive action precisely the cultural transformations their ideology demands.

    Reply
    • Pat Lang Pat Lang says: April 25, 2021 at 1:35 pm

      fred "They are imposing by executive action precisely the cultural transformations their ideology demands." Totally

      Reply
      • Avatar PRC90 says: April 26, 2021 at 3:33 am

        It would be interesting to further divide these transformations into those sourced from their own ideology and those derived from the corporate sponsors behind their PAC oxygen supply. Both subsets would contain interesting lists of names and connections.

        Reply
        • Avatar Carey says: April 26, 2021 at 1:35 pm

          > and those derived from the corporate sponsors behind their PAC oxygen supply. <

          There you go. Woke-ism is an *Elite* project; one of the many, many tentacles of Divide and Rule.

          Reply
  2. Avatar EEngineer says: April 25, 2021 at 11:10 am

    We already have the command economy, and command media, of a socialist state. The mechanism just has a stage of indirection, to borrow a term from the software world. If you're a money losing business of any kind you can always raise money by floating shares or issuing bonds that are miraculously bought by "the market", ahem, Blackrock. That they get to skim their vig in the process is a "feature not a bug". Business then devolves into a contest to see who can be most craven to the official party narrative. With the Fed printing money in the form of zero interest "loans" to insider controlled hedge funds and investment banks like it was going out of style, this can continue until the dollar inflates away or the Fed, through the banks, owns just about everything. Market Socialism!

    Reply
  3. Avatar Steve+G says: April 25, 2021 at 1:06 pm

    Excellent analysis of the current state of the Red vs Blue situation. I live in the epicenter of The ongoing SJW disaster , Minneapolis. The Downtown, which was once lauded as " the Minny Apple", is no more. Between the Covid and Chauvin trial it is an ongoing disaster.

    I walk the skyway system twice a week yearly and Have done so for 50 years. Approximately 150k People used to work there with all the attendant Amenities. Stores restaurants bars etc. were the Lifeblood of the ever growing and liveable space. On a 2 to 3 mile walk through the 8 plus mile Labyrinth I might encounter 50 to 100'people if That. Noon hour used to be in the thousands.

    Two retail stores, Target and Walgreens, the only Two open. Fights and assaults common near those Stores. The defund clowncil rescinded the no Loitering ordinance. This is the result.

    All major store fronts have been boarded Up and the world has seen the fencing and Barricades everywhere. The future here is bleak Indeed. The Mayoral and council are up for Re-election this November. If no changes the U-haul caravans and for sale signs will sprout Like the proverbial mushrooms. It was a nice Run despite the climate.

    Reply
    • Avatar Deap says: April 25, 2021 at 3:56 pm

      That is such a sad report. On a visit to Minneapolis a few years back staying at a downtown hotel (the converted bank hotel) We hit the streets the next morning looking for breakfast, only to find almost no street life in this major city. How strange we thought, for such a major and apparently healthy looking city.

      It was only later in the day we learned street life was all going on inside the remarkable Skyway – what a magical world that was, and what a perfect way to create year round community vitality.

      You can join the rapid decline of California city street life too – taken over by vagrants, closed shops and sad out door dining operations. And a recent rash of crazy people with guns, knives, obscene conduct in public, gang fights and out of control vehicles jumping curbs and running into flimsy restaurant parklets..

      Something has clearly gone very wrong in pubic decorum and decency expectations. But we do have docks for electric bicycles. So you can at least try to get away faster than if by toot.

  4. Avatar Eric Newhill says: April 25, 2021 at 2:48 pm

    IMO, the article glossed over the risk posed by big corporations moving from storing their data on "the cloud/AWS" in today's revolutionary political alliance with big biz, especially the tech biz and even more especially tech biz owned by "socially active" megalomaniacs like Bezos.

    I've recently been involved in some related corporate discussions. The lure of cost savings and scalability represented by the cloud is swaying decision making in its favor. No one seems to be seriously looking at the downside. Once the data and extract/reporting processes are out on AWS, if the political activist powers that be decide they don't like a corporation for whatever reason, they have that corporation's ability to access the data and do business held hostage. That would be a nuclear sized disaster in an industry sector like insurance, but is, really, pretty damaging to any industry since everything about business is now highly data driven. If Bezos decides to shut you out, you're done for. You would not be able to re-build internal infrastructure in time to save your operation.

    Would a Bezos pull that trigger? I think so, when the time is "right".

    Look at how companies like Nike are willing to alienate 50% of their potential customer base. Ditto Facebook, professional sports The list of woke kamikaze corporations is growing longer every day. They appear willing to take the losses if it beats their enemy ("deplorables" like you and me) into compliance in the long run.

    Reply
    • Avatar Deap says: April 25, 2021 at 8:48 pm

      At one time, Dutch corporations ruled the globe too. Look what happened to them, and they invented the darn things.

      Reply
  5. Avatar John+Merryman says: April 25, 2021 at 4:07 pm

    While I agree woksterdom is a mile wide and an inch deep, the other side of the coin is that we are not going back to some proverbial happy place. American culture(why is the United States the only country in the world without a term specifying the citizen? No United Statian.) is built on several centuries of geographic, economic, industrial and technological growth, topped off with 40 years of exponential debt to keep the party going. What happens when we try looking inward?

    We are not the Old World, with millennia of cultural history to fall back on, when he current civil structures implode. Contrary to Dick Cheney, debt doesn't matter, until it does. We are determined to max out the national credit card and the most everyone seems to do, is point to the other guy wasting it, not looking in the mirror.

    I've been saying for over a decade, our kids are not going to be wondering what side of whichever Middle Eastern conflict we will be pouring money and material, but how many countries the US break into. Now it is happening. As for a deeper observation, logically a spiritual absolute would be the essence of sentience, from which we rise, not an ideal of wisdom and judgement, from which we fell. The fact we are aware, than the details of which we are aware. The Ancients were not ignorant of monotheism, but as there was no division between culture and civics, it equated with monoculture. One people, one rule, one god. Democracy and republicanism originated in pantheistic cultures, as that was how they modeled multicultural societies, with many aspects and distinctions, from two sexes to the regeneration of the population. The Romans adopted Christianity as the Empire solidified and any remnants of the Republic were shed. Though the Trinity was a nod to the Greek year gods. Father, son, mother. Consequently the default political model for the West, for the next 1500 years, was feudalism and monarchy, all about the Big Guy at the top. When the West went back to more populist forms of government, it required the separation of church and state, culture and civics. The problem with confusing the ideal with the absolute, is that it creates the belief one's aspirations should be universal and beyond question. An ideological basis for both the current left and right. Though the pendulum swings back and forth, depending on the momentum. Where are we today? Is anyone about to seriously question their cultural assumptions, or just keep blaming the other side?

    Reply
    • Avatar Eric Newhill says: April 25, 2021 at 9:21 pm

      John, It's an old Cosa Nostra trick. Get them in debt to you and then pull the plug. When they can't pay, ruthlessly take control of the business.

      Speaking of La Cosa Nostra, something that impressed me, negatively, about Italy, especially the South, is how there isn't even sufficient electrical power for people to properly bath or wash their clothes. So much for the strength of ancient cultures. People in the US take way too much for granted. We suffer from something like "Affluenza" and are committing cultural suicide nit picking our collective conscience because we don't realize that we have already pretty much achieved relatively as close as humans can get to utopia.

      1929 isn't ancient history, unimageable today. It is only an idiotic decision or two away, and idiotic decisions are now the norm because an exceedingly ideological government is trusted by 50% and seizing control anyhow.

      Totally agree that the current economic policy is not sustainable. Only wise and cautious leadership could steer us back to a sustainable path. We don't have any of that.

      Reply
  6. Avatar Sam says: April 25, 2021 at 4:47 pm

    IMO, we don't have socialism. What we have seen over the past 50 years is a steady evolution to classic fascism. The merging of Big Business and Big Government. The merging of the National Security State and Big Corporate & Financial Interests.

    The pandemic response exemplifies it best. The government through edict shut down and bankrupted small businesses while they allowed big business and big finance to further consolidate their market power. We now have the most concentrated market power in American history. Even greater than a century ago which led to the reforms like anti-trust and Glass-Steagall, which have all been successfully eroded. We now have the greatest wealth inequality and concentration of economic and political power.

    The 2 Americas is the tale and theater designed to further entrench power. The bottom 90% in both blue & red America have allowed themselves to be enslaved, precisely because of their infatuation with narrow cultural identities and the faux culture wars.

    The behind-the-scenes puppeteers of both blue & red America are the same. Obama used the race and BLM canard to political gain. His personal social network however are the Richard Branson's and David Geffen's. His own $12 million home is on "white supremacist" Martha's Vineyard. Trump sold the Deplorables on Draining the Swamp and then proceeded to hire the Swamp to run his administration. Mitch McConnell epitomizes the duplicity.

    The left/right, Red/Blue, Liberal/Conservative faux battles are precisely the entertainment that the "owners" as George Carlin labeled them want, to keep the bottom 90% distracted & divided. What has changed from the Roman "bread & circuses"?

    https://youtu.be/fT03vCaL-F0

    Reply
    • Avatar Carey says: April 26, 2021 at 1:41 pm

      >IMO, we don't have socialism. What we have seen over the past 50 years is a steady evolution to classic fascism. The merging of Big Business and Big Government. The merging of the National Security State and Big Corporate & Financial Interests.<

      Agree. This isn't socialism at all; it's capital- F Fascism.

      Reply
    • Avatar Eric Newhill says: April 25, 2021 at 9:52 pm

      Andrei, Never under-estimate the stupidity of the typical American.

      My grandfather barely survived the Armenian genocide, made his way to America, joined the Army, was so strac he was promoted directly from private to sergeant in WW1. After service, he organized Armenian business owners in Detroit to arm themselves and successfully fight off the Purple Gang (a Jewish mafia, predecessors of the Italian mafia in Detroit). He made actually money during the depression. Real tough guy.

      He was offered an opportunity to invest in Disney Land (world?) on initial offering. He laughed it off as a con. Who would pay good money to travel across the country to spend time with unskilled actors in stupid cartoon mouse costumes? My father, another street wise tough guy, WW2 vet, and by that time, an attorney and advisor to the family, agreed. Idiotic concept.

      When I was a young man my father and I sat down and did a ballpark calculation of what that offering would have been worth, at present, had my grandfather gone for it. It was a staggering amount. It was a lesson the old man wanted me to learn.

      I understand what you are saying about "big tech" versus the real thing. However, the so called big tech people don't need to be very real or stellar to be highly influential. True quality has always been, and only can be, appreciated by a small few. The masses are always appeased by shallow, crude, garbage. It's a sad truth that the few tend to overlook, because it's offensive to them. Cynics exploit it.

      Reply
  7. Reply
  8. Avatar J says: April 26, 2021 at 6:53 am

    If the Nation has were to fracture into a United States Red, and a United States Blue. Who gets the Pentagon? Or would they even want it?

[Apr 22, 2021] What Do -Woke- Anti-Racists Believe- Here's Three Things You Need To Remember - The National Interest

Apr 22, 2021 | nationalinterest.org

August 12, 2020 Topic: Politics Region: Americas Blog Brand: The Reboot Tags: Woke Political Correctness Racism George Floyd Black Lives Matter

me marginwidth=

me title=

me scrolling=

Skip Ad

me scrolling=

What Do "Woke" Anti-Racists Believe? Here's Three Things You Need To Remember

"If we truly believe that all humans are equal, then disparity in condition can only be the result of systemic discrimination."

by Jarrett Stepman

me title=

In our summer of discontent, of protests and then riots in what many view as a racial reckoning following the death of George Floyd at the hands of police, we've seen previously radical ideas such as defunding the police become the norm.

SPONSORED CONTENT Recommended by

[Pics] The Truth Is, Doris Day Wasn't As Wholesome As We All Thought Money Versed

Quick Poll! Do You Approve of President Biden? Paid for by the Democratic Governors Association

The Most Successful Lawyers In Ledgewood. See The List Attorneys | Sponsored Listings

Not only that, we've seen liberal institutions such as The New York Times bow before "woke" mobs and cancel all who don't conform to the whims of the radical left.

And we've seen corporate America almost universally endorse Black Lives Matter, a radical organization with Marxist roots.

But why?

https://lockerdome.com/lad/12130885885741670?pubid=ld-12130885885741670-935&pubo=https%3A%2F%2Fnationalinterest.org&rid=duckduckgo.com&width=550

These trends haven't happened in a bubble.

SPONSORED CONTENT Recommended by

[Photos] The One and Only WD40 Trick Everyone Should Know The Primary Market

Forget Expensive Roofing (Do This Instead) Roofing | Sponsored Listings

Doctor: If You Have Tinnitus (Ear Ringing) Do This Immediately! newhealthylife.club

Two writers in particular have risen in popularity on the left, dominating national bestseller lists while gathering increased media attention: Robin DiAngelo, a lecturer and author of " White Fragility: Why It's So Hard for White People to Talk About Racism ," and Ibram X. Kendi, director of the Center for Antiracist Research at Boston University and author of " How to Be an Antiracist ."

Although their works are distinct, both writers promote an ideology they call "anti-racism."

SPONSORED CONTENT Recommended by

[Photos] Tom Brady's New $80M Jet Is Ridiculous Bon Voyaged

Here are the Cost Differences Between Cremation and a Burial (See the List!) Cremations | Search Ads

New Jersey Contains The #1 Ranked Abandoned Military Base Definition

These two authors are shaping the modern discussion over "wokeness" and the ideas that are becoming politically mainstream in America, at least on the American left.

It's critical to have an understanding of what they believe.

me title=

For instance, why would a mob opposed to white supremacy attack statues of both a slaveholder and an abolitionist?

Is this an example of mindless, wanton destruction? Or perhaps the rioters are embracing a larger set of ideas that creates a ruthless dichotomy between racists and anti-racists?

SPONSORED CONTENT Recommended by

[Pics] The 29 Most Dangerous Bridges In The World - New Jersey Takes The Cake Definition

[Photos] Kurt Russell Is Celebrating 70 This Year Looking Like This The Primary Market

This Game is So Beautiful it's Worth Installing Just to See Raid: Shadow Legends

Here are three key concepts to which the anti-racists have attached themselves.

1. Racism Redefined

me title=

According to both DiAngelo and Kendi, there really are only two paths any person may take: racism or anti-racism. Being "not racist," as Kendi writes, is not good enough, nor does it mean one isn't a racist.

DiAngelo defines "white fragility," the topic of her book, as a process whereby white people return to "our racial comfort, and maintain our dominance within the racial hierarchy."

me title=

"Though white fragility is triggered by discomfort and anxiety, it is born of superiority and entitlement," DiAngelo writes. "White fragility is not weakness per se. In fact, it is a powerful means of white racial control and the protection of white advantage."

Essentially, if a white person is uncomfortable talking about race or denies his fundamental whiteness, as well as his racism, he is guilty of white fragility.

me title=

In fact, according to the arguments of both DiAngelo and Kendi, even a denial of racism can be construed as evidence of racism.

As several other writers, including Mark Hemingway at The Federalist , have noted, this is what's called a Kafka trap, a rhetorical device "where the more you deny something, the more it's proof of your guilt."

me title=

me allow=

me name=

DiAngelo and Kendi promote a racial variation of common oppressor versus oppressed narratives, seen in many traditional left-wing ideologies . Marxist economic ideology revolving around class is more or less replaced by race in a scenario where there are only winners and losers.

Kendi and DiAngelo argue that racism is not just an individual act of discrimination or prejudice toward a person or a people based on their race.

Instead, racism is redefined as a collective condition leading to inequities in society.

Kendi argues that those whom many Americans see as actual racists are far less dangerous than the real threat of widespread acceptance of color blindness. He writes:

The most threatening racist movement is not the alt right's unlikely drive for a White ethnostate but the regular American's drive for a 'race-neutral' one. The construct of race neutrality actually feeds White nationalist victimhood by positing the notion that any policy protecting or advancing non-white Americans toward equity is 'reverse discrimination.'

Kendi decries "assimilationists" as being essentially as bad as "segregationists."

Assimilation is the process by which group differences are reduced or eliminated within a society to form a common culture.

Kendi opposes the assimilationists, as he defines them, because he says they attribute behavior to the unequal outcomes for different races.

In fact, even asking the question of why different groups of people have statistically differing outcomes in a society may be construed as racist.

DiAngelo adopts Kendi's construction of racism, writing that "if we truly believe that all humans are equal, then disparity in condition can only be the result of systemic discrimination."

The argument essentially is that any racial discrepancies in society are examples of racism.

So, if a society has a disproportionate number of rich white people compared to rich black people, that is racism. If one race has a higher mortality rate from a disease than another, again the culprit is racism.

Kendi is, of course, highly selective in the statistics he cites to demonstrate that "there may be no more consequential White privilege than life itself."

As Coleman Hughes wrote for City Journal : "By selectively citing data that show blacks suffering more than whites, Kendi turns what should be a unifying, race-neutral battle ground -- namely, humanity's fight against deadly diseases -- into another proxy battle in the War on Racism."

Hughes, like Kendi, is black.

2. Colorblindness Is the Problem, and Racist

The concept of equal opportunity is fundamentally rejected by the doctrines of DiAngelo and Kendi. They argue that in a deeply racist society conditioned to white supremacy, equal opportunity under the law perpetuates only more inequality.

Both DiAngelo and Kendi rebuke the idea of colorblindness in how we treat race. DiAngelo does so more in a cultural sense. She argues that colorblindness is essentially a sign of white privilege, a manipulation of the message of Martin Luther King Jr. to perpetuate more racism.

"Color-blind ideology makes it difficult for us to address these unconscious beliefs," DiAngelo writes. "While the idea of color blindness may have started out as a well-intentioned strategy for interrupting racism, in practice it has served to deny the reality of racism and thus hold it in place."

White people must build their racial "stamina," DiAngelo argues, to overcome their white fragility.

The way for white people to do this is by recognizing, embracing, and critically examining collective "white identity" as an antidote to white fragility. DiAngelo writes that "as an insider," she can speak for the white experience, but that she uses her white identity as a way to "challenge racism."

DiAngelo lays on white people the responsibility -- the burden, one might say -- of attacking and defeating racism and "whiteness."

3. Racism Is Solved Through Discrimination

Kendi leans more strongly into creating laws that specifically promote anti-racism. To be effective, he says, they must be discriminatory.

Discriminatory laws, Kendi argues, can be desirable and in fact necessary as a way to promote equity:

If discrimination is creating equity, then it is anti-racist. If discrimination is creating inequity, then it is racist. Someone reproducing inequity through permanently assisting an overrepresented racial group into wealth and power is entirely different than someone challenging that inequity by temporarily assisting an underrepresented racial group into relative wealth and power until equity is reached. The only remedy to racist discrimination is anti-racist discrimination. The only remedy to past discrimination is present discrimination.

As long as the discriminatory finger is on the button of "equity," however Kendi and the anti-racists define it, it is good.

Christopher Caldwell, author of " The Age of Entitlement: America Since the Sixties ," wrote for National Review that Kendi rejects the notion -- stemming from many civil rights advocates -- "that everything will be well as long as we treat people with equality, neutrality, and respect."

"It is illegitimate. It is a 'racist' obstruction," Caldwell added.

Kendi proposes an anti-racist amendment to the Constitution, which he wrote about in a short piece in Politico. It's worth quoting in full:

To fix the original sin of racism, Americans should pass an anti-racist amendment to the U.S. Constitution that enshrines two guiding anti-racist principals [sic]: Racial inequity is evidence of racist policy and the different racial groups are equals.

The amendment would make unconstitutional racial inequity over a certain threshold, as well as racist ideas by public officials (with 'racist ideas' and 'public official' clearly defined). It would establish and permanently fund the Department of Anti-racism (DOA) comprised of formally trained experts on racism and no political appointees.

The DOA would be responsible for preclearing all local, state, and federal public policies to ensure they won't yield racial inequity, monitor those policies, investigate private racist policies when racial inequity surfaces, and monitor public officials for expressions of racist ideas. The DOA would be empowered with disciplinary tools to wield over and against policymakers and public officials who do not voluntarily change their racist policy and ideas.

This proposal by Kendi effectively would end self-government and nullify the Bill of Rights. A cadre of intellectuals ensconced in the Department of Anti-racism would have the power to decide who can and can't run for office, and which laws can or can't be passed based on their interpretation of what is racist.

Again, racist being defined by Kendi as "one who is supporting a racist policy through their actions or inaction or expressing a racist idea."

Which policies fall under the rubric of being racist or anti-racist?

SPONSORED CONTENT Recommended by Neuropathy (Nerve Pain)? Do This Immediately (Simple diduknow.io The Most Successful Lawyers In Ledgewood. See The List Attorneys | Sponsored Listings If You Have Toenail Fungus Try This Tonight Learn More Fungus Eliminator

All of them.

"Every policy in every institution in every community in every nation is producing or sustaining either racial inequity or equity," Kendi writes.

For those who believe they can escape the ugly culture war implications of these ideas and focus on economic or fiscal policies, it's worth noting that embracing socialism and fighting capitalism is a critical element in promoting anti-racism.

https://lockerdome.com/lad/12130885885741670?pubid=ld-12130885885741670-935&pubo=https%3A%2F%2Fnationalinterest.org&rid=nationalinterest.org&width=550

And you will oppose capitalism, or else.

SPONSORED CONTENT Recommended by If You Have Toenail Fungus Try This Tonight Read more Fungus Eliminator This Game is So Beautiful it's Worth Installing Just to See Raid: Shadow Legends [Pics] The Truth Is, Doris Day Wasn't As Wholesome As We All Thought Money Versed

An example of racist policy, Kendi writes, is lowering capital gains taxes .

Therefore, a supporter of lower capital gains taxes -- or even someone who isn't actively opposing lower capital gains taxes -- may be barred from running for or serving in office by a team of unaccountable bureaucrats in a permanently funded federal agency.

SPONSORED CONTENT Recommended by Quick Poll! Do You Approve of President Biden? Paid for by the Democratic Governors Association Surgeon: Tinnitus? When The Ringing Won't Stop, Do This (Watch) newhealthylife.club [Pics] This Is What Hells Angels Do To People With Fake Merchandise Money Versed

On top of that, this agency would have the power to void passage of a lower capital gains tax in Congress.

Gone are notions of individual rights or limited self-government. Gone are constitutional protections of freedom of speech and association.

me title=

Gone is the very bedrock of the system created by the Founders, the Constitution that has bent the flawed but exceptional American system toward liberty and justice.

We have a word for such a law: tyranny.

SPONSORED CONTENT Recommended by [Photos] The Ingenious Reason There Are No Mosquitoes at Disney World Trivia.com [Pics] New Found Ring Of Jesus' Executioner May Alter The Story That We Know Money Versed [Photos] Kirstie Alley Is Celebrating 70 This Year Looking Like This The Primary Market

This article by Jarrett Stepman first appeared in The Daily Signal on August 10, 2020.

Connect Topics Regions
National Interest Newsletter

© Copyright 2021 Center for the National Interest All Rights Reserved

By using this website, you agree to our use of cookies. This use includes personalization of content and ads, and traffic analytics.

More info

https://nationalinterest.org/blog/reboot/what-do-woke-anti-racists-believe-heres-three-things-you-need-remember-166695

[Apr 19, 2021] Perhaps the Biden presidency is the first woke/cancel culture one in history.

Apr 19, 2021 | www.moonofalabama.org

Stonebird , Apr 19 2021 20:33 utc | 36

Perhaps the Biden presidency is the first woke/cancel culture one in history. Not ( necessarily ) for the sexual part, but because wokism is emotional not rational. What is happening in the deep recesses of the Blinken or Biden mind is based on absolute certainty and emotionally ingested tripe.

The original Deep State and democratic manipulation was to give the population a binary "choice" between Trump-bad and Putin-Bad. Any third possibility, that neither were as " bad as all that " was not spoken of in the MSM. For four years, both "choices" were hammered by the Democrats into the supine brains of the US masses. which has given rise to "automatic" and forceful unthinking attitudes. ( All bad because I say so and I am right, and I know I am right because I say so ). It is the basis of our censorship culture. Over four years they have brainwashed themselves as much as the "plebs" .

Then the Democrats "won" the election with a bit of help from the deep state, and found themselves in power.

When Blinken was anchoraged , he expected to tell the Chinese what to do, think and he possibly even expected the Chinese to take a knee to honour the "self-evidence" of his wisdom . He probably got into a hussy fit when they didn't agree with he knew emotionallly or had been told by the CIA, Bowder or Bidens favourite sweet-smellin' lobbyist. What Politicians now do is ; when in a stresssful position they revert to emotional dominated reactions and do not follow orders from the deep state, oligarchs or lobbies.

Now we come to Ukraine and Taiwan. For the center of the democratic party, Biden Pelosi, Blinken, what they "know" is all there is to know . So they don't listen to anyone .

The lobbies, military profit-makers and the Deep State are equally sure they know but they cannot change the brainwashing that they helped install in others.
Washington is emotional and the Intelligence/Military are the cold-killers. Whatever one says the other will contradict it. So we have a forked tongue "Adminstration".

What has happened and one of the aims of both Putin and Xi, is to move a "woke" adminstration out of it's comfort zone. Outside it's usual certitudes. The pressure will now be coming from East Eurasia. In many fields -
ie. Even the Czechs are already walking back their expulsion of Russian Diplomats as they hadn't expected a strong "retaliation". Tough for the five Czechs left in Moscow. All part of the plan to drive home that actions will have repercussions.

******
Donbas? More shelling than ever before but the Russian red line is known. No Children or other civilians to be killed. There is a tweet available, with sounds of shelling in the background and children playing in the street ........ The Ukes have woken up to the fact that a sea "invasion" is possible and now are sending (fast !) tank loaded trains back towards Odessa.

[Apr 14, 2021] Woke-ism is an *elite project*, serving primarily to get the little people to fight each other, rather than the vastly-wealthy Very Few..

Essentially wokism is the method of fighting populism invented by the US neoliberal elite
Apr 14, 2021 | turcopolier.com
Sam says: April 10, 2021 at 11:20 am

Black Lives Matter Co-Founder Receives Backlash for Buying a $1.5 Million House in a Predominately White Neighborhood

https://twitter.com/breaking911/status/1380707163790774273?s=21

The whole BLM/Metoo movement is "political" and primarily driven by media/academia/think-tank elites. Yes, mostly white males and females along with the token members of the "aggrieved" class. I don't get the psychology but denouncing their own race/ethnicity/gender/identity through virtue signaling to achieve political ends is the game. Cancellation and destruction of careers are all part and parcel of techniques to suppress dissent and breed compliance to the overlords.

This trend has not occurred overnight. It is many decades in the making with creeping fascism – the melding of Big Business and Big Authoritarian Government. This is not just Democrats but Republicans too. The division and fracturing of society on the basis of identity is deliberate. Gullibility is no excuse. The vast majority of Americans have fallen for identity politics across many generations. Reply

bwilli123 says: April 11, 2021 at 1:16 am

If the 'woke' movement were actually a revolution that threatened 'the powers that be,' it would never have been allowed to get this far. Reply

  1. Erich Newhill says: April 10, 2021 at 11:46 am

    Walrus,
    I don't know about all of that. As much as I despise "woke" culture, I think these concerns are little overblown; or at least they are in *my* experience as a corporate manager for a major US company. A caveat being the since the Covid panic/woke control of the world, we've all been working virtually and all business trips are cancelled. So there is little to no opportunity for situations to arise.

    I have a couple of relevant rules from which I never deviate; 1. Never discuss politics at work unless it is in a purely analytical way that is related to impact on our business. 2. Do not meet with female employees – whether they be higher-ups, peers or staff – one on one, outside of the office (e.g. not at a happy hour). The former I implemented from day 1 in my corporate career and the latter I developed based on early experience, but not the experience you may think.

    I entered the corporate world in my late 30s and well into my 40s I was a very fit handsome devil (I'm getting fairly long in tooth now, in my late 50s). I have been told by my superiors that I exude a quiet, calm confidence and it seems that people perceive me as being intelligent and polite. Apparently women find that mix attractive. As recently as ten years ago, I had all kinds of women, from work, coming onto me. I know the difference between some harmless flirting and the real thing, though, IMO, as inevitable as it may be, even the harmless flirting should stay out of the work place. An attractive female employee is in a boring meeting with me, I catch her looking at me, she smile coyly, bats her eyes, flips her hair back a little and looks at me again with a sultry smile. That's harmless flirting. Used to happen all of the time. Debriefing over a cocktail on a business trip with a female employee, in the hotel bar, and she starts running her foot up my leg, that's crossing the line. That kind of scenario used to happen frequently too. Married women, single, older, younger, peers, bosses, staff – and, especially, when they were engaged to be married. Are they going to be ticked off and vengeful if I turn them down? Would they destroy me later if I take them up on their offer? I didn't want to find out. Best to avoid the situation.

    Anyhow, it seems to me that hiring high quality people in the first place diminishes the risk significantly. No one with talent and ambition wants to sacrifice a rewarding corporate career by starting trouble over "me too" nonsense. That goes for both the alleged perpetrator and the alleged victim in scenario. So far, I haven't become aware of any accusations or legal issues at work.

    As for the grandfather/woke grand daughter thing, I hadn't thought about that, but, sadly, you have a good point there. Idiot school counselors and poorly raised scatter brained friends can sway a forming young mind to say all kinds of damaging things. Reply

  2. Avatar Peter Moritz says: April 10, 2021 at 12:15 pm

    Pray tell – what is wrong with single sex schools? I grew up in Germany when all schools were either for male or female students, and I maintain I had a more respectful attitude towards females because of that.

    But I forget – sex does not mean anything, as anyone can freely choose Zir, Hir, Eir, Vis, Tem, Eir preferred possessive pronoun for Zir, Hir, Eir, Vis, Tem, Eir preferred gender..which makes establishing schools for about 63 genders ( http://www.hoschl.cz/files/6035_cz_Genders.pdf ) rather improbable . Reply

  3. Avatar Deap says: April 10, 2021 at 1:02 pm

    Time to explore the prevailing wisdom that led to some of those "stuffy, old-fashioned codes of conduct" that maybe were not to silly after all.

    Perhaps they offered more freedom, than our modern version of freedom has afforded.

    Freedom from STDs; freedom from false accusations; freedom of movement in public settings; freedom from drunken harassment and freedom morning after remorse; freedom from solo parent impoverishment -- though the story of the "plucky orphan" was long fodder for coming of age literature classics .

    Just re-watched the Shirley Temple "Heidi" – plucky orphan on steroids, matched only by Anne of Green Gables as female empowerment role models who did thrive in a world of code of conduct restrictions.. Reply

  4. Avatar Jose says: April 10, 2021 at 2:40 pm

    Walrus, unfortunately I have to agree with you. We are approaching the point where husband and wife need to sign a consent agreement to have sex. Young adults' are simply avoiding the subject due to social pressures.

    Our experts are deflecting "Liberal" ideas with other factors:

    https://www.healthline.com/health-news/young-adults-especially-men-having-sex-less-frequently Reply

  1. Keith Harbaugh says: April 10, 2021 at 6:29 pm

    Regarding "the demonisation of White heterosexual Males in all its forms",
    I would like to add some evidence, and some historical background.
    The two links below, of articles written by an anonymous American professor, give some vivid evidence.
    Each link is followed by a quote from the linked page.

    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2020/12/13/academic-hysteria-part-i/

    "In the midst of all of this "inclusion," one can look in vain for anything positive for Whites, Europeans, etc.
    The only mention of Whites, as a group, is always in a purely negative sense."

    https://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2021/04/02/academic-hysteria-part-ii/

    "The curriculum of my institution is to be changed to prioritize "social justice" over all else; indeed, we have been told that we need to de-emphasize actual scholarship, the teaching of objective facts, and providing a truly enlightened liberal arts education in favor of politicized far-left talking points. The entire curriculum is to be subordinated to radical anti-White propaganda. Please note that this trend in American academia is not restricted only to undergraduate education, but also extends into post-graduate education of all sorts: graduate school, law school, medical school, etc. With respect to the latter, the scientifically illiterate and hyper-politicized hysterics of the AMA are used to justify curriculum changes at the level of medical education; one set of political hacks justifies the lies and distortions of another group, and vice versa. All of these academic and professional organizations are completely dominated by the Left."

    I first encountered the demonization of my value system during my stint at Brandeis Univ. from 1967 to 1973.
    There, much to my amazement and shock,
    the soldiers of the U.S. Army were called "babykillers".
    Of course, there may have been isolated instances where Vietnamese children were wrongly killed,
    but it was commonplace to generalize this to the whole U.S. Army in VN.
    Likewise, police were called, for no evident reason, "pigs".

    It wasn't just the U.S. Army and the police that were trashed.
    "Smash the establishment" (sometimes more specifically "Smash the WASP establishment")
    was a commonly expressed demand.
    Also, "the bourgeoisie", or "bourgeoisie values", were to be despised and scorned.
    I am sure there were many at Brandeis who did not support such radical ideas, but they were certainly more common there than in my previous environments.

    As to hatred of whites and the then-mainstream white culture, there were three prominent (non-Brandeis) examples;
    1. Susan Sontag: "The white race is the cancer of human history"
    2. (Somewhat later) Tim Wise
    3. Weatherman John Jacobs, quoted in Mark Rudd's Underground : "We're against everything that's good and decent in honky America. We will burn and loot and destroy. We are the incubation of your mother's nightmare."

    For further documentation, see the excellent article:
    https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/qed/2020/06/white-self-hatred-and-the-cancel-culture/ Reply

    • Avatar Keith Harbaugh says: April 12, 2021 at 8:21 pm

      The claims and asserted experiences of the anonymous American academic cited above are seconded by a named American academic, Lama Abu-Odeh, here:

      National Review: Georgetown Law Professor Decries 'Maoist Takeover' of Academia.
      https://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/georgetown-law-professor-decries-maoist-takeover-of-academia/

      "Terror and dread fill academic workers, professors and staff alike, and it is everywhere.

      A new ruling elite has taken over academic institutions, and it is using its 'minority status' to exercise a 'soft coup'
      "

      She goes on to talk about what she calls
      "the all-powerful members of the victim minority faculty"
      (her words!). Reply

  2. Avatar irf520 says: April 10, 2021 at 6:33 pm

    There's another possible outcome. That is one where the bottom 80% of men (the ones that the average woman thinks are 'below average' in attractiveness) can't get a middle-class job at all. They are limited to jobs which are dangerous (e.g. police officer, firefighter, construction), dirty (refuse collector, sewage worker) or unglamorous (e.g. bicycle-based delivery operative – jobs which the women don't want. The 'top jobs' are all held by women and the small number of men they are interested in. Reply

Fred says: April 11, 2021 at 1:00 am

Walrus,

You left out race. Having had to fire a couple of protected class employees over the years was only marginally better- in regards to the negative blowback on the manager – than the problems you describe. In addition to the grandfathers you should realize father's have faced such false allegations since at least the '80s. Try giving your 2 year old a bath today and see what accusation you might have to defend yourself from in a decade. Thank feminists and the lgbt+ movements for that. walrus says: April 11, 2021 at 9:09 am

Fred, I've never fired a member of a minority. What works better is to declare them "redundant' (ie: their job just disappeared) so its no fault and a tax free $30k – $50k compensation payment on top of their legal entitlements to make it a little sweeter. Fred says: April 11, 2021 at 12:11 pm

Walrus,

These employees committed theft. The last one pre-commited company funds then provided false documentation multiple times to the general auditors office. I didn't fire that one, I had to do the retraining route. He decided to leave on his own accord . Reply

  1. PRC90 says: April 12, 2021 at 9:19 am

    Do these things happen by mass hysteria, or by intent ? The former tends to burn itself out when the promised rewards do not arrive. It would be interesting to work up the chain to the source of the money and intellectual force required to power all this and to co-opt government acquiescence.

    Walrus, may I add two more:

    5. An attempted capture of the new power center, that being instant access to the minds of the public, created by social media in the last fifteen years, in a way proven successful by the lodgement of 'progressive' forces within education systems decades earlier. Nature, and 'progressives' abhor a vacuum, and it's well underway now.
    Nothing decisive would result, merely the capture of newly available ground. Note that existing ground held by established powers are left untouched.

    6. In the US, a division between 'woke' States and the deplorable States, characterized by deliberate legislative differences and measured by the movement of people to States that reflect their ideological preferences. Will the 'woke' States offer full employment economies, and would that even matter to the woke refugees ?
    The key word of point 6. is 'division', and the US cannot maintain it's place in the world in that condition. All of this will not be reversed except by force and with the backing of the majority, even a bare one, of the US population. That force will need to be headed by a non-conforming leader with the credibility to muster it and to administer what comes after, and that ain't Karmala. Reply

  2. Avatar optimax says: April 12, 2021 at 10:07 pm

    A friend of mine's sister went to a therapist who convinced the sister her parents had messed with her mind by performing satanic rituals on her when she was young and and had suppressed the memories. Supposedly, the therapist had helped her recover these traumatic events when, in fact, the therapist had implanted them. This took place in the 80s when many innocent people were accused of performing satanist rituals, sometimes including human sacrifice. There were some real devil worshiping killings but it turned into an out of control witch hunt.

    The sister eventually recovered her sanity after tormenting her family for a couple of years and made up with her parents. Therapists track most of their patients problems back to the parents, based on Freudian theory, even when the problem is drug and alcohol abuse, as it was with this woman. The father was a Methodist minister.

    Today sexism and racism are as over blown as satanism was in the 80s. I wonder what the next media implanted Big Trauma will be? Reply

    • Avatar Sam says: April 13, 2021 at 11:15 am

      I'm not sure how widespread therapeutic malpractice is but at times I wonder how rigorous is the field of psychology? I think it is important to study human behavior but I question if it can be generalized and whether it is capable of capturing nuance. The one problem that I have with the practice is the incentive structure. It is $/billable hour not $/outcome. The incentive is clearly to increase billable hours.

      In any case I recall well the McMartin case and the surrounding media hysteria and witch-hunts. Reminiscent of the current woke and cancel culture hysteria.

      https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-ol-patt-morrison-richard-beck-child-abuse-pizzagate-20190220-htmlstory.html Reply

    • Avatar Carey says: April 13, 2021 at 2:37 pm

      > Today sexism and racism are as over blown as satanism was in the 80s. I wonder what the next media implanted Big Trauma will be? <

      So does this mean I'm not the only one who remembers the McMartin mcScandal?

      It's disappointing but not really surprising to see how easily swayed and led
      the Polity can be.. those very few who rule us depend on that. Reply

[Apr 14, 2021] Outcomes of #Metoo - BLM - Antifa - Cancel Culture by Walrus

Apr 14, 2021 | turcopolier.com

I wrote a post on the above-mentioned subject but I deleted it. I will not discuss the demonisation of White heterosexual Males in all its forms for fear of cancellation. I will instead leave you with my conclusions – which are consistent with The Walrus Law; Governments achieve the reverse of their stated objectives.

Conclusion 1. No white male corporate manager is going to risk their career by engaging in any of the following actions:

– Mentoring female subordinates.
– Taking one on one meetings with any female.
– Participating in any but the most innocuous social functions with female subordinates and certainly not where alcohol is present.
– In fact avoiding any one on one situation with a female.
– It also stands to reason that women will not be employed or promoted if sufficient excuse can be found. There wasn't a glass ceiling. There is now.

Why? Because a female subordinate can now permanently end a males career in a microsecond by the act of alleging any impropriety thanks to #metoo. No proof is required.

Conclusion 2. The British/ European/ American class system is coming back with a vengeance. Young men and their parents will confine their search for partners and social interactions, to females of the same social strata, values, financial resources and background as their own. This is not a guarantee of marital harmony, It does however decrease the likelihood of a male being accused of relationship and career destroying improprieties twenty years after the alleged event. You can forget marrying 'for love' outside your social class.

Conclusion 3. Male behaviour in the upper and middle classes is indeed going to change. We will witness the return of the Chaperone for males. We will witness the end of many mixed sex parties and entertainments because of the ever present threat of denouncement. Expect single sex private schools to flourish. Co -education is an invitation for a young males career to be finished before it even starts – all it takes these days is an allegation made perhaps years and years after the alleged "event". The first a young male will know about it is when he is arrested and handcuffed.

Conclusion 4. The nature of families is going to change. We are going to see the return of stereotyped roles. Case in point? As a Grandfather I have decided I will have nothing more to do with the informal upbringing of grand daughters – there is too much risk that if they go off the rails in puberty or get involved in drugs, mental illness, etc. they will conveniently blame sexual abuse by a relative as the cause. That means I will never allow myself to be alone with them or be responsible for them ever and the rest of the family know it. Period. The personal risk is just too great

I have examples to back up each conclusion but I will not share them with you.

I have not addressed the American race and firearm based issues but I would expect that changes to firearm laws and characterisation of various behaviors as "extremist' will also have the same opposite effect from what Government intended.

6,454 total views, 128 views today

Posted in Walrus | 39 Comments
  1. Bill H. says: April 10, 2021 at 10:51 am

    Indeed. I suspect that if I were of dating age (and single) today I would go on to die celibate. A minority of women have made engaging with the entire gender entirely too dangerous. Reply

  2. Avatar Oilman2 says: April 10, 2021 at 11:14 am

    I brought this up on another blog I read.

    The law of unintended consequences

    We are an adaptive bunch; witness how successful Prohibition was, or the alleged 'War on Drugs'. Look at how Trumps border wall was rapidly shot to hell with a few acetylene torches and some hinges – making really nice gates for the coyotes to run people through.

    It's interesting that there is no actual, physical way that the number of guns out here 'in the wild' is even known, much less can be seized. Guns can be seized by the ATF/FBI/etc. making a huge raid on a single family and killing them all as examples – but once that card is played, the ante will be upped and things will not be as easy for them. The gun grabbers are literally about 200 years too late, as the gun cow is long out of the barn.

    The Covidian Cult is waning finally – in spite of the push by the globalist CDC, WHO, Big Pharma, MSM and many others. It's hard to push fear of dying when there is nothing to base it on any longer.

    So now we are back to Ukraine, where Biden is both well known and well connected. Russia will swat anything approaching her borders, and may swat hard. I would not be surprised to see our puny couple of ships in their sea crippled electronically, again. But Russia doesn't want what NATO and Biden are serving for dinner.

    It's the same old SSDD of world ending disasters to keep everyone afraid of everyone else while the big wheels in government are sending contracts out to their family members and their various foundations using money leveraged against our grandkids.

    57 genders; women cannot be approached without opening yourself to legal actions and yet they are all in the military and government positions in far larger percentages than people realize. Our local school principal was recently accused of "inappropriate conduct" with a female teacher who is so obese she requires an electric scooter to move her bulk about. Having actually seen this female, it was obvious to me, as a man with normal appetites, that approaching her would have resulted in disgorgement of the previous meal and not engorgement of anything.

    It's human nature that when you forbid something unilaterally, it becomes more attractive to many, just for the sake of flouting convention. Perhaps that is what the morbidly obese teacher is striving for?

    We are entering the Land of Unintended Consequences, and there is no way but through.

[Apr 11, 2021] Target Sells Woke Prayer Book- -Dear God, Please Help Me Hate White People

Woke bolshevism is perverted ideology that equals black with Proletariat and white with Bourgeoisie using classic Marxist terminology. See Explaining Marxism- The Bourgeoisie and Proletariat - Shortform Books .
The replace class conflict with race conflict. What can go wrong ?
Professional woke revolutionaries like Chanequa Walker-Barnes who is the author is racial hate prayer (is not this a hate crime?) are similar to Russian Commissars. History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce.
Apr 11, 2021 | www.zerohedge.com

A prayer book called "A Rhythm of Prayer: A Collection of Meditations for Renewal," is a number one bestseller on Amazon in the category "meditation".

One prayer, called "Prayer of a Weary Black Woman," by Dr. Chanequa Walker-Barnes, a theology professor at Mercer University, starts:

"Dear God, Please help me to hate White people. Or at least to want to hate them I want to stop caring about their misguided, racist souls, to stop believing that they can be better, that they can stop being racist."

The "prayer" then describes the type of White person they want to hate -- not the actual blatantly racist ones, but the "wolves in sheep's clothing" who "don't see color", are friendly and accepting on the surface.

" Lord, if it be your will, harden my heart. Stop me from striving to see the best in people. Stop me from being hopeful that White people can do and be better. Let me imagine them instead as white-hooded robes standing in front of burning crosses. Let me see them as hopelessly unrepentant, reprobate bigots who have blasphemed the Holy Spirit and who need to be handed over to the evil one."

"Grant me a Get Out of Judgment Free Card if I make White people the exception to your commandment to love our neighbors as we love ourselves."

This is a sick, insane, religious cult of hateful people. But institutions like churches, schools, and corporations are pushing this blatant racism mainstream.

The book is also available at Target -- a store which banned a book that gave voice to transgender people who regretted their decisions to transition.

play_arrow

hmmmm 35 minutes ago

Maybe include a prayer in your book... "Dear God, Please help me to hate black people. Or at least to want to hate them I want to stop caring about their misguided, racist souls, to stop believing that they can be better, that they can stop being racist."

Md4 57 minutes ago

"" Lord, if it be your will, harden my heart. Stop me from striving to see the best in people. Stop me from being hopeful that White people can do and be better."

Instead of whining...why not just leave?

America isn't the right place for a lot of people anymore...

...so just go.

You'll be happier.

And we'll be happier.

You'll see...

Meatier Shower 1 hour ago

" It was not part of their blood, it came to them very late, with long arrears to make good, when the Saxon began to hate.

They were not easily moved, they were icy – willing to wait til every count should be proved, ere the Saxon began to hate.

Their voices were even and low. Their eyes were level and straight. There was neither sign nor show, when the Saxon began to hate.

It was not preached to the crowd. It was not taught by the state. No man spoke it aloud when the Saxon began to hate.

It was not suddenly bred. It will not swiftly abate. Through the chilled years ahead, when time shall count from the date that the Saxon began to hate."

- Rudyard Kipling

Sol Invictvs 2 hours ago (Edited)

They're worshiping the devil. There's no room for racial hate if you believe in God.

Kanzen Saimin 1 hour ago remove link

"If you or anyone in your household identifies as Black, Indigenous, or a person of color (BIPOC), including anyone with Abenaki or other First Nations heritage, all household members who are 16 years or older can sign up to get a vaccine."

Health Vermont does not explain why there is a racially segregated line for the Covid vaccine -- apparently it's just the woke thing to do these days

Health Vermont does not admit eugenics is in play.

12Doberman 1 hour ago

They've become what they supposedly despise. They clearly have believed their own propaganda. Makes you wonder what's coming next...white's to be deprived of their property?

homeskillet 1 hour ago (Edited)

This is beyond the pale, the elites are pushing for a race ware - chaos and violence. They are the entities that should be destroyed.

jonesbeach 1 hour ago

Progressivism is not a religion of peace.

HonorSeeker 1 hour ago (Edited)

It's more like a cult. Its members are recruited for their vulnerability, for their desperation, and for their willingness to blame others for their failings. The members are groomed, brain-washed and then released upon the nation they are to act like parasites against by sapping the nation's spirit and sowing discord.

Liesel 1 hour ago remove link

I just saw the book on Amazon. Interesting enough, there were "666" reviews. You just can't make this stuff up.

secretspaniel 1 hour ago remove link

Blacks are not behind this, this whole issue is being weaponised to foment a race war to destroy us

JohnGaltsChild 1 hour ago

I refused to go into a Target the moment they started blended gender toy departments.

They're sick.

A Girl In Flyover Country 1 hour ago

There is no stopping the decline of the American empire. I wish I was wrong.

Macho Latte 1 hour ago (Edited)

WOKE HATE IS JUST GETTING STARTED

GET YOUR CHILDREN AS FAR AWAY FROM PUBLIC SCHOOL AS YOU CAN

11. The Public Schools - will ramp up their level of political indoctrination including severe anti-family, anti-white rhetoric and Woke Hate. History will be re-written destroying every level of pride in America. Prepubescent children will be made to question their gender. Heterosexual white boys will be emasculated and demonized. Interracial sex for white girls will be encouraged. The destruction of childhood will be the most horrible consequence of Woke Hate which will be administered mostly by hateful, indoctrinated, white women with children (mothers). The incalculable psychological damage to our youth will last generations. Demoralized, many will become addicted to prescription drugs. Many will commit suicide.

Neo2021 1 hour ago

I guess that's not racist. I stopped reading after learning the author's name; Dr. Chaneqa Walker. I was laughing too hard. Where is the outrage?

Ms No PREMIUM 1 hour ago remove link

People should buy a copy of that. It will be worth money as a Bolshevik relic. This won't last for ever but it's most insane displays will have shock value forever.

NewMouldy 1 hour ago remove link

Like rap music. I remember saying in the 80's "this will only be a fad" (sigh)

secretspaniel 1 hour ago

The elite are really pushing for a race war that they know will cause minorities to suffer most of all - they are literal Nazis and the real racists. Let's not forget that the people pushing this only consider themselves white when it suits their purposes. They hate black and white equally and are total extremists.

Xena fobe 1 hour ago (Edited)

Chanequa has some kind of mental health disorder.

Paranoid or schizophrenic.

Hyper Entropy 2 hours ago

How come no Targets got burned down during the riots?

Huckleberry Pie 1 hour ago

Because the looters were trying to get home with all their 'reparations'. Hard to start a fire, when your arms are full of stolen $hit.

Miler52 1 hour ago

This absurdity needs to stop. Keep stirring the pot with this divisional crap and all hell well erupt eventually. Not all 12.6% of America which is the black population support this stupidity and those that do are imbeciles and incapable of making a difference anyway. Some people are itching for a racial explosion and a completely unsafe America. They will find it very regrettable supporting such a toxic ideology.

5G-Powered Nanobots 1 hour ago

I would bet 90% of blacks in America don't support this nonsense.

mike6972 1 hour ago

It may not be 90%. But it's probably at least 75%.

Miler52 1 hour ago

Whatever the percentage actually is, the majority of Americans of any ethnicity do not support this ongoing assault on Americas ability to respect one another. And the majority of Americans are angry about the open border, the massive, abusive spend, raising taxes, the misleading HR1, packing the Supreme Court, the arrack on the 2nd Amendment, etc. This is all being done by a minority of people to collapse America.

Sol Invictvs 1 hour ago

All race hustlers need rope or lead.

For the sake of humanity.

Kanzen Saimin 1 hour ago remove link

If you've never seen the movie 'Crash', I would highly recommend it. This "Chanequa" reminds me of the character (wait for it...) Shaniqua.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=uAHRs3XBt_s

Ms No PREMIUM 2 hours ago remove link

Here we go again. Constant fake hate crime.

Narrative shattered: 'KKK,' 'White power' graffiti on campus written by Black student

https://www.campusreform.org/article?id=17213

Archimedes bathwater PREMIUM 2 hours ago

That is a FAVE shock fake event. Write a racial slur on the wall somewhere (with a member of the victim class doing the writing), then send a letter to all the alumni from the college president decrying the episode whilst beating the drum for more indoctrination/re-education. When my college did this to me as an alumnus, and I couldnt respond to the college president's email (bounceback), I called the alumni office and cancelled all further contact with the school.

Ms No PREMIUM 2 hours ago

It's a favorite tactic lately.

"The suspect who allegedly vandalized four synagogues in Brooklyn with anti-Semitic graffiti over the weekend has been identified as 39-year-old Emil Benjamin, who is a Jewish man from Brooklyn."

"The person arrested for a spate of anti-Semitic graffiti in New York is apparently just mad about a business dispute and not on a hate campaign against ****; in fact, he's Jewish." (Really, they accepted that excuse? That wouldn't work for us)

"An alleged anti-Semitic attack on a kosher-style café in Winnipeg, Canada was staged by the owners of the restaurant, police now say."

http://www.renegadetribune.com/jewish-man-arrested-for-scrawling-anti-semitic-graffiti-on-brooklyn-synagogues-in-hate-crime/

https://www.theatlantic.com/national/archive/2012/01/suspect-behind-new-yorks-rash-swastika-graffiti-jewish/333028/

https://www.timesofisrael.com/canadian-police-say-anti-semitic-attack-on-cafe-was-staged/

[Apr 09, 2021] Rob Manfred's All-Star Error - WSJ Major League Baseball decided last week to move the All-Star Game out of Atlanta after the Georgia Legislature passed changes to the state's voting laws that many, including President Biden, called racist. Activists urged Commissioner Robert Manfred to punish Georgia. By rushing to do so without first protesting the substance of the law, Mr. Manfred made a serious mistake. The use of "muscle" or financial power to influence policy is an ancient tactic. The term "boycott" has its roots in 19th-century Ireland, where the nationalist politician Charles Stewart Parnell urged his followers not to deal with Charles Cunningham Boycott, a highly unpopular British land agent. A boycott is generally an act of desperation, and the original one was largely unsuccessful. Major League Baseball decided last week to move the All-Star Game out of Atlanta after the Georgia Legislature passed changes to the state's voting laws that many, including President Biden, called racist. Activists urged Commissioner Robert Manfred to punish Georgia. By rushing to do so without first protesting the substance of the law, Mr. Manfred made a serious mistake. The use of "muscle" or financial power to influence policy is an ancient tactic. The term "boycott" has its roots in 19th-century Ireland, where the nationalist politician Charles Stewart Parnell urged his followers not to deal with Charles Cunningham Boycott, a highly unpopular British land agent. A boycott is generally an act of desperation, and the original one was largely unsuccessful. The use of "muscle" or financial power to influence policy is an ancient tactic. The term "boycott" has its roots in 19th-century Ireland, where the nationalist politician Charles Stewart Parnell urged his followers not to deal with Charles Cunningham Boycott, a highly unpopular British land agent. A boycott is generally an act of desperation, and the original one was largely unsuccessful. The use of "muscle" or financial power to influence policy is an ancient tactic. The term "boycott" has its roots in 19th-century Ireland, where the nationalist politician Charles Stewart Parnell urged his followers not to deal with Charles Cunningham Boycott, a highly unpopular British land agent. A boycott is generally an act of desperation, and the original one was largely unsuccessful. OPINION: POTOMAC WATCH CEOs vs. Georgia / The Economic Climb by Mr. Manfred's decision will be Atlanta's stadium workers and local vendors. The midsummer All-Star Game is an exhibition that benefits only the city where it's played. It was reported Tuesday morning that Denver will be the new host. The players will get paid no matter where the game takes place. MLB will get the same television revenue. The only people hurt by Mr. Manfred's decision will be Atlanta's stadium workers and local vendors. The midsummer All-Star Game is an exhibition that benefits only the city where it's played. It was reported Tuesday morning that Denver will be the new host. The players will get paid no matter where the game takes place. MLB will get the same television revenue. The only people hurt by Mr. Manfred's decision will be Atlanta's stadium workers and local vendors.
NEWSLETTER SIGN-UP

Opinion: Morning Editorial Report
Apr 09, 2021 | www.wsj.com

All the day's Opinion headlines. PREVIEW SUBSCRIBE


The talk shows and editorial pages are full of questions. What is the basis for acting so forcefully against Georgia? If Georgia is racist, how can baseball talk of doing business with China? Mr. Manfred failed to spell out specific criticisms of Georgia's voting law. Now he's put himself in the awkward position of having to defend Colorado's voting laws.

During my time as commissioner, I learned that the American people view baseball as a public trust. They want the game to stand for the best and noblest of our national virtues. They see baseball as the repository of their dreams, even as they root for their favorite teams. They don't want, and won't accept, anything that separates them from the game's history and leadership.

Major League Baseball can't become a weapon in the culture wars, a hostage for one political party or ideology. It can't be only for the rich or the poor, nor can it only be for one race, as it was until 1947. Baseball must always stand above politics and its dark elements of corruption, greed and sordid selfishness. It can't go wrong by standing for national greatness.

The situation calls to mind the 2006 Duke lacrosse case, when many erred -- like Mr. Manfred has here -- by leaping to a conclusion based on assumptions rather than carefully considered facts. I've done the same thing, to my regret. Much rides on Mr. Manfred's shoulders so he must be prudent. Perhaps he now sees how complicated these issues can become. I wish him well.

Mr. Vincent was commissioner of baseball, 1989-92.

[Apr 08, 2021] Corporations 'increased' interest in hiring diverse candidates after killing of George Floyd: Year Up CEO

Apr 08, 2021 | finance.yahoo.com

Truth SQ 1 hour ago Here's a crazy idea - how about hire the best person for the job? Reply 4 JBer 46 minutes ago The interest might be there, the candidates probably aren't. Reply 2 Jones 44 minutes ago These statements are just game plays to project an image as being a good company. At the end of the day the higher ups / managers have their own buddies / crownies / clowns that they keep promoting. Reply 2 Yo 15 minutes ago Companies are making public statements because they fear being canceled more than they fear losing money on bad decisions. It is the old Pleasure Pain equation. When the pleasure derived from taking an specific action exceeds the pain involved by taking the action, you are more likely to take the action. When the pleasure derived from taking a specific action is exceeded by the pain of taking the action, you are more likely to not take the action. Corporations are making these judgement calls on everything from social justice, climate change, and the woke religion. Corporations are interested in one thing... how to separate you from your hard earned money. When "wokism" no longer pays, corporations will stop the insanity. Rational people need to start making corporations pay for choosing wokism over rational thought.
Anthony 16 minutes ago The race card over and over. Hire qualified and be open minded and then satisfaction will follow.
eric 1 hour ago Oh good, hiring based on race. What is the worst that could happen?

[Apr 05, 2021] McConnell Slams Outrage Industrial Complex As Corporations Behave Like Woke Parallel Government

This is a classic "divide and conquer" strategy for corporation, which distract population from neoliberal abuses of Wall Street banksters and financialization of the economy. It also helps to suppress the wave of populism, heat from which corporation felt very well. Paradoxically the leaden of the most pro-corporations Party voiced his objections against such behaviour of major corporatins.
Mr. McConnell accused Democrats of spreading misinformation about the Georgia legislation to justify their plans to ram throuth Senate For the People Act , which facilitated voting fraud. The bill passed the House, 220-210. No Republicans voted for it.
"This power grab is impossible to defend, so the left wants to deflect. Instead of winning the debate, they want to silence debate by bullying citizens and entire states into submission," Mr. McConnell said.
Apr 05, 2021 | www.zerohedge.com

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) on Monday warned of "serious consequences" if corporations continue to use their economic power to support 'far-left causes,' the latest being a lemming response to the new voting law in Georgia, according to Bloomberg .

"From election law to environmentalism to radical social agendas to the Second Amendment, parts of the private sector keep dabbling in behaving like a woke parallel government, " he said, adding "Corporations will invite serious consequences if they become a vehicle for far-left mobs to hijack our country from outside the constitutional order."

McConnell's rebuke comes as a number of corporations, including Delta Air Lines Inc. and the Coca-Cola Co., have criticized Georgia's new election law. Major League Baseball moved its All-Star Game from Atlanta, a move endorsed by President Joe Biden .

McConnell dismissed comparisons of Georgia's new voting laws, passed by Republicans, to the Jim Crow voting restrictions for African-Americans. He said many states run by Democrats, including New York, have fewer days of early voting than Georgia's new law requires, and he cited polling showing most Americans favor voter ID requirements . -Bloomberg

"Nobody really thinks this current dispute comes anywhere near the horrific racist brutality of segregation," said McConnell - mocking Democrats for their dramatic Jim Crow analogy.

https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=false&embedId=twitter-widget-0&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1379057301827555330&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fpolitical%2Fmcconnell-slams-outrage-industrial-complex-corporations-behave-woke-parallel-government&siteScreenName=zerohedge&theme=light&widgetsVersion=e1ffbdb%3A1614796141937&width=550px

"Our private sector must stop taking cues from the Outrage-Industrial Complex," McConnell added. " Americans do not need or want big business to amplify disinformation or react to every manufactured controversy with frantic left-wing signaling ."


JimmyJones 2 hours ago (Edited) remove link

Eat a Big "icecream cone" McConnel, you POS. You knew that last election was a complete fraud and you did nothing even worse actively worked against the uncovering and exposing of that fraud. As if we don't see through your fake outrage. I hope you are primaried and replaced.

McConnel you are a Traitor, we all know.

znilboy 2 hours ago

Guess he thinks enough time has passed and we forgot already..

Ghost of Porky 1 hour ago

Nearly 50 years as a conservative in public office.

Hasn't conserved a damn thing.

Buzz-Kill 19 minutes ago (Edited) remove link

Mitch's public service, for the people, has made him very wealthy.

How did that happen? Term Limits PLEASE!!!

Kayman 1 hour ago remove link

Despite McConnell doing nothing about clipping the wings of this Woke Corporatism, at least he is mouthing the words,

[Apr 04, 2021] Russia's Lavrov Warns Of Surging Anti-White Racism In US - ZeroHedge

Apr 04, 2021 | www.zerohedge.com

Authored by Paul Joseph Watson via Summit News,

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov says there is surging "aggression against white people" in the United States and that it is harming efforts to fight racism.

Lavrov made the comments during an interview with political scientists that was broadcast on national television.

"We were pioneers of the movement promoting equal rights of people of any skin color," said Lavrov, adding that "everyone wants to get rid of racism."

However, he emphasized how it was important "not to switch to the other extreme which we saw during the 'BLM' (Black Lives Matter) events and the aggression against white people, white U.S. citizens."

Lavrov also insisted that forces within the U.S. were trying to spread a "cultural revolution" around the world by forcing "diversity" down everyone's throats.

"Hollywood is now also changing its rules so that everything reflects the diversity of modern society," he said, labeling it "a form of censorship."

https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=false&embedId=twitter-widget-0&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1377837946888409092&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com%2Fgeopolitical%2Frussias-lavrov-warns-surging-anti-white-racism-us&siteScreenName=zerohedge&theme=light&widgetsVersion=e1ffbdb%3A1614796141937&width=550px

"I've seen Black people play in Shakespeare's comedies. Only I don't know when there will be a white Othello," Lavrov said.

"You see this is absurd. Political correctness taken to the point of absurdity will not end well," he concluded.

As we previously highlighted , after every mass shooting, journalists and leftists rush to blame white people even before the perpetrator has been identified.

In the case of the Boulder supermarket shooting, this backfired massively after it was revealed that the gunman was an Islamist immigrant from the Middle East.

After the Atlanta shooting attack which targeted massage parlors, the media once again whipped up hysteria over "white supremacy," despite the fact that authorities found absolutely zero evidence the assault was motivated by race.

This led New York Times contributor Damon Young to assert that "whiteness is a pandemic" and "the only way to stop it is to locate it, isolate it, extract it, and kill it."

"He was not fired from his job at The Root and the New York Times refused to condemn him -- such proclamations are what they pay him for!" writes Chris Menahan .

This narrative, in addition to Critical Race Theory, which teaches that all the United States' problems are the fault of white people, has clearly created an atmosphere where race hate directed towards white people is not only tolerated, it is openly encouraged.


Lordflin 6 hours ago (Edited)

I feel as though I have woken up on the other side of the looking glass...

We are the ones on the 'other side of the iron curtain' my friends...

Something of a surreal experience, wouldn't you say...?

r0mulus 5 hours ago (Edited)

It's a convenient scapegoat the hegemons are hoping to hide themselves in while the USA wanes and the USD/American dream slowly melts into a supranational corporate, fascist dystopia. We're a good way on our journey, not too much further to go now. Writing is and has been on the wall.

r0mulus 5 hours ago

I honestly don't know enough about the upper reaches of the "deep state" power structure to be able to say for sure, but I do know that they are interested in dominating everything forever in a self-perpetuating rentier and seignorage friendly autocracy, and that as subjects to their power, we've no rights to fair markets, no rights to fair legal systems, and even increasingly no rights to fair scientific/empirical systems (definition of reality). How could one living with an honest understanding of that situation ever want to support such a society?

Misesmissesme 6 hours ago

South Africa part deux

DPLETTENBERG 6 hours ago

Similar but not quite like South Africa. Here a small minority (16%) of the population is somehow given power and control over the majority.

Christian whites have been ingrained with the idea of forgiveness and turning the other cheek. This belief may well cause our destruction. It's time to value truth over turning the other cheek.

r0mulus 5 hours ago

Well said- I've been curious as to what the thoughts of non-"black" Afrikaaners have been about their society...

two hoots 6 hours ago (Edited)

Life is like the yellow brick road, as you approach the end you discover the many perceptions and beliefs that provided your support along the way are mostly fallacies, manipulations and deceptions. Once there, don't linger on it, accept it and find your peace. Life is.

eatthebanksters 5 hours ago

Except the percentage of the population who are white and who agree the left is nuts is far larger than in South Africa. South Africa didn't need to cheat to win an election.

HRH of Aquitaine 2.0 6 hours ago

As someone who served in the former West Germany during the Cold War, yes, it is a very strange time.

Sir Edge 6 hours ago

Russia's Lavrov Warns Of Surging Anti-White Racism In US

Wow... There goes Russia again meddling in USA affairs by telling the truth ...

chunga 6 hours ago

This Lavrov is an impressive individual. I don't think we have anything like him in the US.

Ignatius 6 hours ago (Edited)

My concern is that Lavrov's statements -- which, in isolation, I agree with -- feeds the narrative that if one is against CRT then one is obviously a Russian agent (aka, more "Russian collusion" BS).

Our current overlords are a clever, though evil lot. Don't underestimate them.

chunga 6 hours ago

The fake news experts will say that. Who cares.

I remember a few years ago there was a fake news conference of some sort and a bunch of the talkers were shouting questions at Lavrov like maniacs and Lavrov just laughed at them, completely un-phased and said "where are your manners?" The guy is clearly cut from a different cloth.

Biff M 6 hours ago

...white people and males. [there. I fixed it for ya]

enjoy your S Africa experience.

SQRT 69 6 hours ago remove link

Big difference in S. Africa where whites were an overwhelming minority to blacks. Here in the US whites are still the majority while blacks are roughly 13%. The intelligent ones know that this is a setup by the ruling class (Anglo Zionist Cabal) to create a polarized society that doesn't notice the show going on right before their eyes, i.e. the Cabal looting the nation and leaving behind a hollowed out corpse.

harvester0fsorrow 6 hours ago

Russian leaders are far more intelligent and honest than ours. Sad that the once free-est nation in the world is now turnimg quickly fascist. no...it cannot end well

WorkingClassMan 6 hours ago

Turning quickly maoist. This is almost the exact same playbook, complete with Red Guard mobs.

TBT or not TBT 6 hours ago

And the Marxist struggle sessions. It's amazing to see my wife's zoom style meetings during the faux plague spending time on trading confessions of guilt for all imaginable bias and insensitivity.

Portal 6 hours ago remove link

It's not entirely about racism.

Democrats want to deconstruct America.

Destroy small businesses, the bastion of free market capitalism. Destroy traditions. Destroy cultural sports. Destroy the military. Destroy the Constitution. Destroy elections. The list goes on...

cforeman44z 6 hours ago remove link

WHO owns the media? If you know, then you will know WHO is behind this cultural revolution and WHO the TRUE ENEMY is.

LeadPipeDreams 6 hours ago

... forces within the U.S. were trying to spread a "cultural revolution" around the world by forcing "diversity" down everyone's throats.

Uh...these (((forces))) within the U.S. have been trying to spread a "cultural revolution" in every country for millenia. The U.S. is simply (((their))) primary target at the moment.

Iron Noob 4 hours ago remove link

Russia wants sanity to prevail so that it can avoid a nuclear exchange with the US. That is why it is trying to make common cause with the sane people in the US.

[Apr 02, 2021] Corporate America's 'Big Lie' - WSJ by Kmberley A. Strassel

So, "black bolshevism" is onthe upswing. "History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce."
And those executives who signed the letter actually are trying to prolong the rule of neoliberalism in the USA, the rule that hurts black population equally or more than white population outside of top 10%.
Apr 02, 2021 | www.wsj.com
ID requirements are no more racist at the ballot box than they are on a Delta flight.

Corporate chieftains last year criticized Donald Trump for denying his re-election defeat. So it's quite a spectacle to see them actively spreading the left's own big lie about elections.

According to Delta CEO Ed Bastian, there is only one reason Georgia passed a voting reform: to suppress the votes of black Americans and other minorities. Georgia's Republican Legislature used the "excuse" of voter fraud to "make it harder for many underrepresented voters" to "exercise their constitutional right to elect their representatives," Mr. Bastian wrote this week in a memo to employees.

Mr. Bastian has plenty of company in the C-suites. Some 72 black executives, including the CEO of Merck and a former CEO of American Express, signed an open letter calling on corporate colleagues to fight "undemocratic" and "un-American" GOP efforts across the states to "assault" the "fundamental tenets of our democracy." Coca-Cola , Microsoft and Apple chimed in, and dozens more are readying outraged press releases.

Nancy Pelosi couldn't be more thrilled. Democrats and the activist left have long honed their techniques for intimidating corporations. They successfully pressured companies into withdrawing contributions from free-market groups, into embracing a climate-change agenda, into refraining from political contributions, into adopting new "social" investment criteria.

Enlisting corporate America to help peddle a patently false narrative is their biggest success by far. The left spent last year using litigation and political pressure to alter and weaken election standards across the country. Democratic lawmakers and the Biden administration moved swiftly to cement this effort with a federal takeover of state election law, the bill known as H.R.1.

Its enactment is still no sure thing, so the left is trying to block election-reform efforts at the state level. Central to this campaign is the dishonest claim that Republicans are launching these efforts only because they lost the White House and because they want to cripple the minority vote. Activists have spent weeks threatening companies that didn't join them with boycotts, protests and the label of "Jim Crow racists," and companies have complied.

Thus the sight of the nation's top business leaders monotonously reciting a fact-free narrative. As they know, state legislatures are moving to reaffirm longstanding rules and restore confidence in electoral systems that were arbitrarily remade during Covid. ID requirements are no more racist at the ballot box than on a Delta flight. Some 36 states have them, and they've been upheld by the Supreme Court. It isn't Jim Crow to codify the use of the ad hoc drop boxes that sprung up last year. It isn't voter suppression to reaffirm that activists aren't allowed to approach voters in line, especially to solicit votes with gifts (contrary to urban legend, the Georgia law allows poll workers to provide water). The Georgia law expands voting, adding early voting on more weekends and providing additional equipment and poll workers in larger precincts.

Mr. Bastian's moralizing memo fails to cite a single one of the supposedly "egregious measures" in the bill that will suppress the vote, although he does stress he hears his employees' "pain."

The letter from the 72 executives misstates the Georgia rules, suggesting the only way to satisfy the ID requirement is with a driver's license, even though "200,000 Georgians lack a license." In fact, voters can also use a free, state-issued nondriver ID, and those who lack one can fulfill the requirement with a Social Security number or even a copy of a "current utility bill, bank statement, government check, or paycheck." The letter suggests the Georgia "playbook" -- enacting rules less onerous than those in many blue states, as Karl Rove has noted in these pages -- is of a piece with "police dogs, poll taxes, literacy taxes." One can only hope Merck is more rigorous when conducting pharmaceutical trials.

Corporate CEOs may think this virtue signaling will spare them the left's boycotts or Democrats' punitive legislative measures. That's a sucker's bet given this week's Democratic plan to siphon $2.3 trillion from corporations to fund new spending. Meanwhile, longtime Republican defenders of corporate activity are rapidly losing interest in aiding CEOs who promote partisan conspiracy theories. Witness Sen. Marco Rubio's fuming tweet on Thursday calling Delta a "woke corporate hypocrite," noting that the company is "business partners with the Chinese Communist Party," raking in "billions of dollars in a country that doesn't even have elections."

Smart executives have long understood the value of political neutrality. Corporate America is now throwing its lot in with one of the most partisan, brass-knuckle, dishonest campaigns in recent political history. It will be a long time mending fences with Republicans -- if that's even possible.

Write to kim@wsj.com.

Copyright ©2020 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

[Mar 28, 2021] If you're looking for a sinister oligarch angle which explains people like Warren Buffett* supporting BLM, perhaps the idea is to tank the values of gentrified urban property again in order to make money by chopping up exurban/suburban farms into tract housing and selling it to the urban refugees for the next 30-40 years.

Mar 28, 2021 | www.unz.com

Alec Leamas (hard at work) , says: March 25, 2021 at 2:22 pm GMT • 3.1 days ago

If you lived in an urban area through the 60s-90s urban crime wave, you could have predicted this with more precision than Mr. Sharkey.

If you're looking for a sinister oligarch angle which explains people like Warren Buffett* supporting BLM, perhaps the idea is to tank the values of gentrified urban property again in order to make money by chopping up exurban/suburban farms into tract housing and selling it to the urban refugees for the next 30-40 years. Then you scoop up the low value urban property anticipating that the normies will actually demand policing again like they did in 1994 they can sell "redeveloped" real estate in cities to the kids who grew up in boring suburbs again. Population churn yielding increased profits for eternity . . .

* a few years ago Buffett got into the realty brokerage business for some reason.

[Mar 28, 2021] Atlantic: Yes, the Racial Reckoning Unleashed Mayhem...But That's a Good Thing!

Mar 28, 2021 | www.unz.com

STEVE SAILER MARCH 25, 2021

Americans are experiencing a crime wave unlike anything we've seen this century. After decades of decline, shootings have surged in the past few years. In 2020, gun deaths reached their highest point in U.S. history in the midst of a pandemic. In 2021, although researchers can't yet say anything definite about overall crime, shooting incidents appear to be on the rise in many places.

... Sharkey anticipated both the summer of anti-police protests and the possibility that souring police-civilian relations would contribute to an increase in violent crime.

Thompson: The subtitle of your book Uneasy Peace is The Great Crime Decline, the Renewal of City Life, and the Next War on Violence . Is it safe to say that the "great crime decline" has come to an end?

Sharkey: I would say it is very clearly paused. What remains to be seen is just how anomalous last year was. There's a possibility that this was just a year when social life was completely destabilized in so many ways, and that resulted in a huge surge of violence that was temporary. That's the hope.

Their public spaces have not been maintained. Their schools are underfunded.

"Underfunded" is a euphemism for "have students with low test scores." E.g., "Washington D.C.'s underfunded schools." Presumably, it means "underfunded relative to some theoretical amount of money, such as a gajillion dollars, that would be sufficient to raise these students' test scores to average."

Unlike The Atlantic , I came up with 274 more murders in Chicago in 2020 and in 103 other cities back on January 6 in Taki's Magazine , which has no paywall.

Since the Racial Reckoning was declared, blacks have been shooting people, mostly other blacks, at a high rate.

Sharkey: My work looks most closely at where crime is happening, not at individual victims. But there are some things we think we know. Intimate-partner violence increased in 2020. So did hate crimes against Asians. But the overall demographics of victims is incredibly consistent over time. It's young people of color, particularly young men of color. I don't see anything yet to indicate that's changed dramatically.

It's all those dark-skinned Tamil Brahmin young men of color shooting each other in suburban New Jersey.


Polistra , says: March 25, 2021 at 9:28 am GMT • 3.3 days ago

"the overall demographics of victims is incredibly consistent over time. It's young people of color, particularly young men of color."

That's it for the victims all right. Tragic for sure. But let's focus on the perpetrators for once, shall we? The perpetrators are bullets , and shots which ring out . These things come from guns .

These things happen all by themselves, of course, so the solution is to make sure that law-abiding people are never in control of these things, which happen. Have I got this right now?

william munny , says: March 25, 2021 at 10:09 am GMT • 3.2 days ago

Sharkey is trying to take a victory lap. As a sociologist in his 30s, he "predicted" that historically low crime rates would not stay historically low, confident he would be proven prescient. He blamed it on not giving enough to blacks, which is catnip to sociologists, the NPR crowd, and the media. His profession and clowns like Coates make him famous in his field because he is available for soundbites suggesting that reparations are necessary. A few years later, when the crime rate inevitably rises, he can say I told you so. He thought it might take many years, but it was only about 6.

On a related note, I am beginning my book on how the introduction of critical race theory into preschools, the banning of racist Dr. Seuss books, Netflix algorithms forcing people to see previews of Beyonce's Black is King every time they touch their remote, and the new privately-funded welfare programs for non-whites only have caused the crime rate to fall from 2020-2021 back to more typical levels. Watch for my interviews before 2030.

Jake , says: March 25, 2021 at 11:10 am GMT • 3.2 days ago
@william munny

Yep, Sharkey made himself a major young academic star, and Steve explains how and why: But crime rates mostly seem to go up and down depending up what Important People want. E.g., from the early 1990s onward, Important People were sick of all the murders in New York City, so New York eventually became the least homicidal big city in America.

The Elites wanted this rise in violent crime, so they could blame racists, the white trash, the Deplorables, Middle America, whiteness, etc. That serves as cover for their Satanic level of wealth accrued at the same time that they are murdering the middle class and reducing the working class to beggary from Big Government.

[Mar 27, 2021] Ghetto Studies and the Wokegensia

Mar 27, 2021 | torrancestephensphd.substack.com

This is not the only example of fake scholarship being employed to confirm the nonexistent and implement damage on the Black community. In Oregon , the Department of Education is urging teachers to register for training in what they called "ethnomathematics." The reason being is that out of the blue they "feel (without research or proof)" that White supremacy manifests itself in the focus on finding the right answer in Math. This is based on their premise that amidst a pandemic, importance should be placed on "dismantling racism in mathematics" rather than teaching skills that make black students competent in Math.

More dumb shit for lack of a better descriptor. Now correct me if I am wrong, if math is so racist, why do more half of Asians/Pacific Islanders ( 52% ) scored at or above the proficient level in math in the United States?

The results from the 2015 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA), from 2015, placed the U.S. an unimpressive 38th out of 71 countries in math and 24th in science. According to the most recent data, the US is behind China, Singapore, Hong Kong, Japan, Korea and ranks 37th in proficiency in Math globally.

The progressive liberal academic is a heretic – an unprincipled person who as George Orwell described in Animal Farm, thinks that some animals are more equal than others. They know what is best for all and as such, all should think like them, be forced to think like them or be censored if one thinks or dares to state otherwise. Thus, in their purview, even the ridiculous becomes sane. Even if it means asserting that math, objectivity and science are inherently racist. The Seattle school district believes this, that math is a representation of white privilege and structural racism. Why, for no other reason than the Oregon department of education does – that showing your work and coming to the correct solution is something black students can't do...

[Mar 27, 2021] Woke Supremacy - Way Worse than White Privilege and Systemic Racism - The Thought Crime-Permanently Banned from Twitter You

Mar 27, 2021 | torrancestephensphd.substack.com

Woke Supremacy - Way Worse than White Privilege and Systemic Racism When you promote Anti-racism, you get Anti-Argument Torrance Stephens, PhD Mar 22 6 2


I am a relic. I am a child of segregation and remember the marches in Memphis during the garbage strikes in 1968. I unlike many today claiming the experience of racism, was born in a black only hospital in Memphis – John Gaston hospital .

Yesterday a friend of mine asked if I saw the Grammy's. I take it he already knew that my answer was no, so he sent me two video clips. I gave up award shows decades ago for in my purview they were merely a reflection of mindless celebrity twaddle. But being the person, I am, I watched and saw something of a pornographic depiction during prime television. Couldn't wrap my head around it, or how this was even considered to be TV friendly given the present environment in which the Looney Tunes French skunk Pepe Le Pew is suggested to propagate the toxic masculinity of rape culture and that Dr. Seuss books are racist. But what would one expect from a collective of folk who mandate having a vagina or the color of one's skin is more important than competency for filling any job or political appointment.

Then again, maybe two black women (questionable) shaking azz surrounded by other half naked black women (questionable) twerking in cages, rubbing their puzzies together is the representation of black female empowerment as defined most likely by white feminist. Strange given that calling them women and the use of the word female reflects the patriarchy (see how dumb these arguments or anti-arguments can be.) Things change so fast that it is difficult to take any of this emotional dissonance serious. Just a year or two back, scientific papers were published and even lauded that theorized about the " overt objectification and dehumanization of Black people "and how " Black women are sexually objectified at an interpersonal level ." Others lectured on " how racist, sexist, and classist ideologies contributed to sexual objectification experiences (SOEs) among African American women " and how "black women are more likely than white women to be sexually objectified and perceived less than fully human."

There is so much going on in the age of woke supremacy that you cannot literally keep up. Used to be that segregation was evil, now they segregate under the progressive guise of keeping Black people safe from white people. Truth of the matter using FBI and Department of Justice data, black folk would be way (more) safer around white folk than another Black folk. I am not hating, just stating a fact, just like blacks are more likely to die from drowning , in particular kids ages 5 to 14 , or a Stroke than by a white cop. But my fault, I forgot that Math is racist. This is how the anti-argument of woke supremacists functions.

All this idiocy started with the agenda of convincing US citizens that this country is the worst and most racist ever has been going on since the 1960's. Each decade it's gotten worse. I believe the goal is to condition people to accept extreme change. People will accept it because they believe our present system is so hopeless and they're winning because it has substituted the significance of narrative over fact and reason. The examples are too numerous to count because the dialectic of woke supremacy is not rooted in science and ergo non-existent.

Take the recent shootings in Atlanta that targeted several message parlors. The quick take for the purpose of narration was that this action was a hate crime and that it evidenced that white supremacy was the cause of this given that the man charged killed eight people, six of which were Asians and two whites. Thus, it was easy for an unsubstituted contention – that this was confirmation of a rising tide of violence against Asian Americans (mostly Korean) based on white supremacy and the words of Donald Trump regarding a virus originally from China was why this happened. Although the record notes this man was a confirmed sex addict, who spent time in rehabilitation for sex addiction and an eye witnesses report he always talked about dealing with his sex addiction by shooting up the message parlors that (lets be honest) take advantage of illegal immigrants and turn them into prostitutes. Dude was on his way to Florida to do the same. Also, data documents that Atlanta is one of the largest hubs for adult and child trafficking. This was too reasonable and fact-based for the woke anti-argument crew. All that mattered was the color of the folk he shot and that he was white, not even to be considered was that one would think a white supremacist wouldn't shoot two white people dead, pay to have sex with Asians in places he had visited or be motivated by a fear of a virus called something by a former President.

There is also avoiding the fact that according to the FBI and Urban Institute , Atlanta has an internal child/human sex trafficking issue , in which minors , many recruited and exploited for sex. It is estimated that around 100 adolescent girls are exploited each night in Georgia via escort services, erotic/nude massage parlors, internet-based exploitation and other avenues. The big cities presently reporting an increase in anti-Asian violence are place like Oakland, San Francisco and New York (large democrat run places where most attackers are non-white Blacks), not Atlanta. Thus, it is possible in the Atlanta shooting, race was not a factor.

Yet this is too logical for the typical woke supremacist so they double down. Once upon a time Kamala Harris was the first Asian American female senator, then became the first African American Vice President and now she over night has changed into the first Asian American Vice President to meet the narrative. The Anti-Argument woke supremacist do not and cannot self-correct for it would support the notion that facts, math, science, reason and objectivity are real, and that they could be wrong.

Sad truth is that this has been occurring since the 1980s in America. The Rev. Al Sharpton had the gumption to suggest that former President Trump inspired this wave of anti-Asian violence happening around the country. He forgets that in the 1990s he led a boycott against Korean immigrants in Brooklyn which resulted in several Korean immigrant businesses going out of business. The same was true during the 1992 Los Angeles Riots which resulted in more than 2,000 Korean-owned businesses being looted or burned (45 percent of all damages caused by the riot). As I recall, none of the police who beat Rodney King were Asian.

The woke know this, and that this is an endemic behavior exhibited by the wokiest Blacks in America. In past tweets, San Francisco school board's Vice President Alison Collins called Asian Americans as 'house n***ers' and has been asked to resign but indicates she will not. This is how woke supremacy is – be racist to others while at the same time claim to be fighting anti-Black racism and white supremacy. The lack of self-awareness is thick. Same is true for Alexi McCammond , the short-lived Teen Vogue editor. She also had to go after her tweets presenting racist tropes of Asian-Americans while in college surfaced. Prior to this, she was wokity woke-woke.

Woke supremacy is dangerous. The problem isn't that the woke want to destroy everything, the problem is that they will take everybody down with them just to divide everyone by skin color alone. Merit-based activities by their axiological nature are racist and equal white supremacy although such has been practiced around the world for centuries prior to the establishment of America. No country that punishes folk for intelligence and hard work can survive. Sad thing is the people who are the main pushers of this behavioral Fentanyl are the wealthiest of the wealthy and most privileged Blacks in America – Lebron James, Oprah Winfrey, almost every dimwit in Hollywood, Joy "homophobic" Reid and Don Lemon among others (one reason most people hate Hollywood and celebrities at this point). Nobody gives a hoot what they think. Only the woke supremacist would consider a multi-millionaire white black hybrid royal duchess oppressed. If you can't concede to this then it's off with your head.

Unfortunately, there will never be an honest media again if we do not stand and fight back. We are too far gone for words and conversations. These people have no good intentions. They want revenge. They have no problem lying to further their goals because they are disingenuous actors to begin with. If Americans aren't ready to stand up and treat these people as tyrants, then it's really going to get worse. Why? Because these people are so focused on grievances they forget to live, and pull everyone down with them. Me, I only live when I sleep, then I awake. Had no reason to become woke for I already was. The thing is with these cats is that like in a clique of cannibals, one day, it's your azz on the plate. 6 2

← Previous Next → Carl Mar 22

It's nice to know that intelligent people are as fed up with woke insanity as I am. Hang in there, doc, by the end of Biden's term (Harris, rather) enough dummies will be on our side to enable the MAGA movement to return in triumph.

[Mar 26, 2021] Every other ad has a mixed couple, every company makes sure their image, etc is associated with "diversity".

Mar 26, 2021 | www.unz.com

Spect3r , says: March 25, 2021 at 8:32 am GMT • 1.5 days ago

@Alfred ent to spend a weekend in Oslo she was shocked how we would go through some areas where you wouldnt see any white people.
If no one told you that was Oslo, you wouldnt had figure it out by yourself.

When i registered to take Norwegian classes, that i was paying, a few days before the course started i was informed that i have lost my position to someone because they had refugee status WTF?? I am paying and still i dont have priority? Their reply but you are European, others need more than you.

Every other ad has a mixed couple, every company makes sure their image, etc is associated with "diversity".
Seriously, is no different from Netherlands, France, etc

[Mar 26, 2021] The US government is demonizing the very backbone of the US military right-leaning white [men] to an absolutely astounding extent. It's like they are trying to collapse the empire. Maybe they are

Mar 26, 2021 | www.unz.com

anonymousperson , says: March 22, 2021 at 7:41 pm GMT • 4.0 days ago

There is absolutely no reason at all for any American, especially white ones, to fight and die for the Zionist-Washington empire. Even America's "decline" is misleading. It is the American EMPIRE in decline, not the continental heartland of the USA itself. Don't join the military.

JoaoAlfaiate , says: March 24, 2021 at 10:29 pm GMT • 1.9 days ago

" .whites have no reason to fight for a government that discriminates against them, replaces them through immigration, and scorns their heritage."

This is perhaps more true and more dangerous than the author realizes.

In the US Army the combat arms-infantry, armor, artillery, combat engineers-are staffed at the enlisted level mostly with patriotic middle class whites from rural backgrounds. Support jobs like cook, field wireman, supply clerk, etc. are populated with folks having a different socio economic profile.

If the very people the USG-and especially the current Administration-are doing their utmost to alienate stop enlisting and reenlisting, well, who is going to pull the trigger?

AndrewR , says: March 25, 2021 at 5:28 am GMT • 1.6 days ago
@anonymousperson unauthorized Capitol tour upped the ante even more. The US government is demonizing the very backbone of the US military – right-leaning white [men] – to an absolutely astounding extent. It's like they are trying to collapse the empire. Maybe they are.

Anyway I brought all this up with this guy and he just said "I don't really follow all that." And for every uninformed and apathetic vet like this guy, there are probably a few uninformed and apathetic 18 year olds who want to enlist. Perhaps the saving grace is that these boys (and girls) will not reenlist like they used to, thus starving the military of NCOs, or at least white ones.

Good luck Uncle Shmuel: you're gonna need it

By-tor , says: March 25, 2021 at 4:08 am GMT • 1.7 days ago
@JoaoAlfaiate

In the US Army the combat arms-infantry, armor, artillery, combat engineers-are staffed at the enlisted level mostly with patriotic middle class whites from rural backgrounds. Support jobs like cook, field wireman, supply clerk, etc. are populated with folks having a different socio economic profile.

If the very people the USG-and especially the current Administration-are doing their utmost to alienate stop enlisting and reenlisting, well, who is going to pull the trigger?

Hopefully, it will be Re'derrik, Enrique, Mohammed, Aahan, Chao, Stevie ( formerly Sally ) and Juan.

Anonymous [374] Disclaimer , says: March 25, 2021 at 8:51 am GMT • 1.5 days ago
@AndrewR Concept of the operation is to turn the US into a South Africa or Zimbabwe analog: not influential internationally, but with a regime protection force and no law to speak of. To do this, the US military must be turned from a combat force into a regime protection force. The US Army has largely given up direct combat employing conventional infantry, has realized that special operations don't have a strategic effect (it's essentially a force multiplier, an analog to the "forlorn hopes" of medieval warfare). That is, the US Army is no longer a combat force. It is not, however, a regime protection force and cannot be with current personnel. It would have to be re-populated (as was academia) before it can be fully converted into a regime protection force.
KenH , says: March 25, 2021 at 11:45 am GMT • 1.4 days ago

Whites who don't hate themselves should welcome America's geopolitical decline and eventual displacement. Anything that weakens this anti-white satrapy leading to its total collapse is a good thing.

[Mar 15, 2021] History repeats and now identity movement replicates some Bolsheviks practices; it is clear to what end this lead

"Woke" racism is a form of financial oligarchy control of population. Specifically the attempt to rule by classic "divide and conquer" strategy and hide the problems connected with the collapse of neoliberalism in the USA under the smoke screen of racial injustice. So yes this is replication of Bolshevik's practices.
Notable quotes:
"... I am appalled at what is currently occurring in schools in the U.S. Sadly, under the guise of progress, history is repeating itself in the country I chose to escape the nightmares of my early childhood. ..."
"... Winter Park, Fla. ..."
"... East Amherst, N.Y. ..."
Mar 15, 2021 | www.wsj.com

Originally from: Dividing by Race in Schools Is Destructive - WSJ

Mr. Bartning's account of his children's grade school's new "curriculum" hit a nerve in me. I grew up in Poland, born shortly after World War II, so my early childhood experiences included attending school in Stalinist and communist times.

We, too, were encouraged to report on each other and our parents: their habits, what radio stations they listened to, etc. Since kindergarten we were spoon fed stories of heroic young pioneers who, as activists, valued their country's leaders and its agenda above their own families. We were taught two versions of the history of our country: one, official and propagandized in school, the other, real and truthful at home. My parents later told me they were afraid I would say something in school which would result in them being arrested.


I am appalled at what is currently occurring in schools in the U.S. Sadly, under the guise of progress, history is repeating itself in the country I chose to escape the nightmares of my early childhood.

Barbara Anderson

[Mar 12, 2021] Mediocrity Is Now Mandatory by Andy Kessler

Is not this a new variant of Soviet promotion of sons and daughters of "workers and peasants" in university education on the new level.
Notable quotes:
"... But what colleges love more than anything are untalented, hard-working individuals that will stick around for years to get that degree. The tuition money just keeps rolling in and it doesn't matter whether it is mom and dad's money or the governments. ..."
"... Why do you think colleges have separate categories for military members using the GI Bill? Because even if they're dull the college knows they will pay their bill. ..."
Mar 12, 2021 | www.wsj.com

Feb. 7, 2021

Has an era of American mediocrity begun? In January the College Board announced it would eliminate the essay portion of the SAT, as well as all of the separate SAT subject tests. Their stated purpose was "reducing and simplifying demands on students." Such a burden.

One high school near me just dropped freshman advanced-standing (honors) English "to combat the effects of academic 'tracking" because it "ultimately separates students of different socioeconomic and racial backgrounds." It turns out that middle schools from lower-income areas aren't adequately preparing their students for high school. So rather than fix that problem, they dumbed down high school.

... ... ...

Virtually all universities and now many companies have D&I departments, for diversity and inclusion. Sounds worthy. But as far as I can tell, the No. 1 job of a D&I department is to hire more people into the D&I department. No one ever mentions excellence.

T Terrence M Ryan SUBSCRIBER 4 weeks ago Regression towards the mean is now more than a statistical phenomenon, it is a policy. 5 Share link Report B Barbara Shamah SUBSCRIBER 4 weeks ago This has been going on for a long time. By dumbing down admissions for everyone, it's just now more open. China doesn't have to lift a finger. Self destruction is here 19 Share link Report B Blanche O'Brien SUBSCRIBER 1 month ago It's true that colleges are making it "easier" to get in or more "holistic" as he says but that's because enrollments are down. The open admissions policies like some have are making it harder for other colleges to "compete" in the capitalist framework that they are all now using. So let's face it, it all comes down to money. So what the author is really saying although it's probably not his intention ha ha, is that capitalism is driving mediocrity! Don't get me wrong, the Boomer generation really did everyone a disfavor by raising an entire generation of millennials to think that everyone is a "winner" and to not be able to handle criticism. However, I think his argument is a bit off here as to who (or what) is to blame. J joseph barbato SUBSCRIBER 1 month ago The article mentions Hampshire College. Both the author and the readers might appreciate this additional information about the school. Enrollment between 2018 and 2019 was down 94%.

https://www.boston.com/news/education/2019/05/09/hampshire-college-15-students-fall-2019 Doug Eaton Doug Eaton SUBSCRIBER 1 month ago Merit is now governed by the "progressive" powers that be determining if the person thinks and votes they way they do. If they do, the candidates are automatically deserving. If they don't they are cancelled.

In other words, conservatives and Christians need not apply. 3 Share link Report W William McIntire SUBSCRIBER 1 month ago Mediocrity isn't new. This trend has been in place a long time. When I was in college in the early 80's it was already in place. After recently being downsized in the engineering industry, where I worked for over 30 years, I would note that college grads generally have no idea what the heck they are doing, as a rule. I got to the point that more than 20 years ago I would not hire a new college grad from an engineering school to work in my department. Few of them can think and even fewer can articulate a basic sentence much less develop a study report. The last 10-15 years have been the worst with functional illiterates being sent to my office for interviews that knew nothing about the company they were interviewing for and could not demonstrate basic engineering skills, much less communication skills. Their entire lives are centered around social media and without cell coverage they are lost. I think about this every time I cross a bridge or overpass these days. Doug Eaton Doug Eaton SUBSCRIBER 1 month ago

Mediocrity isn't new.

What is new is the institutionalization of it.
C
Charles Clemmons SUBSCRIBER 1 month ago Thank goodness for Equity! College professors will no longer have to fend off those bright students who ask pesky, penetrating questions. Their classes will be filled with nescient victims giggling over their tired Bon mots. One can hardly wait for a stampede of stupefication to hit grad school and the employment market. This re-defined Know-Nothing movement should last at least as long as it takes an equity-selected crew to crash a space vehicle. Like thumb_up 6 Share link Report D Deirdre Hood SUBSCRIBER 1 month ago If you haven't watched the movie "Idiocracy", please so so. We are there now...
Like thumb_up 6 Share link Report P Paul Runge SUBSCRIBER 1 month ago Vonnegut nailed it with his short story "Harrison Bergeron". Welcome to the monkey house. 9 Share link Report R Ross Johnston SUBSCRIBER 1 month ago I believe this was all indirectly predicted 25 years ago in the Bell Curve. Ever since I read that book (which you can't unread) I wondered how it would play out in a diversifying world - and now I see . Outperformance is now called "unfair advantage" and merit is looked upon like Pol Pott's soldiers in the "Killings Fields" who asked for the "academics" to step forward for "reeducation" - which landed them dead in a field with a plastic bag tied around their head.

It really is the dumbing down of America, but I'm sure it's a global phenomenon. The SAT Board has already had to dumb down the test twice over the past 15 years to keep scores moving up as the cohort taking the test scored lower and lower on average. The elimination of the modules is a logical next step if want to dumb it down further.

I doubt you want your Medicare/Medicaid covered heart surgeon to be from the Bahama's School of Medicine - hired for reasons of diversity quota - with no class ranking - do you? C Christopher Petersen SUBSCRIBER 1 month ago You don't get it, do you?

Colleges created diversity programs to create a larger clientele. Colleges still want the smartest kids because having alumni become Nobel Laureates creates bragging rights. Colleges also want really smart kids that are going to drop out and create amazing things because their name will be attached to them forever. But what colleges love more than anything are untalented, hard-working individuals that will stick around for years to get that degree. The tuition money just keeps rolling in and it doesn't matter whether it is mom and dad's money or the governments.

Why do you think colleges have separate categories for military members using the GI Bill? Because even if they're dull the college knows they will pay their bill.

As for government...If you're mad about mediocrity and you got a stimulus check, either donate it or put it in the shredder. If not, you're complicit in this.

P Parul Dutt SUBSCRIBER 1 month ago This article feel like a rant that colleges have done away with SAT and there is an undesired focus on Diversity and Inclusion. While I agree that America must strive for exceptionalism , the author seems to be blind to the challenges that exist for underprivileged students and minorities. Challenges are real and the playing field is not leveled.

There has to be conversation on equitable education so that an underprivileged child has an equal chance of success. Also, don't forget American colleges are not producing engineers and technologists but relying on foreign students to fill the STEM void (I don't have statistics but Silicon valley is built on the labors of engineers who come to the U.S. for higher education or better future). Just doing away with the SAT may not be the ideal solution but maybe the beginning of a conversation. R Ronald Ganim SUBSCRIBER 1 month ago Maybe a wealth tax isn't such a bad idea. We could confiscate the wealth of the tech oligarchs and thereby eliminate their power to censor us on social media. How about a law that no one can have wealth greater than $20 million (I'm under that figure)? John Kerry would have to give up his private plane (thus helping the environment) and Jack Dorsey wouldn't dare shut down anyone else on Twitter. As conservatives, maybe we should start thinking outside the box! B bruce miller SUBSCRIBER 1 month ago I have elsewhere advanced the same notion.
Why does progressivity in the IRC stop at $500K? Is an accountant, electrician or other small business owner, earning $500K on the same footing as a tech plutocrat earning $50 million? Of course not. Why are we defending these people who do not have our best interests at heart? Tax the earnings above $1 million per year at escalating progressive rates. Heck, Buffet wanted that. Oblige him! 1 Share link Report J Jean Samuel SUBSCRIBER 1 month ago I am a "woman of color" married to a White man who's a pediatrician. I am an electrical engineer with an MSc in mathematical sciences. I earned my degrees and my well paying job through hard work and sweat equity same for my husband. We both find racial preferences and the dumbing down of college level courses simply revolting. Of course if you choose to major in modern dance you have earned your job at Starbucks. Mediocrity only wins out if you allow it.
G
George Rebovich SUBSCRIBER 1 month ago Kudos to you and your husband.

My parents were the first generation to be born in America. My father worked in an oil refinery most of his life as an hourly wage earner. We lived modestly and within the family budget. My father worked many overtime shifts so his children could go to college, the first generation of our family to do so. We learned the value of education, hard work and postponing gratification for long-term happiness.

My daughter is an MD ... the story line of how that happened is similar to my brothers and I being the first to go to college.

America is a great country that offers opportunities to citizens that are only dreams elsewhere. But those opportunities don't arise from mediocrity. J Jason S SUBSCRIBER 1 month ago I'm not sure the author really understands why colleges and universities are dropping standardized tests. It's not that they're unfair. That's just the cover story.

The real reason is the trouble Harvard got into from excluding Asian Americans. Those kids had the grades and the test scores and used them to prove (in court) that Harvard wasn't using those metrics to determine which kids to admit. Could (or still might) cost Harvard a lot of money. :-s

But here's the thing, if you don't use standardized test scores as part of your admission process, well, guess what, you can't be sued as easily for recruiting/admitting whoever you want.

This opens up the door to going after students from richer families who can actually pay full price. Who really cares about test scores anyway when your budget is on the line?
L
LEONARDO ROSENFELD SUBSCRIBER 1 month ago Mr. Kessler touches on a dozen examples of what he sees as liberals disincentiving merit in favor of mediocrity. What he seems to ignore is the fact that most people who have been successful in life have had some help along the way, whether through the privilege of their parents, a high-quality education (afforded to those who can pay for it through private school or living in expensive suburbs), or another form of support (connections, etc.). If you want to see more children grow up to be successful and get to fulfill their own version of the American dream, then recognize that our society is not equal and that the American experience is not the same for everyone.
The initiatives Kessler cited are far from perfect, but at least they're acknowledging that there is a problem that continues to grow with each decade as income inequality becomes more extreme. Maybe this isn't a problem for you, Mr. Kessler, but it is for many others who work hard and still cannot get ahead. G Greg Barry SUBSCRIBER 1 month ago I will agree with those challenging "American exceptionalism" in as much as I believe that we will enjoy no special protection from our bad decisions. Take a look at historical examples of what embracing class warfare and mediocrity yeild on a societal scale, and you have a window into our possible future. Like thumb_up 3 Share link Report J Juan Vega SUBSCRIBER 1 month ago Mediocrity and the pursuit of what is trivial and irrelevant. Never in the history of the world has a great nation chosen to commit self immolation by become deaf, dumb, and blind.

However, to those that think that they have won the recent events are not unlike when Churchill was confronting the reality of Nazi Germany after Dunkirk when members of his own party were trying to convince him to surrender and negotiate. Those of us that look beyond the horizon of the next few years realize that now is definitely the time to stand.

I thought that as smart as the left was in orchestrating the electoral coup they need to see that it did wake a sleeping giant of 75 million that went out and voted. We do not need Trump to keep the dream of a free, fair, and proud America. Freedom is in this nation's blood and soul.

Many of the 80plus million already see the mistake and how they we lied to. Hunter Biden's thievery is true. Catholics that voted for Biden will see him as a hypocrite.

[Feb 27, 2021] The Democrats Role in Distracting with Identity Politics - Michael Hudson

Feb 27, 2021 | michael-hudson.com

Vrettos: 1. We're waiting to see how the rhetoric of the new Biden administration will play out in actual policies.

Hudson: Biden's long political career has been right-wing. He's the senator from Delaware, the country's most pro-corporate state – which is why most U.S. corporations are incorporated there. As such, he represents the banking and credit-card industry. He sponsored the regressive bankruptcy "reform" written and put into his hands by the credit-card companies. As a budget hawk, he's rejected MMT, and also "Medicare for all" as if it is too expensive for the government to afford – thereby making the private sector afford to pay 18% of US GDP for health-insurance monopolies.

Hardly by surprise, Biden has chosen cabinet members as corporate lobbyists, including the new Secretary of Defense. And on February 9 he invited Jamie Dimon and other business leaders to the White House and asked them what they recommended. These billionaires said that they didn't need $1.400, so why should anyone else? They pretended that spending money might cause inflation – yet we are in the midst of debt deflation and falling disposable income for most families.

Biden's prejudices are why the Democratic National Committee pushed him as their candidate over Sanders, and why Rep. Jim Clyburn made his pharmaceutical industry backers happy by pushing Biden over the top in South Carolina, delivering the black vote in that state's big primary.

What amazes me is the ability to attract this vote despite the degree to which Biden has sponsored legislation that hurts blacks and other minorities: his cutbacks in welfare spending, his anti-crime laws falling mainly on the black community, his bankruptcy laws, and of course his denial of universal public medical care to that part of the population with the highest death rates, shortest lifespans and worst medical care.

He has tried to cover up this history by appointing Neera Tanden as head of the budget, claiming that she's a progressive presumably simply because she's non-white. Yet she's a leading opponent of Bernie Sanders' Medicare for All proposals.

V: In our polarized economy, wages have stagnated since 1971 – home ownership rates have fallen as foreclosures, evictions and homelessness have jumped dramatically during the 2020-2021 Covid pandemic.

The big decline in home ownership was the result of Obama's double-crossing his campaign promises by bailing out the banks and leaving all the junk-mortgage debts and other fraudulent loans on the books. This led to foreclosures and evictions of about 9 million American families, most of them Hispanic and black. Home ownership rates plunged from 68 to 61 percent of the population (an enormous and rapid 10% drop).

The covid epidemic is leading to enormous arrears mounting up – for renters and for mortgage debtors. Evictions have been suspended by moratoriums that expire in March or April, and unpaid mortgages have been added onto later due dates (with appropriate penalties making this remunerative for the banks).

So the question is whether Biden can outdo Obama in reducing U.S. home ownership rates by another 10% -- say, to just 56% of the population.

Let's look at what could be done – today and a decade ago. Obama and Biden COULD have written down the junk mortgages to realistic market prices (and thrown the mortgage brokers and bankers in jail for fraud). Instead, they supported the fraudsters against the voters who had been promised "hope and change." Most of the millions of foreclosed homes were bought by absentee owners and turned into rental property. Companies such as Blackstone were major players. The evicted families entered the rent market – and U.S. rent charges have soared. So consumer income has been spent much more on real estate, finance and insurance than for goods and services.

V: It's most severe and unstable at the bottom of the housing market where tenants who have lost jobs have amassed $11 billion in rental arrears -- a broader measure which includes all delinquent renters puts the number at $53 billion.

There are two kinds of results. The first will be an enormous accrual of back-rent debts and mortgage arrears to be paid off. For commercial businesses such as restaurants, these arrears are so large that they probably will choose to go out of business rather than paying all the profits for the next few years to their landlords.

Unless these debts are written down, most of the population is too debt-strapped to buy goods and services. So corporate profits can come only from rising prices, or getting government subsidy,

A second result is going to be a rise in homelessness in many cities. Entire camps of evictees will be forming in tents, perhaps in the major parks – or on the subways as in the past.
Many properties will be sold – yet housing prices are still rising.

V: What are some of the specific racial effects of this housing and job crisis, what's been the Bidden administration's response so far and how does this relate to your own work on racial reparations measures?

The low rates of black home ownership reflect a vicious history of red-lining. Limiting the areas where non-whites can buy has gone together with charging much higher interest rates than white buyers receive.

Housing is the basic criterion for joining the middle class. And for a century, blacks were excluded, not only by banks but from the government mortgage-insurance programs dating from FDR's reforms in the 1930s. That's what made black buyers "more risky" and hence charged higher interest rates.

I grew up in Hyde Park, in Chicago. The University of Chicago and its property management companies were among the worst abusers. For them, a "free market" meant a market free of blacks. But in the late 1950s they saw that they could do "block busting," that is, selling a home in a white neighborhood to a black buyer. This panicked the neighboring owners, who sold their homes. The buyers were largely the speculators, who flipped them to black buyers at marked-up prices.

That happened on my block, on 48th and Dorchester, a block from where Obama has bought his home. Once a few houses had changed hands, Mayor Daley condemned the block. My house was torn down, as were others, and the land is not gentrified.

To put the issue in perspective, think of the situation in 1945. That is when the great increase in middle-class wealth – today's middle-class net worth – took off. It was limited to white people, because they were the only people who qualified for the great increase in net worth created by the house-price boom over the past 75 years.

The norm was that banks limited their mortgages to a level that would absorb up to 25% of a buyer's salary. The buyer would get a self-amortizing mortgage, to be paid off in 30 years free and clear. This limit on debt leveraging kept housing affordable.

You and I have spoken about the issue of black reparations before. It's very hard to pay reparations for slavery, because the enslaved families have died long ago. The reparations need to be paid to the living – and after all, it's the living blacks who remain injured.

There is one way to make the black population economically as resilient as the white population has been. That is to give it the same deal that created most white middle-class wealth. The government should buy or build homes – private homes, just like white neighborhoods, not public housing. They should offer buyers the same deal that was given in 1945. Any black family would be given a home, with a mortgage of 25% of the household head's income, to be amortized over 30 years.

Suppose the black buyer earns the minimum wage, or about $25,000 a year. Then 25% of this would be $6,250 – just about $500 a month. Over 30 years, the buyer would pay $187,500 – much of it in interest, guaranteed by the FHA.

As a practical political matter, of course, such a windfall would have to be offered to all Americans across the board. Hispanics and white poor would qualify.

That is the only way to create economic resilience of a class that has been excluded on racial lines, and which remains excluded today.

Without special subsidy of this sort, there cannot be any serious talk of equality. Minority buyers were the great victims of the junk-mortgage run-up and the Obama evictions.

V: In a recent N.Y. Times piece, David Leonhardt raises the question of why the U.S. economy has fared so much better under Democratic presidents than Republicans?
In fact, he argues the gap is "startlingly large" when one measures annual growth rate, Gross Domestic Product growth rate, jobs, incomes, productivity -- even stock prices.

Well, the New York Times has been the leader in "fake news," not least for its support of real estate and financial interests, and of the Democratic Party.

The focus on growth rates as measured by GDP is a travesty of reality. Since 2008, GDP for 95% of Americans has actually declined. We are still in the Obama Depression – that was the state of affairs when the covid-19 crisis hit. Pavlina Tcherneva at the Levy Institute at Bard College has produced the statistics.

When debtors fall behind and have to pay penalty interest rates to banks and credit card companies, this is counted as an "increase in GDP," classified as "financial services." As if the banks are providing a service by charging higher fees to indigent debtors who are unable to keep current on their living costs.

About 7% of GDP is hypothetical "homeowners rental value" – what homeowners would have to pay themselves if they rented out their homes to themselves as tenants. As rents have risen (largely by absentee owners who bought homes that were foreclosed), this increases GDP. It leaves out minority owners, whose home ownership rate is much lower than that of whites.

What The New York Times and others looking at GDP leave out of account is how unequal the distribution of wealth and income have become since 2008, and indeed since the 1980s. Economists are now talking about a K-shaped recovery: up for owners of stocks and bonds (about One Percent of the population owns something like 80 percent of these securities), and real estate. But wage earners are being squeezed. The "recovery" is not a recovery for them. It's a boom for the wealthy, for the rentier class, mainly in the Finance, Insurance and Real Estate (FIRE) sector.

That sector is the main audience for The New York Times. And most of the Democratic Party's donor class comes from the FIRE sector. Despite this, the Democratic success at identity politics has created a political situation in which only the Democrats can enact anti-labor and anti-black policies, because their politicians are able to deliver the labor and black votes.

I don't see how there can be real progress unless the Democratic Party is replaced, at least with the DNC leadership that has turned its politics into demagogy. Its identity politics is based on every identity except being a wage-earner.

V: Central to Biden and America's neoliberal vision of world order is an economic philosophy of privatization and financialization. How do you think this will play itself out in the Biden administration's foreign and economic policy of military spending and arms sales and use of military threats and force if necessary, to enforce U. S. international dominance and technological hegemony?

Biden has spent his career defending the financial sector, and its leading policy is to privatize basic infrastructure. That means blocking governments from providing basic services at cost or on a subsidized basis – education, health care, roads and communications. Yet that is how America became the leading industrial economy from the late 19th century onward. Financialization and privatization have left it a high-cost economy, uncompetitive in world markets. that is why the economy is de-industrialized.

Privatized and financialized economies are high-cost. America spends 18% of its GDP on health care – far more than any other country. And then there is the military budget. A year ago January, Biden wrote an article in Foreign Affairs in January 2020 promising that his incoming "foreign policy agenda will place the United States at the head of the table."

So what is he going to lead? He's already said that he's not going to negotiate with Iran, but to keep the Trump administration policies in place. He's appointed neocon hawks to leadership positions, especially Victoria Nuland and other anti-Russians. Biden seems to want to use sanctions to isolate countries he sees as rivals or enemies – which is turning out to be a rising share of the world's population, from Russia and China to Venezuela and Iran.
The reality is that the United States is isolating itself! It is trying to block Europe from importing Russian gas, and insisting on U.S. IT monopolies directed against China. And Biden has as little respect for treaties as Trump had – that's why he's retaining Trump's withdrawal from the Iran deal.

Even if Biden makes a new treaty, Congress would have to approve it. But Congress has remained firm that no foreign countries can set policy for the United States. It therefore insists on not subjecting itself to any international rule of law not drawn up by its own political donors.

The looming global fracture is becoming a fight against the most basic organizing principles of economies throughout history. All successful economies have been mixed. And to promote survival and prosperity, it is necessary to subordinate private gain-seeking to public objectives benefitting the 99 Percent, not just the One Percent.

That isn't Biden's policy or any other Democratic or Republican policy.


V: You see a basic conflict between financialized rentier economies and democratic-socialist ones that seek to promote public objectives benefiting the 99 percent, not just the one percent.

Privatized economies are high-cost economies. This is mainly because basic infrastructure is a natural monopoly: roads and other transport, communications, the post office. When they are privatized, they are run for a profit – consisting mainly of monopoly rent, over and above normal profits, plus capital gains as these rentier claims are capitalized into stocks and bonds at rising prices.

The policy of American industrial capitalism in the 19th century is the same as that of socialism: to minimize the cost of living and doing business. Privatization is largely responsible for de-industrializing the U.S. economy. While leaving 95 or 99 percent of the population to stagnate, it has been a bonanza for the 5 to 1 percent.

V: Could you expand on what you mean by that conflict and where you see the Biden administration heading on it?

The conflict often is put by juxtaposing Wall Street to Main Street – that is, the FIRE sector to the industrial goods-and-services economy. Wall Street's objective is to increase wealth. This is done largely by capital gains, not by hiring workers to produce more goods and services – such investment is done mainly abroad by today's multinational firms.

V: How does the $1.9 trillion stimulus aid package fit into this debate?

I don't think you should call it a "stimulus." It's disaster relief. The idea is to catch up. The aim should be to at least put the economy back where it was before – that is, still in the Obama Depression.

What WAS a "stimulus" was the $6 to $8 trillion created by the Federal Reserve to buy stocks and bond, including junk bonds, to fuel the Wall Street boom. That is the essence of the K-shaped recovery. Rising prices for wealth, falling wages and net disposable income for living labor, after deducting the payments to the FIRE sector that families have to pay off the top – rent and debts, medical insurance contributions, FICA paycheck withholding (the most regressive tax), and monthly payments to privatized utility monopolies.

The $1.9 trillion checks of $1,400 or $2,00 actually should be sent out monthly, not part time. Europe pays its laid-off work force 80 percent of their normal wages, so that they will not be plowed under by the covid shutdowns.

V: There's profound disagreement about how to handle increased bankruptcies here and in Europe.

Biden himself is largely responsible for the bankruptcy problem. He was the politician who steered the regressive bankruptcy reform through Congress, making it harder for low-income families to wipe out their debts – and making it impossible to wipe out student debt through bankruptcy.

In that sense, he "owes" it to the economy to make up for his opportunistic water-carrying for his campaign backers in corporate-run Delaware.

Will he do it? Can he do it? He's a deficit hawk, and has appointed deficit hawks such as Neera Tanden to his cabinet. He also promised that "nothing will change." This is just how the Obama administration was run (demagogically running on a slogan of "hope and change"). So will Biden be Trump 2.0 or Obama 3.0? It really doesn't matter much. Because both Obama and Biden were basically Republicans running with a different ethnic profile for the voters that they delivered to their campaign contributors.

V: Chapter 11 bankruptcy filings in the U.S. rose in the third quarter to the highest level since the 2010 financial crisis. In the last week 900,000 Americans have filed new unemployment claims.

John Williams' Shadow Statistics puts the real unemployment rate at 20 percent. Many people have dropped out of the work force, as no jobs are available, at least, no jobs for them.

The rent moratorium has enabled many unemployed or low-income workers to remain in their homes. If they're evicted and become homeless, how can they work? The real crisis is scheduled to fall in March and April. Small businesses such as restaurants and stores will give up and close.

V: Europe has been more receptive in extending national programs to keep troubled businesses afloat, but there too a sharp debate exists as to whether a strategy of protecting businesses and workers "at all costs" will cement a recovery or whether it will leave economies less competitive and more dependent on government aid when the pandemic recedes.

Europe and other countries are trying to avoid disaster. U.S. policy is to see disaster as an opportunity. It's easier to make fortunes in a disaster than in normal times, at least if you are wealthy, liquid and have access to bank credit to buy up distressed businesses and properties.

The aim of Europe – and of economies through the ages – has been to provide resilience. That is what is missing here. The doctrine of "individual responsibility" is a euphemism for letting the financial classes take control of economic and social planning. And their objective is their own self-enrichment, not that of economies as a whole.

What is it that can be "recovered"? To most politicians, it means that creditors – the economy's top One Percent – can "recover" the money that is owed to them by the indebted 99 Percent.

In Europe's system of parliamentary politics, third parties can arise to promote a social policy of economic resilience. That isn't possible in the United States, because of the two-party duopoly. Duopolies resolve themselves into monopolies, which is what we really have today: pro-Wall Street and anti-labor, pro-creditor and anti-debtor.

[Feb 27, 2021] When Being Black is White Supremacy

Feb 27, 2021 | www.moonofalabama.org

Dogon Priest , Feb 27 2021 1:35 utc | 29

When Being Black is White Supremacy
The Difficulty Social Justice Warriors have noting Criminality and Evil has no Race

https://torrancestephensphd.substack.com/p/when-being-black-is-white-supremacy

[Feb 24, 2021] The Democrats Role in Distracting with Identity Politics

Feb 24, 2021 | www.moonofalabama.org

karlof1 , Feb 23 2021 23:12 utc | 255

emersonreturn @239--

Thanks for alerting me to the new Hudson item : "The Democrats Role in Distracting with Identity Politics," which is far more about economics that ID politics. An outtake:

"The looming global fracture is becoming a fight against the most basic organizing principles of economies throughout history. All successful economies have been mixed. And to promote survival and prosperity, it is necessary to subordinate private gain-seeking to public objectives benefitting the 99 Percent, not just the One Percent....

"The policy of American industrial capitalism in the 19th century is the same as that of socialism: to minimize the cost of living and doing business. Privatization is largely responsible for de-industrializing the U.S. economy. While leaving 95 or 99 percent of the population to stagnate, it has been a bonanza for the 5 to 1 percent....

"I don't think you should call it [the $1.9 Trillion] a 'stimulus.' It's disaster relief . The idea is to catch up. The aim should be to at least put the economy back where it was before – that is, still in the Obama Depression.

"What WAS a 'stimulus' was the $6 to $8 trillion created by the Federal Reserve to buy stocks and bond, including junk bonds, to fuel the Wall Street boom. That is the essence of the K-shaped recovery. Rising prices for wealth, falling wages and net disposable income for living labor, after deducting the payments to the FIRE sector that families have to pay off the top – rent and debts, medical insurance contributions, FICA paycheck withholding (the most regressive tax), and monthly payments to privatized utility monopolies.

"The $1.9 trillion checks of $1,400 or $2,00 actually should be sent out monthly, not part time. Europe pays its laid-off work force 80 percent of their normal wages, so that they will not be plowed under by the covid shutdowns." [My Emphasis]

And there's much more. Hudson sees the real crisis as yet to come, and warns not to expect any help from Biden as many of the bad policies now in place were his doing. One thing is clear: Europeans won't suffer much at all compared with the Outlaw US Empire's citizens. The Obama/COVID-Trump Great Depression will only involve one nation, although it will certainly try to blame others for its failed policies; and given its great immaturity, might even end humanity in a fit of pique.

[Feb 14, 2021] What the hell is 'inclusivity' and how is that a principle?

Feb 14, 2021 | www.unz.com

Priss Factor , says: Website February 12, 2021 at 4:34 am GMT • 1.8 days ago

"principles of ethics, fairness, and inclusivity"

What the hell is 'inclusivity' and how is that a principle?

I know what ethics is. And I know what fairness is. It means in meritocratic competition, let the best person win. Don't favor someone based on family, color, or some such.

But what is this baby talk of 'inclusivity'? Doesn't fairness cover the rules of acceptance or inclusion on the basis of qualification? The principle of fairness dictates that one's admission into an industry or institution is incumbent on one's qualification and ability.
By adding 'inclusivity' to the equation, it suggests that some people should be 'included' despite lack of ability because what? They happen to be black, and that's qualification enough?

Fairness means entry by qualification. 'Inclusivity' implies entry by something other than qualification. Thus, it is not fair and undermines the very foundation of principles.

Btw, 'inclusivity' seems to apply mostly to blacks. I mean, NO ONE talks about how the NYT should include a Palestinian American columnist or how the White House should hire some Arabs sympathetic to Palestinians. And it's perfectly fine to suppress BDS, and it's never a problem when there are TOO MANY JEWS. Or TOO MANY BLACKS. NBA is hardly diverse. It's mostly black and lack diversity, but no one complains about how it should 'include' more non-blacks. No one gripes about TOO MANY JEWS in Biden's administration.

Jews talk about Diversity, but they don't want diversity of opinions in NYT columns. How many Palestinian-American columnists did NYT feature?

[Jan 25, 2021] NY GOP congresswomen blast Nancy Pelosi's new House gender rules

Jan 25, 2021 | nypost.com

Some of New York's most prominent female Republicans derided and mocked Speaker Nancy Pelosi's proposal to eliminate gendered language from the official House rules.

"Instead of reviving the economy, restoring our Constitutional freedoms and delivering results for the American people, Speaker Pelosi has chosen her debut legislation -- which would ban words like mother, sister and daughter," upstate Rep. Elise Stefanik told The Post. "Obviously she is triggered by the historic number of GOP women elected to Congress who will fire Nancy Pelosi once and for all in 2022."

Staten Island's Congresswoman-elect Nicole Malliotakis also had words for the new rules.

"There are millions of Americans suffering, our economy is hurting, vaccine distribution is lagging and Nancy Pelosi and the House Democrats are worried about this nonsense," she said. "Here's a gender neutral word to describe this legislation: ridiculous."

Proposed changes to the rules of the House of Representatives would "honor all gender identities" by eliminating such specific terms as mother and father, son and daughter, and aunt and uncle.

Instead, only gender-neutral terms such as "parent," "child," "sibling" and "parent's sibling" would be allowed in the text of the House rules.

Outrage even made its way to the all-important Georgia Senate runoff, where Republican Kelly Loeffer warned it was reason enough to vote for her.

"The far-left's priorities, everyone. If you'd like to still be able to call yourself a father, daughter, mother or son, vote for me and @Perduesenate on Tuesday," she tweeted Saturday, adding, "Sincerely, A Proud Daughter."

Meanwhile, top Dems in Congress took credit for the new regulations.

"I'm proud to start the 117th Congress by drafting these historic rules changes," Rep. Jim McGovern said in a tweet.

SEE ALSO Pelosi may strip all gender references from House of Representatives rules

Pelosi touted the new rules, calling them "the most inclusive in history."

However both Pelosi and McGovern continue to use gendered terms to describe themselves on their respective Twitter pages Saturday.

The new rules are expected to be voted on when the house reconvenes Sunday.

The rules also got a big boost from progressive Queens/Bronx Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, who said she was "grateful for@RepMcGovern's leadership" during the process.

One Capitol Hill insider told The Post the idea for nixing gender from the new rules package likely originated in the House's Office of Diversity and Inclusion. The same rules also enshrined the office as a permanent new addition to the Capitol.

The agency was created by Democrats in one of their first acts at the start of the previous Congress.

"This office is charged with submitting to Congress a diversity plan to direct and guide House employing offices to recruit, hire, train, develop, advance, promote, and retain a diverse workforce," reads its official about page .

[Jan 24, 2021] Isn't identity politics precisely the red herring that will divert debate from real questions like the division of labour, financialisation, consequences of economic and military imperialism and the question of the future of the late capitalist West

Jan 24, 2021 | www.moonofalabama.org

Patroklos , Jan 23 2021 1:13 utc | 91

Is this site really starting down this path? Isn't identity politics precisely the red herring that will divert debate from real questions like the division of labour, financialisation, consequences of economic and military imperialism and the question of the future of the late capitalist West? Let's leave this one in the way-too-hard-basket as the distraction it is.

[Jan 13, 2021] Marxism as a pseudo-religion and Wokism is a pseudo-religion too

Jan 13, 2021 | www.unz.com

whodat , says: January 12, 2021 at 3:40 pm GMT • 12.6 hours ago

Who are these people on opposite sides of the barricades?. Would the analogs
from past conflicts supposed to be the same as the root , recognize one another in
the modern context. Marxism was a pseudo religion, with blessings from the self declared intellectuals of the day, and that is what gave then a degree of cohesion. yes many were Jews which added another element of clan to the glue. Today, the WOKE religion and it's blessing by those who would put this academic vanguard in charge, provide the unit cohesion for the left. The poor and economic class warfare nonsense is kicked to the curb in the new left side of the barricade. They fight for their "side", their clan, and the spiritual core of it is of little consequence practically, but listen to their "I hate Ignorant Trump wall mart deplorables" talk coming from those who embrace corporate and even foreign interests, without a twinge of irony. The root enemy from a theoretical level, are the university lefties who are hungry for the rest of us to recognize their wisdom and put them in charge where they belong. There we have it. Same as 1917 in Russia and Germany in the street. Their graduates seek to wear the mantle of learned and wise as their teachers. Go to the streets of Madison and Ann Arbor and observe BLM and Antifa, see their afinity to WOKism and their teachers.

quasi_verbatim , says: January 12, 2021 at 6:57 pm GMT • 9.4 hours ago

Seems more like Cultural Trotskyism to me, more than anything that old stinker Marx could have come up with.

[Jan 10, 2021] "It's the height of hypocrisy for people who claim to be the champions of rights for women to deny the very biological existence of women," former Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard, who just might be the last Democrat in DC with a functioning brain, told Tucker Carlson

Jan 10, 2021 | www.moonofalabama.org

Down South , Jan 10 2021 14:43 utc | 1

"It's the height of hypocrisy for people who claim to be the champions of rights for women to deny the very biological existence of women," former Democratic presidential candidate Tulsi Gabbard, who just might be the last Democrat in DC with a functioning brain, told Tucker Carlson. "Instead of doing something that could actually help save people's lives, they are choosing instead to say 'You can't say mother or father.'"

I would ask for an 'Amen!' at this point, but, thanks to the clown work of lawmaker Emanuel Cleaver, who ended his congressional prayer opening of the very unsexy 117th Congress with the words "amen and awoman," even that simple gender-free term (which simply means 'so be it') is now tainted with foul political intrigue.

With these sort of unforgivable stunts under the belt, the Democrats should be very grateful they have perfected the art of 'winning' elections, otherwise they would probably vanish from the political landscape simply out of lack of doing anything positive for the nation. Indeed, the term 'Democrat' may be on the way out faster than that of 'male' and 'female.'


Oh Brother! Who Will Fight for Women's Rights Now That the Democrats Have Scrapped Gendered Terms?

[Jan 09, 2021] Larry Fink heads Blackrock Investments. This firm has a massive $7.6 trillions of dollars in investments. Fink is also the one person who was most responsible for successfully pushing "wokeness" onto our present day American corporations.

Jan 09, 2021 | www.unz.com

schrub , says: January 8, 2021 at 5:08 pm GMT • 6.3 hours ago

A lot of talk here but no really effective strategy or tactics. Here is something that might well work.

Larry Fink, do know him? You should,, you REALLY should.

Larry Fink heads Blackrock Investments. This firm has a massive $7.6 trillions of dollars in investments. Fink is also the one person who was most responsible for successfully pushing "wokeness" onto our present day American corporations.

Fink is the absolute czar of "wokeness". He is probably the biggest reason for American corporations caving into this new trend.

He did this by first threatening to remove these corporations' heads using his massive influence, (based his firm's stock ownership in these firms) on the companies' boards of directors. If this threat failed to work he then threatened to dump Blackrock's massive holding of these companies' stocks, thereby potentially crashing their stock prices.

Fink's tactics proved to be VERY effective. Virtually every US corporation folded under such an onslaught. Then, these craven cowards were pressured to prove their newborn fealty to"wokeness" by, among other things, financially supporting "woke" groups like Black Lives Matter and The Antidefamation League and contributing additional funds to Democrat politicians while also lightening up in their support to "unwoke" Republican candidates.

Blackrock has mutual funds and ETFs (exchange trade funds) that many UNZ readers might own. "Ishares" are probably the best known ones. No patriot should hold any security controlled by Blackrock. Boycott Blackrock. Fight back by hitting them in the pocketbook.

Here is a list of Blackrock investment funds. Go through it carefully. Do you own any of these? If so, dump them and tell your friends to do likewise.

https://www.blackrock.com/us/individual/products/investment-funds#!type=all&style=All&fsac=43535%7C43580%7C43581%7C43584%7C43585%7C436

Desert Fox , says: January 8, 2021 at 5:36 pm GMT • 5.8 hours ago
@Charles Carroll

Agree, here is what Nathan Rothschild infamously said, I care not what puppet is placed on the throne of England to rule the empire, for the man who controls the money supply controls the British Empire and I control the British money supply.It is the same here in America.

The zionists who own the FED control America and until the FED is abolished nothing will change, wars and debt all coming from the zionist owned FED.

Recommend the book The Controversy of Zion by Douglas Reed, it can be had on amazon, and also recommend reading The Protocols of Zion.

[Jan 08, 2021] Partisan media sources, Taibbi added, are driving different groups to hate each other

That's the essence of identify politics. The key idea is put various groups at each other throat so that neoliberal oligarchs are safe. If you do not understand this you understand nothing...
Jan 08, 2021 | thehill.com

Journalist Matt Taibbi joined Hill.TV's "Rising" on Thursday and suggested that partisan media circles resulted in echo chambers that have left many Americans without factual, reliable sources of information.

Taibbi told hosts Krystal Ball and Saagar Enjeti that those who stormed the U.S. Capitol grounds on Wednesday were victims of misinformation and conspiracy theories resulting from these echo chambers.

"We have two basically conflicting media ecosystems...and what ends up happening when people get an uninterrupted stream of information of this type for long enough, is they just completely lose their ability to assess situations rationally, and they will eventually lash out," Taibbi said.

Partisan media sources, Taibbi added, are driving "different groups to hate each other."

[Jan 02, 2021] Proposed House Rules Seek To Erase Gendered-Terms Such As 'Father', 'Mother', 'Son', 'Daughter'

The neoliberal "identify wedge" that gone way too far ;-)
In any case this is looks like an important stage in the development of Neoliberal Newspeak
Jan 02, 2021 | www.zerohedge.com

Authored by Mimi Nguyen Ly via The Epoch Times,

Leaders in the House of Representatives announced on Friday a rules package for the 117th Congress that includes a proposal to use " gender -inclusive language" and eliminate gendered terms such as "'father, mother, son, daughter," and more.

James McGovern (D-Mass.) speaks during a meeting at the Capitol in Washington, on Dec. 21, 2017. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Terms to be struck from clause 8(c)(3) of rule XXIII , the House's Code of Official Conduct, as outlined in the proposed rules ( pdf ), include "father, mother, son, daughter, brother, sister, uncle, aunt, first cousin, nephew, niece, husband, wife, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, stepfather, stepmother, stepson, stepdaughter, stepbrother, stepsister, half brother, half sister, grandson, [and] granddaughter."

Such terms would be replaced with "parent, child, sibling, parent's sibling, first cousin, sibling's child, spouse, parent-in-law, child-in-law, sibling-in-law, stepparent, stepchild, stepsibling, half-sibling, [and] grandchild."

According to the proposed rules, "seamen" would be replaced with "seafarers," and "Chairman" would be replaced with "Chair" in Rule X of the House.

... ... ...

The rules package will be introduced and voted on once the new Congress convenes.


bloostar 1 hour ago remove link

What gender was the pig's head? Is it correct to refer to it as a pig?

researchfix 1 hour ago

Well, my father and mother are dead already. So they will never know, that they are not my father and mother.

Al Gophilia 1 hour ago

These idiots should no longer be honorably idenified with the noun Represtenative.

judgement put 29 minutes ago

Actually, 'repressed-tentative' isn't so bad.

Ms No PREMIUM 1 hour ago

I think it was Lenin that said "The last enemy of Marxism is the family"

Et Tu Brute 1 hour ago (Edited)

When politicians cannot deliver a $2K stimulus that affects 30%+ of the population but have time to promote laws representing the interest of less than 0.6%* but still affecting the over 95% who do or will have a family, you know it's not just a matter of ineffective governance and culture wars, it is deliberate Psychological Warfare, coordinated through Mainstream Media, aimed at dividing and demoralising the population.

* https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_demographics_of_the_United_States

DefendYourBase5 1 hour ago remove link

americans will receive 600$ and pakistan will get 10 million for Homosexual Studies :D

https://thehill.com/opinion/finance/531589-congress-served-its-own-interests-rather-than-ours-with-the-relief-bill

PGR88 1 hour ago (Edited)

"*******" is an appropriate non-gendered term referring to all the Democrats in Congress.

St. TwinkleToes 1 hour ago

So now we're supposed to appease 1% of the population who are gender confused freaks by removing thousands of years of family relationships?

RocketPride PREMIUM 1 hour ago remove link

Democratic Congress continues to endear themselves to true American values. F-ing idiots, I hope they are all voted out in 2022

sgt_doom 1 hour ago remove link

On Dominion voting machines?????

sgt_doom 2 hours ago (Edited) remove link

Exactly why there should be laws against geriatric dementia-suffering twits who once were financially connected to Saddam Hussein in congress.

The twitch Pelosi wants to destroy the family unit: Job #1 of the Maoist agenda!

Itinerant 1 hour ago (Edited) remove link

Just look at how much they are improving the world, fueling inclusive economic growth !!!

In France they've already moved to force you to fill in parent1 and parent2 instead of mother and father.
Medical Experts are now saying that boy/girl should be removed from birth certificates as clinically irrelevant.

Right, no need to check for descended testicles or abdominal hernia in little boys, or anything else.
What you circumcise, may as well be your thumb, right?

I just had an operation on my testicle, of course it is clinically irrelevant to find the right doctor for anything to do with your prostrate or testicles, or any gynecological issues, for that matter.

We are going insane ... we are already in the lemmings rushing to the cliff stage.

[Dec 20, 2020] The neoliberal elites firmly believe in the moronic "identity" narrative that they are pushing and think that they can control the "deplorables" and suress the resistance to the neoliberal ideology

Dec 20, 2020 | www.moonofalabama.org

William Gruff , Dec 19 2020 13:41 utc | 41

Stumpy @29
Debsisdead @30

Re: Clinton

There was a very specific plan in development since at least the mid-1970s by the Ivy League fraternity secret society set (their right hand in action is the CIA so I usually just refer to that organization for rhetorical shorthand). This plan was to finally bury the threat of communism in the imperial heartlands by redefining to the population that conflict in society is an identity issue rather than one of conflicting interests of socioeconomic classes. This plan was going to be a massive multi-channel, multi-media affair involving every aspect of contemporary culture. Sports, literature, music, movies and TV shows, classroom content, workplace cultures, and of course political discourse all would be guided to lead to this capitalist Utopia of a population fixated on their personal perceived socially constructed non-class identities.

Of course, this project has been in development for some time now and those developing it knew it would take decades to implement. That implementation process started its roll out at the turn of the Millennium with accelerated changes in mass media products intended to soften up the population. The changes were intended to transition from a largely media push to tangible impacts on the broader population with the 2008 elections, accompanied by over-the-top fanfare surrounding America electing its first woman president. This was to be followed by a drumbeat of elections (and accompanying mass media priming of the population) in which successive under-represented populations get represented. After Clinton's victory in 2008 gave cultural "representation" to women then in 2016 Black Americans would get their "representation" by Obama, followed in 2024 with LGBTQXYZ identifying people achieving "representation" with Butt-gig in the White House. With that America would have finally arrived at the "End of History" and achieved the perfection of capitalist culture.

Of course these plans went to shit because they are based upon the retarded nonsense notion that capitalist culture can be perfected, which is patently absurd to anyone who actually understands how capitalism works (Marxists, for instance). Obama was just supposed to be getting his debut to national audiences like a political debutante at a kind of national debutante ball in order to prepare for being installed in the presidency in 2016, in exactly the same way that Butt-gig was debuted in 2016 for his/its installation in 2024.

Obama was scripted to sound rash and radical in 2008, which his image managers in the CIA felt would sink in his chances for victory in 2008. Obama would then spend the intervening years until his scheduled turn as President in 2016 "maturing" and being cloaked by the mass media in artificial "gravitas" . In a surprise to the plotters, though, the voters eagerly embraced the imaginary "radicalism" of Obama and took a pass on Clinton's bland "maturity" .

The elites firmly believe in the moronic "identity" narrative that they are pushing and think that they just have to educate and civilize the "deplorables" to bring them on board with it. As a result these elites who are far less intelligent than they give themselves credit for totally misinterpreted Obama's success with the voters. They were sure the voters were demonstrating greater respect for Black people versus women rather than the voters responding to Obama's more aggressive political rhetoric and promise of Single Payer.

Well, the CIA's cultural engineering plan had some flexibility so they swapped Obama for Clinton and moved Clinton's presidential installation date up to 2016. In the meantime, though, Clinton had to be kept in the public eye so she could run again in 2016. Even more important was that Clinton had already been brought up to speed on the empire's covert "ratline" and "ratfucking" operations around the world and they needed someone who already knew the script to handle the public relations side of those ops (Obama was still too green at the time). Since the US State Department is nowadays nothing more than an appendage to the CIA but with a high-profile public face, the Secretary of State was the obvious place to plant Clinton.

Of course, Clinton losing in 2008 was a bit unsettling for the plotters. They thought they had it set up just right. They were not willing to take any chances in 2016. To make absolutely certain that Clinton won this time they frauded the DNC primaries to clear the field on the left and cleared the right by making sure the most ludicrous buffoon running (in their own perception) got that side's nomination.

Here is where their failure to comprehend Clinton's loss in 2008 came back to bite them. Completely counter to all the bad analyses by the miseducated morons in their stink tanks and newsrooms and boardrooms, the voters actually voted on issues rather than identity : End war and create jobs.

[Aside: The Post Trump Stress Disorder victims will shriek in their typical hysterical way and with ALL CAPS "But... but Trump never intended to do those things! I know that because I am psychotic... uh, I mean psychic!" . It doesn't matter what Trump intended to do. He was simply the only candidate in the general election to even pay lip service to real issues and so he was the only one for the "deplorables" to vote for.]

"Deplorables" are too stupid to vote on issues, aren't they? It is all just emotion and knee-jerk behavior for them, in the elites perspective. The establishment had those sides of things sewn up, so what could possibly have gone wrong? It must have been the Russians!

In any case, that is why Clinton had to be installed at the top of the US State Department in 2008. It might sound complicated but it is really quite straight forward.

[Dec 20, 2020] Neoliberals implemented a plan to finally bury the threat of communism by redefining the conflicts in society is an identity issue rather than socioeconomic classes issue

Dec 20, 2020 | www.moonofalabama.org

William Gruff , Dec 19 2020 13:41 utc | 41

Stumpy @29
Debsisdead @30

Re: Clinton

There was a very specific plan in development since at least the mid-1970s by the Ivy League fraternity secret society set (their right hand in action is the CIA so I usually just refer to that organization for rhetorical shorthand). This plan was to finally bury the threat of communism in the imperial heartlands by redefining to the population that conflict in society is an identity issue rather than one of conflicting interests of socioeconomic classes. This plan was going to be a massive multi-channel, multi-media affair involving every aspect of contemporary culture. Sports, literature, music, movies and TV shows, classroom content, workplace cultures, and of course political discourse all would be guided to lead to this capitalist Utopia of a population fixated on their personal perceived socially constructed non-class identities.

Of course, this project has been in development for some time now and those developing it knew it would take decades to implement. That implementation process started its roll out at the turn of the Millennium with accelerated changes in mass media products intended to soften up the population. The changes were intended to transition from a largely media push to tangible impacts on the broader population with the 2008 elections, accompanied by over-the-top fanfare surrounding America electing its first woman president. This was to be followed by a drumbeat of elections (and accompanying mass media priming of the population) in which successive under-represented populations get represented. After Clinton's victory in 2008 gave cultural "representation" to women then in 2016 Black Americans would get their "representation" by Obama, followed in 2024 with LGBTQXYZ identifying people achieving "representation" with Butt-gig in the White House. With that America would have finally arrived at the "End of History" and achieved the perfection of capitalist culture.

Of course these plans went to shit because they are based upon the retarded nonsense notion that capitalist culture can be perfected, which is patently absurd to anyone who actually understands how capitalism works (Marxists, for instance). Obama was just supposed to be getting his debut to national audiences like a political debutante at a kind of national debutante ball in order to prepare for being installed in the presidency in 2016, in exactly the same way that Butt-gig was debuted in 2016 for his/its installation in 2024.

Obama was scripted to sound rash and radical in 2008, which his image managers in the CIA felt would sink his chances for victory in 2008. Obama would then spend the intervening years until his scheduled turn as President in 2016 "maturing" and being cloaked by the mass media in artificial "gravitas" . In a surprise to the plotters, though, the voters eagerly embraced the imaginary "radicalism" of Obama and took a pass on Clinton's bland "maturity" .

The elites firmly believe in the moronic "identity" narrative that they are pushing and think that they just have to educate and civilize the "deplorables" to bring them on board with it. As a result these elites who are far less intelligent than they give themselves credit for totally misinterpreted Obama's success with the voters. They were sure the voters were demonstrating greater respect for Black people versus women rather than the voters responding to Obama's more aggressive political rhetoric and promise of Single Payer.

Well, the CIA's cultural engineering plan had some flexibility so they swapped Obama for Clinton and moved Clinton's presidential installation date up to 2016. In the meantime, though, Clinton had to be kept in the public eye so she could run again in 2016. Even more important was that Clinton had already been brought up to speed on the empire's covert "ratline" and "ratfucking" operations around the world and they needed someone who already knew the script to handle the public relations side of those ops (Obama was still too green at the time). Since the US State Department is nowadays nothing more than an appendage to the CIA but with a high-profile public face, the Secretary of State was the obvious place to plant Clinton.

Of course, Clinton losing in 2008 was a bit unsettling for the plotters. They thought they had it set up just right. They were not willing to take any chances in 2016. To make absolutely certain that Clinton won this time they frauded the DNC primaries to clear the field on the left and cleared the right by making sure the most ludicrous buffoon running (in their own perception) got that side's nomination.

Here is where their failure to comprehend Clinton's loss in 2008 came back to bite them. Completely counter to all the bad analyses by the miseducated morons in their stink tanks and newsrooms and boardrooms, the voters actually voted on issues rather than identity : End war and create jobs.

[Aside: The Post Trump Stress Disorder victims will shriek in their typical hysterical way and with ALL CAPS "But... but Trump never intended to do those things! I know that because I am psychotic... uh, I mean psychic!" . It doesn't matter what Trump intended to do. He was simply the only candidate in the general election to even pay lip service to real issues and so he was the only one for the "deplorables" to vote for.]

"Deplorables" are too stupid to vote on issues, aren't they? It is all just emotion and knee-jerk behavior for them, in the elites perspective. The establishment had those sides of things sewn up, so what could possibly have gone wrong? It must have been the Russians!

In any case, that is why Clinton had to be installed at the top of the US State Department in 2008. It might sound complicated but it is really quite straight forward.

[Dec 11, 2020] As a Professor at a Tier 1 university. It dawned on me the damage of Critical Race Theory indoctrination being taught by my colleagues

Dec 11, 2020 | www.zerohedge.com

4343pete 4 hours ago

Even with direct and damning evidence, it is too late to expect the directors of major media to give up their activist role. They have been thoroughly indoctrinated by the academic collective. If I were King, academia would be the focus, the place to begin eliciting change to the very radical and biased directions promoted at these institutions. For decades Che Guevara, and others of that same ilk, have been heroes to the elitists in higher education. It is the liberal educators who have embraced the revolutionary agenda, in their minds finding a warped sense of purpose promoting today's mania of cultural revolution. Notice the openly Marxist leaders of BLM, and the white, progressive followers. This group is not the downtrodden seeking to redress wrongs. Many are spoiled rich kids looking for a life, a cause to believe in, because they have been told they are special. But in the end, they are just one of many with too much student loan, and a degree in art history which doesn't pay very well.

BinAnunnaki 4 hours ago

As a Professor at a Tier 1 university. It dawned on me the damage of Critical Race Theory indoctrination being taught by my colleagues when during a podcast two gender muddled 20 year olds discussed banning Dr. Seuss from bookstores bc he didn't have people of color in his stories.

I wanted to grab these two twerps by their necks and scream. Theodore Seuss devoted his entire life to childhood development. What the foq have you little bastards done to improve society?

Cancel Culture is their first arrow out of the quiver. By all means blame Academia for this mess. 40 years of gender, race, and ethnic studies programs.

WorkingClassMan 6 hours ago

I dunno, I for one TOTALLY trust the corporate junkenpresse. They would never lie to me. When they call Whites racists simply for being White...I believe them! When they tout "systemic racism," as the cause of all the worlds' ills...I believe them! When they ignore the astronomical black-on-White murder sprees from year to year and instead focus on the rare White-on-black killings...I believe them! When they say Trump is the worst thing since cancer...I believe them!

Yeah...they care about us.

[Dec 10, 2020] Winding Up Americans -

Dec 05, 2020 | www.zerohedge.com

Winding Up Americans by Tyler Durden Wed, 12/02/2020 - 23:00 Twitter Facebook Reddit Email Print

Authored by Jeff Thomas via InternationalMan.com,

For the last four years, Americans have become increasingly polarised -- divided between Democrat crusaders who are determined to save America from becoming a racist, sexist Nazi dictatorship under Donald Trump, versus Republican crusaders who are determined to save America from becoming a liberal Marxist state under a Democratic reign.

This fervour has become so extreme that families can no longer meet for the holidays without a conversational blow-up. No longer are people "entitled to their opinions." This has become a crusade between Good and Evil. ("I'm good. You're evil.")

The absurd nature of this dichotomy has reached the point that even Dr. Phil is increasing his viewership by featuring disputes between siblings who are on opposite sides of the political divide and are no longer speaking to each other.

At this point, all that remains to be done by the networks would be to air a Red versus Blue television game show in which contestants compete with their own family members to "Win the White House."

Until November, the great majority of Americans appear to have been hoping that the November election would end this strife one way or the other.

My take on this has been that the opposite would happen after 3rd November. The fireworks would increase exponentially after the election. The election would be hotly contested by whomever was the apparent loser.

This should easily have been foreseen, as the media on the right have insisted for months that the Democrat encouragement for mail-in ballots was a precursor to election fraud.

Similarly, the media on the left have insisted for months that Donald Trump's suggestion that he may not accept the election results meant that he was planning a coup after he (presumably inevitably) lost the election.

https://lockerdome.com/lad/13084989113709670?pubid=ld-dfp-ad-13084989113709670-0&pubo=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com&rid=www.zerohedge.com&width=890

And now, the battle has been met.

It's been estimated that 93% of all Fox watchers are Republicans and 95% of MSNBC watchers are Democrats. Since neither side watches the other's news programme, each side is cognizant of only its own team's heavily slanted rhetoric.

The conservative media is awash with details of voter fraud by Democrats, whilst the liberal media states with equal conviction that Mister Trump and his lawyers have provided no details whatever.

Therefore, those who voted Republican will conclude by watching their own "unbiased" news channel that Democrats have tried to steal the election and thereby steal control of the country.

And those who voted Democrat will conclude by watching their own "unbiased" news channel that Republicans have tried to steal the election and thereby steal control of the country.

But how did this get to be so bad? Americans have not been so wound up -- nor so polarised -- since 1861, at the beginning of the Civil War.

Indeed, the post-election fervour is as strong as though Fort Sumter had just been fired upon.

More importantly, what will be the outcome?

Will the courts rule against the claims of Mister Trump?

If so, that decision will enrage an already angry right-wing crowd, refusing to vacate the White House and defending it against the pinko mob.

Or will the courts rule in favour of Mister Trump?

If so, that decision will unleash nationwide riots, intent on bringing down the evil dictator.

Either way, we can anticipate that the US will be in flames. If for any reason the level of strife is insufficient, those with deep pockets will hire squads of shills as mercenary soldiers.

The populace will be in terror. Republican voters will beg the federal government to bring in the troops to contain Antifa and the BLM mob.

Democratic voters will beg the federal government to bring in the troops to quell the Republican militias.

In such an upheaval, the one thing both sides will have in common is that they will both beg for the creation of a police state.

And the federal government will answer that call. Martial law would be declared, possibly as a "temporary measure," until normalcy has returned.

But what if normalcy does not return? What if pockets of violence continue to pop up all over the map with regularity?

If that occurs, martial law would need to continue for as long as it was deemed necessary, which would be likely to translate into a permanent police state.

At one time, the media was for the most part impartial and benign, but in recent decades it has been bought out by four large corporations. And some of those corporations own and direct both liberal and conservative networks, which would seem to be at odds with each other.

However, they are not. Today, the objective of the media is not to offer news. It is to create strife -- to pit one half of the electorate against the other. In doing so, the ruling elite have the justification to lock down the entire USA under martial law.

NEVER MISS THE NEWS THAT MATTERS MOST

ZEROHEDGE DIRECTLY TO YOUR INBOX

Receive a daily recap featuring a curated list of must-read stories.

Once that has been accomplished, the elite may do as they please. As in all countries where a police state has been achieved -- such as Nazi Germany, Mao's China or Stalin's Russia -- once military control has been put into place nationwide, meaningful protest ends.

In each of the above cases, the populace was whipped up into a frenzy of hate and violence against the Jews or the aristocracy or whatever other demon had been invented. But the real objective and the result were the subjugation of the populace.

The American populace has been programmed like windup toys, with the ruling elite winding up the keys on their backs as tightly as they will go . When the levers are released, Americans will act dramatically and, in many cases, blindly.

At this point, it's not too late for people to stand back, take a deep breath and ask themselves if they're not being conned into their own subjugation. But it would appear that they've been wound up so tightly that such objectivity is unlikely to occur.

However, if they do not, they risk losing what remains of their once-proud democracy.

* * *

Economically, politically, and socially, the United States seems to be headed down a path that's not only inconsistent with the founding principles of the country, but accelerating quickly toward boundless decay. In the years ahead, there will likely be much less stability of any kind. That's exactly why New York Times bestselling author Doug Casey and his team just released an urgent new report titled Doug Casey's Top 7 Predictions for the Raging 2020s .

Click here to download the free PDF now .


[Nov 25, 2020] Splitting the public up into two oppositional factions who barely interact and can't even communicate with each other because they don't share a common reality keeps the populace impotent, ignorant, and powerless to stop the unfolding of the agendas of the powerful.

Highly recommended!
Nov 25, 2020 | caitlinjohnstone.com


NEWTON FINN
/ NOVEMBER 24, 2020

"Splitting the public up into two oppositional factions who barely interact and can't even communicate with each other because they don't share a common reality keeps the populace impotent, ignorant, and powerless to stop the unfolding of the agendas of the powerful."

Surely so. But I'm not sure whether this was deliberately planned by the plutocrats as a political strategy, or whether this bifurcation spontaneously emerged from tech company algorithms designed only to increase their profits.

Clearly, the plutocrats have seized upon this bifurcation to keep the populace divided and engaged in a kind of civil war, but it's sort of like the pandemic – was it a plot hatched or an opportunity exploited?

This might not seem to matter at this point, but IMHO the answer helps to determine not only what we're up against but also the best ways to fight the bastards.

SHOCKER / NOVEMBER 24, 2020

https://www.wakingtimes.com/tyranny-standing-rock-govt-divide-conquer-strategy-work/
`
"Divide and conquer.
`
"It's one of the oldest military strategies in the books, and it's proven to be the police state's most effective weapon for maintaining the status quo.
`
"How do you conquer a nation?
`
"Distract them with football games, political circuses and Black Friday sales. Keep them focused on their differences -- economic, religious, environmental, political, racial [gender- pandemic] -- so they can never agree on anything. And then, when they're so divided that they are incapable of joining forces against a common threat, start picking them off one by one."

JWK / NOVEMBER 24, 2020

"We live in different information universes, chosen for us by algorithms whose only criterion is how to maximise our attention for advertisers' products to generate greater profits for the internet giants,"
Which precisely explains how we got the recent POTUS candidates, displayed as the "best and brightest". Really? That's the best they have? You can look across the board at ALL of the two party's leadership and get the same picture. These are far from the "best and brightest". They may be bright, since psychopaths are often quite intelligent, but they certainly have zero qualification for best.

KHATIKA / NOVEMBER 24, 2020

Regardless. The democrats ignored people like Tulsi Gabbard and Sanders to flock to Biden. This is just a sign of how brainwashed the people have become. The propaganda is working quite well.


ANARCISSIE
/ NOVEMBER 24, 2020

This raises the question of why these people were selected. I think Trump sabotaged the Republican fix for 2016 by exploiting weaknesses in its pseudodemocratic primary structure, but the choice of Biden is hard to figure from any angle. Someone should investigate. About a year ago I was conversing with some deplorables about Biden and a perfectly intelligent young Black woman hotly defended him against all criticism. Anita Hill, the crime bill, the invasion of Iraq, his creepiness, just bounced off her shell. How do people get this way?

JULIUS SKOOLAFISH / NOVEMBER 24, 2020

in passing
.
WESTERN VALUES™ . The country that judges other countries' elections just had an election. Somebody won. One day a court will tell us who. Apparently counting votes is a tremendously difficult task, requiring enormous amounts of time.
.
http://russiahouse.org/current_news.php?language=eng&id_current=3183
.
See also (via Fort Russ – Matthew Ehret)

RON CAMPBELL / NOVEMBER 24, 2020

Ah, Ms Johnstone, my fellow United States citizens love their " echo chamber comas " because it allows them to completely suppress any and all logic, justice, empathy, and shame for the blood-thirsty Evil Empire that they cherish and support. The Evil Empire has no soul at all; and it requires its subjects to be soul-less as well. Resistance is futile!

[Nov 25, 2020] Any social programs that benefit the working class are, in fact, affirmative action programs

Notable quotes:
"... Identitarianism is a far more effective strategy at watering down the left than any Red Scare or McCarthyist witch hunt ever was. ..."
Nov 25, 2020 | www.youtube.com



Viewable11
, 2 days ago

"Affirmative Action" is an euphemism for bigotry.

parallelworldsguy , 5 days ago

"Any social programs that benefit the working class are, in fact, affirmative action programs."-Krystal. So true.


Nathaniel Allen
, 5 days ago

Damn, Krystal dropping one of her classic heaters today: "Affirmative action is the type of program that poses little threat and only benefits to affluent white liberals. It's the college admissions version of identity politics: more about getting brown faces in high places to make WHITE people feel good than it is about actually addressing the very real problems it seeks to ameliorate." - Krystal Ball


Will J
, 5 days ago

As a black person I hate to admit that I've bought into the BS all of this time but she is absolutely right. All of her data is correct. AA is just a tool for bourgeoisie blacks to get into better schools. Period. Nothing else. Stop trying to sell it as some saving grace that it is not. The point about student loans is exactly right. If you want to help a ton of black people with college then do something about this BS student loan situation.


Jackson Morgan
, 5 days ago

the term "brunch liberals" is pure gold 😂


Chris Colon
, 5 days ago

Identitarianism is a far more effective strategy at watering down the left than any Red Scare or McCarthyist witch hunt ever was.


halfeatenwaffle
, 9 hours ago (edited)

"White Saviors" is a way to say what we've been saying all along. Affirmative Action IS racist. You are saying that someone needs help because of their skin color, as if that makes them inferior. Racist.


Bert C
, 1 day ago

When Affirmative Action Was White: An Untold History of Racial Inequality in Twentieth-Century America, by Ira Katznelson (W.W. Norton & Company, New York, 2005), preface, appendix, index, 238 pp.


trinnas
, 9 hours ago

How does it help the poor to have $15 minimum wage when they are priced out of the job market and you have raised the overall cost of living?

[Nov 25, 2020] Identity politics - the best scam to save billionaire scum

Nov 25, 2020 | www.youtube.com

B Stily , 1 week ago

Identity politics - the best scam to save billionaire scum

[Nov 22, 2020] MeToo excesses create a vast playing field for female sociopaths by Elizabeth Bartholet

Highly recommended!
Elizabeth Bartholet correctly point out blatant disregard of law and witch hunt atmosphere on MeToo movement. This aspect is easily exploitable by female sociopaths who want to remove a men who did not reciprocate their "favors" or just represent obstacle on their career path. Teachers are especially vulnerable to such a blackmail.
Notable quotes:
"... However, I am concerned that in the recent rush to judgment, principles of basic fairness, differences between proven and merely alleged instances of misconduct, and important distinctions between different kinds of sexually charged conduct have too often been ignored. Similar problems plagued the imposition of new sexual harassment guidelines for colleges and universities by the administration of former President Barack Obama. I was involved in attempts to push back against those guidelines and to develop at Harvard Law School our own policies, better designed to balance the important values at stake. ..."
"... My fairness concerns with the #MeToo phenomenon include the ready acceptance in many cases of anonymous complaints, and of claims made by women over conflicting claims by men, to terminate careers without any investigation of the facts. ..."
"... Sometimes the alleged conduct is so egregious, or alleged patterns so suspicious, that suspension is warranted while facts are determined. Sometimes allegations are demonstrably credible by virtue of independent evidence. But where facts are in doubt or conduct is subject to different interpretations, efforts must be made to investigate what actually happened and how the different parties understood the events. ..."
"... I am also deeply troubled by over-expansive definitions of wrongful conduct. In the current climate, men are called out for actions ranging from requests for dates and hugs on the one hand to rape and other forced sexual contact on the other, as if all are the same and all warrant termination. ..."
"... The legal definition of sexual harassment in employment and education is a helpful guide to what sexual conduct should be the focus. It is illegal to engage in quid pro quo harassment, namely conditioning an employment or educational benefit on sexual favors. It is illegal also to create a "hostile environment" through unwelcome sexual advances that are severe or pervasive and that limit the victim's ability to enjoy employment or educational opportunity. ..."
"... Finally, I am concerned with the cynical exploitation of sexual harassment cases and related scapegoating of individuals. ..."
"... Corporate and political leaders, who must have been at least generally aware of these problems, did little to address them until this moment of public shaming. Now they dismiss alleged perpetrators overnight, often with no regard for the facts but clearly with significant regard for their corporate reputations and electoral strategies. ..."
"... All this puts real reform at risk. It undermines the legitimacy of action against serious sexual misconduct and abuse of power. It creates the potential for backfire. ..."
Jan 16, 2018 | www.thecrimson.com

Like many others, I am outraged by the egregious incidents of sexual misconduct made public recently through carefully documented journalism. I applaud the removal of many alleged perpetrators who have clearly abused their positions of power, often through force and even violence. I celebrate those who have stepped forward to call out sexual misconduct and demand changes in the degrading culture that has characterized working conditions for women in too many settings for too long.

However, I am concerned that in the recent rush to judgment, principles of basic fairness, differences between proven and merely alleged instances of misconduct, and important distinctions between different kinds of sexually charged conduct have too often been ignored. Similar problems plagued the imposition of new sexual harassment guidelines for colleges and universities by the administration of former President Barack Obama. I was involved in attempts to push back against those guidelines and to develop at Harvard Law School our own policies, better designed to balance the important values at stake.

My fairness concerns with the #MeToo phenomenon include the ready acceptance in many cases of anonymous complaints, and of claims made by women over conflicting claims by men, to terminate careers without any investigation of the facts. Some argue that women who speak out should simply always be believed. Others argue that if some innocent men must be sacrificed to the cause of larger justice, so be it. I find this deeply troubling. I do not contend that mini-trials should always be required before action can be taken. Sometimes the alleged conduct is so egregious, or alleged patterns so suspicious, that suspension is warranted while facts are determined. Sometimes allegations are demonstrably credible by virtue of independent evidence. But where facts are in doubt or conduct is subject to different interpretations, efforts must be made to investigate what actually happened and how the different parties understood the events.

I am also deeply troubled by over-expansive definitions of wrongful conduct. In the current climate, men are called out for actions ranging from requests for dates and hugs on the one hand to rape and other forced sexual contact on the other, as if all are the same and all warrant termination. I do not believe that all touching by a man in power is the same as touching that is clearly unwanted or the deliberate abuse of power to obtain sexual favors. I do not believe that all romantic and sexual overtures should be banned from the workplace, even between people on different hierarchical levels. Some recent cases involve peremptory dismissal for behavior that may involve nothing more than that. Women are not so weak as to need this kind of protection. Banning all such activity from the workplace would reduce the quality of life for everyone, including women.

The legal definition of sexual harassment in employment and education is a helpful guide to what sexual conduct should be the focus. It is illegal to engage in quid pro quo harassment, namely conditioning an employment or educational benefit on sexual favors. It is illegal also to create a "hostile environment" through unwelcome sexual advances that are severe or pervasive and that limit the victim's ability to enjoy employment or educational opportunity.

Objective standards apply, so the question is whether a reasonable person in the position of the alleged perpetrator or alleged victim would have thought the conduct was sexual harassment, not simply what the alleged victim subjectively felt.

Finally, I am concerned with the cynical exploitation of sexual harassment cases and related scapegoating of individuals. The #MeToo movement has helped demonstrate to the world the toxic level of sex discrimination and sexual misconduct that have characterized work life for too many women in business, entertainment, media, and government. Corporate and political leaders, who must have been at least generally aware of these problems, did little to address them until this moment of public shaming. Now they dismiss alleged perpetrators overnight, often with no regard for the facts but clearly with significant regard for their corporate reputations and electoral strategies.

All this puts real reform at risk. It undermines the legitimacy of action against serious sexual misconduct and abuse of power. It creates the potential for backfire.

Elizabeth Bartholet '62 is the Morris Wasserstein Public Interest Professor of Law at Harvard Law School.

[Nov 17, 2020] The Roots and Reach of Critical Race Theory by MICHAEL VOLPE

Nov 17, 2020 | www.theamericanconservative.com
The left's latest ideological obsession isn't limited to BLM protests -- it's all the rage in top law schools, and it's breaking into Congress.

There's a lesson I've learned: if it's a fad, be wary. The tulip craze in Holland in the 1500s led to one of the first economic bubbles. The internet replicated the problem in 2000, as did cryptocurrency in 2019. At one time, the hula hoop was all the rage.

Today, there's a social philosophy that's building up a bubble of its own: critical race theory (CRT). CRT has been around since the 1970s, but has blown up in the past few years as terms like microaggression, white guilt, white privilege, and white supremacy have come to dominate the popular lexicon. All of it is rooted in CRT.

https://lockerdome.com/lad/13045197114175078?pubid=ld-dfp-ad-13045197114175078-0&pubo=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.theamericanconservative.com&rid=www.theamericanconservative.com&width=838

CRT -- though it's known to most as a potent political force, and the ideological underpinning of the Black Lives Matter organization -- has always been, first and foremost, a legal philosophy. It starts with the premise that the United States is rooted in white supremacy and that this white supremacy is written into the law. This inherent racism is presented as the explanation for any disparity in outcome, such as that drug convictions and death penalty sentences are more likely to be rendered on minorities.

Mari Matsuda, a CRT luminary, described it as "the work of progressive legal scholars of color who are attempting to develop a jurisprudence that accounts for the role of racism in American law and that works toward the elimination of racism as part of a larger goal of eliminating all forms of subordination."

Far from being a grassroots philosophy formulated by radicals on the streets, it can be traced back to the faculties of some of our nation's most elite law schools. From Critical Race Theory: An Introduction :

Critical race theory sprang up in the mid-1970s, as a number of lawyers, activists, and legal scholars across the country realized, more or less simultaneously, that the heady advances of the civil rights era of the 1960s had stalled and, in many respects, were being rolled back. Realizing that new theories and strategies were needed to combat the subtler forms of racism that were gaining ground, early writers such as Derrick Bell, Alan Freeman, and Richard Delgado (coauthor of this primer) put their minds to the task. They were soon joined by others, and the group held its first conference at a convent outside Madison, Wisconsin, in the summer of 1989.

All three -- Bell, Delgado, and Freeman -- were law school professors. Derrick Bell was teaching at Harvard Law School when he published the seminal CRT treatise Race, Racism, and American Law . Freeman taught at the University of Minnesota, the University of Buffalo, and others. Delgado is currently teaching at the University of Alabama, and has previously taught at UCLA, the University of Colorado, and elsewhere.

me title=

00:07 / 00:59

"The Law as Microaggression," another pioneering work on CRT, was written by NYU Law professor Peggy Davis and published in the Yale Law Journal in 1989. One especially successful CRT practitioner is Patricia Williams, who currently holds the title of Director of Law, Technology, and Ethics at Northeastern University. From 2000-2005, she was the recipient of a $500,000 MacArthur Grant. Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw, another CRT heavyweight, is the Isidor and Seville Sulzbacher Professor of Law at Columbia Law School.

Crenshaw, in addition to her professorial duties at Columbia, heads up the university's Center for Intersectionality and Interpolicy Studies. That center advertises:

The Center for Intersectionality and Social Policy Studies was established to examine how social structures and related identity categories such as gender, race, and class interact on multiple levels to create social inequality. The first such center of its kind, the Center's research projects and initiatives will bring together scholars and practitioners from law, sociology, feminist and gender studies, human rights, social justice, and other fields to explore the relationship of intersectionality to their work, to shape more effective remedies, and to promote greater collaboration between and across social movements.

It's a good gig, if you can get it. But it's far from her only one. Crenshaw is also the founder of a 501(c)(3), the African American Policy Forum, which promotes CRT to both popular and academic audiences. The forum's mission statement :

Founded in 1996, The African American Policy Forum (AAPF) is an innovative think tank that connects academics, activists and policy-makers to promote efforts to dismantle structural inequality. We utilize new ideas and innovative perspectives to transform public discourse and policy. We promote frameworks and strategies that address a vision of racial justice that embraces the intersections of race, gender, class, and the array of barriers that disempower those who are marginalized in society. AAPF is dedicated to advancing and expanding racial justice, gender equality, and the indivisibility of all human rights, both in the U.S. and internationally.

Among other AAPF activities, Professor Crenshaw hosts a regular webinar, Intersectionality Matters. One recent webinar, released shortly before the election, was entitled, "Black Men for Trump? The Overdue Conversation on Patriarchy and Misogynoir in Black Politics." This election's result, with the greatest share of black voters breaking for a Republican since 1960, is clearly seen by CRT advocates as a problem to rectify, rooted in internalized racism or misogyny.

Another webinar which AAPF put on recently -- "Under the Blacklight: Politics, Power, & the Struggle Against Black Precarity" -- gives a good idea of the influence CRT is gaining. It's not so much the topic that's interesting here as the guests.

Perhaps the most recognizable speaker was Ayanna Pressley, a Massachusetts congresswoman and member of "The Squad." Pressley, as so many CRT advocates do, presented the legal movement and the activist movement as inextricably linked: "If you believe that Black Lives Matter, then you believe that Black healing matters and Black justice matters."

Joining Pressley were Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA) and Kim Foxx, the Cook County State's Attorney who let off Jussie Smollett. During the webinar, Foxx made it clear that she drew no lines between her racial identity and her legal duties, professing, "I'm unapologetic that I come to this role as a black woman."

Heather MacDonald looked closer at Foxx's identity prosecuting in City Journal :

Foxx is a leading figure in the recent national wave of progressive local prosecutors who came to power by playing race politics. She campaigned on the Critical Race Theory credo that the criminal-justice system is endemically biased. She inveighed against the so-called school-to-prison pipeline and promised to reduce racial disparities in prosecutions. Last month, she dismissed aggravated battery charges against a 16-year-old student who had attacked two Chicago police officers; the Chicago police union argued that her dismissal of the charges fit a pattern of favoring offenders over police officers. Foxx operates in a cultural milieu that holds that the fact that a hate crime is a hoax is less important than the fact that it could have been true.

Two congresswomen and a district attorney is no mean collection of power and influence. Even still, the devotees of CRT are far from attaining any kind of governing consensus in Congress or in the criminal justice system. But radical progressive prosecutors like Foxx are sweeping into offices across the country, and all four members of the Squad won reelection -- these ideas, and their radical proponents, are on the rise.

The only question is, how much bigger will the bubble get before it bursts? BillDaytona • 21 minutes ago Critical Theory has become entrenched in the universities. It's not a bubble. It's a takeover.

[Nov 08, 2020] Rep. Dan Crenshaw - Trump, BLM and the 2020 Election

CHAZ as a parody in French revolution is an interesting idea
Nov 08, 2020 | www.youtube.com


Mark Dyer
, 1 month ago

JOHN: "Human nature does not change" ( 10:00 ) is not a conservative insight. It is a 'religious' insight, which conservatism recognises. But no 'religion' analyses human nature, and recognises it for what it is, better than the teachings of a young Galilean around two thousand years ago. Unfortunately his teachings on our 'human-ness' were important for the first two hundred years after his death and resurrection; but have, since, been absorbed, and subsumed, into the image of the 'Christos', in order that the 'leaders' of the Church might achieve POWER. We see these pathetic 'career-clergy' men and women clinging to their 'clerical power' to this very day: but covid has found their empty gospel wanting.


SD
, 1 month ago

Very good interview and excellent questions. Dan is very intelligent and has a common sense, down to earth, moral attitude to life and as a congressman. Do not agree with all of his judgements politically but respect his thorough investigation and research into the matter. Really respect his mature attitude and personal comport. Do not agree with his disdain for the Pres even when agreeing with the Pres actions. There is a personal problem due to an encounter or some other personal conflict on a deeper level. Credit due to separating it from the office he holds.


Christian Prepper
, 3 weeks ago

"SYSTEMIC RACISM" EXISTS! 11:58 It's called "Affirmative Action" -- allowing the skin color of an applicant to weigh in on whether or not to accept the applicant.

Katana Sharp , 1 month ago (edited)

As far as BLM and CHAD and racism is concerned look at South Africa today and what's happened in South Africa since Mandela and the AMC took power in South Africa after Apartheid!

Nigel Ripon , 1 month ago (edited)

It took to nearly the end of the interview to state what is truly missing from public discourse, and that is the understanding that a person's moral compass, a party's moral compass, a nation's moral compass, depends upon something higher than themselves, for some it is God, for others it is themselves, in the form of the State. Therein lies the conflict - between absolute truth and relative truth, between eternal morals and situation ethics, between thankfulness and entitlement, between forgiveness and condemnation, between love of country and betrayal. And right now that conflict in the USA is reflected on the political battlefield between Republicans and Democrats.

Ron Les , 1 month ago (edited)

The one thing you never hear from the left today, is the idea of personal responsibility for your own actions and behaviors, which is the cornerstone of freedom. I recently saw a video of a drug store, where two men came into the store and shoplifted from the store, the store manager called the Police. The Police had the shoplifters give back what they'd stolen and were not arrested for their actions. Afterwords a woman got out her phone to record and began to badger the store manager for his actions. She said to him that he was endangering the lives of black men because they could have died at the hands of the Police that day. Never once did she acknowledge that they shouldn't have shop lifted and it was their actions that should be in question, not the store manager. She got downright nasty with the manager and later people protested in front of the drug store for the injustice of calling the Police on shoplifters. Think about that for a second, we've swung completely upside down as a society with this type of thinking. Recently a Policeman shot and killed a crazed man as he came charging out a front door wielding a knife over his head running at the officer to kill him with the knife, the officer ran away but eventually had no choice but to turn and shoot this man, and people came out in large numbers and protested the officers actions. I guess he was supposed to sacrifice his life to the black lives matter movement. So in the vocal black community there is absolutely no need for personal responsibility anymore, no matter what someone does it's always everyone else's fault, or our racist societies fault, but never their own due to their own behavior. Now that's some scary shit.

amber , 1 month ago

Excellent interview. I've not seen many interviews with Dan, great to have him on my team! Very well spoken and makes good points.

bluskies1000 , 2 days ago (edited)

13 minutes "Systemic Racism" Let me start by saying I'm self educated, my observations my own, I follow no one, and I have no followers :) People are misunderstanding the reasons for their economic problems (meaning poverty), and inability to ever improve conditions, and describing it as Systemic Racism. Truth is we all have limited horizons. Parochial, whether by geography or class, or both. Where I live I see a mix of all race/ethnic- mostly caucasian (white) Americans, impoverished , homeless, miserable, who tried and failed so much they have given up. Black people see the same thing but it's mostly black people where they chose to live. Same with Asians, South Americans, Somalians (Ilhan Omar :( and so forth. Whats stuck everyone in the mud is called NAIRU (natural anti inflation rate of unemployment), a rule adopted by all the central banks around the world including the USA and Australia in the last half of the 1970"s. Search & find dozens of varying descriptions of what NAIRU is about. That was when or first homeless appeared (generally "overpaid" union American farm workers at first) It means permanent high unemployment, adjusted by the central banks, leaving workers in surplus, in order to keep wages flat or slightly declining. In the USA add to that mass runaway immigration of low skilled workers accustomed to minimal wage. Think of it as a game of musical chairs. The number of chairs (jobs) is slowly increasing, but the number of people looking for chairs increases faster. Thus our large and seemingly permanent population living in alleys and street sidewalks, never able to find employment, and given in to despair. Trump has turned off NAIRU at our central bank, and greatly slowed the excessive and illegal immigration, and until the Pandemic shutdowns, turning everything around. A tighter labor market had employers rehabilitating older homeless workers and employing them, plus raising wages to attract workers


jerrylev59
, 1 month ago (edited)

Systemic racism is an illusion that some people see due to their unconscious bias. It works both ways! ;)

EF M , 1 month ago

16:48 Fascism- characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition and strong regimentation of society and of the economy. Anarchism - is a political philosophy and movement which is skeptical of authority and rejects all involuntary, coercive forms of hierarchy. Communism - a socioeconomic order structured upon the ideas of common ownership of the means of production and the absence of social classes, money and the state. It looks like the congressman is putting negative words together without understanding they are opposites of each other. He's become a politician.


TheMoravians
, 3 weeks ago

Yes! FINALLY someone is contradicting the false claim of "both sides are doing it" with censorship and cancel culture. Now, if only people would talk specifically about how CRT fuels the insanity, we would have a chance to pull our country out of this spiral of destruction. A sane person in Portland needs a little help here!

Bandit Quest , 1 month ago

For 40 years I paid a large chunk of my Paycheck into Social Security. How can Dan call this an Entitlement. I guess the paycheck that I worked for is an Entitlement too. When did the labor that I provide become an entitlement. Entitlements are when something of value is given to those that did nothing to earn it, like welfare checks.


PRINCIPLES WISE
, 1 month ago (edited)

Interesting analysis! Systemic racism is everywhere,🙄 is in the institutions?, **but it's in you 😳and you don't know it?** So you have to change the institutions and make the UNEQUAL👹? in order to create equality🥴😂🤣😂😆😂😂 Isn't Radical Left = Socialism?


Robert Garay
, 1 month ago

The defunding of the police is to set the way for a national police as proposed by President Obama in 2009 governed by DC. In its place temporarily, the strong arm of this movement are Antifa and BLM. I equate these groups to the Brown Shirts of the Nazi party in the 1930s. Once the German police were pacified and converted to the ideals of the party an SS was created along with a Ghestappo which made the Brown Shirts an irrelevant and dangerous group. It was destroyed in The Night of the Long Knives. Now you truly have the recipe for central control and the tendency towards repression of those that will not conform.


D Smith
, 1 month ago (edited)

Crenshaw spoke disingenuously about "the debt crisis, " blaming it on seniors. Surely he realizes we have a fiat money system -- the bankers and other mega-corporate interests seized TRILLIONS recently in two massive "Covid" heists." Bankers got trillions in October in a REPO rescue, which was barely reported. Add their 2008 bailout, costing $21 trillion. And don't forget defense industry payouts PLUS an even larger stealth siphoning revealed in the delinquent Pentagon audit -- it exposed more TRILLIONS missing! And #Unappropriated by Congress ! Their excuse: oops, "clerical" Why doesn't Rep Crenshaw complain about trillions disappeared by the military? Or going to rich bankers? Yeah. Blame it on Boomers living on Social Security... and who had FICA taxes removed from their paychecks for decades.


T J
, 1 month ago

Social security is not an entitlement but money that the working class had taken out of their paychecks for the time they worked for me 35 plus years but maybe your too young to know about that...do your home work


Bryan Neff
, 1 month ago

The globalist technological revolution that we are in the midst of has pulled the economic and cultural rug out from under the vast majority of citizens of western capitalist democracies. Many people feel as though they no longer have anything of value to provide others in a society based on the free and voluntary exchange of goods and services, or if they do, that someone in China will provide it for far less. This reality has set the stage for the attractiveness of Marxist ideology. We have made the average person in the West obsolete or superfluous.

[Nov 07, 2020] Victor Davis Hanson - Trump, China and Black Lives Matter by John Anderson

The crocodile will eat Dems and may be not as the last as they hope
Nov 07, 2020 | www.youtube.com

John Anderson
101K subscribers SUBSCRIBE Victor Davis Hanson is an American classicist, military historian, columnist, and farmer. He has been a commentator on contemporary politics for the National Review and The Washington Times and is currently the Martin and Illie Anderson Senior Fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution. He and John analyse the current culture war and the effect it is having on our geopolitical strategy especially in relation to China, in light of the current pandemic. If you value this discussion and want to see more like it, make sure you subscribe to the channel by clicking this link: https://www.youtube.com/c/JohnAnderso...


Lucius Seneca
, 3 months ago

As someone who wasted his youth on a worthless law degree, I can tell you that the US has way too many lawyers, and way too many law schools. The job market for lawyer collapsed about 10 years ago, and law schools responded by pushing social justice activism as a recruitment tool. They're training movie lawyers, instead of real ones, and jacking up tuition to ridiculous levels. The graduates come out financially ruined, propagandized, and barely employable. I repaid my loans by leaving the field and working construction, and I wish I'd never wasted my time on it. They send me alumni donation request forms, trumpeting their new social justice initiatives.

Flash , 2 months ago (edited)

Interesting conversation. Regarding "racism" it is an empty charge against America today from those of African descent. Like America has always been racist and AS IF their ancestors came from a place that was not. I have visited several countries in Africa and read much of history. What is called "racism" hardly compares to the brutal "tribalism" that is in Africa. Often one tribe wiping out other tribes. Of course, we are aware many tribes sold "other tribes" into slavery. Now this follows all of history and other places in the world. There is no nation and no tribe on earth that hasn't been guilty of racism/tribalism/nationalism, etc. Why do we let organizations like BLM distort history? What history is taught in the USA schools? Seesm we horrible suffer much from superficial schooling regarding the history of racism/tribalism/nationalism/religionism/slavery/abolitionism and so on. Seems it will never change until we realize there is none righteous, not one. So - let us all confess past sins and be determine to improve from where we are now as much as humanly possible. Equality and fairness is a forever quest worth pursuing.


Vir Visque Vir
, 2 months ago

Marxists will stimulate and inflame and exaggerate any potential group resentment or conflict or difference within society - race, gender, sexuality - in order to bring about as much confusion and chaos as possible in the hopes that "capitalist" societies - and families and individuals - will fall apart from within so that they can then step up and "save the day" with their brilliant Marxist framework - the same Marxist framework that has worked so brilliantly in the past in the Soviet Union, East Europe, Mao's China, Pol Pot's Cambodia, Ho's Vietnam, etc., - gulags, walls, repression, stagnation and well over 100 million dead through starvation, worked to death in labour camps and mass executions, but, hey, don't let that stop you.

The individual counts for nothing and the collective within the brilliant framework counts for everything. Human life counts for nothing and the ideology counts for everything. Evidence counts for nothing because, hey, you know, if anything ever went wrong, it was "not real Marxism". "So let us try again and next time we'll get the gulags and walls and executions right." Behind all this is the spirit of resentment and vengeance, a spiritual war that will not allow for anything that transcends their limitations, anything that transcends materialism and bureaucracy, like creativity, innovation or free enterprise. Free spirits must be shot down. Individual responsibility must not be allowed.

Everything must be collectivised. You are not an individual, you are a soulless member of a collective according to your race, gender, sexuality and nothing more. You are a locked-in member of a bureaucratic category and nothing more! There is no "you" apart from the category we place you in. So give up all hope, all striving and all spiritual and aesthetic and intellectual growth, and just accept your impotent, inevitable, irrefutable future as a zombi worker slave to the Central Committee that will make all decisions for you. History has a plot and you are just a meaningless iota in the grand sweep of history.

And if you don't go along with this narrative, we will work on your guilt feelings, your sense of fairness, your fear of losing your livelihood, by calling you a "racist", "sexist", "fascist", "something-phobe", "anti-something" and bureaucratically moving you out of your position. The soulless, heartless, godless bureaucracy is everything and you are nothing. Until there - literally - is nothing.

Their end goal is not something like power, prestige, money; their end goal is nihilism, nothingness, the lights go out, the pain stops, the "unfairness" stops. "If I can't have it, then you can't have it either." And their vengeance against life, spirit, God, glory, joy, beauty, is complete Th- th- th- That's all folks!

GORDON COUTTS , 1 month ago

All really interesting. The linking of what is happening in the States with the French Revolution is astounding. One thing that stands out is the godlessness of the French during the Revolution, they publicly, through the National Assembly declared themselves atheist and set up the Cult of Reason using a dancing girl as their object of worship and worshipped her in Notre Dame. The anarchy in the States from the left is just as godless and is seeking the same. Problem is is that it led to the Reign of Terror. If anyone is interested, read the chapter on the French Revolution in the book 'The Great Controversy' by E.G. White. Then read the the 24th chapter of the Book of Matthew. We are in for extremely interesting and worrying times.


Arthur. III
, 2 months ago

"Our elite are intellectually and Morally suspect." That is such a real-life statement.

Todd Marshall , 2 months ago

1:15 "Decolonization of post war British Empire"? People! What is the predominant accent you hear in our media today? It is British. We are still their colony. We're like children being patted on the head by our guardians. Our enemies: Our government at all levels; Britain; Israel. We are being attacked from within. When that happens we must divide or be conquered. Emigration is today's Trojan horse. The antidote to globalization is secession. The solution: Iterative secession. We are not homogeneous and shouldn't desire to be. The solution to neighbors who don't get along is not to force them to live in the same house. We need many more spaces. Just look around. Who do you want to be equal to? Who do you think is your equal?


gary webb
, 1 month ago

This country was being destroyed from within by losing the skills of the people in the manufacturing sector. Go into stores an find nothing produced in USA. Even simple things like clothes hangers. My dry cleaners asked me if I could bring any I had to them because of supply disruption from China. Thank God we have a strong agricultural sector. That is our strength. China's weakness. A billion more mouths to feed. China has to look outside there country to feed there people. Our weakness was energy Independence. Trump changed that along with new technology like fracking. He allowed the horses to run by removing excess regulation. Now we have new LNG plants an pipelines an opening new areas to drilling. We need to work with Taiwan an Japan to help neutralize China in the East. An Germany needs to stay on board with USA to check Russia expansion. Putin wants to restore the old Soviet Union. We need to support countries like Ukraine an Poland. We have many strengths. USA is not racist. That was proven when we elected an African American candidate with blacks representing less than 15% of population. Americans need to stand up for there country an not be labeled by a radical group like BLM or Antifa. Stop the destruction of our culture an monuments. Enjoy VDH talks.

[Nov 06, 2020] "merit" is an inherently racist construct designed and centered on white supremacist framing

Nov 06, 2020 | crookedtimber.org

Kiwanda 10.24.20 at 5:16 pm (
38
)

Actually s/he complained about the 'misuse' of the phrase 'white supremacy', a phrase which can be very easily defined by the apparently bizarre and abnormal activity of 'looking up the phrase in a dictionary'. It literally has no 'hidden' or 'non-standard' definition.

The motte definition of "white supremacy" is Mirriam-Webster: "the belief that the white race is inherently superior to other races and that white people should have control over people of other races".

The observation that white supremacy, under this definition, has been influential in American history, is not controversial. (Controversial: claiming that the American revolution was fought to protect slavery, as claimed by the 1619 Project, before the, ah, clarification was issued.)

A bailey, if not "hidden", definition of "white supremacy" from the Challenging White Supremacy (CWS) workshop organizers , comments that White Supremacy Culture includes "Perfectionism .Sense of Urgency .Quantity Over Quality .Worship of the Written Word "

This outlook is influential; it, or something much like it, is part of the training of all New York school employees, as George Packer notes:

De Blasio's schools chancellor, Richard Carranza, has answered critics of the diversity initiative by calling them out for racism and refusing to let them "silence" him. As part of the initiative, Carranza has mandated anti-bias training for every employee of the school system, at a cost of $23 million. One training slide was titled "White Supremacy Culture." It included "Perfectionism," "Individualism," "Objectivity," and "Worship of the Written Word" among the white-supremacist values that need to be disrupted. In the name of exposing racial bias, the training created its own kind.

Or as SF School Board member A. M. Collins
says ,

"merit" is an inherently racist construct designed and centered on white supremacist framing

Or from the NYT:

The meaning of the words has expanded, too. Ten years ago, white supremacy frequently described the likes of the Ku Klux Klan and David Duke, the neo-Nazi politician from Louisiana. Now it cuts a swath through the culture, describing an array of subjects: the mortgage lending policies of banks; a university's reliance on SAT scores as a factor for admissions decisions; programs that teach poor people better nutrition; and a police department's enforcement policies.

So Mirriam-Webster is behind the times on the evolving and ever-expanding meaning of "white supremacy"; an update is anticipated.

[Oct 25, 2020] In the first election of 1788-9, only 43,782 men were able to cast votes for Presidential electors, out of a total American population of nearly four million.

Notable quotes:
"... It is the great con game. The super rich use the blacks especially, but also most of the browns, as excuses, weapons, and tools to batter the white middle class and white working class into utter submission. Tyranny of the worst sort seems to be end game. ..."
Oct 25, 2020 | www.unz.com

Observator , says: October 23, 2020 at 12:54 pm GMT

There is no agenda to "work together" with people who are trying to steal our freedom by replacing our heritage as the world's first secular republic with a Christian theocracy. When Christians took over the demoralized remnant of the Roman Empire they ushered in a thousand years of repression and intellectual stagnation. We will not allow them to repeat this crime in our land.

While we are selectively quoting the mendacious propaganda of the Federalist articles, let us recall that in Federalist No. 10, Virginia aristocrat James Madison argued that democracies were "spectacles of turbulence incompatible with the rights of property [owners]." He was especially frightened of the mass of landless Americans, who, not unlike his own slaves, "labour under all the hardships of life, and secretly sigh for a more equal distribution of its blessings."

In Federalist No. 35, the future first US secretary of the treasury, Alexander Hamilton, wrote, "The idea of an actual representation of all classes of people by persons of each class is altogether visionary." Anticipating the infamous line in Orwell's "Animal Farm", he continued, the "weight and superior acquirements of the merchants render them more equal" than men of ordinary means.

The usual account of anti-federalism tells of the activism of wealthy men who feared a strong central government would encroach on their local power and privilege. All but forgotten is the opposition of rank-and-file Continental Army veterans who gathered in protest at a number of locations nationwide to burn copies of the new constitution. They declared it was a betrayal of what they thought they had fought for. Captain Daniel Shays, a leader of the western Massachusetts militiamen's abortive uprising the previous year, spoke for all American patriots when he said "we did not overthrow a wise king to be ruled by shopkeepers" but their voices have long been silenced in conventional histories of those turbulent times.

Recall also that in the first election of 1788-9, only 43,782 men were able to cast votes for Presidential electors, out of a total American population of nearly four million.

Jake , says: October 23, 2020 at 2:10 pm GMT
@Observator

And Hamilton is now lionized as being the great hero for blacks and browns.

It is the great con game. The super rich use the blacks especially, but also most of the browns, as excuses, weapons, and tools to batter the white middle class and white working class into utter submission. Tyranny of the worst sort seems to be end game.

anon [197] Disclaimer , says: October 23, 2020 at 2:23 pm GMT

You're like some Guelph who flopped out of a time machine yelling about the bucket and everybody's like, What the fuck is he talking about?

Do you really want to piss away the rapidly dwindling rest of your life fixating on some bullshit stereotyped melodrama? It's three words of one article of one clause of one of the nine core human rights instruments. (You don't know what I'm talking about but bear with me.) Both parties are in perfect agreement about screwing you out of every other human right you got.

Nobody gives a rat's ass about Jay. Your founding fathers are Allen Dulles and Frank Wisner. The conflicts you're trained to emote about are wholly synthetic. Apparatchiks of both parties concur on impunity. That's all your country is. The United States of Impunity.

Rurik , says: October 23, 2020 at 2:49 pm GMT

Trump and his backers have been accused of mass murder.

And during the summer of 2020, the Black Lives Matter- and antifa-fueled riots, looting, arson and assaults on cops went on for weeks, destroying billions of dollars in property and ending with demands to "defund the police."

Scores of statues have been toppled and destroyed -- statues of explorers, missionaries, Founding Fathers of the republic and presidents on Mount Rushmore.

Now, not only are we fractured over ideology, religion, race, culture and morality, but also our country's history has become a cause of irreconcilable conflict.

diversity is (((our))) strength!

Kolya Krassotkin , says: October 23, 2020 at 3:12 pm GMT
@Rational

Leftism, no matter what you call it, has always been dysgenic and always will be. It is a "philosophy" embraced by those unable to surrender their dream for an impossible to achieve perfect world for an imperfect and achievable good one.

Reg Cæsar , says: October 24, 2020 at 5:34 am GMT
@Observator

Recall also that in the first election of 1788-9, only 43,782 men were able to cast votes for Presidential electors, out of a total American population of nearly four million.

Fewer than that. Almost all the states had their legislatures choose the electors back then.

follyofwar , says: October 24, 2020 at 3:46 pm GMT
@Observator

Regarding your last observation, Observator, the fact that the right to vote has become nearly universal for all adults, has made the country's dire situation and short and long-term outlook much worse. Too bad we can't go back to the days when only well-educated male property owners could vote and hold office. Too much democracy contains within it the seeds of its own destruction, which we are witnessing in spades today.

[Oct 24, 2020] Identity politics and cultural marxism

Oct 24, 2020 | www.unz.com

Petermx , says: October 23, 2020 at 10:13 pm GMT

@The Alarmist extreme left have been a disaster for Europe, at least since 1990. They have destroyed the high standard of living Europe built up after the war and they have destroyed Europe's competitiveness. Same for the USA. And the left has done much more warmongering than the right the last 30 years. Neo-Cons (Republicans) are former leftists, mostly Jewish, that promote war for Israel's security and strength. When Europe's right wing parties gain power then Europe can begin its turnaround and perhaps become competitive again. They also want good relations with Russia. That will benefit everyone. Hopefully this happens before the left makes Europe a shithole no one wants to live in.

[Oct 24, 2020] Extremes meet, or how identity wedge can hit neoliberal in the head, when they are not expecting it

Oct 24, 2020 | www.unz.com

Ray Caruso says:

October 23, 2020 at 4:44 am GMT 100 Words

We have, for instance, Lieven focusing on the current top two, great interlocking challenges: climate change and the fact that "350 years of Western and 250 years of Anglo-American predominance are coming to an end."

I was under the impression this was about serious topics, not liberal claptrap. My mistake.

Every problem [neo]liberal cockroaches claim is a calamity -- discrimination against "transgender women of color", police brutality, systemic racism, COVID-19, the Chinese crackdown on Uyghur militants and the Hong Kong chapter of Antifa, and, of course, "climate change" -- is imaginary, inconsequential, or an actual positive.

Everything liberals claim to be a positive or dismiss as inconsequential -- "diversity", mass Third World immigration, Moslem barbarity, BLM and Antifa riots, rigged elections, the normalization of sodomy, feminism, sexual liberation -- is a calamity.

[Oct 21, 2020] Teaching hite Privilege As Fact Is Breaking Law -- UK Equalities Minister Blasts BLM, Critical Race Theory by Simon Veazey

Judging from comment ZH audience does not like Critical Race theory one bit :-). Does this mean Trump 2020-2024?
It is also clear that the tide of white public opinion that's to BLM and Critical Race Theory turned against the blacks and turned drastically. In a way founders of BLM did a very bad service to community. It proved to be extremely divisive for the country.
Oct 21, 2020 | www.zerohedge.com

Black bolshvism, maserading a BLM and Critial Race thory.

Authored by Simon Veazey via The Epoch Times,

Schools that teach " white privilege " as fact are breaking the law , the equalities minister has told MPs.

MP Kemi Badenoch said the underpinning ideology of critical race theory "sees my blackness as victimhood and their whiteness as oppression."

"This government stands unequivocally against critical race theory," she told MPs during a debate on Oct. 20 in which Labour MP Dawn Butler had called for the curriculum to be "decolonised."

https://www.youtube.com/embed/KtXshJDqJOw

Badenoch, MP for Saffron Waldon and also minister for equalities, said the rise of critical race theory was a "dangerous trend in race relations."

"We do not want to see teachers teaching their white pupils about white privilege and inherited racial guilt," she said.

"Any school which teaches these elements of critical race theory or which promotes partisan political views such as defunding the police, without offering a balanced treatment of opposing views, is breaking the law."

The defunding of police has been a demand of many key members and supporters of Black Lives Matter.

"Some schools have decided to openly support the anti-capitalist Black Lives Matter group, often fully aware that they have a statutory duty to be politically impartial," said Badenoch. "Black lives do matter -- of course they do. But we know that the Black Lives Matter movement, capital B, L, M, is political."

Some Black Lives Matter leaders and groups, including the UKBLM group, are explicitly anti-capitalist.

https://lockerdome.com/lad/13084989113709670?pubid=ld-dfp-ad-13084989113709670-0&pubo=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com&rid=www.zerohedge.com&width=890

"What we are against is the teaching of contested political ideas as if they are accepted facts," said Badendoch.

"We don't do this with communism. We don't do this with socialism. We don't do it with capitalism."

'Not America'

Badendoch also warned against importing the rhetoric on race from America.

" Our history of race is not America's history of race. Most black British people who have come to our shores were not brought here in chains, but came voluntarily due to their connections to the UK and in search of a better life. I should know. I am one of them.

"We have our own joys and stories to tell. From the Windrush generation to the Somali diaspora, it is a story that is uniquely ours."

During the debate on education and race, MP Dawn Butler had earlier called for the curriculum to be "decolonised," saying that "history is taught to make one group of people feel inferior and another group of people feel superior."

Former Windrush passengers and members of the RAF Donald Clarke, George Mason, Sam King MBE, and Allan Wilmot in the Imperial War Museum in London on June 12, 2008. (Cate Gillon/Getty Images)

But Badenoch said the curriculum did not need decolonising for "the simple reason that it is not colonised," adding, "We should not apologise for the fact that British children primarily study the history of these islands."

In the United States, the Trump administration recently banned agencies or contractors from "conducting training that promotes race stereotyping, for example, by portraying certain races as oppressors by virtue of their birth."

"This ideology is rooted in the pernicious and false belief that America is an irredeemably racist and sexist country; that some people, simply on account of their race or sex, are oppressors; and that racial and sexual identities are more important than our common status as human beings and Americans," Trump wrote, later calling the ideology "divisive."

The UK government last month issued guidance which says schools should not use resources "produced by organisations that take extreme political stances on matters."

Examples of unacceptable stances include "a publicly stated desire to abolish or overthrow democracy, capitalism, or to end free and fair elections," as well as opposition to free speech or the use of racist or anti-Semitic language. Materials "promoting divisive or victim narratives that are harmful to British society," were also included as an example.


Lt. Frank Drebin , 1 hour ago

A rare example in these surreal times. I salute you ma'am.

Nothing , 36 minutes ago

Not that rare. Ive heard numbers of blacks and latinos speak out like this. But these voices are systematically suppressed by Google, by Facebook, and also by the blocking of peaceable assemblages and by simple conversation with strangers without being muzzled with the excuse given of coronaphobia.....

Dickweed Wang , 1 hour ago

If all races are so equal why is it that when Europeans first went to the African continent the people there were not using the wheel?

Yippie21 , 1 hour ago

Now do American Indians; same

CriswellSpeaks , 1 hour ago

If whites are superior to blacks then why didn't the white race completely supplant the black race in Africa? Short answer, same reason the black race never built any great cities in Africa, tropical diseases. Geography is destiny and being located at the equator, tropical diseases have prevented black Africans from creating any great civilizations until the present era. When the whites of S. Africa attempted to migrate north much past Rhodesia they were stopped dead in their tracks(literally) by tropical diseases. Imagine what a society would look like if it got hammered by the Black Death every century and you have black Africa.

DeathMerchant , 1 hour ago

********! There was no enviromental incentive to progress in equatorial regions. No need for warmth, food or advanced tools to progress beyond ability to provide basic necessities which were available to them year round. Compare that to the northern climes which had minimal seasonal opportunities to provide those things and the development of capability to cope with such.

CriswellSpeaks , 1 hour ago

Critical Race Theory is a form of back handed racism directed at minorities. According to CRT, as a white person I possess this magical power to oppress all black people that I was born with. No matter what black people do, they are powerless is the face of my absence of skin pigmentation. Seriously, if you do a little digging into the founders of CRT you will probably find the law firms/lawyers/political lobbyists who were responsible in the 1960's for opposing the abolition of Jim Crow laws. After they lost to color blindness and integration, they infiltrated the Communists, claimed racial harmony was preventing a Marxist revolution and had to be reversed for it to happen. CRT would drag race relations back to the post civil war era.

PCShibai , 32 minutes ago

Ask yourself this, " if ' white privilege ' is the real reason why blacks cannot get ahead in the US, then why aren't blacks successful in all the other black-lead nations on the planet?" I mean...... there's ZERO history of ' white privilege ' keeping down Uganda, or the Congo, or ANY other black-lead nation...... and yet they are all failing their people miserably and have ALWAYS failed their people miserably!

WHAT DO ALL THOSE BLACK NATIONS BLAME " THEIR " CONTINUOUS FAILURE ON? The Samoans???

" White privilege " is the CRUTCH that is used by the black race for their own failures. Failure to maintain a family that raises children properly, failure to insist that their children are properly educated, failure to integrate into the successes of the surrounding culture, failure to accept the fundamentals that make people economically successful.

Until they eliminate the CRUTCH and accept their responsibility for their own success & their own failures, they will continue to be the one failed culture throughout the entire world!

cvp , 9 minutes ago

I do not disagree with the point your making; I would like to add, the people who migrate from the African continent to the United States are some of the happiest people I've met and worked with in my life. They are not interested in what BLM is selling! Jus say'n...

5onIt , 40 minutes ago

None of the black people in this country were brought here in chains either. They are free to leave whenever they damn well please.

greatdisconformity , 30 minutes ago

The institution of slavery gave black lives a value they did not otherwise have in Africa.

Africans simply sold the losers of tribal wars, or their own slaves, to the coastal markets.

It was either the auction block, or the killing fields.

I do not feel any guilt at all.

Without slavery, these people would not exist in any form; here or with descendants in Africa.

They owe their existence in its most fundamental form to slavery.

They should be glad.

Whitey is being played. Big time.

Spetzco , 19 minutes ago

Especially as most of the major slave traders in Africa were BLACK themselves.

greatdisconformity , 35 minutes ago

The language of Critical Race Theory is the language of Genocide.

Historically, when an ethnic group is singled out for a savage take-down like Critical Race Theory, it has been a prelude and pretext for mass killings.

Of course, this time things will be different.

Shifter_X , 14 minutes ago

It's the same playbook the Boshies Nazis and Maoists used. Yes, genocide and wiping out history, that's their specialty.

St. TwinkleToes , 1 hour ago

When you're a race hustler filled with the dripping hatred of Whitey, and all you have going in life are endless victim grievance bs regurgitated to get a head in life, it all makes sense. It's not enough that Blacks have their own BET, endless Black This & Black That Awards, staring roles in most all feature films, Two term POTUS, no, they want it all. They want Whitey to live in imaginary Black World Wakanda as indentured Servants as reparations for slavery 150 years ago. They want to drag us in chains down roads of endless Persecution until we are no more.

Phuc Critical Race Theory, and Phuc Black Lives Matter.

SunsteintheSodomite , 58 minutes ago

Rhodesia, Zimbabwe, and South Africa showed the world that you can build a complete NATION with infrastructure, economic supply routes, trade deals, agriculture, technology, EVERYTHING...

...then drop off the keys and an instruction manual...

...and within 5-10 years it will be beyond repair.

Throughout their history, blacks have had only one route to civilization:

Follow WHITEY.

Rest Easy , 23 minutes ago

And van jones has the nerve to say white people have a virus. Maybe so van. We are too nice.

Is there a US city and unfortunate surrounding suburbs that has a large percentage of black persons not causing havoc? Ruin. Just generally weird stupid bs. Morning noon and night. Tip toeing through the daisies trying to keep the young black kids fun down to a dull roar. If you are "lucky". Get a little uppity and the klan with a tan comes a knocking. Sometimes just being white around black Nazis is more than sufficient.

Yeah. Good times. It's a party in the USA.

https://youtu.be/M11SvDtPBhA

Stuck on Zero , 33 minutes ago

At least teach students about what happened in Rwanda.


play_arrow
Misean , 4 minutes ago

Or Rhodesia, the bread basket of Africa.

After changing it's name to Zimbabwe, the black rulers have reduced the nation to abject poverty. From feeding much of sub Saharan Africa, the nation now depends on massive food imports, most of which is given by western nations at great expense.

The population of productive whites and blacks have either left or been killed by roving bands of bandits. The bandits "reclaimed" commercial farms at gun point, took girls as slaves killed all makes, and raped then murdered the women.

Having no clue how commercial farming works, but assured by their leaders that traditional African farming was superior, they sold the farm equipment to smarter thugs, for dimes on the dollar (the buyers exported the equipment to better run countries, for sizable profits, this depleting the country of the farm capital necessary to turn things around).

The farm bandits, with stone age farming techniques, destroyed the soil quickly. Most of the fertile top soil has washed away, what's left is exhausted.

nsurf9 , 1 hour ago

The only "privileged" our country is suffering under - is not already ending the Affirmative Action Act of 1986. It had it place 25 years ago. Now, it is nothing more than a prima facie Government sanctioned systematic discrimination against Caucasians - that's now well past being justified by any stretch of a "compelling state interest" argument.

If you are being wrongfully discriminated, you have the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment and State law to pursue your claim - like the rest of us.

SmokingArgus , 25 minutes ago

If you have a "Minister of Equalities" you've already lost.

Shifter_X , 1 hour ago

"" Our history of race is not America's history of race. Most black British people who have come to our shores were not brought here in chains, but came voluntarily due to their connections to the UK and in search of a better life. I should know. I am one of them"

What a steaming pile of ********.

The settlers who came to America in 1560 (not 1619 as the fictitious farcical revised "history" claims) and thereafter brought their slaves WITH THEM FROM THE UK

The UK was happy to pass the slave trade on to the colonies.

But make no mistake, the UK was up to its *** in slavery well before the colonies were even formed.

DieSocialJusticeWankers , 1 hour ago

A Biden win and there will be affirmative action and CRTheory on steroids. The USA will die for young white people. Vote Trump white people, or you're fkkkkked!

tyberious , 1 hour ago

https://www.breitbart.com/2020-election/2020/10/21/10-examples-of-joe-bidens-history-of-racially-charged-conduct-and-comments/

1. As recently as June of 2019, Biden praised the "civility" of the segregationist senators he worked with in Congress to pass anti-busing legislation.

2. Biden praised the notorious segregationist politician George Wallace, boasted about how Wallace once honored him with an award in 1973, and told a Southern audience in 1987 that "we [Delawareans] were on the South's side in the Civil War."

3. Biden opposed busing in the 1970s and expressed fears that it would lead to a "racial jungle."

4. Biden voted to protect the tax-exempt status of private segregated schools.

5. Biden told black radio host Charlamagne tha God, "If you have a problem figuring out whether you're for me or Trump, then you ain't black."

6. Biden told the Asian and Latino Coalition of Des Moines that "poor kids are just as bright and just as talented as white kids."

7. While delivering remarks before a black audience in Delaware, Biden launched into a meandering story about a gang leader named Corn Pop and claimed that he "learned about roaches" while working at a community pool in a black neighborhood.

8. In 2008, Biden referred to then presidential candidate Barack Obama as "the first sort of mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean."

9. In 2006, Biden told C-SPAN, "You cannot go to a 7-Eleven or a Dunkin' Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent."

10. Biden falsely claimed to have "marched" in the civil rights movement.

Still waiting on Trump's racist comments, been like 6 years.

chubbar , 1 hour ago

https://thedailycoin.org/2020/07/06/there-are-more-white-americans-who-are-descendants-of-slaves-than-there-are-black-american-descendants-of-slaves/

ThomasJefferson69 , 41 minutes ago

Brits had slave's just as almost every other country in the world has, in the past even white slaves (Irish). Brits have no higher ground to stand on than anyone else looking at their indiscretions in India and China and elsewhere. Such as the opium wars in China.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/worst-atrocities-british-empire-amritsar-boer-war-concentration-camp-mau-mau-a6821756.html

milo_hoffman , 46 minutes ago

Silly British. They should realize it has NOTHING to do with race. It's all about COMMUNISM, they are just as in danger from the cancer of communism as anyone else.

rmogabe , 27 minutes ago

She said it is a political movement.

artytom , 1 hour ago

Thank Goodness. Very surprised to see this coming out of the UK government - but...

Is the tide turning.
Have the World Bank run out of bribes?
Have we passed the tipping point and they have taken off the pressure because they know there is no going back?
Are they satisfied that the economies are in free fall and won't bounce back?
Are they simply covering their asses (the most likely of all).

DeathMerchant , 1 hour ago

In 1959, AAMD set the IQ threshold for mental retardation at < 85. The civil rights movement of the next decade forced psychologists to rethink this boundary, because half the African American population fell below it. In 1973, responding to this concern, AAMD (by then AAMR) changed the threshold for retardation from IQ < 85 to IQ < 70. The boundary moved south by one standard deviation! The proportion of blacks below the threshold instantly dropped from about 50 percent to 12 percent. Subsequent refinements made it still more difficult to meet the criteria for retardation.
When Binet in 1905 produced the first IQ test, it promised to revolutionize the diagnosis and treatment of mental retardation. A half century later it came under attack for reasons Binet could not have imagined. Could any of the pioneer psychometricians have foreseen Larry P. v. Riles (1979), a California class-action suit that focused on IQ testing of young black children? The court held that IQ tests were not valid for African Americans. It banned California from using the tests for placing black students in classes for the "educable mentally retarded" or equivalent categories on the grounds that the tests were biased. After a series of appeals, the district court ruled that no special education related purposes exist for which IQ tests could be administered to black pupils. Though only a California ruling, the case began a political assault on standardized testing that has spread beyond the IQ test to college entrance exams, promotional exams and more.
A Case History of Government Intervention
In 1996, The Office for Civil Rights placed 16 school districts nationwide under review for potential discrimination. The districts were charged with violating the civil rights of minorities, especially African Americans, because blacks were found to be overrepresented in special education programs, especially those for the mentally retarded. Five of the 16 districts were in Maryland. Ironically, Maryland is a very liberal state very much in tune with the goals of the Civil Rights Office. Maryland is also almost 30 percent black. The offending districts included Baltimore, Howard, Harford, Montgomery and Prince Georges counties. OCR detectives uncovered "discrimination" by looking at school records. The offending data appear in Table 1. The irritant is in the last column. Black children were classified as retarded at 1.5 to 2.2 times the rate of whites. OCR ordered the counties to find a "remedy."

http://www.lagriffedulion.f2s.com/******.htm

Bill of Rights , 1 hour ago

BLM is a racist organization.

Ideology in Practice , 1 hour ago

Fortunately teaching Critical Race Theory or any other invented marxist propaganda is going to get a lot of people killed.

They'll find they deployed the subversion before gaining a sufficient majority, or sufficient technological control among a highly educated peasantry.

And by the end of all that killing, there will be a brighter future for European descendants, darkness relegated to its corner of the Earth.

By that time, all the people who would otherwise wish they'd never uttered a word of critical race theory will simply be no longer.

Fight back.

You have the moral law on your side and you will win.

GreatUncle , 18 minutes ago

UK Government ... ROFL.

The UK government last month issued guidance which says schools should not use resources "produced by organisations that take extreme political stances on matters."

Because see we the UK government do that ... ain't you noticed? So as we do it then it is all legal like mass immigration to destroy the indigenous population...

MadameDeficit , 1 hour ago

Oh boy, can't wait for the hypocrites to tell her why she's wrong.

Maghreb2 , 1 hour ago

She's right but she should shut her mouth either ways because she's a tory sell out bitch and we know that because we know the Tories and the Freud-Murdoch run P.R firms they get their polices from . Real racial theory would have David Lammy lynched by everyone but the Chinese. Starting teaching the little white boys about Jimmy Savile in Leeds infirmary and we'll have them ready to suicide bomb Buckingham Palace and go after the nearest member of "the people who will n ot be blamed for nothing " minority . Tell them that is what Mi5 are for. To protect White Privileges and the weaker ones will kill themselves when they see what they have planned for them in the future. By the Divine right of the Windsors suicide isn't even legal and just remember that is why he was in the infirmaries. She should remember how similar the white monkeys are to the black monkeys in their natural habitat .

The west is past imported racial talking points. Blood for the money will be new mantra after the war starts but we wouldn't expect the people in parliament to have ever understood that in way because they can't see the real world. Rivers of Blood Libel these days. Play them this song and we'll see which music turns them into hardened killers over night. Tell them Guy Burgesses and Rothschild used to go to the Gargoyle club and the stories about Dolphin Square .

Tell her to go listen to songs of praise in a Church with other happy clappers tell her to listen closely to the words she'll get the message.

curmudgery , 1 hour ago

Victim ideology as broadcast by media, politicians and schools is the true divider and oppressor that reinforces the odious legacy of slavery. The only way people move beyond what was unacceptable in the past is to release and bury it. Those who are vested in maintaining the old ugly status quo are the ones who won't let it go. that's the cabal and all their minions. Enough.

GeezerGeek , 1 hour ago

How many black slaves were needed on Britain's cotton plantations? Duh...

How many black slaves were brought to Britain's colonies in America (not just on the continent) before it became an independent (at least that's the story) nation? Duh...

As an aside, isn't one particular candidate for VP this year the descendant of a slave owner in a former British colony?

Compare slaves brought to British colonies against slaves brought into the USA after independence. Which number is greater and which process lasted longer?

For fun, we can then consider black slaves brought to other places in the Americas, both North and South, plus the nearby islands.

At least she had the courage to attack CRT, which strikes me as another example of the soft bigotry of low expectations. How long do you think it will be before she finds herself looking for a new job?

Richard Raymond , 3 minutes ago

https://counter-currents.com/2020/10/michael-hoffmans-they-were-white-they-were-slaves/#more-122575

Yamaoka Tesshu , 9 minutes ago

What is never mentioned is that poor whites suffered from slavery. Depressed wages. Being forced to man "slave patrols" or risk jail time. That system robbed everyone

Faustus B. , 2 hours ago

The left got so worked up about intelligent design being taught in the classroom, but apparently it was just political. We must never forget that they'll ram racial pseudo-science down kid's throats the minute they get the chance.

[Oct 19, 2020] I've been an ethnic minority politician, here's why I know non-white shortlists for MPs will simply make racial divisions worse -- RT Op-ed

Oct 19, 2020 | www.rt.com

Christina Jordan is a Malaysian-born British politician. She served as a Brexit Party Member of the European Parliament (MEP) for South West England from 2019 to 2020.

A Lib Dem parliamentarian's bill to legalise race-based candidate lists is undemocratic, patronising & will undo the decades of progress Britain has made.

I was so irked by an elected public servant's recent declaration, that paraphrasing a great man's quotation was the only response I felt could touch my exasperation.

My comments will not attract much attention in the crowded Twitterverse, but I felt that if there was even half a chance that a few might notice, then I should use the opportunity to do so.

In 1954, while trying to explain what it was to be a parliamentarian, Winston Churchill defined it as, "The first duty of a Member of Parliament is to do what he or she thinks in his or her faithful and disinterested judgement is right and necessary for the honour and safety of Great Britain. Their second duty is to their constituents, of whom they are the representative but not the delegate."

Instead of understanding the primal importance for representative democracy exemplified by those words, on October 14, an elected Member, the Lib Dem Wera Hobhouse, proudly affirmed that she would present a bill that went against that very goal. She wants to make it legal to select politicians based solely on the colour of their skin. Ludicrously, she claims that the bill is necessary to beat racial injustice.

https://platform.twitter.com/embed/index.html?creatorScreenName=RT_com&dnt=false&embedId=twitter-widget-0&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1316337035309993984&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rt.com%2Fop-ed%2F503908-ethnic-minority-politician-shortlists%2F&siteScreenName=RT_com&theme=light&widgetsVersion=ed20a2b%3A1601588405575&width=550px

Her attempt to allow non-white only shortlists will do the exact opposite. Bringing forward a bill which makes it legal to discriminate against candidates just because they are white is undemocratic and downright patronising. It implies that non-whites are incapable of being selected on merit unless Caucasians are sidelined. It is 'one insignificant step for national unity, one giant leap for racial division and disharmony'. Any candidate selected on this basis will be open to justified ridicule.

It is extraordinary that in our democratic country, in the mother of parliaments, a place less happy parts of the world can only eye enviously, we have elected politicians seeking to legalise racial discrimination.

READ MORE By backing housing charity's 'Jewish only' rule, UK court drops the ball. Aren't we all equal in Britain? By backing housing charity's 'Jewish only' rule, UK court drops the ball. Aren't we all equal in Britain?

Quotas do not work. Short lists that favour colour over merit do not work. Parliamentarians who push these divisive agendas should not work for us. Far from eradicating or helping racial injustice, this bill would only serve to stoke the flames of resentment. Our country should, and must, demand that only the best are sent to Westminster. We want candidates to prove to the electorate that they deserve their place and have been chosen on merit, not on a nod and a wink. The message must be that discrimination is always wrong, whatever the skin colour.

I fear that some politicians are taking our country on a destructive path in their crusade to right historical wrongs. In trying to put their new world order into practice, they risk tearing the very fabric of our peaceful and cohesive society. They are saying to our citizens that they are not to be trusted when it comes to fairness and justice for all. Diversity, equality and anti-racism does not mean we divide people of different races, beliefs, backgrounds, religions and ancestry into two groups, i.e. white and non-white.

I write as a person of colour, an immigrant, a democrat and a believer in fair play. I am a staunch and loyal citizen of this great country. One who believes that the majority wants to see us move forward together. But how can we when we have politicians telling us that we cannot be relied on to look out for, and after, each other? It is bad enough that some, through all-women shortlists believe that we should be politically divided by sex. Now they claim only non-whites can better represent non-whites. What message does that send to our friends, peers, children and visitors to our shores?

When I stood for election in 2019 for the European Parliament, I naively believed that I had faced optimal vitriol and abuse. Nothing would ever match the overflowing vat of bilious hate my colleagues and I faced. I had not appreciated however, that in pushing back against our country's navel-gazing, knee-bending, finger-pointing, supine acceptance that white people are privileged racists and black/brown/mixed/Asian/none of the above-skinned people are victims in dire need of saving, I have leapt into a den of hate and scorn.

ALSO ON RT.COM No, the countryside is NOT racist and to suggest it is does the good people of rural Britain a major disservice

I do not parade the following messages to elicit sympathy. I just want to expose the fact that, as a woman of colour who rejects victimhood labels, I receive pretty vile abuse from both the white and non-white contingent of the virtue brigade. In the last few days alone, some of these have included:

You've sold your soul because you're so desperate to be accepted by the Right yet no matter what you say your skin colour will always be the major factor.

So desperate to be liked by the flag waving mob that she'll happily throw her self-respect and morals out the window.

Christina is just a hypocrite and a sell out to get the flag waving bigots on her side.

How can such a dark face have such a white name?

This "christina" seems to be of Asian descent and claims to be an immigrant, not sure how she ended up with an English name

Pulling up the ladder after her to prevent immigrants from entering the country.

Impressing her bully boy, flag shagging fash mates.

Off you pop good immigrant, probably have some bootlicking that's overdue to show how grateful you are to be here.

These, and other comments, only make me more determined to stand up for our country against the monotonous, wearisome and never-ending bashing she undeservedly receives. Creating division is not the answer. Most of us live outside the political, institutional and media bubble and we get along just fine, thank you.

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.


[Oct 19, 2020] A new statue depicting Medusa holding a man's severed head symbolises what's bad about #MeToo and why it's backfired on women by Alexander Adams

Oct 17, 2020 | www.rt.com

In Greek mythology, men used to fear the stony gaze of the snake-haired Gorgon. Today, men once again feel such fear – but, ironically, no campaign has done more to impair women's opportunities either.

A seven-foot statue of Medusa holding a man's severed head was unveiled in New York this week. For six months, this sculpture, made by the Argentinian-Italian artist Luciano Garbati, will be situated facing the Manhattan Supreme Court, where Harvey Weinstein was prosecuted and convicted of sex crimes against actresses and female film-production staff.

The statue is being used in this position as a symbol of justice enacted against male rapists. However, it more accurately – and unintentionally – symbolises the difference between the public triumphalism of the #MeToo movement and its negative repercussions for women in the United States.

The most famous painting of Medusa – a female character from Greek mythology who had a hair of snakes and could turn men to stone if they met her gaze directly – was painted by Caravaggio in 1596. He was inspired by Vasari's account of a lost painting by Leonardo da Vinci. It has been a common subject for artists since. Garbati's statue was made in 2008 and adopted by the #MeToo movement subsequently. From moral outrage to financial advantage

The #MeToo movement hit prominence in 2017 and was initially primarily concerned with incidents, and allegations, of sexual abuse in Hollywood. It quickly grew to include cases of sexual impropriety in many fields, mainly in the US. However, as it expanded, it encompassed rape, sexual abuse, inappropriate sexual contact, unwanted advances, and transactional sex.

By refusing to draw distinctions between actual crimes, ethical/professional infractions, and consensual (but regretted) sex, the movement became diffusely broad. Allegations of sexual abuse led to the accused losing contracts, jobs, and marriages; in some cases, it contributed to suicide. In the ensuing storm of moral panic, actual rape was conflated with Ben Affleck's groping of an actress in a video interview , a woman complaining about a date with Aziz Ansari and Louis CK exposing himself to colleagues (with their consent).

By failing to distinguish between levels of seriousness, the movement lost what moral credibility it had and became a means of gaining revenge and exacting extortion. If crimes have been committed, then they should be reported to the police, not aired in a public forum. The accused need anonymity just as the victims do, until justice can be served.

Sexual accusations have long been weaponized in American pop culture. It has already been proven that a whisper network of female comic-book professionals has targeted male colleagues with – alongside actual crimes – unfounded accusations, in order to provide more opportunities for female creators. This is not a male/female problem; using deceit and exaggeration to advance oneself is as old as language itself.

In American television and film production, #MeToo gained control of productions via Time's Up, enforcing quotas of women and extracting payments. It became a grab to secure lucrative work for women, relying on goodwill from the public and the fear of executives. The Time's Up movement is co-led by Katie McGrath, who runs production company Bad Robot Productions with her husband J.J. Abrams. Bad Robot has a history of presenting itself as a pro-social-justice company. This summer, at a time when rioters were burning shops and destroying historic monuments, Bad Robot made an infamous announcement that there had been " Enough polite conversation. Enough white comfort. "

ALSO ON RT.COM Rose McGowan's new #MeToo rape claim puts the Left in difficulty. No prizes for guessing what they'll do – they'll dump on her Unintended consequences

By presenting a company as an ethical, socially conscious body, that company is an ideal position to benefit from major firms being pressured into making decisions not based on competence but politics. Individuals and companies have seen how they can manipulate public sympathy about sexual abuse to their own advantage. But firms are now realizing this danger.

No event has done more to impair women's opportunities in the workplace than the #MeToo/Time's Up movement. Production companies – even those led by women – now see female colleagues as a source of potential extortion and compensation claims. As a result, they now avoid hiring women in order to avert the possibility of costly legal claims and reputation-impairing social-media campaigns. Following decades-long attempts to persuade male-dominated industries that hiring women brought advantages and an expansion of the talent pool, the moral panic of #MeToo has served only to reveal the disadvantages of employing women.

When male executives see women today, they fear them, just as heroes in Greek mythology feared the gaze of Medusa. Ironically, rather than celebrating female power, Garbati's statue is instead a fitting symbol of the way a campaign that began well has, once again, made men mistrust women.

Think your friends would be interested? Share this story!

Alexander Adams

is an artist, art critic and author. His book 'Iconoclasm, Identity Politics and the Erasure of History' is published by Societas. Follow him on Twitter @AdamsArtist

The statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of RT.


[Oct 15, 2020] Yes, Take '1619' To Task, But Problem Goes Beyond One Story -

Oct 15, 2020 | www.zerohedge.com

Yes, Take '1619' To Task, But Problem Goes Beyond One Story by Tyler Durden Thu, 10/15/2020 - 18:20 Twitter Facebook Reddit Email Print

Submitted By J. Peder Zane, via RealClearInvestigations,

I'll join the chorus calling New York Times columnist Bret Stephens "brave" for last week's takedown of his newspaper's "1619 Project." But I'd also like to ask him: What took you so long?

The 100-page collection of 18 articles that infamously claimed America's "true founding" date is not 1776, but 1619 – the year enslaved Africans were first brought to these shores – has received withering criticism since it was published in August 2019 .

Ten months ago some of the nation's leading historians – including Pulitzer Prize winners Gordon Wood and James McPherson – wrote the Times to challenge a wide array of its claims, which the newspaper and its partner, The Pulitzer Center, were disseminating free of charge in the nation's classrooms . The historians were especially troubled by its assertion that the Revolutionary War was fought to preserve slavery and the project's near total erasure of the contributions of whites to dismantling slavery and working for freedom. Their letter described these failings as "a displacement of historical understanding by ideology."

Their criticisms were echoed and extended by others including Leslie M. Harris, an African American professor of history at Northwestern University, who said she "vigorously disputed" some central claims of the project when she helped fact-check it before publication. "Despite my advice," she wrote in Politico seven months ago , "the Times published the incorrect statement about the American Revolution anyway."

Stephens' sharply written broadside breaks no new ground. What it does provide is a skillful synthesis and endorsement of these voluminous critiques in the Times – by a Timesman. That is significant. But his decision to write the essay so long after the project's mistruths have been laid bare – and months after it was honored with a George Polk Award and a Pulitzer Prize – suggests more rot at the Gray Lady and in American journalism.

As Stephens (pictured) himself suggests, the precipitating event was Phillip W. Magness' Sept. 19 article in Quillette , which revealed that the Times has "taken to quietly altering the published text of the project itself after one of its claims came under intense criticism." Most significant, the paper had scrubbed the claim that 1619 was "our true founding" from the online text without acknowledgment.

This is not mere editing, but stealthy expurgation intended to cover up the paper's journalistic malpractice.

This sketchy conduct, presumably approved by New York Times Magazine Editor Jake Silverstein and others, warrants far more than a column. It demands a published response from the paper's executive editor, Dean Baquet, that acknowledges the misdeed and states whether Baquet knew of and/or approved the secret changes. Baquet must also detail the paper's response and explain why the Times still stands by the project, given the need for such major corrections.

https://lockerdome.com/lad/13084989113709670?pubid=ld-dfp-ad-13084989113709670-0&pubo=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com&rid=www.zerohedge.com&width=890

In this context, a column by someone with no authority at the Times beyond his opinion seems part of a strategy to acknowledge a problem without fixing it. For all his bravery in writing this piece, Stephens is the perfect foil for the Times, one that creates an escape hatch for 1619 acolytes.

It is relevant that Stephens – a conservative who came to the Times after a Pulitzer Prize-winning stint at the Wall Street Journal – is the columnist whom so many liberal Times subscribers love to hate. One of the few scribes at the paper who does not incessantly preach to its woke choir, he has generated strong pushback from colleagues and readers for his opinions on climate change and the Middle East . This may explain why the New York Times Guild initially felt comfortable sending a now deleted Tweet criticizing the editors for running Stephens' 1619 piece, which, it said, "reeks."

Stephens' standing makes it easier for many Times readers to dismiss or ignore his devastating critique. Imagine the impact a similar piece might have had if it been written by David Brooks or Nicholas Kristof.

Times publisher A.G. Sulzberger appears to be unconcerned by the allegations. The man who forced editorial page editor James Bennet to resign because he ran a controversial op-ed by Sen. Tom Cotton , issued a brief statement Sunday that ignored the journalistic and factual issues raised by Stephens and others, and instead insisted that the 1619 Project was "a journalistic triumph" whose publication is "the proudest accomplishment of my tenure as publisher."

[ Baquet echoed Sulzberger's comments in a note to his staff on Oct. 13, when this column was posted. Without directly addressing the ethical and factual issues raised, he asserted that "the project fell fully within our standards as a news organization" and that it "fill(s) me with pride."]

The deeper issue raised by Stephens' column is that the 1619 Project is just one example of the degree to which the Times and other mainstream news outlets have displaced traditional journalistic practice with ideology. Informed by the tenets of social justice and critical race theory that have long dominated the humanities departments at leading universities, journalists have abandoned a commitment to the elusive ideal of objectivity for a naked embrace of results-oriented activism masquerading as reportage. In this regard, journalism is a symptom, rather than cause, of the deep-seated cultural relativism that pervades American culture.

The essence of the 1619 Project is the idea that America is a permanently racist nation whose founding ideals were lies. This is the capital T truth it seeks to advance. It dismisses facts that undermine that narrative, distorting the historical record because they are seen as roadblocks in the arc that bends toward justice. This approach relies on one of the most dangerous engines of dishonesty in human history: the notion that the means justify the ends.

That the Pulitzer board would bestow its prize for commentary to the lead writer of the 1619 Project, Nikole Hannah-Jones, despite damning scholarly critiques, suggests how deeply this activist approach has infected journalism.

This impulse now drives much of the coverage in the Times, the Washington Post, the New Yorker, NPR, and other prestigious news organizations. The clearest example is reporting on Donald Trump, whom the left sees as an existential threat. This is the capital T truth they advance through stories that insistently eschew nuance to portray the president as a monster.

From climate change to identity politics, examples of their tendentious coverage are legion. But none is more thoroughgoing and dishonest than the years-long coverage claiming Trump colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 election.

My RealClearInvestigations colleagues are among those who followed the leads and dug up the facts mainstream outlets refused to and, so, got the story right. Tom Kuntz, a former Times editor who leads RCI, detailed how the Times and the Post relied on untrustworthy anonymous sources, unfair innuendo and cherry-picked facts to advance this narrative in a series of stories that won both papers a Pulitzer Prize in 2018.

This effort to distort the truth continues unbowed and unabated. Last week, New Yorker writer Dexter Filkins wrote that Christopher Steele's dossier – opposition research paid for by the Hillary Clinton campaign that claimed the Russians had been cultivating Trump as an asset for decades – "has been neither proved nor disproved."

NEVER MISS THE NEWS THAT MATTERS MOST

ZEROHEDGE DIRECTLY TO YOUR INBOX

Receive a daily recap featuring a curated list of must-read stories.

In fact, much of it has been debunked and the key parts of it that haven't been probably never will because you can't prove a negative – one can't ever prove that there is no videotape showing Trump paid Russian prostitutes to pee on a Moscow hotel bed the Obamas had slept in.

Shane Harris of the Washington Post encapsulated the ongoing dishonesty in an article last week acknowledging, after a fashion, damning new intelligence tying the Clinton campaign to Russiagate. In a single paragraph he both denied overwhelming evidence that the Clinton campaign helped generate that now debunked scandal while also insisting that the conspiracy theory was legitimate. Harris wrote:

"Trump allies have seized on the intelligence as evidence that Clinton was in some way involved in ginning up an investigation of Trump to tie his campaign to Russia. The president has consistently denied the charge as a 'hoax,' even though multiple investigations have documented numerous instances in which his campaign sought Russian assistance in damaging Clinton."

There is hardly any evidence that the Trump campaign "sought" such assistance. The most that can be said is that it was receptive to offers of dirt on Clinton at the infamous June 2016 Trump Tower meeting . Her campaign, by contrast, used people like Steele to actively seek compromising material on Trump, which appears to have included Russian disinformation.

Such reporting is so brazen that it suggests a far deeper problem than any one story. Indeed, the deeply misleading Trump/Russia coverage and the 1619 Project are not deviations from the norm. They are the new standard at prestigious outlets that are committed to pursuing their notion of the capital T truth – inconvenient facts be damned.


[Oct 15, 2020] Not enough black venture capitalists- What's next, not enough black war criminals? by Helen Buyniski

Fetishizing surface diversity insults us all
Oct 15, 2020 | www.rt.com

The problem with the venture capital industry, a sub-sector of private equity in which deep-pocketed investors bankroll cash-hungry startups, is the lack of black representation – or so says venture capitalist Frederik Groce, who co-founded BLCK VC in 2018 to increase black representation in the sector.

Surfing the wave of 2020's diversity-mania, Groce launched the Black Venture Institute on Tuesday with two other big-name venture capital firms and the University of California at Berkeley's Haas School of Business. Odinsson ariadnatheo 1 day ago Insulted by it? Hardly. Blacks don't want equal treatment; they DEMAND special treatment! ScottMc3 1 day ago Not enough woman in jail, should try and arrest enough so 50% of prisoners are female, obviously prejudice against men.. TWOFilms 15 hours ago There's not enough Black Eskimos. I think they're anti-Eskimo. Reply ariadnatheo TWOFilms 10 hours ago nor black swimming champions. I think the water is racist Odinsson 1 day ago I can just see the Democrats' solution to this problem now. They will give out $13 trillion dollars and distribute it equally among the 13% of America's population that is black. The solution won't work, of course, for the money will be spent on partying and luxury goods and at the end of a year most blacks will once again be living on social welfare. Reply 3 fozbotz Odinsson 1 day ago Actually the demos will appropriate the 13 trillion dollars say they are lending it out to black entrepreneurs launder the money and put it in their back pockets just like they do with foreign aid. Karl_Benz 1 day ago what about more diversity in the NBA ? we need more diversity in the 100 m Olympics, its all blacks running. we should put more whites & asians in there . it can't be dominated by one race - thats not fair. sammy11 23 hours ago If you haven't had the pleasure of a affirmative action boss, it's an experience ColdFacts 19 hours ago there are 40 million blacks in usa, those diversity fanatics will only be happy when there are 400 million black venture capitalists out of this number

[Oct 07, 2020] Cultural Revolution- Woke Totalitarians Have Taken Over Campus -

Oct 07, 2020 | www.zerohedge.com

Cultural Revolution: Woke Totalitarians Have Taken Over Campus


by Tyler Durden Wed, 10/07/2020 - 19:40 Twitter Facebook Reddit Email Print

Authored by John Staddon via Campus Reform,

Podcaster Dave Rubin has the custom of going "off the grid" for a month each summer, to gain some perspective on changes. As a scientist who has been retired from the lab for more than ten years, I feel in a similar position vis-à-vis the state of academic science. To this campus Rip-van-Winkle, things now look very different.

I didn't notice much until the current anti-racism crisis, when I found that academe, as a place for free exchange of ideas, had become almost unrecognizable . Higher education has begun a transformation along the same lines as the 1966 Maoist "Cultural Revolution" in China. Like the cultural revolution, the energized identity-politics movement presents itself as a cleansing force. Pure Maoism was being corrupted by covert capitalist sympathizers. They had to be rooted out.

In U.S. academe, the problem was similar. The "party faithful" took for granted the permanence of "White privilege" and "systemic racism" which, for many, was also their livelihood. But then, in the decades following the civil rights acts, things got better. Measurable indices of racism seemed to be improving: People of color were well represented on city councils, police forces, and state and national legislatures; Black faces were on many magazine covers and in ads for prestigious products; interracial marriages increased; Black entertainers and even opinion leaders were beloved. A Black president was elected and re-elected. A survey showed a steady decline in objective measures of racism up until 2014. What's not to like?

Plenty, as it turned out. The "woke" party saw its anti-racist cause going down to anti-racism! They have fought back, with some success. A survey published in 2017 showed that from 2014 onward people increasingly agreed that "more needs to be done" to achieve racial equality. This tendency was exaggerated in academe. From being relatively content with the state of race relations, administration, faculty, and students have become increasingly doctrinaire in their stance against racism. Unable to point to objective measures of increasing racism, they have turned their attention to something much harder to refute: systemic (aka institutional, structural) racism.

Systemic racism in higher education, a petition

One bit of evidence for this is a currently circulating petition/op-ed that, Science (one of the two leading general-science journals) has apparently agreed to publish about combating systemic racism in STEM. You can read Systemic Racism in Higher Education here but I will just discuss a few of its key assumptions.

Quoting from the petition:

Everyone in academia must acknowledge the role that universities -- faculty, staff, and students -- play in perpetuating structural racism by subjecting students of color to unwelcoming academic cultures The misuse of standardized tests, like the GRE, excludes students who could have otherwise succeeded. [emphases added]

https://lockerdome.com/lad/13084989113709670?pubid=ld-dfp-ad-13084989113709670-0&pubo=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.zerohedge.com&rid=www.zerohedge.com&width=890

Structural (aka systemic, institutional) racism is not defined. The words could be replaced by evil spirits without loss of meaning. The idea seems like a way of deflecting attention from identifiable causes of racial disparities. Careful examination of a specific context (such as police brutality ) can usually point to measurable causes with no need to invoke an abstraction. Nevertheless, we all must acknowledge that the GRE, like any predictive test, is not perfect: it fails some good people and passes a small number of weak ones. But the study cited in the petition seems to fault the STEM-related GRE more because women and minorities do worse on it than men than because it is an imperfect predictor of success in graduate school.

What does the petition mean by "unwelcoming academic cultures"? There are two obvious possibilities: racism, pure and simple, and a problem with the type and level of academic discussion compared with the environment to which some students are accustomed.

The evidence for any kind of overt racism in academe is negligible and if it emerged would surely lead to strong correctives. What remains is just that the disciplines of STEM are difficult, possibly too difficult for students who have been admitted with weaker-than-average qualifications. Human beings are not equally good at everything. Mathematics, particularly, separates the wheat from the chaff in dramatic fashion. Some people (your humble correspondent, for example) just can't handle tough math . If this is the "unwelcoming academic culture" some students will either drop out or - and this is the pressure now - will clamor for a simpler curriculum. If such changes are made, the results will likely be disastrous for the quality of science education.

Reducing structural racism in higher education will require evidence-based, institution-wide approaches that focus on achieving equity in student learning. If we abandon the perception of "fixed" student ability, more BIPOC students will succeed.

The petition assumes that essentially any student is capable of succeeding. But at what? Not at everything. People are not equal; not everyone can master quaternions. The petition assumes that ineradicable individual differences -- "fixed" student ability -- do not exist, which is simply false. By all means, give the best education you can. But do not expect to educate everybody, especially in tough STEM subjects. People are not all equally able. An educational system aimed at this kind of "equity" is likely instead to end in mediocrity.

[These changes] will require making tenure dependent not only on excellence in research, teaching, and service, but also meaningful contributions to promote equity and inclusion . Every scientist should commit to reporting unfair practices All faculty should examine their courses for performance disparities based on ethnicity and gender

Ready to submit? It is apparently not sufficient to teach well and do excellent research, faculty must also commit to eliminating disparities, disparities which are as likely to be the result of differences in interest and talent as inadequate teaching. Faculty are to scrutinize their grade distributions to see that BIPOC do not fall behind. What if they do? The temptation to adjust evaluation so as to eliminate disparities will be strong -- will teachers act racist, but in a good way! They may be "reported" if they don't! This is totalitarianism. not science. There's more, but you get the idea.

NEVER MISS THE NEWS THAT MATTERS MOST

ZEROHEDGE DIRECTLY TO YOUR INBOX

Receive a daily recap featuring a curated list of must-read stories.

If these efforts to eliminate disparities in everything, to match racial proportions in STEM to those in society, if they succeed, it will be a cultural revolution indeed. Science is already in trouble; a successful effort to make it conform to political ends will destroy academic freedom and wreck the nation's science base.

* * *

John Staddon is Distinguished Professor Emeritus of Psychology and Neuroscience


RobbieSmith , 3 hours ago

The persistent so-called "achievement gap" reveals the same racial IQ hierarchy on standardized academic exams. The SAT is largely a measure of general intelligence. Scores on the SAT correlate very highly with scores on standardized tests of intelligence, and like IQ scores, are stable across time and not easily increased through training, coaching, or practice. SAT preparation courses appear to work, but the gains are small -- on average, no more than about 20 points per section.

Even after decades of focused attention to the achievement gap, it has remained unchanged.

Vanderbilt University researchers tracked the educational and occupational accomplishments of more than 2,000 people who as part of a youth talent search and determined that scores on the SAT correlate so highly with IQ that they are described as a "thinly disguised" intelligence test.

ACT Scores by Race:

Year White Black Asian
2009 22.2 16.9 23.2
2010 22.3 16.9 23.4
2011 22.4 17.0 23.6
2012 22.4 17.0 23.6
2013 22.2 16.9 23.5
2014 22.3 17.0 23.5
2015 22.4 17.1 23.9
2016 22.2 17.0 24.0
2017 22.4 17.1 24.3
2018 22.2 16.9 24.5

Source: ACT, Inc.

RobbieSmith , 3 hours ago

The persistent so-called "achievement gap" reveals the same racial IQ hierarchy on standardized academic exams. The SAT is largely a measure of general intelligence. Scores on the SAT correlate very highly with scores on standardized tests of intelligence, and like IQ scores, are stable across time and not easily increased through training, coaching, or practice. SAT preparation courses appear to work, but the gains are small -- on average, no more than about 20 points per section.

Even after decades of focused attention to the achievement gap, it has remained unchanged.

Vanderbilt University researchers tracked the educational and occupational accomplishments of more than 2,000 people who as part of a youth talent search and determined that scores on the SAT correlate so highly with IQ that they are described as a "thinly disguised" intelligence test.

ACT Scores by Race:

Year White Black Asian
2009 22.2 16.9 23.2
2010 22.3 16.9 23.4
2011 22.4 17.0 23.6
2012 22.4 17.0 23.6
2013 22.2 16.9 23.5
2014 22.3 17.0 23.5
2015 22.4 17.1 23.9
2016 22.2 17.0 24.0
2017 22.4 17.1 24.3
2018 22.2 16.9 24.5

Source: ACT, Inc.


~~~~~~~


Black-White SAT Score Gap by Year:

Year White Black Gap
1985 1038 839 199
1990 1031 849 185
1996 1052 857 195
2000 1060 859 201
2005 1061 863 197
2010 1063 855 208
2015 1047 846 201

The new SAT introduced in 2017 was "designed to inspire and increase access to college" by creating "a more equitable exam". The new SAT cannot be compared to previous results:

Year White Black Gap
2017 1118 941 177
2018 1123 946 177

The 2017 "college readiness" scores (ability to earn a C or higher in an entry-level course) showed the stark racial achievement gap; Asians scored 70% college readiness, Whites 59%, and Blacks only 20%.

(Source: U.S. Dept. of Education, College Board)

https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=171

SAT scores are highly correlated to intelligence test scores. The SAT correlates with an IQ test at 0.86, almost the same as an IQ test correlates with itself. For this reason, we can very reliably take SAT scores and convert them to IQ scores.

Results of psycho-metric IQ and scholastic tests are highly correlated. Rindermann & Thompson (2013, p. 822)

In the 20 year period from 1994-2014 the Black-White difference increased on both the verbal and math SATs despite targeted efforts to close the race gap. On the reading test, it rose from .91 to .96 standard deviations. On the math test, it rose from .95 to 1.03 standard deviations.

https://www.brookings.edu/research/race-gaps-in-sat-scores-highlight-inequality-and-hinder-upward-mobility/

In fact, the truncated nature of the SAT math score distribution suggests that these race gaps would be even larger given a harder exam with a bigger score variance. Note, for example, how the Black score distribution is cut off at the bottom while the Asian score distribution is cut off at the top. That suggests that a redesigned exam might feature even more pronounced race gaps.

Percent by Race Reaching the SAT College and Career Readiness Benchmark:

15% = Black
24% = Non-White Hispanic
35% = Native American
53% = White
56% = Asian

Source: The College Board, 2014

RobbieSmith , 3 hours ago

Blacks and Whites with Equal Educational Attainment Differ in Cognitive Ability

Black and White Americans with the same formal level of education differ significantly in their cognitive abilities. Specifically, within any given level of formal education Whites consistently outperform Blacks. Moreover, this effect is so strong that Blacks often underperform Whites who have lower levels of formal education than they do.

Consider the following data from the General Social Survey. This public data is frequently used in social science research and contains a test of verbal intelligence as well as measurements of participant's self-identified race and highest educational degree obtained. Verbal intelligence tests correlate at around .75 with full-scale IQ and so this data can also be taken as a fair measure of intelligence in general (Lynn, 1998). If we set the White mean score on this test to 100 and the standard deviation to 15, we can come up with an "IQ" style scale.

As can be seen, using this method Blacks with a graduate degree have a level of verbal intelligence indistinguishable from that of Whites with a junior college degree. Blacks with a four-year degree are roughly on par with Whites who never went to college at all.

IQ BY RACE AND HIGHEST DEGREE EARNED (1972 - 2014):

Highest Degree White IQ Black IQ Gap
High School Drop-out: 89 82 7
High School Diploma 98 90 8
Junior College Degree 102 95 7
Bachelor's Degree 108 100 8
Graduate Degree 113 102 11

This data is consistent with evidence from the National Adult Literacy Survey (NALS) which administered tests of cognitive ability to 26,000 US adults in 1992. These tests were designed to measure how well people could take information and use it in a way which would help them function in modern society.

Blacks are such poor academic achievers that the National Achievement Scholarship Program was created with lower standards for Black candidates only, instead of the National Merit Scholarship Program which is open to everyone else.

THE SMARTEST STUDENTS: The National Merit Scholarship Program was founded to identify and honor scholastically talented American youth and to encourage them to develop their abilities to the fullest.

BLACK STUDENTS ONLY: The National Achievement Scholarship Program was initiated specifically to identify academically promising Black American youth and encourage their pursuit of higher education.

They are both measured on the PSAT.

Minimum score for National Merit: 220
Minimum score for National Achievement: 190

Roughly, PSAT x 10 = SAT (out of 2400)

The U.S. government's PACE examination, given to 100,000 university graduates who are prospective professional or administrative civil-service employees each year, is passed with a score of 70 or above by 58% of the Whites who take it but by only 12% of the Blacks. Among top scorers the difference between Black and White performance is even more striking; 16% of the White applicants make scores of 90 or above, while only one-fifth of one percent of a Black applicants score as high as 90 -- a White-Black success ratio of 80/1. IQ differences become more pronounced with greater g-loading.

Blacks score so poorly on academic exams that colleges give them 230 "race bonus" SAT points to help them qualify for admission:

http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-adv-asian-race-tutoring-20150222-story.html

https://www.princeton.edu/~tje/files/webAdmission%20Preferences%20Espenshade%20Chung%20Walling%20Dec%202004.pdf

"Personal scores" are the new subterfuge for artificially assisting Blacks gain admission to universities. Asian-American applicants receive a 2 or better on the personal score more than 20% of the time only in the top academic index decile. By contrast, white applicants receive a 2 or better on the personal score more than 20% of the time in the top six deciles. Hispanics receive such personal scores more than 20% of the time in the top seven deciles, and Blacks receive such scores more than 20% of the time in the top eight deciles.

An otherwise identical applicant bearing an Asian male identity with a 25 percent chance of admission would have a 32 percent chance of admission if he were White, a 77 percent chance of admission if he were Hispanic, and a 95 percent chance of admission if he were Black.

typeatme , 3 hours ago

Clearly this guy comes from one of those "Fact" based Universities....

Where "Science" and "Statistics" are used to make "Rational" decisions.....

Imagine the gall....

RAT005 , 2 hours ago

Robbie, there was another ACT (and/or maybe SAT) score translation change before the recent one you list. It was around year 2000 that the test resulted in higher scores such that you can't compare a 1980 score to say year 2000 score.

Just a guess from your listed results that it was done around 1995.

Edit: In 1996, the Educational Testing Service simplified the SAT . The overall effect was to raise the average combined score . On the high end, a verbal score of 730 on the old scale is now awarded a perfect 800 and a math score of 780 on the old scale is now scored as 800.

It wasn't an SJW type change, it was just a calibration change and a weighting difference to increase the verbal section to an equal 50% of the scoring.

RobbieSmith , 2 hours ago

Yes, it's in the first post-

"The new SAT introduced in 2017 was "designed to inspire and increase access to college" by creating "a more equitable exam". The new SAT cannot be compared to previous results."

RAT005 , 2 hours ago

I found the info for you. Like I said, there was a score inflation adjustment done before the one you listed. I actually didn't know about the recent one. I only knew about the mid '90s score inflation adjustment.

RobbieSmith , 2 hours ago

My guess is they will eventually eliminate all standardized testing because the racial IQ hierarchy is too obvious.

August , 3 hours ago

Hard to believe that the average IQ among whites with a graduate degree is only 113.

They must be including those with degrees in Education, Economics and Journalism.

RobbieSmith , 3 hours ago

IQ 113 is the 80.6 percentile.

Umh , 2 hours ago

Of what? Sorry to be dense.

neopolyidus , 2 hours ago

Sorry, you have to have an IQ of greater than 100 to 'get' bell curve math.

Umh , 2 hours ago

To neopolyidus. I have that beat by many points.

RobbieSmith , 1 hour ago

https://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/iqtable.aspx

AEErik , 2 hours ago

Excellent post. In the real world- the working world- "adjusted success" will go over like a lead balloon. Square peg + round hole = failure, no matter how creatively you attempt to cheat the system.

TheTrumanShow , 2 hours ago

"... adjusted success" will go over like a lead balloon."

For now, yes. But given the current BLM bsh*t conformity, for how long?

One possible bright spot might be that the currently BLM bsh*t conforming companies/institutions will end up being outperformed and overtaken by new, no-nonsense startups.

eternal_sarcasm , 43 minutes ago

When you combine this data with FBI crime statistics it doesn't paint a rosy picture.

acetrumchura , 3 hours ago

Yeah, but this is why they attack the actual tests as being culturally bias. ALL THEY DO IS MOVE THE GOAL POSTS.

Yagyu Jubei , 3 hours ago

This is why leftists believe that facts are racist.

factoryworker , 2 hours ago

Don't forget about jimmies.

I just got a birthday cake with jimmies. I should have tossed it on the floor in disgust but blew out the candles and begrudgingly ate my piece in silence.

I'm so ashamed.

Trident5000 , 3 hours ago

If I see you got your degree from a "woke" campus with racial quotas, I simply won't hire you.

J S Bach , 2 hours ago

I DEMAND that we eliminate disparities in all sports, to match racial proportions in BBF (Basketball, Baseball, Football). There are far too few whites in these sports with regards to their actual numbers in our society. If we demand quotas with STEM, then we must have the same quotas for professional and college BBF as well.

fishpoem , 2 hours ago

Furthermore, it shall be mandated that the final scores in all athletic contests shall be exactly equal...even if that means that one team has to sit on the bench throughout most of the game.

NO WINNING IS ALLOWED IN A LAND OF LOSERS.

Hapa , 1 hour ago

to be totally fair, we need to include women as a percentage

HopeToLearn , 3 hours ago

As soon as the MLB, NFL and NBA adopt racially-proportionate hiring practices, we can talk about fact-based SCIENCE.....

oellinas , 2 hours ago

50% of trash collectors must be women = no trash collected.

RAT005 , 2 hours ago

I think an entirely automated playing field with 1,000s of linked sensors to move the "goal posts" instantaneously on an infinitely wide range. When a guy less than 6ft shoots, the basket lowers......when a 7ft goes to stuff, the basket goes up :-)

Yagyu Jubei , 3 hours ago

If it's so cool and woke to lower the bar to create equal outcomes in academics it should be equally as cool to:

1. Have basketball hoops at different heights for those that are shorter or less adept at jumping

2. Require quotas of unattractive people for acting and modeling jobs

3. Require quotas of stupid people for jobs in the media.....oh never mind they already do that

ChrisPatriot , 3 hours ago

LOL, you're about 4 or 5 decades late buddy. They only solution now is burn it all down and recreate it.

typeatme , 3 hours ago

So....who do you want building your bridges, your airplanes, your vaccines, your economy??

How about the most qualified.....???

Wild Idea, I understand...but...it has been proven to work better....

I KNOW! Strive to be better, instead of whining about not being good enough!!!

YEA! WILD THOUGHTS....

August , 3 hours ago

You're brim full of hate... and privilege!

marx , 3 hours ago

women hate STEM. they go in and hate it.

minorities are in the Bell Curve

quanttech , 3 hours ago

so basically just hire asian men and be done with it, seeing as how they're on the higher end of the bell curve, right?

RobbieSmith , 2 hours ago

"so basically just hire asian men and be done with it, seeing as how they're on the higher end of the bell curve, right?"

Asian IQ scores cluster around the mean; thus, the greater cognitive variation among Whites produces more geniuses, but also more morons.

Umh , 2 hours ago

I have noticed the same relationship between men and women. There seem to be more bright men and more male dummies too.

RobbieSmith , 1 hour ago

Mans' accomplishments have been documented according to the number of times they were cited by others. Over 97% of the most important scientists and 74% of the most important artists and authors were White, almost all males, and most from only four countries, Great Britain, Germany, France, and Italy; the remainder were mostly Asian, and none were Black.

RobbieSmith , 2 hours ago

Race differences in intelligence: An evolutionary analysis.
Lynn, Richard (2006)

ABSTRACT
It is widely accepted that race differences in intelligence exist, but no consensus has emerged on whether these have any genetic basis. The present book is the first fully comprehensive review that has ever been made of the evidence on race differences in intelligence worldwide. It reviews these for ten races rather than the three major races (Africans, Caucasians, and East Asians) analyzed by Rushton (2000). The races analyzed here are the Europeans, sub-Saharan Africans, Bushmen, South Asians and North Africans, Southeast Asians, Australian Aborigines, Pacific Islanders, East Asians, Arctic Peoples, and Native American Indians. (PsycINFO Database Record, 2016 APA)

https://archive.org/stream/RichardLynnRaceDifferencesInIntelligence/Richard%20LynnRace%20Differences%20In%20Intelligence_djvu.txt

THIRTY YEARS OF RESEARCH ON RACE DIFFERENCES IN COGNITIVE ABILITY

https://www1.udel.edu/educ/gottfredson/30years/Rushton-Jensen30years.pdf

LorneTheGreen , 2 hours ago

****'s hard and you to sacrifice to make it. Women are better off making babies unless they have an undeniable natural talent. Having been part of various physics departments for 20 years, this does happen, but it's rare.

fightapathy , 2 hours ago

School girls hate it too. I was reviewing coding progress for 5-8 graders today: all boys were exceeding expectations, all girls were lapsing. Well, a few boys were screw-ups and failing hard. But that's to be expected.

GeezerGeek , 3 hours ago

The goal seems to be equality of outcome, regardless of talent. They sometimes blame K-12 schools as being at the root of the problem, because K-12 schools are segregated by class to some extent. Rich folks can send their kids to private schools, regardless of color of skin. Just ask the previous president.

But of course these Maoists/Bolsheviks don't really want equality, they just want to tear down what had been an incredibly successful system. If they really wanted to match racial proportions in occupations, etc., to those in the general population regardless of talent they would insist that sports teams be balanced like they want STEM to be balanced. And speaking of balance, anyone else here notice the proliferation of blacks in commercials these last few months? Or the increase in the number of multi-racial couples?

These are parts of an all-out attack on America, Western Civilization, and at its root on Christianity. Its no wonder so many American Christians want to be raptured out before SHTF. (Not that I think it will work out that way.) Who, after all, wants to make hard choices?

August , 3 hours ago

The nearly-all-black TeeVee commercials have certainly proliferated over the last half-year or so.

I actually watched TeeVee a few days ago, and there were at least six consecutive commercials featuring African-Americans, with the only non-blacks shown being attractive young White or Asian females.

Nothing to see here!

Promethus , 2 hours ago

I've noticed the increase in AAs in commercials, interracial couples and same sex couples. This is to make them the new norm and traditional white Christian families racist freaks.

Delving Eye , 56 minutes ago

Commercials with Blacks flooded the networks the second Obama was elected in 2008. I watched the returns and noticed the shift immediately. I was amazed that there was virtually NO commentary about it.

Didymus , 3 hours ago

it's really an attack on white people, more than america, the west, or christ.

HRH of Aquitaine 2.0 , 2 hours ago

Ding ding ding. Look at how they took out the white people in South Africa.

awesomepic4u , 3 hours ago

They took over long ago, now they're mobilizing.

"Structural (aka systemic, institutional) racism is not defined. The words could be replaced by evil spirits without loss of meaning.

Lack of a definition is only part of the problem. I have noticed that---without exception---claims of systemic racism, especially coming from POC students, never provide any examples. Never.

Great Apes - World Most Intelligent 1st Animals

greatdisconformity , 2 hours ago

The Dean of the University of Massachusetts School of Nursing was summarily fired for publicly stating the Hippocratic Oath on Twitter.

She was fired for stating that all human lives matter.

That Oath is required of all members of the medical profession.

Except that all human lives no longer matter. That is now official dogma in elite US institutions.

Just like in 1930s Germany. History does not rhyme. It is a replay.

Get ready if you have a clue. The lives that do not matter may be those of you and your family.

It was a long crawl through the attic to retrieve and sight-in the SKS.

If someone tries to take your gun away, you have a solemn Duty to perform.

I will do mine. With regret, but I will do it regardless of the consequences.

America began July 4, 1776. A lot of people died. It had nothing to do with Blacks, but with Tyranny.

Never forget that. Teach your kids. The Bible is not a bad book.

Dying-Of-The-Light , 2 hours ago

We are already seeing more and more completely stupid white and black people with PhDs and Professorships. If the Cancel Culture goons get their way then dumb cluck whites won't be getting doctorates but more and more blacks who can barely count will. The West will end up being run by the victim, hate culture we see in the worst white and black citizens right now but it will become black only. Already more and more truly nasty and un intelligent blacks and asians are beginning to infest Western politics. The ones who are Left Wing are in every instance anti white and anti Western culture, despite the fact that many come from parents who fled to the West to escape the brutality of their own shXt hole nations. They are the true racists, hating all whites without any true justification.

rodguy911 , 2 hours ago

Don't look now but its already happening.

greatdisconformity , 2 hours ago

The language of BLM and Critical Race Theory is the language of genocide.

Substitute the word of any other ethnic group for the word 'white' in their manifestos, and you are in 1930s Germany.

Sadly, most college educated young Americans have no clue what was going in 1930s Germany.

But they can talk your ear off about normative Gender praxis post-modern colonialism.

That is by Design folks.

That is by Design.

In N Korea, young people get brainwashed for free. Here, we pay for the privilege.

Captain Phoebus , 3 hours ago

The Great Leap Forward, American style.

GeezerGeek , 3 hours ago

Right off the edge of a cliff...

JD Rock , 3 hours ago

"Systemic racism"🙄

RattieNomNom , 3 hours ago

wankerfistings

Kreator , 3 hours ago

Yeah, they did....

in 1968.

acetrumchura , 3 hours ago

Thanks for already commenting with my answer.

acetrumchura , 3 hours ago

Conservative colleges are growing. Not sure many companies show up to their job fairs though :/

Lather Rinse Repeat , 3 hours ago

Total BS - these soros paid marxiturds are being videoed and will be erased when the time is right.

Didymus , 3 hours ago

people have expecting a reaction since 1946.

Make_Mine_A_Double , 2 hours ago

Rotten poisoned fruit of Affirmative Ape-tion.

Let these yard munkays on campus where they are too stupid to learn anything and with nothing to do they start agitating to lower standards and close down debate least their obvious inferiorty become blatantly obvious and the Big Lie be revealed.

30 years of this nonsense and now our higher ed institutions are completely gutted.

My kids are done thank god, but if you have them in their teens I would seriously look at Russia or Eastern Europe - maybe Colombia or Uraguay. But it would abuse to send them to US campus until all this is destroyed.

Didymus , 3 hours ago

Read Revilo P. Oliver's "The Education of a Conservative" or Henry Ford's "the international ___" and you'll see that this has been going on for a hundred years.

HRH of Aquitaine 2.0 , 2 hours ago

It is also in the "Hope of the Wicked" by Ted Flynn published in 2000. Dewey was a commie.

chubbar , 3 hours ago

Why is it we can only select the most qualified if it is a sport but not if it's a critical job like a doctor or scientist? Why is it important to me, the consumer, that the person I hire to make me well has a specific skin color or gender?

None of this **** works and the morons pushing it know it doesn't. When less than the required number of race "X" applies that are qualified, the standards have to be lowered to bring in the balance. Why is that a good thing?

If there exists equal quality of applicants then the racial equality of outcome would be assured, but that isn't reality and these idiots driving this narrative know it.

There is no reason to continue to point out that all races have different genetic differences in IQ, but it's fact. It's also fact that IQ is a significant predictor of success in many endeavors, STEM being one of those. So without significant concessions in order to accommodate those of lessor IQ's, you are never going to have equality of outcome. You can have equality of opportunity, but that doesn't appear to be the goal of these people.

My suggestion has always been to scrub every application of race & gender and take every possible step to ensure that information isn't revealed during the application process. Then pick those candidates MOST qualified, period. I don't give a **** if the whole class is south pacific islander, just quit with this nonsense about racism being the reason for STEM classes being mostly X or Y race/gender.

Promethus , 2 hours ago

I would be happier watching a sporting event with white Affirmative Action players than being treated by a minority AA doctor.

Cabreado , 3 hours ago

This is the rise of the Self-Absorbed -- the Narcissist and Sociopath -- to a critical mass of places of influence and control.

The only! antidote is a vigorous protection of a righteous rule of law.
The People are failing from every direction.

BGen. Jack Ripper , 3 hours ago

After a few years of starvation they'll be humming a new tune.

HRH of Aquitaine 2.0 , 2 hours ago

The US should have never given out food stamps. They should have given out seeds, shovels, and access to plots of land.

oellinas , 2 hours ago

nah not really... take a look at zimbabwe... starvation is the new normal

ZENDOG , 3 hours ago

Burn the Witches.

emptybeercan , 2 hours ago

Maybe it's time to just defund higher ed. We're defunding things and cancelling them these days, so, let's say goodbye to the land of $1,500/credit hour 'tuition' and tweed jackets with leather elbow pads and people that speak in tongues to avoid being understood by the lumpen proletariat.

Online is the Great Equalizer. The computer does NOT care what you look like, how much money you have, who you are related to, gender, religion, political affiliation, nationality, age, whatever. Either you can use the equipment and access and make sense of the stored information and perform computations and measurements and analysis and such not and so on, or you cannot. Either you have the mental capacity to learn and experiement and study, or you do not. There is no 'equal opportunity', there is only opportunity, and information.

College, university, is an opportunity to study the higher subjects. Advanced mathematics, the sciences, art, music, languages, and other than in the context of a political science class, politics really has no place in it.

I think all colleges and universities should have their own independent admissions testing standards, and develop their own in-house tests. Either you make the grade, or you go and study somewhere else, with no respect to any of the items listed above. Go shake your fist someplace else, come back when you are ready to be a serious student. If you want to get drunk and spend 4 years screwing off at a party school, that option is also open. But reserve higher education for those who have earned the privilege of going. Some people are stupid. And you can't study your way out of that. Or legislate it. Period.

Bastiat , 2 hours ago

The are Marxists--it's their religion. Many of them are fanatics.

greatdisconformity , 2 hours ago

Defund so-called 'Social Science'.

Defund it and evict it from State supported campuses.

This thing will unravel in less than a decade.

We feed this thing that seeks to destroy us.

Templar X , 2 hours ago

Some people are just better at certain things than others. This has always been the case, and it will always be the case.

You can't force a square peg into a round hole.

Pigs will never fly.

Monkeys will never do calculus.

Arnold Schwarzenegger will never become a ballerina.

Well, you get the picture, or you should anyway.

littlewing , 3 hours ago

One college in Texas had 100 professors on China's payroll.

China bought everyone, which is why they are bankrupt now.

JUICE E SMALL IT EMPIRE , 3 hours ago

I can see why colleges had so many active shooters in the past. Insanity havens for brainwashing dems. You learn nothing, get nothing besides an exchange for some worthless paper. Its not even worth it, for anybody. Corporations, students. It distorts the labor market and time of people who really don't need to go. I hav edone a calcution: The added costs for labor for corporations is $100,000,000,000,000 for a bunch of idiots who do not even know what they are doing.

Blondefire , 2 hours ago

I'm a conservative professor at a small private college. Occasionally I get strange looks from my colleagues but they have not persecuted me for anything yet. Fingers crossed. Still teaching students how to think rather than what to think. The air is tense here but still breathable.

fightapathy , 2 hours ago

Higher education? What about lower education? Da Home Dogs don't want to become teachers, so white-*** states like CT and VT are giving out BIG scholarships and preferred places for blacks who want a free ride but look like they're working. Hell, its downright embarrassing in all these democrat ****holes that all the teachers are white and all the dropouts are black. Will black teachers make for more successful black students? Maybe. Or else they will be properly positioned to radicalize the students for mass strike actions even before college.

HRH of Aquitaine 2.0 , 2 hours ago

Higher education has begun a transformation along the same lines as the 1966 Maoist "Cultural Revolution" in China. Like the cultural revolution, the energized identity-politics movement presents itself as a cleansing force. Pure Maoism was being corrupted by covert capitalist sympathizers. They had to be rooted out.

Human beings are not equally good at everything.

That is a hella lot of truthiness right there.

[Oct 06, 2020] One Nation, Under Woke -

Oct 06, 2020 | www.zerohedge.com

One Nation, Under Woke


by Tyler Durden Tue, 10/06/2020 - 18:05 Twitter Facebook Reddit Email Print

Submitted by RealClearPolitics , via Richard Reinsch II,

Through the sweeping and indiscriminate indictment of oppression that it makes against the American republic, wokeism poses the first serious challenge to our constitutional democracy since communism.

Wokeism aims to remake American constitutionalism root and branch, to transform economics, politics, education, and other institutions and practices. The free and equal individual under the rule of law will be replaced with monolithic voices, united by perceived oppression, who demand a mutating law and politics that reward their grievances with punishments against alleged oppressors and redistributed resources for supposed "victims."

The first thesis of wokeism is that persons are reducible to their affiliated identity: above all, race or gender. In this view, we understand ourselves solely through these prisms and we apply that understanding to others and to institutions.

The second thesis is that no person, no idea, and no historical account can be understood by independent human reason unfiltered by race, gender, and stories of interlocking oppression , or, as the case may be, by the acts of oppression one has shared in as a member of the dominant group. Everything comes to us and is either understood or projected by us through our racial or gender identity.

The third thesis is that those who have identities that can be grouped under "persons of color" or LGBTQ possess greater authority to speak -- owing to the various oppressions they have experienced and the cosmic redress required for justice and liberation -- than oppressor groups in almost every sphere.

America's national DNA, according to the New York Times' 1619 Project -- wokeism's anti-American document par excellence -- has been encoded with slavery and anti-black racism. Indeed, America left the British Empire for the purposes of retaining the slavery regime, the project's lead author Nikole Hannah-Jones proclaims (against historical evidence). White males stand as the grand artificer of this oppression, which has been transmitted throughout American history, informing our constitutional documents, politics, and social structures.

The 1619 Project leaves no space or opportunity for redemption, for forgiveness, or for the statesmanship of someone like Abraham Lincoln. It cannot acknowledge that American constitutionalism is a contested space. The 1619 Project cannot understand the succession of witnesses like Frederick Douglass, Booker T. Washington, and Martin Luther King Jr., who call upon Americans to understand in full the principles of our Constitution and Union. Consider that, while American soldiers were still fighting the Civil War, and much of the Democratic Party was arguing against the abolition of slavery, the 13th Amendment to the Constitution was passed by Congress on Jan. 31, 1865, later ratified by the requisite number of states in December 1865. Its central premise stands on the equality language in the Declaration of Independence, the same principles that outlawed slavery in the lands regulated by the Northwest Ordinance of 1788. This is part of our heritage, too.

Our political institutions and our Constitution stand or fall ultimately by their willingness to uphold us as free people pursuing the broad purposes of human existence. Contrast this with the regime that wokeism would build. It would reject any notion of individual integrity or distinctive notion of personhood. Intellectual freedom would be nonexistent. Speech would be filtered through a relentless and constantly evolving set of censors, who would punish or bless our words according to ideological criteria. Consequently, our thinking and speaking would revolve around an endless loop of testimonies to oppression -- either committed against us or by people with whom we share tribal traits. In the latter sense, we would confess our shared guilt and accept whatever punishment is deemed necessary.

Steve Nash, the recently named head coach of the New Jersey Nets, confessed that he had been given the job unfairly because of his white privilege. He wanted to work for "change," he said. Many will make similar pronouncements under more stringent conditions or risk becoming untouchables. Ibram X. Kendi, author of the best-selling "How to Be an Antiracist," asserts that the point of being an anti-racist is not to refrain from discrimination but to know whom to discriminate against -- largely whites and Asians, if the woke polity is to become a reality.

Under wokeism, the function of political institutions would not be to facilitate individual flourishing but to enforce individual sameness, subsuming us all in an egalitarian stew of grievance, redistribution, and retribution. The traits that define a decent community, such as forgiveness, humility and compromise, will not be possible, and those suggesting them will be accused of racism. Wokeism's social-justice constitution would fuel a federal government built for one purpose: the evisceration of the freedoms that Americans have always known.

me title=

If the progressive notion of a "living Constitution" threw the law in doubt, woke constitutionalism will destroy all fixed or limited notions of law. How could it be otherwise, when the operative principle is the elimination of all forms of oppression, as measured by an endlessly moving set of ideological markers? Man can organize the world without sufficient notions of virtue, justice, and freedom, to say nothing of the biblical God, but as theologian Henri de Lubac noted, when man does this he organizes the world against himself. One Nation Under Woke would make this vision a reality.

* * *

NEVER MISS THE NEWS THAT MATTERS MOST

ZEROHEDGE DIRECTLY TO YOUR INBOX

Receive a daily recap featuring a curated list of must-read stories.

Richard M. Reinsch II is the editor of Law & Liberty, host of "Liberty Law Talk," and co-author of "A Constitution in Full." He and over 1,000 similarly concerned scholars and citizens recently made common cause in an open letter published at RealClearPolitics. This article is part of an ongoing " Liberty and Justice for All " series. Kat , 2 hours ago

I'm originally from the USSR. This is just Socialism and Communism under a different banner. Where we were fed a constant stream of anti-capitalist and anti-bourgoisie BS, now it's anti-capitalist and racist BS. But it's all the same thing and they can kiss my behind. All this does is fan the flames of xenophobia and racism.

Kat , 2 hours ago

I just wrote it in my comments. I'm originally from Moscow, back when it was in the USSR. This is exactly the same ****e.

chubbar , 2 hours ago

White privilege is being used as an excuse for losers who can't cut the mustard of life and need someone or something to blame to make them feel better about themselves. It isn't going to work, we all know they are losers and we aren't giving them our **** just because they suck at life. Sorry, better luck next time.

[Oct 01, 2020] Tucker -- City of Seattle tells white employees to work on undoing their whiteness - YouTube

Jul 24, 2020 | www.youtube.com

Fox News Fox News 5.73M subscribers SUBSCRIBE White employees were informed that their so-called 'white' qualities were offensive and unacceptable. #FoxNews #Tucker

[Oct 01, 2020] Business Leaders Who Reject Woke Culture To Be 'First People Lined Up Against The Wall And Shot In Revolution'- Ex-Twitter CEO -

Oct 01, 2020 | www.zerohedge.com

If one needed any further evidence of Twitter's far-left corporate culture, look no further than former CEO Dick Costolo - who went full Bolshevik in a Thursday Twitter rant warning that "me-first capitalists" who don't agree with injecting political activism into the workplace will be "the first people lined up against the wall and shot in the revolution," adding "I'll happily provide video commentary."

Costolo, a partner at Index Ventures and who sits on the board of Patreon (which got spanked in court for deplatforming conservatives), ran Twitter from 2010 to 2015.

As Reclaim The Net writes, "Costolo was replying to a tweet related to how Coinbase's CEO has decided to separate business from political activism and offer an exit package for those employees who feel they can't work in a company that doesn't want to be hindered by politics and activism, as so many other companies have been distracted by in recent times."

[Sep 27, 2020] Trump panders for black votes: Unveils Platinum Plan For Black Americans, Designates Antifa, KKK As Terrorist Organizations

500 billions here, 500 billions there and soon we will be talking about real money.
Pandering will not help Trump gain support, in fact just the opposite might happen.
Judging from ZH comments Trump supports are not pleased. BTW how many white voters Trump lost today ?
Sep 27, 2020 | www.zerohedge.com

Over the next 4 years, Trump promises to lower the cost of healthcare, and "bring better and tailored healthcare to address historic disparities" for the black community. The president will also ensure that black churches can compete for federal resources, and "defend religious freedom exemptions to respect religious believers and always protect life."

The president also seeks to further criminal justice reform, with his plan saying that he will "commit to working on a Second Step Act." He will also work towards "safe urban neighborhoods with highest policing standards," the plan states.

Other aspects of the plan includes making Juneteenth a National Holiday, prosecuting the KKK, designating Antifa a terrorist organization, and making lynching a national hate crime.

Trump's move to designate Antifa as a terrorist organization came after FBI Director Christopher Wray told Congress that those who engaged in recent violent protests are targets of serious FBI investigations.

"We have seen Antifa adherence coalescing and working together in what I would describe as small groups and nodes," Wray has said. Wray added that the bureau is conducting multiple investigations "into some anarchist violent extremists, some of whom operate through these nodes."

Before that, Attorney General William Barr in August said Antifa is a "revolutionary group" that is bent on establishing communism or socialism in the United States.

"They are a revolutionary group that is interested in some form of socialism, communism. They're essentially Bolsheviks. Their tactics are fascistic," Barr said in an interview with Fox News on Aug. 9.

At a "Black Voices for Trump" campaign rally in Atlanta, Georgia, Trump characterized his Platinum Plan as a "black empowerment plan," and warned black voters against supporting his opponent, former Vice President Joe Biden.

"Though black Americans have traditionally been shut out of opportunities to grow our own businesses and create generational wealth, President Trump is working hard to give us access to the American Dream," K. Carl Smith, Black Voices for Trump advisory board member, said in a statement .

"President Trump is a businessman and understands that pride, community, and dedication are built through entrepreneurship."

NEVER MISS THE NEWS THAT MATTERS MOST

ZEROHEDGE DIRECTLY TO YOUR INBOX

Receive a daily recap featuring a curated list of must-read stories.

President Donald Trump elbow bumps with Herschel Walker during a campaign rally in Atlanta, Georgia, on Sept. 25, 2020. (John Bazemore/AP Photo)

"No one in Washington politics today has done more to hurt black Americans than Joe Biden," Trump told supporters on Friday. "For half a century, Joe's personally advocated or enacted virtually every policy that has caused pain and suffering in the black community. You know that."

In a statement prior to Trump's rally in Georgia, Biden said, "As president, I will work to advance racial equity across the American economy and build back better I promise to fight for black working families and direct real investments to advance racial equity as part of our nation's economic recovery."

[Sep 26, 2020] On "White Fragility" by Matt Taibbi

Highly recommended!
Notable quotes:
"... If your category is "white," bad news: you have no identity apart from your participation in white supremacy ("Anti-blackness is foundational to our very identities Whiteness has always been predicated on blackness"), which naturally means "a positive white identity is an impossible goal." ..."
"... DiAngelo instructs us there is nothing to be done here, except "strive to be less white." To deny this theory, or to have the effrontery to sneak away from the tedium of DiAngelo's lecturing – what she describes as "leaving the stress-inducing situation" – is to affirm her conception of white supremacy. This intellectual equivalent of the "ordeal by water" (if you float, you're a witch) is orthodoxy across much of academia. ..."
"... White Fragility is based upon the idea that human beings are incapable of judging each other by the content of their character, and if people of different races think they are getting along or even loving one another, they probably need immediate antiracism training. ..."
"... It takes a special kind of ignorant for an author to choose an example that illustrates the mathematical opposite of one's intended point, but this isn't uncommon in White Fragility, which may be the dumbest book ever written. It makes The Art of the Deal read like Anna Karenina. ..."
"... Yet these ideas are taking America by storm. The movement that calls itself "antiracism" – I think it deserves that name a lot less than "pro-lifers" deserve theirs and am amazed journalists parrot it without question – is complete in its pessimism about race relations. It sees the human being as locked into one of three categories: members of oppressed groups, allies, and white oppressors. ..."
"... This dingbat racialist cult, which has no art, music, literature, and certainly no comedy, is the vision of "progress" institutional America has chosen to endorse in the Trump era. Why? Maybe because it fits. It won't hurt the business model of the news media, which for decades now has been monetizing division and has known how to profit from moral panics and witch hunts since before Fleet street discovered the Mod/Rocker wars. ..."
"... For corporate America the calculation is simple. What's easier, giving up business models based on war, slave labor, and regulatory arbitrage, or benching Aunt Jemima? There's a deal to be made here, greased by the fact that the "antiracism" prophets promoted in books like White Fragility share corporate Americas instinctive hostility to privacy, individual rights, freedom of speech, etc. ..."
"... Corporate America doubtless views the current protest movement as something that can be addressed as an H.R. matter, among other things by hiring thousands of DiAngelos to institute codes for the proper mode of Black-white workplace interaction. ..."
"... If you're wondering what that might look like, here's DiAngelo explaining how she handled the fallout from making a bad joke while she was "facilitating antiracism training" at the office of one of her clients. ..."
"... DiAngelo doesn't grasp the joke flopped and has to be told two days later that one of her web developer clients was offended. In despair, she writes, "I seek out a friend who is white and has a solid understanding of cross-racial dynamics." ..."
"... After DiAngelo confesses her feelings of embarrassment, shame and guilt to the enlightened white cross-racial dynamics expert (everyone should have such a person on speed-dial), she approaches the offended web developer. She asks, "Would you be willing to grant me the opportunity to repair the racism I perpetrated toward you in that meeting?" At which point the web developer agrees, leading to a conversation establishing the parameters of problematic joke resolution. ..."
"... This dialogue straight out of South Park – "Is it okay if I touch your penis? No, you may not touch my penis at this time!" – has a good shot of becoming standard at every transnational corporation, law firm, university, newsroom, etc. ..."
"... One of the central tenets of DiAngelo's book (and others like it) is that racism cannot be eradicated and can only be managed through constant, "lifelong" vigilance, much like the battle with addiction . A useful theory, if your business is selling teams of high-priced toxicity-hunters to corporations as next-generation versions of efficiency experts -- in the fight against this disease, companies will need the help forever and ever. ..."
"... Cancelations already are happening too fast to track. In a phenomenon that will be familiar to students of Russian history, accusers are beginning to appear alongside the accused. Three years ago a popular Canadian writer named Hal Niedzviecki was denounced for expressing the opinion that "anyone, anywhere, should be encouraged to imagine other peoples, other cultures, other identities." He reportedly was forced out of the Writer's Union of Canada for the crime of "cultural appropriation," and denounced as a racist by many, including a poet named Gwen Benaway. The latter said Niedzviecki "doesn't see the humanity of indigenous peoples." Last week, Benaway herself was denounced on Twitter for failing to provide proof that she was Indigenous. ..."
"... People everywhere today are being encouraged to snitch out schoolmates, parents, and colleagues for thoughtcrime. The New York Times wrote a salutary piece about high schoolers scanning social media accounts of peers for evidence of "anti-black racism" to make public, because what can go wrong with encouraging teenagers to start submarining each other's careers before they've even finished growing? ..."
Sep 26, 2020 | taibbi.substack.com

This is part of a larger piece that will be made available to subscribers later this week:

A core principle of the academic movement that shot through elite schools in America since the early nineties was the view that individual rights, humanism, and the democratic process are all just stalking-horses for white supremacy. The concept, as articulated in books like former corporate consultant Robin DiAngelo's White Fragility (Amazon's #1 seller !) reduces everything, even the smallest and most innocent human interactions, to racial power contests.

It's been mind-boggling to watch White Fragility celebrated in recent weeks. When it surged past a Hunger Games book on bestseller lists, USA Today cheered , "American readers are more interested in combatting racism than in literary escapism." When DiAngelo appeared on The Tonight Show, Jimmy Fallon gushed , "I know everyone wants to talk to you right now!" White Fragility has been pitched as an uncontroversial road-map for fighting racism, at a time when after the murder of George Floyd Americans are suddenly (and appropriately) interested in doing just that. Except this isn't a straightforward book about examining one's own prejudices. Have the people hyping this impressively crazy book actually read it?

DiAngelo isn't the first person to make a buck pushing tricked-up pseudo-intellectual horseshit as corporate wisdom, but she might be the first to do it selling Hitlerian race theory. White Fragility has a simple message: there is no such thing as a universal human experience, and we are defined not by our individual personalities or moral choices, but only by our racial category.

If your category is "white," bad news: you have no identity apart from your participation in white supremacy ("Anti-blackness is foundational to our very identities Whiteness has always been predicated on blackness"), which naturally means "a positive white identity is an impossible goal."

DiAngelo instructs us there is nothing to be done here, except "strive to be less white." To deny this theory, or to have the effrontery to sneak away from the tedium of DiAngelo's lecturing – what she describes as "leaving the stress-inducing situation" – is to affirm her conception of white supremacy. This intellectual equivalent of the "ordeal by water" (if you float, you're a witch) is orthodoxy across much of academia.

DiAngelo's writing style is pure pain. The lexicon favored by intersectional theorists of this type is built around the same principles as Orwell's Newspeak : it banishes ambiguity, nuance, and feeling and structures itself around sterile word pairs, like racist and antiracist, platform and deplatform , center and silence, that reduce all thinking to a series of binary choices . Ironically, Donald Trump does something similar, only with words like " AMAZING !" and " SAD !" that are simultaneously more childish and livelier.

Writers like DiAngelo like to make ugly verbs out of ugly nouns and ugly nouns out of ugly verbs (there are countless permutations on centering and privileging alone). In a world where only a few ideas are considered important, redundancy is encouraged, e.g. "To be less white is to break with white silence and white solidarity, to stop privileging the comfort of white people," or "Ruth Frankenberg, a premier white scholar in the field of whiteness, describes whiteness as multidimensional "

DiAngelo writes like a person who was put in timeout as a child for speaking clearly. "When there is disequilibrium in the habitus -- when social cues are unfamiliar and/or when they challenge our capital -- we use strategies to regain our balance," she says ("People taken out of their comfort zones find ways to deal," according to Google Translate). Ideas that go through the English-DiAngelo translator usually end up significantly altered, as in this key part of the book when she addresses Dr. Martin Luther King's "I have a dream," speech:

One line of King's speech in particular -- that one day he might be judged by the content of his character and not the color of his skin -- was seized upon by the white public because the words were seen to provide a simple and immediate solution to racial tensions: pretend that we don't see race, and racism will end. Color blindness was now promoted as the remedy for racism, with white people insisting that they didn't see race or, if they did, that it had no meaning to them.

That this speech was held up as the framework for American race relations for more than half a century precisely because people of all races understood King to be referring to a difficult and beautiful long-term goal worth pursuing is discounted, of course.

White Fragility is based upon the idea that human beings are incapable of judging each other by the content of their character, and if people of different races think they are getting along or even loving one another, they probably need immediate antiracism training. This is an important passage because rejection of King's "dream" of racial harmony -- not even as a description of the obviously flawed present, but as the aspirational goal of a better future -- has become a central tenet of this brand of antiracist doctrine mainstream press outlets are rushing to embrace.

The book's most amazing passage concerns the story of Jackie Robinson:

The story of Jackie Robinson is a classic example of how whiteness obscures racism by rendering whites, white privilege, and racist institutions invisible. Robinson is often celebrated as the first African American to break the color line

While Robinson was certainly an amazing baseball player, this story line depicts him as racially special, a black man who broke the color line himself. The subtext is that Robinson finally had what it took to play with whites, as if no black athlete before him was strong enough to compete at that level. Imagine if instead, the story went something like this: "Jackie Robinson, the first black man whites allowed to play major-league baseball."

There is not a single baseball fan anywhere – literally not one, except perhaps Robin DiAngelo, I guess – who believes Jackie Robinson broke the color barrier because he "finally had what it took to play with whites." Everyone familiar with this story understands that Robinson had to be exceptional, both as a player and as a human being, to confront the racist institution known as Major League Baseball.

His story has always been understood as a complex, long-developing political tale about overcoming violent systemic oppression. For DiAngelo to suggest history should re-cast Robinson as "the first black man whites allowed to play major