|News||Content management||Recommended Books||Recommended Links||Problems with Wiki||Social Problems in Enterprise Unix Administration||Slightly Skeptical View on Enterprise Unix Administration|
|Solaris vs Linux||bread crumbs||Kwiki||UseModWiki||TWiki||Scoop||DoxWiki|
|Blogs||MediaWiki (now in PHP)||Information is not knowledge||Wikipedia and the problem of vandalism||Humor||Random Findings||Etc|
charles hugh smith-Weblog and Essays
This Week's Contrarian Theme: The Positives
Socializing, Sharing and Learning: The Web's Leverage Points
October 18, 2008
In pondering leverage points for positive change, the Web dominates my thinking precisely because it offers our highly social, highly curious species new ways to socialize and explore.
At the risk of sounding entirely unpolitically correct, I would say the natural, ideal scenario for the average human being is not building a temple, pyramid, fortress or palace but lazing around under a shade tree with other humans, gossiping and making jokes--often at someone else's expense.
If that seems too timid and obvious to be un-PC, then how about this: the only activities which really rouse the blood of human males are:
1. killing something which is good to eat, but if not, killing something just for fun
2. starting a fire or otherwise destroying stuff
3. going fast, climbing high, etc. (yes, the space shuttle can be counted twice)
4. seeing what's going on in the next valley (prospects of danger, violence or easy pickings make it ever more attractive)
5. acquiring easy wealth or social status which can be translated into access to desirable females
6. playing some sort of game or equivalent "guys in the treehouse" activity which either offers hope of raising one's social status or at least strengthens bonds to the Leaders of the Pack, i.e. maintains current social status
7. learning/acquiring something which offers a competitive advantage in terms of wealth (mating prospects) or social status (mating prospects), preferably without requiring too much work (i.e. credit default swaps, flipping real estate, etc.)
Human females of course are also adventurous, curious and interested in raising wealth and social status; but while the guys in the treehouse are either daring each other to swim Turtle Creek or attempting to make homebrew out of juice, sap, crushed leaves, etc., under the tree the conversation drifts to essentials such as, who's hooking up with whom, who just broke up, who's pregnant, whatever happened to him/her, and what's up with the local leaders/celebrities.
Unsurprisingly, the Web offers opportunities for all of the above, mostly vicariously. The attractions of socializing, gossiping and networking are essentially human nature distilled to its essence.
That may seem trivial as we face the unprecedented challenges ahead (blah blah blah), but building trust and sharing successful strategies are perhaps the motivations behind the development of both spoken and written language/codes.
There are downsides, of course, to the Web. This is, after all, real life and not a game, so there are always non-trivial tradeoffs. Perhaps the most obvious--and despite this, perhaps the most profound--downside is the atrophying of actual real-live human socializing (e.g. bowling alone, few cook real food any more, etc.) in favor of its online simulacrum, and in the physical atrophying of action in the real world in favor of mouse-clicks and joystick manipulation.
I know many of you are like me, and you run out of patience for the screen after a few hours so you turn it off and go on a bicycle ride or do something in the real world with your physical being--pull weeds, water the roses, pluck some beans from the vines, try to fix that stupid vacuum cleaner whine, etc.
Although I haven't found any definitive study on this, clearly our brain chemistry/ activity is changed by watching TV or films, and changed in somewhat different ways by web-surfing, emailing, etc. It seems likely these changes are not net-net positive for our mental or physical health.
Rather like the old Woody Allen comedy in which cream puffs were discovered to be good for you, I would be quite surprised if living online 8 hours a day turns out to be wonderful for our mental and physical health.
A more subtle and therefore more pernicious downside is the flattening of knowledge by the simulacrum of "information." In one of my very first entries on this blog Flattening the Knowledge Curve: The "Googling" Effect (May 2005) (back when it had 30 visitors on a good day rather than 10,000), I suggested that Googling and the wealth of short segments of expertise/knowledge offered up by searches created an illusion of comprehensive knowledge--what we might call "working knowledge." This superficial "wealth" is actually a simulacrum of "the real thing" which can only be gathered by the reading of lengthy, contextually rich, coherently organized books or by experience in the real world.
As a free-lance journalist, I learned the necessity of background knowledge or context; but I also learned how easy it was to simulate an understanding of complex topics by eliciting the requisite "three quotes" from "experts" or "man/woman on the street" sources.
The Web thus offers up a tempting simulation of actual working knowledge. It's all too easy to read a few articles and then feel the comfort of having learned something valuable; in a university course, this is standard in introductory classes. But the overview and the excerpts are followed by book-length readings which provide the background needed for analytic or working skills.
For instance: energy is undoubtedly the key issue facing humanity as petroleum enters depletion. Without some grounding in the basics of oil geology and refining, I am doubtful that anyone can summon the necessary skepticism for pie-in-the-sky fantasies like offshore drilling or shale oil. Yes, those may well provide some petroleum in quantity but the numbers just don't add up: the U.S. burns 19.5 million barrels a day (down from 21 MBD a year ago) and the world consumes about 85 MBD. So adding 2 MBD is nice but it isn't going to make Peak Oil go away.
This is why I try to recommend books. Not everyone has time or interest to read a book or two on a subject, but we as a society/civilization have to be very careful not to confuse a mass of information with context-rich knowledge.
I don't claim to be an expert in Peak Oil (or anything else, for that matter) but I reckon these books offer a decent orientation to the issues:
The Future of Life
Beyond Oil: The View from Hubbert's Peak
The Party's Over: Oil, War and the Fate of Industrial Societies
The End of Oil: On the Edge of a Perilous New World
Twilight in the Desert: The Coming Saudi Oil Shock and the World Economy
The Long Emergency: Surviving the End of Oil, Climate Change, and Other Converging Catastrophes of the Twenty-First Century
The Solar Economy: Renewable Energy for a Sustainable Global Future
If you already have a deep knowledge base, then the Web is an astonishing resource. If you already know your way around Windows, for instance, all the fixes and hacks available online will be extremely useful. In trying to repair a friend's buggy Windoz machine (I know, a hopeless task), I couldn't figure out how to force the boot menu with Safe Mode to load on startup. A quick web search provided the answer.
But a novice would have been flummoxed by the instructions. We all know this, because we're all novices in many things. Take auto mechanics. I am undoubtedly one of the world's worst, most talentless mechanics, but I had to swap out a sensor in my Honda engine and online resources explained how to do it in a few lines of text. With this, I was able to go rent the tool from Kragen (free if you bought the sensor there) and get the job done.
But if you've never opened the hood of a vehicle or messed with wrenches, you would be hard-pressed indeed to use the "knowledge" that the web provided. The same can be said of cooking; without some real-world experience, a recipe is only an outline, not instruction.
These are just three of countless examples. Information is not knowledge, yet the Web offers a seductive confusion of the two.
Groupthink : Two Party System as Polyarchy : Corruption of Regulators : Bureaucracies : Understanding Micromanagers and Control Freaks : Toxic Managers : Harvard Mafia : Diplomatic Communication : Surviving a Bad Performance Review : Insufficient Retirement Funds as Immanent Problem of Neoliberal Regime : PseudoScience : Who Rules America : Neoliberalism : The Iron Law of Oligarchy : Libertarian Philosophy
War and Peace : Skeptical Finance : John Kenneth Galbraith :Talleyrand : Oscar Wilde : Otto Von Bismarck : Keynes : George Carlin : Skeptics : Propaganda : SE quotes : Language Design and Programming Quotes : Random IT-related quotes : Somerset Maugham : Marcus Aurelius : Kurt Vonnegut : Eric Hoffer : Winston Churchill : Napoleon Bonaparte : Ambrose Bierce : Bernard Shaw : Mark Twain Quotes
Vol 25, No.12 (December, 2013) Rational Fools vs. Efficient Crooks The efficient markets hypothesis : Political Skeptic Bulletin, 2013 : Unemployment Bulletin, 2010 : Vol 23, No.10 (October, 2011) An observation about corporate security departments : Slightly Skeptical Euromaydan Chronicles, June 2014 : Greenspan legacy bulletin, 2008 : Vol 25, No.10 (October, 2013) Cryptolocker Trojan (Win32/Crilock.A) : Vol 25, No.08 (August, 2013) Cloud providers as intelligence collection hubs : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2010 : Inequality Bulletin, 2009 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2008 : Copyleft Problems Bulletin, 2004 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2011 : Energy Bulletin, 2010 : Malware Protection Bulletin, 2010 : Vol 26, No.1 (January, 2013) Object-Oriented Cult : Political Skeptic Bulletin, 2011 : Vol 23, No.11 (November, 2011) Softpanorama classification of sysadmin horror stories : Vol 25, No.05 (May, 2013) Corporate bullshit as a communication method : Vol 25, No.06 (June, 2013) A Note on the Relationship of Brooks Law and Conway Law
Fifty glorious years (1950-2000): the triumph of the US computer engineering : Donald Knuth : TAoCP and its Influence of Computer Science : Richard Stallman : Linus Torvalds : Larry Wall : John K. Ousterhout : CTSS : Multix OS Unix History : Unix shell history : VI editor : History of pipes concept : Solaris : MS DOS : Programming Languages History : PL/1 : Simula 67 : C : History of GCC development : Scripting Languages : Perl history : OS History : Mail : DNS : SSH : CPU Instruction Sets : SPARC systems 1987-2006 : Norton Commander : Norton Utilities : Norton Ghost : Frontpage history : Malware Defense History : GNU Screen : OSS early history
The Peter Principle : Parkinson Law : 1984 : The Mythical Man-Month : How to Solve It by George Polya : The Art of Computer Programming : The Elements of Programming Style : The Unix Haterís Handbook : The Jargon file : The True Believer : Programming Pearls : The Good Soldier Svejk : The Power Elite
Most popular humor pages:
Manifest of the Softpanorama IT Slacker Society : Ten Commandments of the IT Slackers Society : Computer Humor Collection : BSD Logo Story : The Cuckoo's Egg : IT Slang : C++ Humor : ARE YOU A BBS ADDICT? : The Perl Purity Test : Object oriented programmers of all nations : Financial Humor : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2008 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2010 : The Most Comprehensive Collection of Editor-related Humor : Programming Language Humor : Goldman Sachs related humor : Greenspan humor : C Humor : Scripting Humor : Real Programmers Humor : Web Humor : GPL-related Humor : OFM Humor : Politically Incorrect Humor : IDS Humor : "Linux Sucks" Humor : Russian Musical Humor : Best Russian Programmer Humor : Microsoft plans to buy Catholic Church : Richard Stallman Related Humor : Admin Humor : Perl-related Humor : Linus Torvalds Related humor : PseudoScience Related Humor : Networking Humor : Shell Humor : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2011 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2012 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2013 : Java Humor : Software Engineering Humor : Sun Solaris Related Humor : Education Humor : IBM Humor : Assembler-related Humor : VIM Humor : Computer Viruses Humor : Bright tomorrow is rescheduled to a day after tomorrow : Classic Computer Humor
The Last but not Least Technology is dominated by two types of people: those who understand what they do not manage and those who manage what they do not understand ~Archibald Putt. Ph.D
Copyright © 1996-2020 by Softpanorama Society. www.softpanorama.org was initially created as a service to the (now defunct) UN Sustainable Development Networking Programme (SDNP) without any remuneration. This document is an industrial compilation designed and created exclusively for educational use and is distributed under the Softpanorama Content License. Original materials copyright belong to respective owners. Quotes are made for educational purposes only in compliance with the fair use doctrine.
FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to advance understanding of computer science, IT technology, economic, scientific, and social issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided by section 107 of the US Copyright Law according to which such material can be distributed without profit exclusively for research and educational purposes.
This is a Spartan WHYFF (We Help You For Free) site written by people for whom English is not a native language. Grammar and spelling errors should be expected. The site contain some broken links as it develops like a living tree...
|You can use PayPal to to buy a cup of coffee for authors of this site|
Last modified: March, 12, 2019