Softpanorama

May the source be with you, but remember the KISS principle ;-)
Home Switchboard Unix Administration Red Hat TCP/IP Networks Neoliberalism Toxic Managers
(slightly skeptical) Educational society promoting "Back to basics" movement against IT overcomplexity and  bastardization of classic Unix

The if Statements

 The general form of an if statement looks like this:

if test1:                 # if test
    statements1           # Associated block
elif test2:               # Optional elifs
    statements2
else:                     # Optional else
    statements3

The one new syntax component in Python is the colon character (:). All Python compound statements—statements that have other statements nested inside them—follow the same general pattern of a header line terminated in a colon, followed by a nested block of code usually indented underneath the header line, like this:

Header line:
    Nested statement block

The colon is required, and omitting it is probably the most common coding mistake among new Python programmers

Most Python-friendly editors make this mistake easy to spot. Including it eventually becomes an unconscious habit (so much so that you may start typing colons in your C-like language code, too, generating many entertaining error messages from that language’s compiler!).

Although Python requires the extra colon character, there are three things programmers in C-like languages must include that you don’t generally have to in Python.

The first of these is the set of parentheses around the tests at the top of the statement:

if (x < y)

The parentheses here are required in all C-style languages including Perl. In Python, though, they are not—we simply omit the parentheses. Because every expression can be enclosed in parentheses, including them will not hurt, and they are not treated as an error if present. The “Python way” is to simply omit the parentheses in these kinds of statements altogether saving some typing and possible errors.

The second and more significant syntax component you won’t find in Python code is the semicolon. You don’t need to terminate statements with semicolons:

x = 1;

In Python, the general rule is that the end of a line automatically terminates the statement that appears on that line. In other words, you can leave off the semicolons.

x = 1

There are some ways to work around this rule, as you’ll see in a moment (for instance, wrapping code in a bracketed structure allows it to span lines). But, in general, you write one statement per line for the vast majority of Python code, and no semicolon is required.

 Semicolons are allowed but are not necessary in Python.

The elif and else clauses are optional. Python does not have a “switch” statement. Use if, elif, and else for all conditional processing.

End of indentation is end of block

Here’s a typical if statement with all three kinds of clauses (not in optimal style):

if a > b: 
   mymax=a
elif a<b: 
   mymax=b
else: 
  print 'a and b are even'

The block terminates when the indentation returns to that of the clause header (or further left from there). When there is just a single simple statement, as here, it can follow the : on the same logical line as the header, but it can also be on a separate logical line, immediately after the header line and indented rightward from it. Most Python programmers prefer the separate-line style, with four-space indents for the guarded statements. Such a style is more general and more readable, and recommended by PEP 8. So, a generally preferred style is:

if x < 0:
    print('x is negative')
elif x % 2:
    print('x is positive and odd')
else:
    print('x is even and non-negative')

You can use any Python expression as the condition in an if or elif clause. Using an expression this way is known as using it in a Boolean context. In a Boolean context, any value is taken as either true or false. As mentioned earlier, any nonzero number or nonempty container (string, tuple, list, dictionary, set) evaluates as true; zero (of any numeric type), None, and empty containers evaluate as false. To test a value x in a Boolean context, use the following coding style:

if x:

This is the clearest and most Pythonic form. Less clear forms are:

if x is True:
if x == True:
if bool(x):

There is a crucial difference between saying that an expression returns True (meaning the expression returns the value 1 with the bool type) and saying that an expression evaluates as true (meaning the expression returns any result that is true in a Boolean context). When testing an expression, for example in an if clause, you only care about what it evaluates as, not what, precisely, it returns.

When the if clause’s condition evaluates as true, the statements after the if clause execute, then the entire if statement ends. Otherwise, Python evaluates each elif clause’s condition, in order. The statements after the first elif clause whose condition evaluates as true, if any, execute, and the entire if statement ends. Otherwise, when an else clause exists it is executed, and then the statements after the entire if construct execute.

Python 3.8 introduced C-style operator := ( assignment expression or Walrus)

Python 3.8 implements the walrus operator ( C-style assignment expression), which looks like this:

name := expression

Slightly artificial but simple example (most commonly walrus is used when you search sub-string in the string and want to preserve the starting position of this search)  

my_list = [1,2,3,4,5]
if len(my_list) > 3:
   print(f"The list is too long with {len(my_list)} elements")

In this case the walrus operator  eliminates the need to  call the len() function twice.

my_list = [1,2,3,4,5]
if (n := len(my_list)) > 3:
   print(f"The list is too long with {n} elements")

The walrus also can be used with for  and while loops

 


Top Visited
Switchboard
Latest
Past week
Past month

Old News ;-)

Recommended Links

Google matched content

Softpanorama Recommended

Top articles

Sites



Etc

Society

Groupthink : Two Party System as Polyarchy : Corruption of Regulators : Bureaucracies : Understanding Micromanagers and Control Freaks : Toxic Managers :   Harvard Mafia : Diplomatic Communication : Surviving a Bad Performance Review : Insufficient Retirement Funds as Immanent Problem of Neoliberal Regime : PseudoScience : Who Rules America : Neoliberalism  : The Iron Law of Oligarchy : Libertarian Philosophy

Quotes

War and Peace : Skeptical Finance : John Kenneth Galbraith :Talleyrand : Oscar Wilde : Otto Von Bismarck : Keynes : George Carlin : Skeptics : Propaganda  : SE quotes : Language Design and Programming Quotes : Random IT-related quotesSomerset Maugham : Marcus Aurelius : Kurt Vonnegut : Eric Hoffer : Winston Churchill : Napoleon Bonaparte : Ambrose BierceBernard Shaw : Mark Twain Quotes

Bulletin:

Vol 25, No.12 (December, 2013) Rational Fools vs. Efficient Crooks The efficient markets hypothesis : Political Skeptic Bulletin, 2013 : Unemployment Bulletin, 2010 :  Vol 23, No.10 (October, 2011) An observation about corporate security departments : Slightly Skeptical Euromaydan Chronicles, June 2014 : Greenspan legacy bulletin, 2008 : Vol 25, No.10 (October, 2013) Cryptolocker Trojan (Win32/Crilock.A) : Vol 25, No.08 (August, 2013) Cloud providers as intelligence collection hubs : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2010 : Inequality Bulletin, 2009 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2008 : Copyleft Problems Bulletin, 2004 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2011 : Energy Bulletin, 2010 : Malware Protection Bulletin, 2010 : Vol 26, No.1 (January, 2013) Object-Oriented Cult : Political Skeptic Bulletin, 2011 : Vol 23, No.11 (November, 2011) Softpanorama classification of sysadmin horror stories : Vol 25, No.05 (May, 2013) Corporate bullshit as a communication method  : Vol 25, No.06 (June, 2013) A Note on the Relationship of Brooks Law and Conway Law

History:

Fifty glorious years (1950-2000): the triumph of the US computer engineering : Donald Knuth : TAoCP and its Influence of Computer Science : Richard Stallman : Linus Torvalds  : Larry Wall  : John K. Ousterhout : CTSS : Multix OS Unix History : Unix shell history : VI editor : History of pipes concept : Solaris : MS DOSProgramming Languages History : PL/1 : Simula 67 : C : History of GCC developmentScripting Languages : Perl history   : OS History : Mail : DNS : SSH : CPU Instruction Sets : SPARC systems 1987-2006 : Norton Commander : Norton Utilities : Norton Ghost : Frontpage history : Malware Defense History : GNU Screen : OSS early history

Classic books:

The Peter Principle : Parkinson Law : 1984 : The Mythical Man-MonthHow to Solve It by George Polya : The Art of Computer Programming : The Elements of Programming Style : The Unix Hater’s Handbook : The Jargon file : The True Believer : Programming Pearls : The Good Soldier Svejk : The Power Elite

Most popular humor pages:

Manifest of the Softpanorama IT Slacker Society : Ten Commandments of the IT Slackers Society : Computer Humor Collection : BSD Logo Story : The Cuckoo's Egg : IT Slang : C++ Humor : ARE YOU A BBS ADDICT? : The Perl Purity Test : Object oriented programmers of all nations : Financial Humor : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2008 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2010 : The Most Comprehensive Collection of Editor-related Humor : Programming Language Humor : Goldman Sachs related humor : Greenspan humor : C Humor : Scripting Humor : Real Programmers Humor : Web Humor : GPL-related Humor : OFM Humor : Politically Incorrect Humor : IDS Humor : "Linux Sucks" Humor : Russian Musical Humor : Best Russian Programmer Humor : Microsoft plans to buy Catholic Church : Richard Stallman Related Humor : Admin Humor : Perl-related Humor : Linus Torvalds Related humor : PseudoScience Related Humor : Networking Humor : Shell Humor : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2011 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2012 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2013 : Java Humor : Software Engineering Humor : Sun Solaris Related Humor : Education Humor : IBM Humor : Assembler-related Humor : VIM Humor : Computer Viruses Humor : Bright tomorrow is rescheduled to a day after tomorrow : Classic Computer Humor

The Last but not Least Technology is dominated by two types of people: those who understand what they do not manage and those who manage what they do not understand ~Archibald Putt. Ph.D


Copyright © 1996-2021 by Softpanorama Society. www.softpanorama.org was initially created as a service to the (now defunct) UN Sustainable Development Networking Programme (SDNP) without any remuneration. This document is an industrial compilation designed and created exclusively for educational use and is distributed under the Softpanorama Content License. Original materials copyright belong to respective owners. Quotes are made for educational purposes only in compliance with the fair use doctrine.

FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to advance understanding of computer science, IT technology, economic, scientific, and social issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided by section 107 of the US Copyright Law according to which such material can be distributed without profit exclusively for research and educational purposes.

This is a Spartan WHYFF (We Help You For Free) site written by people for whom English is not a native language. Grammar and spelling errors should be expected. The site contain some broken links as it develops like a living tree...

You can use PayPal to to buy a cup of coffee for authors of this site

Disclaimer:

The statements, views and opinions presented on this web page are those of the author (or referenced source) and are not endorsed by, nor do they necessarily reflect, the opinions of the Softpanorama society. We do not warrant the correctness of the information provided or its fitness for any purpose. The site uses AdSense so you need to be aware of Google privacy policy. You you do not want to be tracked by Google please disable Javascript for this site. This site is perfectly usable without Javascript.

Last modified: July 28, 2020