|Home||Switchboard||Unix Administration||Red Hat||TCP/IP Networks||Neoliberalism||Toxic Managers|
May the source be with you, but remember the KISS principle ;-)
Bigger doesn't imply better. Bigger often is a sign of obesity, of lost control, of overcomplexity, of cancerous cells
Prev | Contents | Next
|News||Cruise to Frugality Island||Casino Capitalism Dictionary||Famous quotes of John Kenneth Galbraith||Lord Keynes||The Roads We Take||Humor||Quotes||Etc|
Due to the size financial skeptic dictionary is now converted to a separate page
|"They vilify us, the scoundrels do, when there is only this difference: They plunder the poor under the cover of law ... and we plunder the rich under the cover of our own courage..."|
Quote "Figures for new orders - which indicate future growth - remained stable".
Real meaning "we do not know real figure and suspect that existing orders can be cancelled anytime"
Something which needs to be either done or at least placed in a list of things in need of doing. This is probably the most annoying corporate term that there is.
A big problem that nobody in the company knows how to fix. A challenge may very well lead to the demise of said company. If your company spends more time talking about challenges than home runs, it may be time to look for a new job.
The group of people in a company that make the important decisions and all of the money. You are most likely not a member of this group.
The list of things that a company would like to provide and accomplish. Most are more like hallucinations than visions.
Features of a product that should have been included in the original release, however, due to market pressure the product had to be released without these features. These may be sent to customers if/when they are available.
This is a misunderstanding. For example, your sales staff is probably selling a product that was discontinued in the '70s. This would be a disconnect between sales and marketing.
The classes that are taken when a racial discrimination or sexual harassment complaint has been filed against a company in order to limit legal liability.
Usually referring to a person that has moved up the corporate ladder faster than they could prove their worth or be held accountable for the mess they made.
A bandwagon. All aboard?
Hit a Home Run
This can either mean that things went according to planned for once or that the sales team has actually been coming into work and selling stuff.
This means to motivate someone to do something by promising something (usually a company mug or pen) if they do. They become a perfectly predictable robot, subject to the whims and offerings of the clever, incentive-offering manager.
A utopian term meaning that all of the different parts of a solution (product or series of products) work together. While the term is used frequently, there is no such thing in the real world.
The person that will get all of the credit on a project.
A fancy version of the word "use." For example, instead of saying "We could use your product knowledge to help us make a sale", the corporate type would say, "We could leverage your product knowledge to help us make a sale". The use of this word is one of many examples of people trying to sound important in the office.
As a technical type, these are the accounts that you will drop everything for and brown-nose at the request of sales and management.
A measurement of success or value. These measurable parameters are used by companies to make important decisions regardless as to whether or not they are measuring what they should be or their collection model is sound.
Next steps are where you go from here and can refer to a project or a process. It is difficult to ever complete these steps due to the number of meetings scheduled to determine what the next steps are.
The reasons why a customer does not want to buy from your sales people. The most common objection is the overuse of the terms on this page which tends to confuse the customer. The antidote is plain English.
This means to discuss something in a place or at a time other than the one you currently find yourself in. This may be used by managers to convey that they do not wish to talk about the subject, they do not find it important or you are wasting everyone else's time in a meeting.
Out of the Loop
This phrase means that one has not been informed about a subject. It is used to deny responsibility or to complain about not having been consulted.
Outside the Box
Creativity. Those that do think outside the box are generally considered rabble-rousers and trouble-makers. While verbally encouraged, your reward for thinking outside the box may be a pink slip party.
The process of laying off internal employees in favor of a staff of high-school drop-outs run by another company for half the price.
The cost of keeping the lights on and the doors open.
To take responsibility for something. Someone who "owns" something can never claim that they are "out of the loop."
A meeting before another meeting in which the company slackers will get together and figure out what to say or present at the next meeting so that they do not make fools of themselves.
An employee. Resources are managed by a group which calls itself "Human Resources." Like hardware, resources have fixed lifespans, can become obsolete and can even malfunction.
Poor choices have been made and the company needs to start from scratch. Will include massive layoffs and double the workload for those that remain. Upper management will all receive raises.
A sales pitch committed to memory by sales staff. Designed to prevent foot-in-mouth syndrome and to discourage creativity.
This term refers to a group of people that work together. The team is strongest when composed of "Yes" men and women.
The process of convincing a customer to purchase products and services that they do not want or need.
Tacking on extra features (for free) to an existing product so that customers have difficulty comparing prices with competitors.
A story told by a salesperson that describes a difficult sale that they made. It usually starts off something like, "So I was in the Bahamas..."
A fascinating business concept that somehow eliminates the "loser" in any deal or project. A win/win situation is when a customer pays their exorbitant bills on time and doesn't ever complain.
January 25, 2006 | CrossingWallStreet.com
Portsmouth Herald News:Academician has big shoes to fill as Fed Reserve head
San Diego Union Tribune:Big shoes to fill
U.S. News and World Report:Following the legend of Greenspan, Bernanke certainly has big shoes to fill.
St. Petersburg Times:One focus is the transition at the Federal Reserve Board, where Alan Greenspan is on his way out as chairman and Ben Bernanke is stepping into those extra-large shoes.
Black Enterprise:Big Shoes to Fill
The Daily YomiuriIt will not be easy for Bernanke, who is tasked with overcoming domestic and external problems that could short-circuit the currently sound U.S. economy and to fill the big shoes of Greenspan, who has won international recognition for his economic policies.
NPR:In terms of his role as a political player, analysts agree he has some big shoes to fill.
Investors Business DailyBernanke knows he has big shoes to fill.
Smart Money:You'd think Alan Greenspan shows up to work in a clown costume with all the talk about the next Federal Reserve chairman having big shoes to fill.
Jan. 18, 2009 | Bloomberg
Mr. Alan Greenspan Greenspan Associates
1133 Connecticut Avenue NW Washington, DC 20500
Dear Mr. Greenspan:
I was somewhat surprised to read that you had been hired as an adviser to John Paulson, the hedge fund manager who made a killing last year betting against the mess you made. The irony is really rich: Paying someone whose policy mistakes and missteps were the source of your success! I'm sure it will be a productive working relationship for everyone involved.
What got my wheels turning, though, was re-reading your comments about your ``Rule of One,'' as I call it. You have said that you would consult with only one client in each industry.
So far, your roster includes one bank (Deutsche Bank AG), one bond-fund manager (Pimco), and now one hedge fund. I'm sure there's some overlap in what these firms do, but my intent here isn't to quibble about details.
If I understand you correctly -- you speak much more clearly than you did when you were Fed chairman, now that you're getting paid a bundle per word -- you still have an opening for a media company. So I'd like to propose what I think could be a mutually beneficial relationship between you and, yes, me.
The benefits to you should be immediately apparent.
1. Buying Access
With each announcement of your exclusive consulting relationship with a client, the chatter is that these firms are buying ``access'': access to your institutional knowledge of the Fed; access to your Rolodex; access to any inside information you might get from policy makers in the U.S. and overseas.
The way I see it, it wouldn't be a bad idea for you to buy access -- from me. Lots of politicians see my column; maybe even a few who are running for president. I might be able to put in a good word for you that would give you a shot at Treasury secretary, an opportunity lost when Jimmy Carter defeated Jerry Ford in 1976.
Running the mint isn't nearly as glamorous as controlling the printing press, but at least it keeps you in the public eye (not that you ever left it).
2. Keep Your Friends Close, And Your Enemies Closer
Let's face it: No one has been a bigger thorn in your side than yours truly. I started my journalism career a few months before you landed at the Fed, and we've been joined at the hip ever since.
If I were on your payroll, you can be pretty sure I'd be talking you up rather than putting you down. I mean, it wasn't until Bill Gross hired you that he stopped trashing you. And you didn't even have to pay him to change his tune!
If you put me on retainer, you'll be surprised how easily I can be persuaded to see economic history in a different light.
Remember how you denied there could be a housing bubble, only belatedly acknowledging some ``froth'' in certain local markets? I've already forgotten you said that, along with your lament on how homeowners would have done better with adjustable- rate mortgages.
Or how about that ridiculously low federal funds rate that overstayed its usefulness for years, not months? I think I could make an argument, based on a ``risk-management'' approach, that it was necessary to ward off deflation.
In other words, Mr. Greenspan, money talks -- or in this case, money would encourage me to talk less, if you know what I mean.
3. Playing Cyrano to Your Christian
Just as Christian de Neuvillette used Cyrano de Bergerac's words to woo Roxane, you, sir, could use a bit more dash when it comes to preserving or, at this point, resuscitating your legacy.
No one ever accused me of being dull or uninspired. And I've always had a hankering to play Cyrano, sucker that I am for that swashbuckling, romantic stuff.
``I draw my sword and raise it high.'' ``Let me choose my rhymes.'' ``Then, as I end the refrain, thrust home!'' Oh, it will be grand. Together we can win their hearts!
4. A Better Crystal Ball
This may be a sore subject with you, but your forecasting acumen hasn't been the best. Your visibility on bubbles has been close to zero. You were late to see recession in both 1990 and 2001. Your rationalizations for your forecasts have been pretty lame as well.
Money manager Bill Fleckenstein sets your record straight in a just-published book, which isn't likely to be a coffee-table fixture in your household.
If you saddle up with me, you can get rid of all those arcane manufacturing ratios and obscure indicators you used to pull out of a hat to justify a policy action. You can do better watching two rates -- the overnight rate that the Fed sets and the long-term rate determined by the market -- than you can with the 18,500 indicators you reportedly track in the bathtub.
I'd like to thank you in advance for considering my offer. I'm ready to proceed with negotiations as soon as I hear back from you.
Very truly yours,
Caroline A. Baum
Grigory Rasputin was a Russian religious adventurist who is perceived as having influenced the later days of the Russian Emperor Nicholas II, his wife Alexandra, and their only son the Alexei. See The Rasputin File by Edvard Radzinsky for details. The key component of his power was his ability to influence the imperial family. It was Tsarina Alexandra who was the key to the Rasputin influence :
The Tsarina's anxious concern for her son's illness led her to embrace Rasputin, a debauched 'holy man' who proved able to stem Alexis' loss of blood (it has been suggested through hypnosis).
Already unpopular at court - where she firmly held sway over her husband - Alexandra's unswerving loyalty to Rasputin (whom she believed had been sent by God to save the Russian throne) led her to continually excuse his notorious excesses, and further damaged her reputation both at court and in the public at large (whom she gave every indication of despising).
It has been argued that Rasputin helped to discredit the tsarist government, leading to the fall of the Romanov dynasty. While contemporary opinions saw Rasputin as a debauched religious charlatan with insatiable sexual appetite and tremendous luster for power and influence a lot of contemporaries saw an influential religious figure, a both wizard with the ability of intuitively understand world events and find the right course of actions. There are some subtle analogies between Rasputin and Greenspan. We have found seven most prominent areas of similarity:
- Radicalism, fringe views. Rasputin was religious radical with questionable agenda and almost blind trust from the large part of Russian aristocracy as well as tsar family, but who simultaneously created the level of corruption which greatly contributed to the Imperial Russia demise. Greenspan is a market fundamentalist with questionable agenda (strong allergy for regulation and zeal in dismantling New Deal safeguards) as well as tremendous lust for power and prestige; the man who enjoyed almost blind trust from the Wall Street moguls, Congress and a large part of academic community.
There is no question that in monetary policy Greenspan proved to be a dangerous radical: overzelous statist insteal of libertarian as he often tretends to be. Doug Nolan noted this sad fact in his column The Greenspan Era Lessons to be Learned
Truth be told, Mr. Greenspan is a monetary policy radical. He presided over the greatest expansion of speculative finance in history, including a Trillion dollar hedge fund community, bloated Wall Street firm balance sheets approaching $2 Trillion, a $3.3 Trillion repo market, and a global derivatives market surpassing an unfathomable $220 Trillion. During the late-nineties, when leveraged speculation was heavily infiltrating the financial system, he became the leading proponent of the "New Economy." He became a powerful advocate of derivatives and Wall Street finance, all the time avoiding any discussion of the impact these new financial instruments and practices were having on Credit growth, marketplace risk perceptions, speculation, asset prices and the underlying structure of the economy.
Like Rasputin intrigues, his monetary policy contributed to the excessive leverage and derivative boom that was instrumental in rapid expansion of financial sector and reckless speculation. That created of current troubles for Wall Street firms (especially New York banks which were favored by Greenspan due to his past as a bank lobbyist)), the troubles that might eventually lead to collapse of once mighty banks and threatened that status of the dollar as a reserve currency. The question whether the most corrupt players avoid lynching as happened in Russia is still open.
- "Greed is good" as a more limited version of "Sin is purifying" motto. If you think about Rasputin's motto "sin is purifying" and his sexual excesses that is not that far from "greed is good" and monetary excesses which were typical during Greenspan tenure. The mask of libertarian along with flexibility in his own convictions (as was demostrated in his support of Bush tax cut) and tremendous political survival skills permitted both to adapt it to the needs of those in power and prosper on the corrupt environment they created. Similary to Greenspan libertarism, mysticism was a key that open for Rasputin the door to high society, the universal key opener which provided undeniable advantages for political ladder climbers during Reagan years. The battle cry was dismantling of the New Deal checks and balances for the benefit of the most greedy and reckless part of Wall Street. The most apt demonstration was neutering of Glass-Steagall Act. As FT commented there are big differences between commercial and investment banks with the latter being far more dangerous animals, especially as they grow in size:
Commercial and retail bankers are like battery hens. You put them in a small cubicle, pressurise them with tough sales targets but provide a decent salary, and they will produce a steady stream of returns. Most are conservative, somewhat harassed souls, who seldom think to bite the hand that feeds them.
An investment bank is more like a zoo, full of bizarre, prideful and sometimes dangerous animals. A zookeeper who pushes them around, or issues orders, is asking to have an arm bitten off. Instead, the job is to keep the animals in their cages, so they do not savage the paying customers, while understanding their individual behaviour patterns. What does it mean, for example, when a derivative trader refuses to take a holiday?
- Substance abuse. While Rasputin was the traditional alcoholic which enjoyed wild orgies, Greenspan personal inclinations were limited to modest love of cocktail parties and he was more of a financial bartender: irresponsible regulator who instead of removing punch bowl was serving drunks booze after booze to keep them from falling on the floor.
- Tremendous, all-encompassing lust for power and status. Like Rasputin became a new, bizarre center of power in Imperial Russia, Greenspan also gradually acquired and tightly gripped to the role that entails tremendous political power. Tremendously autocratic he partially derived his political power from his ability to raise or lower the interest rates before the elections and thus make or break the candidates from the party in power. The mere threat of such actions was often enough for confirmation by presidents who definitely would prefer somebody else at this position. So quid-pro-quo arrangements extending Greenspan's tenure were something similar to J. Edgar Hoover ability to survive under so many presidents. It is because of Hoover's long and controversial reign that FBI directors are now limited to 10-year terms. I do not see why Fed Chairman position should be different: Greenspan was enough of the warning sign to prevent this from happening again.
Sir Alan convincingly demonstrated during his long carrier that he can do whatever it takes to stay in power, principles be damned. It has been reported that Ayn Rand once remarked at a party in the late fifties about Greenspan, "Oh, Alan is so brilliant, but he's such a social climber." Seems she pegged him rather well, for Mr. Greenspan certainly became quite skilled in the climbing game that makes up Wall Street and Washington.
In FSO Editorials Greenspan's Choice Scylla or Charybdis (04-28-2004) Nelson Hultberg noted that Greenspan has tremendous lust for power (read also Bob Woodward's Maestro to learn of Greenspan's love of status):
Power-luster. There’s only one reason a central deified by economists and Wall Street strategists. He planner seeks to do whatever he wishes, to willfully obfuscate his aims, deliberately deceive questioners and operate unaccountably: because he’s a power-luster. That was Greenspan. The idolatry he received from Wall Street, academia, Congress and the White House only emboldened him to secure and exercise still more political power than he already possessed when he began. Consider the near-disappearance of intellectual independence under his reign.
It is interesting to note that retired Greenspan still tries to remain in spotlight and became a consultant several firms including one which explicitly benefited from subprime bubble.
- Refined hypocrisy, ability to use fuzzy language to mask intensions and avoid critique. Like in case of Rasputin, much of the debate around Greenspan's legacy has revolved around the matter of hypocrisy, of a man preaching laissez-faire who repeatedly intervened in the market to save the wealthiest players. As for his religious zeal as an accolade of obscure teachings of Ann Rand (Objectivism) he has come under criticism from Harry Binswanger, who believes his actions while at work for the Federal Reserve and his publicly expressed opinions on other issues show abandonment of Objectivist and free market principles. It is interesting to note that Fed position is incompatible with Rand teachings and is completely incompatible with any sincere libertarian beliefs. For most people the term libertarian evokes an image of a scraggly misfit living in the woods with his gun collection, a few marijuana plants, some dog-eared Ayn Rand titles, and a battered pickup truck plastered with bumper stickers reading "Taxes = Theft" and "FDR Was A Pinko."
"Greenspan speak" was probably more like a kind of "The King New dress", the attempt to conceal the emptiness of content. As XXX noted in The talented Mr. Greenspan
The secret of his success is his ability to match the arcane but ultimately content-free arcane jargon of the alchemist to the gullibility of the customers. No one wants to admit that they don't know what he's talking about.
Greenspan describes himself as a "lifelong libertarian Republican" but this a very questionable statement as his actions are difficult to understand for someone who believe in small government, and, especially, in fiscal responsibility. In his position of Fed Chairman he was more like a member of Politburo, unelected very powerful official that citizens cannot control. On March 3, 2005, Democratic Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid attacked Greenspan as "one of the biggest political hacks we have here in Washington" and criticized him for supporting Bush's 2001 tax cut plan. While this particular metamorphoses was more dictated by the desire to extend his tenure for another four years, it is true that many Easy Al actions are more explainable by hypothesis that he was a Wall Street agent in Fed then by the hypothesis that he was a "lifelong Republican". For this reason economist Paul Krugman was not correct by sharply criticized Greenspan as a "three-card maestro" with a "lack of sincerity" who, "by repeatedly shilling for whatever the Bush administration wants, has betrayed the trust placed in the Fed chairman." In addition to being far from a polite discourse this hypotheses ignores the influence of tremendous desire to survive on Chairmen actions.
- High IQ, ability to read people, tremendous political abilities along with lack of education. Few people really grasp of how brilliant a politician and truly connected a player Greenspan actually was. In terms of subtle calculation, ego manipulation and natural alignment to power, he really was a "Maestro" of the highest order. But as for economic education, despite his Ph.D from NYC University, Greenspan looks like at best is a semi-educated economist and "one of the worst forecaster who occupied Fed chair":
Despite all media hype Greenspan was one of the worst forecaster who occupied Fed chair. His forecasting record before becoming Feb chairman was equally dismal. Most of his prognosis turn to be so false that the best strategy of using Greenspan predictions is to use then as a contrarian indicator. As the Associated Press reported Jan 05, 2008:
Critics contend that former Federal Reserve chairman Alan Greenspan pursued interest-rate policies that led to a speculative housing bubble while failing to use the Fed’s regulatory powers to crack down on abusive mortgage lending practices.
Here are comments made by Greenspan on housing and mortgages:
- February 2004: “American consumers might benefit if lenders provided greater mortgage product alternatives to the traditional fixed-rate mortgage,” Greenspan said in a speech praising the benefits of adjustable-rate mortgages.
- October 2004: “While local economies may experience significant price imbalances, a national severe price distortion seems most unlikely in the United States, given its size and diversity,” Greenspan said, playing down the threat of a national housing bubble.
- May 2005: Greenspan said in a speech that he doubted there was a national housing bubble similar to the one in the stock market. But he said there were a “lot of local bubbles” in housing, and he called the pace of housing price increases unsustainable.
- July 2005: “A decline in the national housing price level would need to be substantial to trigger a significant rise in foreclosures, because the vast majority of homeowners have built up substantial equity in their homes despite large mortgage-market-financed withdrawals of home equity in recent years,” Greenspan said in testimony to the House Financial Services Committee.
- September 2007: “I was aware that the loosening of mortgage credit terms for subprime borrowers increased financial risk. But I believe then, as now, that the benefits of broadened home ownership are worth the risk,” Greenspan wrote in his recent memoir, The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in the New World.
- December 2007: “Cash is available, and we should use that in large amounts, as is necessary, to solve the problems of the stress of this,” Greenspan said in an interview on ABC’s “This Week.” He suggested the government should boost support to homeowners facing the prospect of losing their residences because their mortgages were resetting at higher interest rates.
- The eternal theme of brainless sheep and greedy, corrupt shepherds. Systemic corruption and wanton greed of those who knowingly aided and abetted the secularization mess is nothing new in history and has strong parallels with Imperial Russia demise. In both cases the key players understood perfectly well that it will inevitably hurt the society.
Chapters within the Thesis
- Literature Reviews.
- Key areas of similarity
- Results and Discussion.
|1||Alan Greenspan threw the apple at Isaac Newton||4.5|
|2||If you had a cent for everytime Alan Greenspan made a mistake. You'd owe him money.||4.4|
|3||Alan Greenspan can't watch CSI. There is no such thing as mystery to him.||4.2|
|4||Alan Greenspan is so sharp he has to warn people before making sudden movements.||4.0|
|5||Alan Greenspan last had a sick day 76 years ago. BAM....great depression.||3.9|
|6||Alan Greenspan watched the Neverending story....to the end||3.8|
|7||Alan Greenspan's handwriting is Times New Roman||3.7|
|10||Alan Greenspan was all three wise men||3.7|
|11||Alan Greenspan is the only living prime||3.7|
|13||The G8 is just Alan Greenspan standing in a room with 7 mirrors||3.6|
|15||When Alan Greenspan jumps in a pool he doesn't get wet, the pool gets Alan Greenspaned.||3.6|
|16||Alan Greenspan doesn't eat breakfast at work, he eats work for breakfast||3.6|
|17||Alan Greenspan can play DVDs with a Betamax player.||3.6|
|18||It is an official rule of 'Who Wants to be a Millionaire' that Alan Greenspan cannot be your 'phone a friend'.||3.6|
|19||The information super highway is the corridor between Alan Greenspans bedroom and bathroom||3.5|
|21||Alan Greenspan can do a rubics cube blindfolded and Drunk......With no hands.||3.5|
|22||10 minutes after birth, Alan Greenspan signed his own birth certificate. In pen||3.4|
|23||They once tried to hypnotise Alan Greenspan. BAM. 1987 Wall Street crash.||3.4|
|24||As a child Alan Greenspan had to wear a neck brace, not because of an accident. Just because his brain was so big.||3.4|
|25||The sun is powered by Alan Greenspan's calculator. Not the other way round.||3.4|
|26||If you saw an MRI of Alan Greenspan's brain your head would explode.||3.4|
|28||You're in a plane and the engine catches fire, the only passengers are you and Alan Greenspan and there is only one parachute....what do you do? Die of course. Alan Greenspan is so smart he jumped out like ten minutes out ago.||3.4|
|29||Alan Greenspan invented google first, but kept it for himself||3.3|
|30||Alan Greenspan doesn't sleep, he just hibernates while his brain backs up||3.3|
|31||Alan Greenspan invented numbers, except 7.||3.3|
|33||Alan Greenspan generated this entire list of facts in five seconds. And his were actually funny.||3.3|
|35||Alan Greenspan beat India at Chess. All of them. At once.||3.3|
|36||Alan Greenspan's CV is so big it has to be read by satellite||3.2|
|37||The US dollar operates on a Greenspan Brain Cell standard||3.2|
|40||30 days has September, April, June and November....Unless Alan Greenspan decides otherwise||3.2|
|42||Census collection is an elaborate hoax. The population of america is decided by Alan Greenspan looking at a map||3.2|
|47||Alan Greenspan's Right Brain uses FedEx to Communicate with his Left Brain.||3.2|
|48||Alan Greenspan sleeps under spreadsheets||3.2|
|50||Alan Greenspan can compose and perform an entire symphony from a DOS prompt using under 20 keystrokes.||3.1|
|51||Alan Greenspan reads Penthouse for the articles. No really. He does.||3.1|
|52||Alan Greenspan can dance like Michael Jackson, he just can't be bothered.||3.1|
|56||Alan Greenspan doesn't listen to in-flight safety demonstrations. He's not afraid.||3.0|
|57||Alan Greenspan went to the moon before Neil Armstrong. Just to check everything was okay.||3.0|
|59||Alan Greenspan was added to Mount Rushmore||3.0|
|63||Green Lantern comics are loosely based on Alan Greenspan's early childhood||3.0|
|66||Alan Greenspan eats serial numbers for breakfast||2.9|
|75||Alan Greenspan learned to count before he learned to learn||2.8|
|81||Alan Greenspan's analysis is so fast, he shuts down before he boots up.||2.7|
|82||It's not a coincidence that Alan Greenspan ryhmes with 'who is the man'?||2.7|
|83||Alan Greenspan has his own in-flight safety demonstration for other passenger's safety||2.7|
|85||Alan Greenspan can mathematically prove that fairies exist. Even though they don't.||2.7|
|91||Underneath Alan Greenspan's glasses, there is only another spreadsheet.||2.7|
|104||If you let a million monkeys type on typewriters for ten years they will eventually produce something close to Alan Greenspans list of qualifications.||2.3|
LOS ANGELES—Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan once again found himself in legal trouble Monday, when he and several members of his extensive entourage were arrested for allegedly destroying a penthouse suite at the Beverly Hills Hotel.
Above: Fed chief Alan Greenspan is led to a holding cell following his arrest for trashing a hotel room. It is his third such arrest in as many years.
Hotel officials say Greenspan, in town to address an annual convention of Federal Reserve District Bank presidents, caused an estimated $8,500 in damages to the room, the surrounding hallway and the swimming-pool area.
Said Beverly Hills Hotel manager Giles Laurent: "The television screen and cabinet had apparently been kicked in. Two chairs were thrown out the window. The mattress was ripped and its stuffing was flung all over the room, as well as into the hallway." Laurent added that minutes before police arrived, Greenspan, with the help of Deputy Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, pushed a vending machine off the balcony overlooking the hotel's swimming pool.
... ... ...Greenspan got into more trouble Saturday night, when he, Fed Vice-Chair Alice Rivlin and several other members of his inner circle visited the trendy L.A. night spot The Viper Room. Clubgoers reported seeing Greenspan, still high off the dollar's late rally against the yen Friday afternoon, shout obscenities and throw ashtrays at the club's DJ. When security personnel attempted to restrain him, Greenspan became belligerent, yelling, "I'm Alan Fucking Greenspan," and vowing to put bouncer Frank Rizzo in a "hurt bracket." The incident is already being compared to his infamous July 1997 fistfight with John Kenneth Galbraith at New York's China Club.
According to Federal Reserve Board insiders, Greenspan, buoyed by the U.S. economy's robust 5 percent growth rate in 1998, as well as flattering cover stories in Barron's, Forbes and Time, has grown increasingly megalomaniacal in recent months.
"He'll spend hours talking about how he's the greatest economist who ever lived, how he's 'bigger than Keynes,'" said one member of the Fed Board of Governors who wished to remain anonymous. "Every time he prevents economic disaster in Brazil or Indonesia by manipulating interest rates, his bloated ego just swells even more. It's just the sort of irrational exuberance he himself once warned against."