|Home||Switchboard||Unix Administration||Red Hat||TCP/IP Networks||Neoliberalism||Toxic Managers|
|May the source be with you, but remember the KISS principle ;-)|
|News||Recommended Links||SNTP||Windows Clients||Etc.|
jpsdomain.org NAT & Private IP Address Ranges
An IP (Internet Protocol) Address is a 32-bit number broken up into "quads" of 1 byte each, separated by dots. 1 byte is 8 bits which in decimal is a number in the range 0 to 255. For example, 10.234.56.71 is an IP Address. There are only so many "real" IP addresses, and they are (and have been) perpetually very close to being used up and thus are very difficult to get.
One of the solutions to this problem is so-called "private" IP Addresses. These are ranges of IP Addresses set aside expressly for use by a company or other entity internally. Private IP Addresses cannot be used to connect directly to the Internet--that is they are non-routable. These are also often called RFC1918 addresses.
You use a Private IP Address when you wish to use TCP/IP on your LAN, but do not wish to try and register enough legal or legitimate addresses for all your devices. Even if you do wish to get than many, you will not. Essentially all valid IP addresses are already owned, either by very large corporations (like AT&T) or by ISPs. When you contract for service from an ISP, you are allocated some number of legitimate IP Addresses out of that ISPís pool of addresses.
See also my SOHO Information Security and Typical Home Network Designs pages.
This is the "classic" RFC1918.
|Class||From||To||CIDR Mask||Decimal Mask|
|Class "A" or 24 Bit||10.0.0.0||10.255.255.255||/8||255.0.0.0|
|Class "B" or 20 Bit||172.16.0.0||172.31.255.255||/12 (or more typically /16)||255.240.0.0 (or 255.255.0.0)|
|Class "C" or 16 Bit||192.168.0.0||192.168.255.255||/16 (or more typically /24)||255.255.0.0 (or 255.255.255.0)|
The following is adapted from this comment associated with RFC1918 and RFC3330. See also the Bogon List.
|Class/Type||From||To||CIDR Mask||Decimal Mask|
|Broadcast/This Net [RFC1700]||0.0.0.0
|Public-Data Networks [RFC1700]||188.8.131.52||184.108.40.206||/8||255.0.0.0|
|Cable Television Networks||220.127.116.11||18.104.22.168||/8||255.0.0.0|
|Local-Link (for auto-DHCP)||169.254.0.0||169.254.255.255||/16||255.255.0.0|
|Testnet addresses (for tests only)||192.0.2.0||192.0.2.255||/24||255.255.255.0|
|6to4 Relay Anycast [RFC3068]||22.214.171.124||126.96.36.199||/24||255.255.255.0|
|Network Interconnect/Testing [RFC2544]||198.18.0.0||198.19.255.255||/15 (supernet)||255.254.0.0|
|Class "D" (IPv4 multicast) [RFC3171]||188.8.131.52||184.108.40.206||/4 (supernet)||240.0.0.0|
|Class "E" (don't use)||240.0.0.0||247.255.255||/4 (supernet)||240.0.0.0|
NAT, AKA IP Masquerading, is the process by which a "private," "illegal," and non-routable IP Address is translated into a "legal," routable address. There are two kinds of NAT, often called static NAT and Hide NAT. Static NAT provides a one to one correlation between the illegal private address and the legal routable one. For example, the Web Server on 192.168.1.10 may be statically mapped to 220.127.116.11. Hide NAT is a many to one arrangement where the many illegal addresses behind some device appear to the Internet as one single address (often the legal address of the device itself). For example, the entire 172.25.1.0 network may hide behind the single valid IP address of the device at 18.104.22.168.
There are three devices that typically perform NAT. They are routers, firewalls and proxy servers.
In hide mode, the external address of the NAT device "hides" most or all outgoing connections. To the Internet, it seems that all traffic originates from this single address, when it really comes from all different machines on the internal network. The traffic is differentiated at the NAT device by a table of port numbers. For example, the port used for Web Surfing is port 80 (http). If a client computer at 192.168.1.37 surfs to www.dell.com, the NAT device may assign that to port 20,134. When the response comes back, the firewall knows that anything directed to port 20,134 really goes to the client at 192.168.1.37. That way, more than one person can surf at the same time, using the same external IP address, but everything goes to the correct person.
In static mode, there is a one to one correlation between internal (illegal, non-routable) and external (legal, routable) addresses. The must be the case if you wish top have an E-Mail server, Web server or any other service that is accessible from the Internet. DNS (Domain Name Service) published the IP Addresses of server (or services) that are accessible. These published addresses must be legal, and routable. The IP network of addresses available for this use is termed the "moat" network, below. A typical "moat" network looks like this:
|22.214.171.124||Available IP Address (usually assigned to the internal router interface)|
|126.96.36.199||Available IP Address (usually assigned to the external firewall interface)|
|188.8.131.52||Available IP Address (may be Web server?)|
|184.108.40.206||Available IP Address (may be E-Mail server?)|
|220.127.116.11||Available IP Address|
|18.104.22.168||Available IP Address|
A very interesting thing happens with static NAT, however. Since the router is at IP address 22.214.171.124, when it sees a packet destined for 126.96.36.199, it "arps" for the Web server. Since the router knows that it is on network 188.8.131.52/29 and the Web server address is 184.108.40.206 they should be on the same network. But they really arenít. So when the router "arps" (uses the Address Resolution Protocol to find the Web server), the Web server will not answer, since it is really on network 192.168.1.0/24. To solve this problem, devices that perform static NAT also perform "proxy arp".
Any device configured to do static NAT has a list of servers it will "answer for" when it hears an arp request. IT will essentially lie and say, "yes, I am that server, please send me the packet." When it get the packet, it forwards it to the real server.
A very common small business-class (as opposed to home use) Internet connection looks like this following:
Re:A router routes packets. (Score:5,
by mad flyer (589291) on Monday January 17, @11:17PM (#11392113)
|Technically it's more PAT (port address translation) rather
than NAT (network address translation).
On cisco it's also the "nat overload".
NAT leave you somewhat vulnerable it's a mapping address for address (many to many). Don't feel secure with NAT without firewalling.
PAT is much more closed (many to one).
It's also true that everyone say NAT when they do PAT.
[Nat00] "The Network Address Translation White Paper," @Home Networks, at http://work.home.net/whitepapers/natwpaper.html
Google matched content
FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit exclusivly for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
ABUSE: IPs or network segments from which we detect a stream of probes might be blocked for no less then 90 days. Multiple types of probes increase this period.
Groupthink : Two Party System as Polyarchy : Corruption of Regulators : Bureaucracies : Understanding Micromanagers and Control Freaks : Toxic Managers : Harvard Mafia : Diplomatic Communication : Surviving a Bad Performance Review : Insufficient Retirement Funds as Immanent Problem of Neoliberal Regime : PseudoScience : Who Rules America : Neoliberalism : The Iron Law of Oligarchy : Libertarian Philosophy
War and Peace : Skeptical Finance : John Kenneth Galbraith :Talleyrand : Oscar Wilde : Otto Von Bismarck : Keynes : George Carlin : Skeptics : Propaganda : SE quotes : Language Design and Programming Quotes : Random IT-related quotes : Somerset Maugham : Marcus Aurelius : Kurt Vonnegut : Eric Hoffer : Winston Churchill : Napoleon Bonaparte : Ambrose Bierce : Bernard Shaw : Mark Twain Quotes
Vol 25, No.12 (December, 2013) Rational Fools vs. Efficient Crooks The efficient markets hypothesis : Political Skeptic Bulletin, 2013 : Unemployment Bulletin, 2010 : Vol 23, No.10 (October, 2011) An observation about corporate security departments : Slightly Skeptical Euromaydan Chronicles, June 2014 : Greenspan legacy bulletin, 2008 : Vol 25, No.10 (October, 2013) Cryptolocker Trojan (Win32/Crilock.A) : Vol 25, No.08 (August, 2013) Cloud providers as intelligence collection hubs : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2010 : Inequality Bulletin, 2009 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2008 : Copyleft Problems Bulletin, 2004 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2011 : Energy Bulletin, 2010 : Malware Protection Bulletin, 2010 : Vol 26, No.1 (January, 2013) Object-Oriented Cult : Political Skeptic Bulletin, 2011 : Vol 23, No.11 (November, 2011) Softpanorama classification of sysadmin horror stories : Vol 25, No.05 (May, 2013) Corporate bullshit as a communication method : Vol 25, No.06 (June, 2013) A Note on the Relationship of Brooks Law and Conway Law
Fifty glorious years (1950-2000): the triumph of the US computer engineering : Donald Knuth : TAoCP and its Influence of Computer Science : Richard Stallman : Linus Torvalds : Larry Wall : John K. Ousterhout : CTSS : Multix OS Unix History : Unix shell history : VI editor : History of pipes concept : Solaris : MS DOS : Programming Languages History : PL/1 : Simula 67 : C : History of GCC development : Scripting Languages : Perl history : OS History : Mail : DNS : SSH : CPU Instruction Sets : SPARC systems 1987-2006 : Norton Commander : Norton Utilities : Norton Ghost : Frontpage history : Malware Defense History : GNU Screen : OSS early history
The Peter Principle : Parkinson Law : 1984 : The Mythical Man-Month : How to Solve It by George Polya : The Art of Computer Programming : The Elements of Programming Style : The Unix Haterís Handbook : The Jargon file : The True Believer : Programming Pearls : The Good Soldier Svejk : The Power Elite
Most popular humor pages:
Manifest of the Softpanorama IT Slacker Society : Ten Commandments of the IT Slackers Society : Computer Humor Collection : BSD Logo Story : The Cuckoo's Egg : IT Slang : C++ Humor : ARE YOU A BBS ADDICT? : The Perl Purity Test : Object oriented programmers of all nations : Financial Humor : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2008 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2010 : The Most Comprehensive Collection of Editor-related Humor : Programming Language Humor : Goldman Sachs related humor : Greenspan humor : C Humor : Scripting Humor : Real Programmers Humor : Web Humor : GPL-related Humor : OFM Humor : Politically Incorrect Humor : IDS Humor : "Linux Sucks" Humor : Russian Musical Humor : Best Russian Programmer Humor : Microsoft plans to buy Catholic Church : Richard Stallman Related Humor : Admin Humor : Perl-related Humor : Linus Torvalds Related humor : PseudoScience Related Humor : Networking Humor : Shell Humor : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2011 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2012 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2013 : Java Humor : Software Engineering Humor : Sun Solaris Related Humor : Education Humor : IBM Humor : Assembler-related Humor : VIM Humor : Computer Viruses Humor : Bright tomorrow is rescheduled to a day after tomorrow : Classic Computer Humor
The Last but not Least
Copyright © 1996-2016 by Dr. Nikolai Bezroukov. www.softpanorama.org was created as a service to the UN Sustainable Development Networking Programme (SDNP) in the author free time. This document is an industrial compilation designed and created exclusively for educational use and is distributed under the Softpanorama Content License.
Original materials copyright belong to respective owners. Quotes are made for educational purposes only in compliance with the fair use doctrine.
FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to advance understanding of computer science, IT technology, economic, scientific, and social issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided by section 107 of the US Copyright Law according to which such material can be distributed without profit exclusively for research and educational purposes.
This is a Spartan WHYFF (We Help You For Free) site written by people for whom English is not a native language. Grammar and spelling errors should be expected. The site contain some broken links as it develops like a living tree...
|You can use PayPal to make a contribution, supporting development of this site and speed up access. In case softpanorama.org is down you can use the at softpanorama.info|
The statements, views and opinions presented on this web page are those of the author (or referenced source) and are not endorsed by, nor do they necessarily reflect, the opinions of the author present and former employers, SDNP or any other organization the author may be associated with. We do not warrant the correctness of the information provided or its fitness for any purpose.
Last modified: September 12, 2017