Softpanorama

May the source be with you, but remember the KISS principle ;-)
Contents Bulletin Scripting in shell and Perl Network troubleshooting History Humor

Mitsubishi Outlander 2006

News Notes on buying a car vs. leasing it Recommended Links Outlander 2003-2006 maintenance related YouTube videos Outlander 2003-2006 60K maintanance Light replacement in Outlander 2003-2006
Mitsubishi Outlander sudden engine stop at idle at intersection Mitsubishi Outlander Vibrations Replacing a Timing Belt on a Mitsubishi Outlander 2003-2006 How to replace low beam light in Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 Replacement bulbs for Outlander Recharging refrigerant in air conditioner of Mitsubishi Outlander
How To Replace 2003-2006 Mitsubishi Outlander Air Filter How To Replace Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 Cabin Air Filter Cleaning your throttle body    Humor Etc

Note: Content partially based on Mitsubishi Outlander - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

General info about Outlander 2006

Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 is the last in the first generation model line. The second generation model was launched on October 17, 2005, Mitsubishi launched  dropping the Airtrek in Japan in favor of adopting the global name Outlander.  It features a new DOHC 2.4 L 16-valve MIVEC engine; Mitsubishi's AWC system which features electronically controlled four wheel drive and stability control, on a stretched Mitsubishi GS platform.  The North American version, powered by a newly designed 6B31 3.0 L V6 SOHC MIVEC was shown in April 2006 at the New York Auto Show prior to its release in October the same year.

In its home market of Japan it was the best-selling SUV from October 2005 to March 2006, while in the U.S. market it achieved 1,694 and 2,108 sales in November and December 2006, the first two full months it was available; it won the 2005 Good Design Award (Product Design Category) sponsored by the Japan Industrial Design Promotion Organization.

Outlander's 2006 distinguishing features include a new-generation platform which underpins better crashworthiness and greater rigidity, a high power and high fuel efficiency aluminum cylinder block 2.4-liter MIVEC*1 engine,  and an electronically controlled 4WD system. 

In terms of environmental performance, Outlander earns a 4-star rating for emission levels that are 75% lower than required by Japanese 2005 Emission Regulations and qualifies for Green Vehicle Tax Exemption by returning fuel consumption that is 5% lower than Japanese 2010 efficiency requirements.

Mitsubishi Motors has revamped its production facilities for the new model. At the Mizushima Plant, where Outlander is assembled, a new welding line has been installed for the first time in 10 years to accommodate the requirements of the new platform. At the Shiga Engine Plant, state-of-the art machining and assembly lines have been added for the new 2.4-liter MIVEC engine. The company has also bolstered quality assurance levels throughout the full development-to-shipment chain. Outlander is the product of stringent scrutiny and inspections implemented through the Mitsubishi Motors Development System (MMDS) in the development phase and the multi-level In-Stage Quality Creation (ISQC) system on the production line.

 

Outlander uses more high-tensile steel sheeting to increase stiffness with little weight penalty, and employs octagonal-section straight front side members and a reinforced cabin environment to create a body that provides higher levels of all-directional crashworthiness. The body construction also meets the requirements of compatibility during impact with small cars and pedestrian protection during impact.

An aluminum roof panel lowers the center of gravity and reduces roll inertia to improve steering response and handling by reducing body roll and stagger without impacting ride quality.

New 2.4-liter 16-valve DOHC MIVEC engine

The Mitsubishi 2.4 Liter SOHC engine is used in the Eclipse, Galant and Outlander. Many people are unaware that the engine is also used in the Chrysler Sebring and Dodge Stratus.

Outlander is powered by a new compact lightweight engine with a die-cast aluminum cylinder block. Using MIVEC intake and exhaust valve trains, the new engine delivers more power while returning better fuel efficiency and low emissions. It earns a 4-star rating for emission levels that are 75% lower than required by Japanese 2005 Emission Regulations and qualifies for Green Vehicle Tax Exemption by returning fuel consumption that is 5% lower than Japanese 2010 efficiency requirements.

Electronically controlled 4WD

Outlander uses Mitsubishi's electronically controlled 4WD system that continuously distributes front/rear wheel drive torque in an optimal way according to conditions. 

New suspension system

Outlander employs a MacPherson strut front and a trailing arm-type multi-link arrangement rear suspension. The wider track and longer stroke improve handling and stability.

At the rear, Outlander employs mono-tube shock absorbers well proven on Lancer Evolution. Offering faster response at slower vehicle speeds, this type of shock absorber reconciles a plaint and well-damped ride with outstanding levels of handling and stability.

16-inch Chrome allow wheels

 They provide a sense of power and stability to the exterior.

#16 of 263 Re: About doing your homework [nickel] by chelentano

Jun 16, 2007 (8:08 pm)

Replying to: nickel (Jun 16, 2007 3:13 pm)
 
The Mitsubishis you drove were different animals. These were essentially Chrysler vehicles with Mitsubishi label. These cars were built in Illinois and they had Chrysler powertrain and parts made by Detroit suppliers. Thanks God, Mitsubishi divorced Chrysler in 2005. Chrysler certainly heavily damaged Mitsubishis reputation in US, which in fact affected the resale values of Chrysler-build Mitsubishis. But now, the things have changed. The Outlander now is built entirely in Japan by exclusively Mitsubishi. As a result, we get one of the most reliable vehicles on the market, certainly more reliable then Tribeca. This is the hard data:
Consumer Reports 2006 ratings:
2006 Outlander: top 5 in class
2006 Tribeca: average
 
Edmunds.com owner rating:
2007 Outlander: 9.2
2007 Tribeca: 8.8
 
Yahoo Autos owner rating:
2007 Outlander: 4.5
2007 Tribeca: 4.0
 
Different sources, and very consistent results in favor of Outlander. So if you want a reliable SUV, get the Outlander. Not only it has better reliability, but it also has better warranty and roadside assistance.
 
As for sportiness, the Outlander beats Tribeca in both handling tests by Edmunds.com: Slalom: 63.9-mph vs. 62.1-mph. Skid pad test: Outlander wins again: 8.0g vs. 7.8g.
 
“Nothing is better than a Subaru while it rains” - this is very bold statement. Do you have any hard data to support this statement? Any independent tests or rally results? Mitsubishi on the other hand does have a great record in extreme weather/road conditions. Last year Mitsubishi won 1st place (7th year in a row) and 2nd place in 2007 Dakar Rally, while Subaru did not even made the top 10.

#17 of 263 Edmunds testing of these vehicles by rsholland

Jun 17, 2007 (7:01 am)

They have an 2007 Outlander as one of their long-term test vehicles. Lots of opinions and comments, mostly of which are quite positive. A very informative read.
 
http://blogs.edmunds.com/roadtests/category/cat.2007MitsubishiOutlanderXLS4WD?
 
2008 Tribeca, also a good writeup, clearly showing how the '08 has improved upon the '06 – '07 models.
 
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/FullTests/articleId=121001
 
2007 CX-7 being compared with the RAV4 and Santa Fe.
 
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/Comparos/articleId=116618
 
Bob

#18 of 263 Re: Outlander VS CX-7 VS Tribeca (perhaps) [rsholland] by medellinrob

Jun 17, 2007 (7:39 am)

Replying to: rsholland (Jun 15, 2007 4:30 pm)
 
"One more point. In many ways the Tribeca is more of a competitor for the larger CX9, and not the smaller CX7. "
 
Thanks bob and every one else.
I know the CX-9 is more alike to a Tribeca than a CX-7 is.
Thing is I like smaller vehicles and I was thinking in a CX-7 and an outlander, but if I were to pay a bit more, it would not be for a CX-9 I would go for the subaru. I don't like the idea of having an expensier car that looks just like it's little brother (Ok I know they are really different, but still they are similar).
 
When I drove the outlander I believe i avaraged 25 mph going only once or twice above 50 mph which is really low to get to know a vehicle, so I'm going to another test drive this week.
At the CX-7, in the other hand, I think I avaraged 35 mph and sped up to 65 or so. I'll also test it again.
 
Thanks to all.

#19 of 263 Outlander VS CX-7 by xgbt

Jul 03, 2007 (8:27 am)

I was very interested in the Outlander when it first came out. I am looking for a compact SUV and the Outlander is right sized and looks good on the paper. So I spent a lot of time sitting in it and then test drove it.
 
I later had an extended test drive of the CX-7. After that, I wouldn't look back to the Outlander any more despite its lower price and my frugality.
 
The CX-7 is not only more powerful, but also much more refined. It rides beter, the seats are more comfortable, and the finishing is way better. In a word, it has the luxurious feel that puts it a par (or many) above the Outlander and more than justifies the price difference.
 
Try them out yourself and see if you agree.

#20 of 263 Re: Outlander VS CX-7 [xgbt] by chelentano

Jul 03, 2007 (10:42 am)

Replying to: xgbt (Jul 03, 2007 8:27 am)
 
I have. So have tried hundreds of other owners, who posted their ratings on MSN and Edmunds.com. This is not "on paper" – these are real owners. Outlander wins over CX-7 with a decent gap on both sites:
MSN: 9.5 vs. 9
Edmunds: 9.2 vs. 8.8
 
In terms of ride, interior and seat comfort neither has advantage. The CX-7 is a good car, but the Outlander is just so much better. It looks more stylish vs. odd-looking CX-7. Its V6 is smoother; and speaking of power it can tow more, it has better fuel economy and runs on regular gasoline. Outlander has more of internal space and it’s equipped better with latest gadgets. Outlander is more reliable (Consumer Reports 2006), has better warranty and comes with 5y. free roadside assistance.

#21 of 263 Re: Outlander VS CX-7 [chelentano] by carlitos92

Jul 03, 2007 (6:16 pm)

Replying to: chelentano (Jul 03, 2007 10:42 am)
 
"Odd-looking" is in the eye of the beholder... and "to each his own." So, far be it from me to stop someone from getting an Outlander if they're looking for an ugly vehicle to tow with and can't afford premium gas.

#22 of 263 Re: Outlander VS CX-7 [carlitos92] by chelentano

Jul 04, 2007 (1:09 pm)

Replying to: carlitos92 (Jul 03, 2007 6:16 pm)
 
Exterior design is a matter of taste, but the fact is that CX-7 exterior design scores consistently much lower by its owners on Edmunds.com and MSN.com ratings vs. Outlander. And while CX-7 owners are not exactly thrilled by Mazda styling, non-owners may consider it odd looking, or even, like you've said, "ugly"
 
As for premium gas, I can afford it, but I don't always buy things, just for the reason of affordability. This Mazda, just does not deserve the premium gas.

#23 of 263 Re: Outlander VS CX-7 [chelentano] by carlitos92

Jul 04, 2007 (1:32 pm)

Replying to: chelentano (Jul 04, 2007 1:09 pm)
 
"but the fact is that CX-7 exterior design scores consistently much lower by its owners on Edmunds.com and MSN.com vs. Outlander."
 
Not knowing you, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt that you understand what you're trying to say - but I don't. I don't have any sympathy for an idiot who would buy a vehicle and then rate it low on design - unless that person is Stevie Wonder. Makes you "wonder" if they were blind when they test-drove the car.
 
So, yes, there are those with an axe to grind who have rated the CX-7 in the dumps, even in areas where they should have had full knowledge going in - but generally, CX-7 owners rate "design" in the 9's and 10's, as it should be. I would assume Mitsu owners do the same, which is fine. I don't know of any formal venue where owners of one car were asked to rate another make on design or anything else. Those who get the CX-7, get it. Those who don't, don't. Same for the Outlander.

#24 of 263 Re: Outlander VS CX-7 [carlitos92] by chelentano

Jul 04, 2007 (2:57 pm)

Replying to: carlitos92 (Jul 04, 2007 1:32 pm)
 
At this price range it’s not always easy to get a perfect car, and some trade offs are not unusual. So, I imagine, for some CX-7 buyers (you call them "idiots") styling could be a secondary factor, and as a result, an average Mazda owner gives it a good exterior design rating, but still not as high as Outlander owner rates the Outlander styling.
 
The Outlander was rated higher overall in other categories as well, so I guess, the Outlander owners made less trade-offs and less compromises at the time of the purchase. Also, the owner satisfaction ratings reflect a few hundred miles of real world ownership, not just a test drive impression.
 
While CX-7 is a great car, on my opinion and based on ratings, the Outlander is just a better balanced car: sophisticated exterior styling, plenty power, sporty handling, latest gadgets, longest warranty, good build quality/reliability, fuel economy, quality leather seats, efficient use of interior space, and value.

#25 of 263 Re: Outlander VS CX-7 [chelentano] by carlitos92

Jul 04, 2007 (7:28 pm)

Replying to: chelentano (Jul 04, 2007 2:57 pm)
 
Respectfully disagree, but that's okay. One man's "sophisticated" is another man's "goofy Asian bling."
 
For the record, I call them "idiots" not because their choosing process is different than mine (it undoubtedly is, because styling is never a secondary factor for me), but rather because we all know that the styling doesn't change over time, whether a few hundred miles, or longer. I suspect the people who rate the CX-7 poorly in "design" might actually be referring to engineering. Other than the gas cap, I've had no engineering problems on my car.
 
Another possibility is that they're unhappy about something else (gas mileage, etc.) and are taking it out on the CX-7 in all categories as a result. Which is why I look at the Edmund's and MSN buyer reviews, but wouldn't make a decision too heavily based on them.
 

Mitsubishi outlander losing power..assy emission control unit - JustAnswer

Dimentions

Exterior length 179.0"
Exterior body width 70.1"
Exterior height 66.3"
Wheelbase 103.3"

 

Recommended Links

Softpanorama hot topic of the month

Softpanorama Recommended

Top articles

Sites

Top articles

Sites

2006 Mitsubishi Outlander Specifications

How To Replace 2003, 2004, 2005 & 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander Thermostat - YouTube

2006 Mitsubishi Outlander Suv Review Edmunds.com

How To Replace 2003, 2004, 2005 & 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander Air Filter...

How To Replace the First Generation‎ 2003-2005 Mitsubishi Outlander Air Filter. OE Replacement Air Filter Part No: MZ690193.

dailymotion.com/video/xowmfg_how-to-replace-2003-2004-2...   More from dailymotion.com

How To Replace Mitsubishi Outlander 2006 Cabin Air Filte

How To Replace 2003, 2004, 2005 & 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander Cabin Air Filter on YouTube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qY4MsDlepP8.

How To Replace 2003, 2004, 2005 & 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander PCV Valve & Spark Plugs - YouTube

How To Clean Throttle Body 2003, 2004, 2005 & 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander Engine Light Code P0506 - YouTube

How To Replace 2003, 2004, 2005 & 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander Automatic Transmission Fluid - YouTube

How To Replace 2003, 2004, 2005 & 2006 Mitsubishi Outlander Thermostat

Outlander Service Reminder - YouTube



Etc

FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit exclusivly for research and educational purposes.   If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. 

ABUSE: IPs or network segments from which we detect a stream of probes might be blocked for no less then 90 days. Multiple types of probes increase this period.  

Society

Groupthink : Two Party System as Polyarchy : Corruption of Regulators : Bureaucracies : Understanding Micromanagers and Control Freaks : Toxic Managers :   Harvard Mafia : Diplomatic Communication : Surviving a Bad Performance Review : Insufficient Retirement Funds as Immanent Problem of Neoliberal Regime : PseudoScience : Who Rules America : Neoliberalism  : The Iron Law of Oligarchy : Libertarian Philosophy

Quotes

War and Peace : Skeptical Finance : John Kenneth Galbraith :Talleyrand : Oscar Wilde : Otto Von Bismarck : Keynes : George Carlin : Skeptics : Propaganda  : SE quotes : Language Design and Programming Quotes : Random IT-related quotesSomerset Maugham : Marcus Aurelius : Kurt Vonnegut : Eric Hoffer : Winston Churchill : Napoleon Bonaparte : Ambrose BierceBernard Shaw : Mark Twain Quotes

Bulletin:

Vol 25, No.12 (December, 2013) Rational Fools vs. Efficient Crooks The efficient markets hypothesis : Political Skeptic Bulletin, 2013 : Unemployment Bulletin, 2010 :  Vol 23, No.10 (October, 2011) An observation about corporate security departments : Slightly Skeptical Euromaydan Chronicles, June 2014 : Greenspan legacy bulletin, 2008 : Vol 25, No.10 (October, 2013) Cryptolocker Trojan (Win32/Crilock.A) : Vol 25, No.08 (August, 2013) Cloud providers as intelligence collection hubs : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2010 : Inequality Bulletin, 2009 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2008 : Copyleft Problems Bulletin, 2004 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2011 : Energy Bulletin, 2010 : Malware Protection Bulletin, 2010 : Vol 26, No.1 (January, 2013) Object-Oriented Cult : Political Skeptic Bulletin, 2011 : Vol 23, No.11 (November, 2011) Softpanorama classification of sysadmin horror stories : Vol 25, No.05 (May, 2013) Corporate bullshit as a communication method  : Vol 25, No.06 (June, 2013) A Note on the Relationship of Brooks Law and Conway Law

History:

Fifty glorious years (1950-2000): the triumph of the US computer engineering : Donald Knuth : TAoCP and its Influence of Computer Science : Richard Stallman : Linus Torvalds  : Larry Wall  : John K. Ousterhout : CTSS : Multix OS Unix History : Unix shell history : VI editor : History of pipes concept : Solaris : MS DOSProgramming Languages History : PL/1 : Simula 67 : C : History of GCC developmentScripting Languages : Perl history   : OS History : Mail : DNS : SSH : CPU Instruction Sets : SPARC systems 1987-2006 : Norton Commander : Norton Utilities : Norton Ghost : Frontpage history : Malware Defense History : GNU Screen : OSS early history

Classic books:

The Peter Principle : Parkinson Law : 1984 : The Mythical Man-MonthHow to Solve It by George Polya : The Art of Computer Programming : The Elements of Programming Style : The Unix Hater’s Handbook : The Jargon file : The True Believer : Programming Pearls : The Good Soldier Svejk : The Power Elite

Most popular humor pages:

Manifest of the Softpanorama IT Slacker Society : Ten Commandments of the IT Slackers Society : Computer Humor Collection : BSD Logo Story : The Cuckoo's Egg : IT Slang : C++ Humor : ARE YOU A BBS ADDICT? : The Perl Purity Test : Object oriented programmers of all nations : Financial Humor : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2008 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2010 : The Most Comprehensive Collection of Editor-related Humor : Programming Language Humor : Goldman Sachs related humor : Greenspan humor : C Humor : Scripting Humor : Real Programmers Humor : Web Humor : GPL-related Humor : OFM Humor : Politically Incorrect Humor : IDS Humor : "Linux Sucks" Humor : Russian Musical Humor : Best Russian Programmer Humor : Microsoft plans to buy Catholic Church : Richard Stallman Related Humor : Admin Humor : Perl-related Humor : Linus Torvalds Related humor : PseudoScience Related Humor : Networking Humor : Shell Humor : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2011 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2012 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2013 : Java Humor : Software Engineering Humor : Sun Solaris Related Humor : Education Humor : IBM Humor : Assembler-related Humor : VIM Humor : Computer Viruses Humor : Bright tomorrow is rescheduled to a day after tomorrow : Classic Computer Humor

The Last but not Least


Copyright © 1996-2016 by Dr. Nikolai Bezroukov. www.softpanorama.org was created as a service to the UN Sustainable Development Networking Programme (SDNP) in the author free time. This document is an industrial compilation designed and created exclusively for educational use and is distributed under the Softpanorama Content License.

The site uses AdSense so you need to be aware of Google privacy policy. You you do not want to be tracked by Google please disable Javascript for this site. This site is perfectly usable without Javascript.

Original materials copyright belong to respective owners. Quotes are made for educational purposes only in compliance with the fair use doctrine.

FAIR USE NOTICE This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to advance understanding of computer science, IT technology, economic, scientific, and social issues. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided by section 107 of the US Copyright Law according to which such material can be distributed without profit exclusively for research and educational purposes.

This is a Spartan WHYFF (We Help You For Free) site written by people for whom English is not a native language. Grammar and spelling errors should be expected. The site contain some broken links as it develops like a living tree...

You can use PayPal to make a contribution, supporting development of this site and speed up access. In case softpanorama.org is down you can use the at softpanorama.info

Disclaimer:

The statements, views and opinions presented on this web page are those of the author (or referenced source) and are not endorsed by, nor do they necessarily reflect, the opinions of the author present and former employers, SDNP or any other organization the author may be associated with. We do not warrant the correctness of the information provided or its fitness for any purpose.

Last modified: June, 17, 2016