|
Softpanorama
(slightly skeptical)
Open Source Software Educational Society |
May the
source be with you,
but remember the KISS principle ;-)
|
Scriptable and Command Line Mailers
From time to time, I try-out different mail clients, hoping to
find the ideal solution. Of course, no luck so far. So, what would
be an ideal mail client for me? It needs to:
- Scriptable
- Simple transparent structure of mail archive that make mail
backup and restore very easy (that effectively excludes
Outlook that otherwise is a good, scriptable and very flexible
mail client)
- Has a thread mode
- Allow an editing of subject and body of the stored messages
- Be cross-platform (at least Unix and Windows)
- Has a Palm compatible address book, which will offer drop-list
of possible matches as I type in, and be automatically populated
from each reply/forward I do
- Defaults to quoting entire message when replying and put
my signature below
- Can have two-pane interface when replying - upper for the
original message, bottom for my reply
- Has a quote-me button, which will transfer the selected
text from upper pane as quoted to bottom pane
- Has regular expression based incoming mail filters
- Correctly support Eastern-European codepages
- Has an OFM-style two pane interface for reading messages,
which can be arranged in various ways
Thunderbird does not look good to me: it looks like all the
ingenuity went to icons and GUI staff, I see no major functionality
benefits in comparison with tried and true Netscape Messenger that
I use at home. But Netscape Messenger is not scriptable and mail
filter does not accept regular expressions. That's the
problem for me.
Lotus Notes (that I use
at work) is scriptable and has a powerful API (it is essentially
a database, not a email client). Still because of its database roots
Lotus Notes sucks in it's own way. In earlier versions has a very
strange interface although in 6.5 it became closer to normal Windows
interface and is much less annoying (old joke was: out of
10 users only one does not like Lotus Notes interface; then other
nine hate it, hate it, hate it ;-). Still even in version 6.5 mail
filtering rules implementation is completely abysmal and is a sign
of IBM programmers degradation. But even with its faults Lotus Notes
6.5 and above are pretty competitive email clients for the
enterprise environment as they avoid problems with stream of Outlook
vulnerabilities that creates mess in enterprise environment.
I heard good things about
The Bat!. For example the Bat! has had Saved Searches for a
while. But I never used it myself.
There are a lot of high quality command line SMTP mailers for
Windows available.
Blat is probably the most popular. It was developed by Pedro
Mendes and Mark Neal at the
University of
Wales at Aberystwyth. There is also command line client
for Lotus Notes, see
alphaWorks
Lotus Notes Command Line Email Client.
Notes:
- This is a Spartan WHYFF (We Help
You For Free) site written by people for whom English
is not a native language.
Some amount of grammar and spelling errors should be
expected.
- The site contain some broken links
as it develops like a living tree...
Please try to use Google, Open directory,
etc. to find a replacement link (see
HOWTO search the WEB for details). We would appreciate
if you can
mail us a correct link.
|
|
|
|
Troubleshooting Blat
If e-mail notification doesn't work, you should verify that Blat is
installed correctly by trying to send a message from the command line.
Open a command prompt window and send a test message with the syntax
An example would be
This should mail you a copy of your config.sys file if you use the
appropriate e-mail address.
If this fails to work, then Blat should generate an error message
indicating the reason.
Blat has an absolute requirement for a recipient following the "-t"
field.
If it turns out that Blat works correctly on the command line, but
fails in actual use, then the problem is likely that Ceilidh doesn't
have the appropriate permission to write the temporary mail file. Mike
Pangborn, at Penn State University, notes that one solution is to
"put Blat in a directory out of the WWW-root path and allow all users
write permission to that directory."
If Ceilidh is still not sending e-mail, you should include the "-test"
diagnostic flag on the "sendmail=" line in ceilidh.conf. Addition of
this flag will prevent Ceilidh from deleting the temporary mail file
(used to store the body of the message) and the command string that
is sent to the operating system will be displayed by the browser at
the bottom of the screen that returns the message index.
In ceilidh.conf, you must not have set "server_process=yes" if you
want to see this diagnostic report in the browser.
Copy this string from the browser's window, paste it onto the command
line and execute it, omitting the beginning "sendmail= " and the ending
" > null". If there is anything wrong, you should be notified by an
error message. You will also be able to verify that you are on the recipient
list.
The most likely error message from Blat is:
Failed to open
registry key for Blat
to set the SMTP server's address and the user name at that address do:
blat -install server username
or use '-server <server name>' and '-f <user name>'
aborting, nothing sent
This is fairly self-explanatory.
You may need to copy this into a text editor and remove carriage
returns that have been inserted into the command string prior to pasting
this string onto the command line. Inclusion of any carriage returns
will cause the sendmail command to fail on the command line as it will
be executed in fragments.
The first version of Thunderbird was worse then Netscape Messenger (virtual
search folders were nice though). This one might bet old Messenger.
By Ron Miller
InformationWeek
Dec 18, 2006 09:23 AM
Mozilla, the developer of the free Thunderbird e-mail client, has
taken a good program and made it better with the release of the version
2.0 beta 1. It's rare that a beta release isn't buggy, clunky, and generally
a mess -- especially when, as word has it, the developers are changing
the code base -- but I was pleasantly surprised by its stability and
the dearth of issues.
Luckily, Mozilla hasn't made the mistake of fixing what ain't broke.
Thunderbird 2.0 will still include free extensions to add functionality
and themes to change the look and feel at your whim. The spam filter
still catches most spam before it clogs your inbox, and it still includes
a terrific search function and built-in RSS. Mozilla also has made some
welcome changes without breaking anything in the process, but there
are features that could still use some work.
I downloaded the installation program and installed without an issue.
The install found all my mail, folders, and settings and imported them
seamlessly into the new version without prompting. My Thunderbird 1.5
extensions and themes didn't have version 2.0 equivalents, but that's
to be expected when the beta was only recently released.
There is a distinct difference in the look and feel of the application.
Mozilla has updated the toolbar, brightened and changed the icons, and
made the interface generally more pleasant and readable. For instance,
the icon that lets you flag your e-mail messages is now a gold star,
which is much more visible than the small red flag in the older version.
When mail arrives, the system tray utility not only informs you that
there is new mail (as in previous versions) but also lists the first
several e-mails. Unfortunately, it displays for such a short time, it's
hard to read much beyond the first item or two, but the additional information
lets you make an informed decision about whether or not to switch to
your inbox. While you can customize how much detail you see in these
alerts, you cannot affect the timing of the display, something that
might be nice to add before final release.
In the in-box, you can place the cursor over any folder marked with
new mail and you get a list of all the new e-mails inside, another handy
new feature. Once inside the folder, you can see all new mail at a glance
because of the nifty new-mail icon (an orange asterisk).
Warning Of Dangerous E-Mail
As in the previous version, Thunderbird warns you about e-mails with
links to external images and those it considers possibly dangerous or
false. As a result, it won't display images until you click a Show Images
button. Thunderbird 2.0 enables you choose to always allow images in
certain e-mails -- clicking a link opens the address book, which whitelists
the e-mail. While this is a welcome change, it would have been faster
if Thunderbird simply whitelisted the e-mail without opening the address
book. It also would be nice if Mozilla could apply a similar principle
to the mail it thinks is a possible scam, so that you can whitelist
these as well.
In addition, Mozilla has expanded the Tag feature in this version,
a long-overdue change. Instead of being limited to five default tags
as in previous versions, you can create as many custom tags as you like,
applying a different color to each one, then using the filter or sort
features to organize tagged e-mail.
The RSS feature has been dressed up with new icons and the same ability
to place the cursor over a feed and see the new items, but beyond that
hasn't changed very much. The current system requires that you know
how to access the Subscriptions dialog and makes you copy and paste
the subscription link from Firefox into Thunderbird. Mozilla should
provide a no-brainer subscription process that walks the user through
the process of adding a new feed in 2.0.
And one small pet peeve: Thunderbird still doesn't provide the ability
to create multiple signatures, a feature I miss from my Outlook Express
days.
For the most part, as with previous versions, Thunderbird 2.0 Beta
1 continues to shine. While there's still plenty of work to be done,
when you consider this is beta software, it's especially impressive
and the new features make this free e-mail client even better.
Mozilla's suite of browser and email
programs is getting a makeover. The new suite, dubbed SeaMonkey, contains
an Internet browser, email program, IRC chat client and a basic web
page maker. Mozilla's goal is to develop a package that is "stable enough
for corporate use", while keeping the familiar look of its previous
Mozilla Application Suite.
What's New in SeaMonkey 1.0 Beta
"Thunderbird 0.9 is now available
for download! New features include
Saved Search Folders (aka Virtual Folders) which allow you to display
messages based on previously set search criteria across multiple folders.
Message Grouping allows you to organize e-mail in a folder by grouping
them based on various attributes like Date, Sender, Label, etc. Thunderbird
0.9 also includes numerous bug fixes and other improvements. For more
information, see the
release notes. Builds can be found on the mozilla.org
FTP server or in the release notes above."
also Lotus Notes (Score:4, Informative)
by dominux
(731134) on Thursday November 04, @10:04AM (#10723254)
|
the way Notes stores mail is a little different in concept
to most other things, folders don't "contain" messages, messages
exist in their own right in the database irrespective of what
folders they might be in. It is perfectly valid for a message
to exist without any folders including the message. Folders
in Notes can have documents dragged into them which stores that
association and you can get to the message through the folder.
A saved search is what would be called a view in Notes, that
is a folder which is based on a selection formula rather than
manual fileing. It is perfectly valid also for one message to
be shown in many many folders and views, but delete it from
one it is deleted from all. Deleting a message is very different
from removing it from a folder. Views and folders can also be
categorised, this is basically the same thing as the group by
feature. Notes views are indexed rather than calculated on the
fly so I suspect they would be quicker for large mail files.
Notes of course isn't open source and you can only do limited
view customisation without the design client, I do like the
user interface for creating these saved searches, it is better
than creating a private view in Notes. |
Re:also Lotus Notes (Score:2)
by afd8856
(700296) on Thursday November 04, @11:23AM (#10724567)
|
|
Chandler [osafoundation.org] is an open source application
that is intended to replace and revolutionize PIM and messaging.
At least one team member worked on Lotus Agenda. So, with a
bit of luck you might get in the near future a replacement for
your Notes :) |
Re:Saved Searches sounds good but...
(Score:1)
by laurens
(151193) on Thursday November 04, @09:56AM (#10723160)
|
There are five labels you can attach to the selected messages
by pressing [1]-[5] on your keyboard.
By default, they are named "Important" (Red), etc., but you
can edit them to read "Mum's birthday" if you want.
The limit of 5 is probably a bit low, though, and it does not
sync back to my IMAP server, so it could be more useful. Anyway,
HTH. |
What about performance and memory usage?
(Score:5, Interesting)
by kbahey
(102895) on Thursday November 04, @09:36AM (#10722925)
(http://baheyeldin.com/khalid)
|
| This is not to disparage Thunderbird or anything. Thunderbird
is one of two mail user agents (MUA) I use regularly, the other
being plain old mutt when I am connected to the home server
using ssh.
The issue with Thunderbird is not functionality, but rather
bloat. It takes up a lot of memory and is slow. Compared to
for example, FireFox, on the same machine.
|
Re:Question for the Outlook "switchers"
(Score:4, Informative)
by gclef
(96311) on Thursday November 04, @09:57AM (#10723182)
|
There are a few reasons I use it for my home email:
1) Mouse gestures. I'm on a lot of mailing lists, and being
able to specify common actions as a gesture (right-click & drag
right to select the next unread message, for example) saves
me a lot of time digging through lists like Full-Disclosure.
2) Message threading. It's not perfect, but it helps a lot to
be able to group messages by thread (I think new versions of
Outlook can do this, but my 2000 version can not).
3) The Baysean filtering is nice, but as you've mentioned, you
already have that.
4) Themes. Yeah, it's trivial, but still...they're fun. |
Re:Question for the Outlook "switchers"
(Score:5, Interesting)
by
Nevenmrgan (826707) on Thursday November 04, @10:05AM (#10723266)
|
- It's faster than Outlook (though slower than Firefox).
In the latest Outlook, message rendering can take up to a few
seconds - the UI is just not very responsive.
- Leaner UI overall. I like Outlook's corporate functions, but
I just don't use them that often at work, and never at home.
Also, Outlook suffers from having 15 different ways to get to
your folders - they keep adding new panels and icons. I don't
consider this a good thing at all, since it rarely - if ever
- increases my productivity or improves my user experience.
It just makes me click around idly.
- Significantly faster (and better) quicksearch (there are even
rumors of search-as-you-type in the future!)
- As with any other Mozilla product, they listen to the users'
comments. If a reasonable, much-requested feature doesn't make
it to the release, I'll bet my hat there's an extension that
does it.
- Shockingly, it's a better client for Ma and Pa User. Fewer
buttons, leaner out of the box, no office environment mumbo
jumbo. (I'm not even going to take seriously suggestions to
use Outlook Express in that case.) |
Re:Question for the Outlook "switchers"
(Score:5, Insightful)
by nvivo
(739176) on Thursday November 04, @10:12AM (#10723355)
|
My reasons to switch:
1. Profile, preferences, rules, contacts, etc are easy to backup.
You can have all your files in one place and you choose where.
2. IMAP support in Outlook really sucks... in a way i can`t
even describe it. Thunderbird is perfect with IMAP, and no need
to purge messages manually...
3. Saved Search folders in 0.9 are great. They are like views
in databases, but for your messages.
4. RSS support to keep you up with the news.
5. Great extensions makes Thunderbird even better.
6. It looks much better than Outlook Express. |
Re:Question for the Outlook "switchers"
(Score:4, Interesting)
by
truthsearch
(249536) on Thursday November 04, @10:28AM (#10723650)
(http://www.msversus.org/
| Last Journal:
Tuesday May 11, @08:32AM) |
In addition to what other posters have listed,
- Administration - One simple screen for e-mail accounts and
another simple screen for other configuration options. I find
the Outlook barrage of configuration windows and tabs VERY annoying.
It's also difficult to see exactly how POP/IMAP e-mail accounts
are configured in Outlook. If you see the options in Thunderbird
you'll see what I mean.
- These new Virtual Folders (mail's not really moved into them,
but it's a view over all your mail based on criteria you specify).
I use Outlook 2002 (XP) at work and I don't see any way to do
the same without creating rules to copy mail to folders.
- Message threads. I see no way to do this in Outlook 2002.
- Less features. Outlook has more features, but I don't have
any use for most of them. So Thunderbird is less cluttered for
me. |
Re:Question for the Outlook "switchers"
(Score:5, Informative)
by Ark42
(522144) <slashdot@@@morpheussoftware...net>
on Thursday November 04, @10:45AM (#10723935)
(http://www.morpheussoftware.net/)
|
I have trouble getting many people to switch to TB even
though they quickly took up FF. The things keeping back these
people I know that are now using FF + Outlook are:
1) Buttons work differently, such as the delete button doesn't
also close the message if you opened the message in a new Window
(These type of problems are solvable with the Buttons! extension)
2) The context menu for Copy To and Move To is very annoying
for them to use since they typically have 100s of folders nested
across their accounts, and they can't seem to find the folder
they want fast enough, where as Outlook will just pop up a little
window with a folder tree for Copy/Move operations.
3) The address book contacts editor has most of the useful information
on the first tab, but the Company Title and Notes section are
on the 2nd and 3rd tab, and users find it annoying to have to
use these extra tabs for such common pieces of information,
when all the other stuff on the 2nd and 3rd tab is unused. Somehow,
they wan't those two fields duplicated onto the main tab for
the contacts editor.
4) Having to open the address book in a new window, and the
contacts sidebar tab really doesn't help anybody I suggested
it to here. Users really seem to wait a contacts folder in their
folder list to see the list of contacts.
5) The contacts list is not easily sortable like Outlook and
blank fields seem to sort above A forcing them to sort Z-A and
scroll down to find the stuff in the middle. I guess they just
want A-Z sorting to put blanks after Z. |
Re:Question for the Outlook "switchers"
(Score:2)
by mikefe
(98074) <<mikefe>
<at> <bigfoot.com>> on Friday November 05, @11:42PM (#10740343)
(http://slashdot.org/)
|
Testing these against TB 0.9:
1.
a) Double click on message to open in new window
b1) click on delete in window deletes that message and opens
the next message
b2) go to message list and delete message in open window --
the window closes and the message is deleted
2. Valid point.
a) I suggest you work in the 3-pane view so that you can drag
and drop the messages in the tree on the left.
3.
It would be hard to search for that one, and would need some
time to come up with a good bug report.
4.
What exact functionality and presentation of information are
they missing? I would need a lot more details to make a good
bug report.
5. Good point.
I'll do some searches through the bugzilla database and see
what I find. In the mean time, can you post some details on
I asked. Thanks. |
Re:I want a "Export to mysql" option
(Score:1)
by
anaplasmosis (567440) on Thursday November 04, @09:54AM
(#10723138)
|
| No. Databases suck for handling free text. |
| [
Reply to This |
Parent ] |
| |
Re:I want a "Export to mysql" option
(Score:1, Insightful)
by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 04, @10:03AM (#10723249)
|
wouldn't it be nice to be able to file messages in a
real database?
What's that got to do with mysql? |
| [
Reply to This |
Parent ] |
| |
Perhaps with an IMAP server (Score:2)
by
jesterzog (189797) on Thursday November 04, @05:56PM (#10729359)
|
| Storing email in a database would be an interesting way
to do things, but it sounds a bit overly complex for most mail
readers out there... most of which (rightly, I think) spend
the bulk of their effort focusing on the front end and actually
reading the mail. Also, the word "export" seems to imply that
you don't want to keep the database up-to-date with your email
in real time.
I think it'd be very interesting to see an IMAP
server that would manage mail folders in a database, though.
That'd take a lot of stress off the folder managing complexity
away from the mail reading client.
Someone else who replied mentioned that databases suck for
handling free text. In my experience, they're at least as good
as any other format, and they tend to have a much more established
way of organising text indexes for any searching that's needed.
The headers on emails can easily be separated for separate indexing
and searching away from the body text, and even the body text
can be indexed with real full-text indexes. (I'm not sure how
well MySql supports that, but there's at least one contributed
extension to PostgreSQL (tsearch2) that does full text indexing
nicely.
|
Forward Wrap (Score:5, Interesting)
by
jeffehobbs (419930) on Thursday November 04, @10:35AM (#10723761)
(http://echelon.dyndns.org:2004/)
|
One of the major annoyances my company is finding during
our internal Thunderbird testing is this freakish behavior:
1) user gets email.
2) user replies to email, text wraps correctly.
3) user forwards email and the text does not wrap at
all, but instead runs off the screen horizontally causing annoying
readability issues.
Does anyone know why this is? It still appears to be in Thunderbird
0.9. I'm confused as to if it is a bug or
by design [ietf.org]. If it's a bug, it's kind of a big
one. If it's by design, it's kind of a poor design and there
should be an option or preference to have "reply" and "forward"
act consistently.
Otherwise, Thunderbird ROCKS -- nice work Thunderbird developers.
It's fast, free and just getting better and better with each
release.
~jeff
p.s. Inline spell check would be nice |
Thunderbird
Mail Project Page
Mozilla Thunderbird is a
redesign of the Mozilla mail component. Our goal is to produce
a cross platform stand alone mail application using the
XUL user interface language. Our intended customer is someone
who uses
Mozilla Firefox (or another stand alone browser) as
their primary browser and wants a mail client based on mozilla
that "plays nice" with the browser. In addition, by focusing
solely on stand alone mail, we believe we can make some
dents in the overall footprint and performance of the mail
client by removing components and chrome we don't need.
On top of that, the UI becomes much cleaner as a stand alone
application as opposed to being part of the mozilla suite.
In addition to the feature
set found in
Mozilla Mail, Mozilla Thunderbird has several new features
and improvements to make your mail and new experience better.
Highlights include:
- The ability to
customize your toolbars the way you want them. Choose
View / Toolbars / Customize inside any window.
-
UI extensions
can be added to Mozilla Thunderbird to customize your
experience with specific features and enhancements that
you need. Support for
extensions. A full list of available extensions
can be found
here.
- A new look and feel.
Thunderbird also supports a large number of
downloadable themes which alter the appearance of
the client.
- An
addressing sidebar for mail compose which makes
it easy and convenient to add address book contacts
to emails.
-
Online help
includes a FAQ, tips and tricks and other useful information.
- Simplified preferences
UI and menus.
- Footprint and performance
improvements.
MSToNS
MsToNs will convert your Microsoft Outlook Express and Internet Mail
e-mail folders to Netscape e-mail folders. Using Outlook Express you can
convert Outlook 9X and other e-mail formats as well.
In case of broken links
please try to use Google search. If you find the page please notify
us about new location
Project Andrew Email Web Resources
Bill Wohler's Email References
-
-
A Beginner's Guide to Effective Email - Style Guide from University
of Illinois
-
PINE
-
Getting Started On Pine
-
An interactive course in using PINE from University of Hawaii
-
PINE Information
Center at University of Washington
-
Elm
-
Elm Tutorial from University of Hawaii
-
UCB Mail
-
UC Berkeley Mail Tutorial
MH
MH use shell as scripting language. To achieve this possibility
in MH, each command is a separate program, and the shell is used as an interpreter.
So all the features of UNIX shells (pipes, redirection, history, aliases,
and so on) work with MH -- you don't have to learn a new interface.
MH is an incredibly rich and flexible email environment. The difference
between MH and other mail systems reminds me of the difference between a
wide-open powerful operating system like UNIX and a more-restricted environment
like Microsoft Windows. At first, the limited environment looks good because
it's simpler: the system designer gave you a limited set of choices -- usually
with menus that remind you of the (limited) choices you have. But once you
reach the limits and want to do more, you may be out of luck. Starting with
MH really isn't that difficult -- and, with the flexibility you'll gain
(whether you do the customization or someone else does), there's almost
no limit to what you can do with email under MH.
One more advantage of MH is the "user-friendly" interfaces that have
been designed for it. This book covers three of them: xmh, mh-e,
and exmh. If you don't like working at the UNIX command line all
of the time, these interfaces make MH commands easier to use: they execute
the standard MH commands for you. When you need to do something more, you
can go to a UNIX command line and type MH commands. Switching between standard
MH commands and the three front-ends to MH takes little or no time.
Ratatosk - TkRat -- mailer
ArrowMail is a powerful yet simple to install Web-Based Email package
that supports MIME messages, attachments, automatic signup and is fully
customizable to your web sites design.
http://cybernet.isecure.net/arrow-mail/
WebMail
Sebastian Schaffert - October 19th 1998, 03:34 EST WebMail is a
WWW-front end to a Unix system mailbox written in perl. Unix users have
complete access to their mail using a WWW browser. WebMail is highly configurable
using templates, has folder and MIME support, link highlighting, smiley
substitution and more.
http://webmail.woanders.de
|
WebMail 0.3.0 |
| WebMail is a WWW-frontend to a
Unix system mailbox written in perl. Unix users have complete access
to their mail using a WWW browser. WebMail is highly configurable
using templates, has folder and MIME support, link highlighting,
smiley substitution and more.
WebMail 0.3.0 now supports multiple folders on multiple hosts.
The look'n'feel has changed very much and several bugfixes are included.
|
Etc
- Mana
-- A mail and news agent for UNIX -- a greatly enhanced, GPLed pine.
- Pine
-- Simple text-based mail program. Archaic interface. Rather bad editor
(Pico).
-
Arrow
-- An easy-to-use mail client, aimed at new Linux users.
- Elm
-- A classic text based mail reader.
-
March -- A mail achiving program with a WWW based user interface.
-
MultiMail -- An offline mail reader for Unix systems
- Electronic Mail Related Request For Comments (RFCs):
- RFC821 (Simple
Mail Transport Protocol)
- RFC822 (Internet
Mail Header Format)
- RFC1123
(Internet Host Requirements)
- RFC1869
(SMTP Service Extensions)
- RFC1891
(SMTP Delivery Status Notifications)
- RFC1892
(Multipart/Report)
- RFC1893
(Mail System Status Codes)
- RFC1894
(Delivery Status Notifications)
- RFC1985
(SMTP Service Extension for Remote Message Queue Starting)
- RFC2045
(MIME)
Accessing
the Internet by E-MAIL
|
WebMailFolder 1.0.3
|
| WebMailFolder is a tool to convert
Emails to HTML and make index files (author, data, subject, thread).
Features include threading, mime support, Base64 and uuencode support,
statistics page, extended configuration and frame support.
|
|
Norbert Kuemin @ 11/12/98
- 17:22 EST |
Blat is
probably the most popular. It was developed by Pedro Mendes and Mark Neal
at the University of Wales
at Aberystwyth.
Command Line SMTP Mailer for Windows
AlphaWorks
Lotus Notes Command Line Email Client Overview -- this one is for Lotus
Notes not SMTP.
fetchmail
-- A free mail-retrieval program which works with POP2, POP3, RPOP, APOP,
KPOP and IMAP.
Copyright © 1996-2009 by Dr. Nikolai Bezroukov.
www.softpanorama.org was
created as a service to the UN Sustainable Development Networking Programme (SDNP)
in the author free time.
Submit
comments This document is an industrial compilation designed and created
exclusively for educational use and is placed under the copyright of the
Open Content License(OPL).
Site uses AdSense so you need to be aware of Google privacy policy. Original materials copyright belong to respective owners. Quotes are made
for educational purposes only in compliance with the fair use doctrine.
Disclaimer:
- The statements, views and opinions presented on
this web page are those of the author and are not endorsed by, nor do they necessarily
reflect, the opinions of the author present and former employers, SDNP or any other
organization the author may be associated with.
- We do not warrant the correctness of the information provided or its
fitness for any purpose
- In no way this site is associated with or endorse cybersquatters
using
the term "softpanorama" with other main or country domains (e.g. softpanorama.com) with
bad faith intent to profit from the goodwill belonging to
someone else.
Last modified:
15 August, 2009
