|
Softpanorama
(slightly skeptical)
Open Source Software Educational Society |
May the
source be with you,
but remember the KISS principle ;-)
|
Filesystems Recovery
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound
of cure.
An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure. I an strongly against stupid
one partition windows systems installations that are prevalent today. I stall stem
in right direction, splitting this partition into two and having a sizable FAT32
second partition other drive where you can store Ghost images on the first partition
and you data significantly simplify recovery and helps to avoid the fees that are
charges by specialists for restoration of your harddrive.
This page is updated when I experience problems with my systems and the frequency
of updating should serve as a warning to everybody that you need conditions disciplined
efforts to preserver your data or at one moment you will be pulling heirs...
FAT32 has great advantage over other competitors: it has powerful, extremely
well developed recovery tools. NTFS recovery tools are weaker in comparison
with the FAT32 recovery tools so if the speed is not important and size of the partition
is below 20G, FAT32 is preferable as a filesystem. FAT32 partitions are perfect
for storing NTFS images created using GHOST or similar tools.
On low level there are few tools that are really helpful.
- Norton Disk Editor is probably the most well known recovery tool
and it is an excellent tool for complex cases of FAT32 recovery. I have no experience
with it on NTFS and not sure that it works with it. You can do wonders
with FAT partitions if you know how to use it and understand the structure of
FAT. To a certain extent it is impossible to lose data on FAT partitions unless
they were physically overwritten or there is a problem with disk hardware.
- Knoppix and other mini
distributions
- Ghost 2003 and
similar Linux
based tools. If you can create an image of the disk in DOS
you can access it on a different computer using Ghost explorer. Also it is important
to have a backup copy of data that you try to recover as recovery can and often
will go wrong.
Again let's talk about prophylactics. I strongly recommend to create
a sizable (let's say 10G) FAT32 partition explicitly for recovery purposes
when installing Windows 2000/XP. Here you can store Ghost images and other stuff
that is important to recover too.
Much depends on your level of understanding of assembler and FAT32 internals.
If we are talking about serious problem that involves valuable data, then before
practicing with Norton Disk Editor on real data I strongly recommend to create an
image of the partition, install it on the second harddrive and try you ideas on
it.
With NTFS everything is 10 times harder but general principles remain the same.
After all you can always read and search the disk sector by sector and write some
scripts to extract relevant portions of the disk based on heuristics that are pertinent
to your data. But it is preferable to operate on a higher level. NTFS can
be mounted as readable partition from Linux which creates some interesting possibilities
in case Windows is damaged to the extent is unable to boot and there is no recovery
disk. I have very little experi4nce with recovering NTFS volumes so I can
not go father then rather generic recommendations.
Notes:
- This is a Spartan WHYFF (We Help
You For Free) site written by people for whom English
is not a native language.
Some amount of grammar and spelling errors should be
expected.
- The site contain some broken links
as it develops like a living tree...
Please try to use Google, Open directory,
etc. to find a replacement link (see
HOWTO search the WEB for details). We would appreciate
if you can
mail us a correct link.
|
|
|
|
safecopy is a data recovery tool which tries to extract as much data as possible
from a seekable but problematic (i.e., damaged sectors) source like floppy drives,
hard disk partitions, CDs, etc., where other tools like dd would fail due to
I/O errors.
About 6 years ago or so I got tired of fixing problem with Tamarah Windows/Linux
box and decided to pay the money for a 15" PowerBook. It was an excellent investment,
she could work on the couch, no more lockups and reboots in Windows or mysterious
"Bennnnnnn!" problems in Linux. Since then she's upgraded to a black MacBook,
and when I joined Joyent they provided me with a MacBook Pro (which I'm typing
on now). So far each of these 3 laptops has lost at least one drive. Since we've
fallen in love with iTunes and iPhoto these drive failures have been a major
blow, and prior to Leopard's TimeMachine we didn't do regular backups.
This post will refer solely to drives for personal use. In the datacenter
you should be using RAID and/or backup or redundancy method in which case a
single drive failure isn't something you waste time trying to analyze or fix.
I've run into 3 major types of drive failure:
- PCB Failure: A case in which the PCB has been "fried". This happened
dramtically once when connected an IDE drive to a system and let the disk
rest, upside down, ontop of the case. It ran fine for aminute and then pop/spark
there was a hole burned in a chip on the PCB. In this case the only solution
is to go to eBay and buy an identical drive and swap the PCB.
- Click of Death: This means catastrophic damage to a drive. The head
is unable to position itself or read data and sweeps the platters in a sort
of seizure. This is the sort of problem that likely requires you to open
the drive or spend big bucks.
- Damaged Cylinders: This is the kind of problem where the drive seems
fine, mounts up and you can read for a bit and then hits some area of the
platters where it freaks out and eventually spins up and down. This is most
clearly seen when you image the drive with dd and it hits some point
and exits on max retries.
Information on drive forensics and recovery is sparse. You tend to get one
of three answers:
- "d00d, totally put it in the freezer and then try it!" Variations come
based on how you should protect against condensation, the best I've heard
is to pack the drive in minute-rice.
- "Send it to DriveSavers" (or other) This is super expensive, anywhere
from $600 up beyond $2,000. You send them the failed disk and optionally
a new drive to restore to. This can take weeks and is only for super extreme
cases.
- "Just download tool xyz.." There are lots of various software solutions
for do-it-yourself drive recovery, most are old DOS based programs recommended
on forums populated largely by Windows users.
In my most recent failure, the drive died one day for seemingly no reason.
There was no impact or horror story, the OS just locked up, I rebooted and the
OS would start to load and then just drift into an infinite slumber. I went
through the painstaking process of replacing the drive in my MacBook Pro and
re-installed everything from scratch. Once back up and running I put the old
drive in a USB enclosure and attempted to image it using dd. Every attempt
it would get 19GB into the drive and then give up.
This kind of problem is the easiest to deal with. There are special versions
of dd, namely
GNU ddrescue,
which is just like dd, but instead of failing on bad blocks will track forward
after a number of retries untill its read the whole disk, for better or worse.
In the case of my MacBook Pro drive I attached the USB enclosure to my OpenSolaris
box, installed ddrescue, and imaged the drive to a file. Of the 80GB
drive the tool reported that I lost about 250MB. I then created a ZFS ZVol of
80GB, used traditional dd to copy the image file into the volume, and then exported
as an iSCSI target using iscsitadm. Using the
globalSAN iSCSI Initiator for OS X I mounted the iSCSI Target, and used
OS X "DiskUtility" to verify and repair the HFS+ Volume. All went well and I
could then mount the volume and extract data. w00t!!! iSCSI Rules!
The tale of Tamarah's MacBook drive didn't end so happily. I had a backup
of her laptop but it was really old. Glenn, our son, grabbed the laptop on the
table sending it crashing to the tile floor below, hitting on the corner where
the drive sits. The laptop was fine, but the drive was toast. After a Mac Genious
showed us how to replace the drive I bought a new disk at Fry's and got things
installed and running again, but the drive contained a lot of projects she wanted,
and is commonly the case, when I showed her the data from the old backup she
was uncertain as to whether it was enough. This is a big problem of the "unknown",
when all your stuff is in one place you commonly forget what exactly is there.
I tried the USB enclosure trick but the drive wouldn't even spin up... click
of death. Given the sensativity of the data I didn't want to go Rambo on the
disk and so we sat down and had a serious discussion about whether or not it
was worth having sent to a drive recovery company. The look on her face was
enough to tell me what to do, and despite her guilt over the cost I sent it
in. After a week and a half, the answer came back "nothing we can do". The tech
was friendly and we had a good discussion about drive recovery, but long story
short there was no hope and we were out $800. Frankly, for a lot of people that
money is well spent because at least you exhausted all avenues, morn and get
on with it.
When it comes to hardcore "swap the platters" style repair things get dicey.
As simplistic as hard drives seem there are a lot of gotchas that you won't
be aware of until its too late. This is where Scott Moulton of
MyHardDriveDied.com comes in.
Scott has done two presentations, both found on YouTube that provide a solid
background for the black-art of hardcore drive recovery used by most of the
big bucks recovery companies.
About: GNU ddrescue is a data recovery tool. It copies data from one
file or block device (hard disc, cdrom, etc) to another, trying hard to rescue
data in case of read errors. GNU ddrescue does not truncate the output file
if not asked to. So, every time you run it on the same output file, it tries
to fill in the gaps. The basic operation of GNU ddrescue is fully automatic.
That is, you don't have to wait for an error, stop the program, read the log,
run it in reverse mode, etc. If you use the logfile feature of GNU ddrescue,
the data is rescued very efficiently (only the needed blocks are read). Also
you can interrupt the rescue at any time and resume it later at the same point.
Changes: The new option "--domain-logfile" has been added. This release
is also available in lzip format. To download the lzip version, just replace
".bz2" with ".lz" in the tar.bz2 package name.
[Sep 9, 2008]
safe-rm 0.3 by Francois Marier
About: safe-rm is intended to prevent the accidental deletion of important
files by replacing /bin/rm with a wrapper which checks the given arguments against
a configurable blacklist of files and directories that should never be removed.
Users who attempt to delete one of these protected files or directories will
not be able to do so and will be shown a warning message instead. Protected
paths can be set both at the site and user levels.
Changes: This release fixes a bug which caused safe-rm to skip the
full blacklist checks when dealing with certain files and directories in the
working directory. Previously, unless the argument you passed to safe-rm contained
a slash, it would not get the real (absolute) path of the file before checking
against the blacklist.
[Jul 22, 2008]
UNDELETED by
Ralf Spenneberg
Linux Magazine Online
Modern filesystems make forensic file recovery much more difficult. Tools
like Foremost and Scalpel identify data structures and carve files from a hard
disk image.
IT experts and investigators have many reasons for reconstructing deleted
files. Whether an intruder has deleted a log to conceal an attack or a user
has destroyed a digital photo collection with an accidental rm ‑rf, you might
someday face the need to recover deleted data. In the past, recovery experts
could easily retrieve a lost file because an earlier generation of filesystems
simply deleted the directory entry. The meta information that described the
physical location of the data on the disk was preserved, and tools like The
Coroner’s Toolkit (TCT [1]) and The Sleuth Kit (TSK [2]) could uncover the information
necessary for restoring the file. Today, many filesystems delete the full set
of meta information, leaving the data blocks. Putting these pieces together
correctly is called file carving – forensic experts carve the raw data off the
disk and reconstruct the files from it. The more fragmented the filesystem,
the harder this task become.
After the overwhelming feeling of dread passed, I started to look into file
recovery options. I demoed a variety of commercial products to see if any of
them could find my lost files or partitions. Nothing seemed to work. Finally,
I discovered TestDisk
and PhotoRec, and was
able to use the latter to recover my lost files.
TestDisk can recover lost partitions of virtually any filesystem. PhotoRec
can recover files of most types, including most picture and video formats. PhotoRec
can be used on existing partitions, or can be used to recover files on deleted
partitions without having to recover the underlying partitions. Both PhotoRec
and TestDisk can be run on DOS, Windows (9x, NT, 2000, XP, 2003), Linux, FreeBSD,
NetBSD, OpenBSD, Sun Solaris, and Mac OS X, and, their developers claim, can
be compiled and run on most Unix systems.
The recovery
I began my attempt at recovery by using TestDisk run from a Knoppix CD. Unfortunately,
I had already overwritten the partition table, and an exhaustive search of the
hard drive for lost partitions yielded too many results. I decided to use PhotoRec
instead to recover my lost files.
PhotoRec recovers files by finding deleted files and copying them to disk.
This means that files should not be recovered to the same disk partition on
which the deleted files reside (unless you're recovering from a disk image file),
because that could lead to the deleted data being permanently overwritten.
Another important thing to remember is that PhotoRec will most likely recover
a lot of files. This means that the partition on which the recovered files are
to be stored should have at least as much free space as the size of the partition
on which PhotoRec is searching for recovered files.
Possible setups for recovery include:
- Recover the files to a separate hard drive.
- Recover the files to a networked storage drive.
- Recover the files to a separate partition on the same hard drive.
- Image the hard drive using a tool like
ddrescue
and recover files using only one partition.
As I had completed erased my partitions, I could not use the third option.
The second option introduces problems associated with network speed and latency.
The fourth option is worth considering in the case of an incident response where
the image of the hard drive is used as evidence.
I chose the first option, and installed two hard drives in a single computer.
I divided the hard drive used to recover files into two major partitions; the
first partition held the operating system (CentOS 4), while the second partition
was set up to hold the recovered files. Partitioning in this manner is an extra
precaution to prevent PhotoRec from halting the system by writing more files
than the storage space allows. Another option is to run the operating system
off a live CD such as Knoppix, which contains
the TestDisk and PhotoRec utilities.
You can download
both PhotoRec and TestDisk in a single archive file. The files photorec_static
and testdisk_static are the executable files, and can be executed from the command
line.
Make sure that the recovery partition is mounted (I mounted it at /var/recovery).
Don't mount the hard drive that contains the deleted files; if the partition
remains unmounted, you can't overwrite the data it contains.
Recovery steps
PhotoRec recovers files to the directory from which it is run. Therefore,
I changed into the /var/recovery directory and ran photorec_static.
If the PhotoRec executable does not run with this command, make sure that you
either copy the executable to the /usr/bin directory or type in the full path
where the program resides.
The PhotoRec interface is easy to understand. At the initial screen, you
select the hard drive you wish to recover. In my case, it was /dev/hdb.
Select a media (use Arrow keys, then press Enter):
Disk /dev/hda - 200 GB / 186 GiB (RO)
Disk /dev/hdb - 160 GB / 149 GiB (RO)
Disk /dev/hdc - 120 GB / 111 GiB (RO)
Disk /dev/hdd - 296 MB / 282 MiB (RO)
[Proceed ] [ Quit ]
|
Next, you select the partition type. In my case, I selected an Intel/PC partition.
Disk /dev/hdb - 160 GB / 149 GiB (RO)
Please select the partition table type, press Enter when done.
[Intel ] Intel/PC partition
[Mac ] Apple partition map
[None ] Non partitioned media
[Sun ] Sun Solaris partition
[XBox ] XBox partition
[Return ] Return to disk selection
Note: Do NOT select 'None' for media with only a single partition. It's very
rare for a drive to be 'Non-partitioned'.
|
The next screen listed the partitions on the hard drive. I wanted to recover
partitions on the whole hard drive, so I selected the first option. However,
before selecting this option, I needed to go to the [File Opt]
menu to select which type of files I wanted to recover.
Disk /dev/hdb - 160 GB / 149 GiB (RO)
Partition Start End Size in sectors
D empty 0 0 1 19456 254 63 312576705 [Whole disk]
1 * Linux LVM 0 0 2 19457 80 63 312581807
[ Search ] [Options ] [File Opt] [ Quit ]
Start file recovery
|
PhotoRec can recover a variety of files, but I only wanted to recovery Word
documents, AVI video files, JPG picture files, and MPEG video files. I selected
the appropriate boxes.
PhotoRec will try to locate the following files
[ ] dbf DBase 3, prone to false positive
[X] FAT subdirectory
[X] doc Microsoft Office Document (doc/xls/ppt/vis/...)
[X] dsc Nikon dsc
[X] eps Encapsulated PostScript
[ ] exe MS executable
[X] EXT2/EXT3 Superblock
[X] gif Graphic Interchange Format
[X] gz gzip compressed data
[X] jpg JPG picture
[X] mdb Access Data Base
[X] mov MOV video
[X] mp3 MP3 audio (MPEG ADTS, layer III, v1)
[X] mpg Moving Picture Experts Group video
[X] mrw Minolta Raw picture
[ Quit ]
Return to main menu
|
After you select the file types, go back to the previous screen and begin
the scan of the hard drive. The scanning process is automated; on my machine
it took a few hours to complete. Once PhotoRec is finished, the recovered files
will be in multiple directories of the form recup_dir.x where x is the
number of the directory. The files within these directories will not contain
the names of the original files; instead, they are numbered to indicate the
order in which the file was recovered, and an extension that indicates the file
type. For example, f89.avi is the 89th file recovered and is an AVI file.
Post-recovery cleanup
While all of my files were recovered, I had many files on my hard drive.
Manually examining each file would be time-consuming and tiresome. I created
three folders within the /var/recovery directory named VID/, DOC/, and JPG/,
into which I sorted the files using the commands:
find /var/recovery/ -name "*.avi" | xargs -i mv {} /var/recovery/VID/
find /var/recovery/ -name "*.mpg" | xargs -i mv {} /var/recovery/VID/
find /var/recovery/ -name "*.jpg" | xargs -i mv {} /var/recovery/JPG/
|
Although all the files are sorted into folders of the same type, the sorting
was far from over. Before my accident, my hard drive contained more than 10,000
pictures, each around 2MB in size. During the recovery process, PhotoRec recovered
all the pictures it could find -- including picture files from the Web browser
cache. This meant it brought back a lot of unwanted files. To eliminate most
of the picture files from miscellaneous sources, I moved files smaller than
1MB to a folder called SMALL, which I kept until I was satisfied that none were
of interest. I moved the files to the folder using the command:
find /var/recovery/JPG/ -name "*.jpg" -size -1024k | xargs
-i mv {} /var/recovery/SMALL/
|
PhotoRec does not recover the file names of recovered files, but luckily
my recovered picture files contained EXIF metadata such as the time and date
the picture was taken and the camera make and model. I used the
Jhead command-line utility
to extract this metadata. In the JPG folder I ran the command:
jhead -n%Y%m%d-%H%M%S *.jpg |
This command renames all files with the jpg extension with its time/date stamp
in the format YYYYMMDD-HHMMSS.jpg. Any files with the same time and date stamp
are named in the format of YYYYMMDD-HHMMSSx.jpg, where x is a lower-case letter
that increments for each duplicate time/date stamp found. Given that these pictures
were all taken on the same digital camera, any pictures with the same time/date
stamp should be the same picture. I moved duplicates to a folder called DUPS
using the command:
find /var/recovery/JPG/ -name "*a.jpg" | xargs -i mv {} /var/recovery/JPG/DUPS/
|
Once I had the files labeled with the time/date stamp, I could sort them
into folders according to their year and month.
If I had included keywords or comments in the picture files, I could have
used libextractor
to extract keywords from the JPEG files and sort the files into folders using
those keywords. Alas, this was not the case, so I had to spend hours sorting
the pictures manually into folders after the recovery. I did however use libextractor
on my AVI files to determine information regarding the codec, frame-rate, and
resolution of those videos.
Write access to NTFS permits some using it virtual machines
"Normally Linux systems can only read from Windows NTFS partitions, but not
write to them which can be very annoying if you have to work with Linux and
Windows systems. This is where ntfs-3g comes into play. ntfs-3g is an open source,
freely available NTFS driver for Linux with read and write support. This tutorial
shows how to use ntfs-3g on a Fedora 7 desktop to read from and write to Windows
NTFS drives and partitions.
See also:
How To Use NTFS Drives/Partitions Under Ubuntu Edgy Eft
Our-Picks: Access Your Linux Partitions Under Windows(Mar 05, 2007)
CNET Community Newsletter Q&A Forums
Question:
I need your help desperately. I have an xD-Picture Card (memory card) that I'm
trying to retrieve my photos from. Normally I just insert the card into my card
reader and transfer the photos to my computer. However, this time when I inserted
the card into the card reader, it froze my PC so I had to do a cold reboot to
get it going again. Once rebooted, I tried numerous times trying to get the
PC to read the card, but was unsuccessful. So I tried it on another computer
and it also failed to be recognize the reader and the content on the card also.
My last attempt was connecting the camera to the computer and retrieving using
that method, but every time I insert the memory card into the camera, the camera
would display "Card error" and proceed to ask if I want to format. Reformatting
is not an option. All I want is to be able retrieve my precious photos from
my honeymoon in the Caribbean. Are there any other methods--software or hardware
that I use to try to retrieve these photos safely? Please help, any recommendations
or advice will be appreciated!
Submitted by: Irene D.
***********************************************************************
Answer:
Hi Irene, you have my sympathies--this is my worst nightmare. There are a couple
of techniques I use to mitigate these kind of disasters. I tend to use several
smaller capacity memory cards, rather than one big one - at least that way,
if the worst happens, I only lose a small portion of my pictures. Also, whenever
possible, I take a laptop with me and download my images at the end of each
day. Of course, none of this helps with your current problem.
Health warning! I've never had to recover a memory card in anger personally,
so I can't give a definitive answer; only suggest actions you might want to
try.
Be VERY careful from here on in; you don't want to compound the problem. This
is especially important, because xD memory cards (I use them) don't have a write-protect
switch like some SD cards do, so you must double-check that any method you use
to try to access the card is READ ONLY.
Looking at your post, there are a number of possibilities for the error. When
you download images from the card, do you copy them to your PC or move them?
I would always recommend copy, and delete them from the card when you have a
verified copy on your hard disk. If you move them, you are effectively writing
to the card and if you get an error, the card's Partition Table or File Allocation
Table may be corrupted. This can happen if you are copying and get a hardware
error but it is much less likely.
Anyway, since your camera is detecting an error and suggesting a reformat, it
sounds as if the FAT is damaged. It may be possible to overcome this if you
can access the card on a PC - the embedded operating systems in digital cameras
are less forgiving because they don't have as much space for error recovery
routines. You are absolutely right not to reformat the card. Your strategy at
this stage is not to modify the card in any way while you try to get the images
off it.
The other point in your post that is of concern is "So I tried it on another
computer and it also failed to be recognize the reader and the content on the
card also."
The piece that concerns me is that the other computer "failed to recognise the
reader". That would suggest that maybe the card reader has developed a fault
- this could explain why your original PC hung up and how the card came to be
damaged. Do you have a spare card (with nothing on it) to try in your reader
or do you know anyone who also has an xD compatible card reader? If so, try
to read the card in their reader. You might be lucky and be able to copy the
pictures off but likely not. Success here would be for the card to be recognised
on the computer, albeit with the errors.
If you can access the card, then there is a plethora of software tools that
may be able to recover the data - Some work by ignoring the errors in the FAT
etc., and do a low level scan of the card for readable logical sectors and try
to reassemble the images. They then allow the successful ones to be copied to
the hard disk. Others attempt to dump the whole memory card on to the hard disk
and then carry out a similar process there. There are Freeware programs available
and a lot of commercial ones, most of which have a free or trial download available
so you can see if they will be able to recover the images before you buy them.
I've included a few links here but you can Google many more:
http://www.cardrecovery.com/
Download and Free Trial
http://www.digitalleo.com/photo_recovery.html
Free Demo USD 27 to buy
http://www.pcinspector.de/smart_media_recovery/uk/beschreibung.htm
German site, English text
http://www.softwarepatch.com/software/smartrecovery.html
Freeware
I would also recommend you take a look at
http://www.ultimateslr.com/memory-card-recovery.php which is a discussion
forum for this topic. Some of the links on the site are dead but there are some
useful ones, e.g.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/connected/main.jhtml?xml=/connected/2002/05/21/ecrbtcm21.xml
that are helpful. The site helps to understand the problems you may encounter
as well as suggesting possible approaches to recovery.
Let me repeat, though, make sure that any of the tools you try are READ ONLY
- the descriptions say if they are - if it doesn't say, assume they are not.
OK, so what if that doesn't work? Your next recourse would be to one of the
specialist companies that attempt data recovery. Again, there are a lot around,
I've included a couple of links but these are for UK companies which may or
may not be of use, depending where you live.
http://www.diskdoctorsdatarecovery.co.uk/
(Mail in Service)
http://www.disklabs.com/data-recovery-contact.asp
Be aware that these companies cannot guarantee success but if they can't retrieve
the data, probably nobody can. Also be aware that they can be expensive - always
get a quote from 2 or 3 before you buy. For irreplaceable pictures, such as
yours, of course, you may consider the cost well worth it. Many of these companies
offer a phone-in diagnostic chat, where you can discuss the specifics of your
problem and they can give a more informed opinion.
Finally, you could try your local photolab, where they may be able to print
your pictures - you'd need to scan them in again but better than a total loss.
Chances are that the print machine will have the same problem reading your card,
though, that your camera has.
A note of caution. Many of the recovery products claim to be able to recover
images from reformatted cards. Theoretically, it might work with some cards
and cameras but I have done a few tests with my camera (a Fujifilm Finepix S304)
with three of the recovery programs. In all cases, if the files were deleted,
they were able to recover them. BUT and it is a BIG BUT, NONE of them were able
to recover the images from a reformatted card. Now this may be because my Fuji
camera creates a three level directory structure when it reformats a card and
the recovery programs can't interpret this correctly but obviously, I can't
recommend this method. Olympus cameras, that also use xD cards, may be different.
If everything else has failed and you are facing a total loss, you might want
to consider risking it. If you do, I'd definitely recommend you experiment with
a spare card before you even think about touching your damaged card.
Good luck and I do hope you are able to recover at least the majority of your
precious photographs.
Submitted by: Sav. M. of the United Kingdom
The first step to carry out for an obviously or
suspected failing disk is to copy the whole contents before it fails completely.
The freeware below is probably all you need for this purpose. Commercial Solutions
won't be much better. Especially try PC INSPECTOR
-
PC INSPECTOR≥ clone maxx Supported
Software Versions or File Systems - "The copying process is always based
on the physical drive and is independent of the file system (e.g. FAT12, FAT16,
FAT32, HPFS, NTFS, Ext2, Reiser, etc.) or the number of partitions."
Developer Provided Description - "PC INSPECTOR≥ clone maxx is the new
professional hard drive copying program from CONVAR. Using the new direct DMA
support, data can be copied from hard drives in high speed mode with speeds
up to 3.3 GB per minute."
Comment - CONVAR √ Die Datenretter≥ who
provide the highest quality set of general use data recovery software on the
Internet. Check out all their software, it's quite impressive for them
to give this stuff away.
- DriveImage XML
OS - Windows XP Home Professional only
|
File Size
- 1.36 MB Supported Software
Versions or File Systems - FAT 12/16/32/NTFS |
Developer
Provided Description - "DriveImage XML is an easy to use and reliable program
for imaging and backing up partitions and logical drives. The program allows
you to:
Backup logical drives and partitions to image files
Browse these images, view and extract files
Restore these images to the same or a different drive
Copy directly from drive to drive
Image creation uses Microsoft's Volume Shadow Services (VSS), allowing you to
create safe "hot images" even from drives currently in use.
Images are stored in XML files, allowing you to process them with 3rd party
tools. Never again be stuck with a useless backup!
Restore images to drives without having to reboot."
Comment - Free for home use.
- Partition Saving
Supported Software Versions or File Systems
- "Most partition types are supported. In the case of FAT (12, 16 and 32),
ext2/3 and NTFS partitions, you can choose between saving all sectors or in-use
sectors only."
Developer Provided Description - "Partition
Saving is a DOS program that is used to save, restore and copy hard-drive, partitions,
floppy disk and DOS devices.
With this program you could save all data on a partition to a file (such as
you could save this file on a CD for example). Then if something goes wrong,
you can completely restore the partition from the backup file. You no longer
have to reinstall every piece of software from scratch. All you have to do is
restore the partition from the backup file and then update any software that
was modified since the backup was created. "
- Roadkil's
Raw Copy
Supported Software Versions or File Systems
- FAT16/32/NTFS
Developer Provided Description -
"This program copies a disk as a raw image
from one drive directly to another. This utility is designed for people who
have faulty drive and want to transfer the data directly to another drive without
doing a file by file copy. This saves the need for operating system re-installs
and allows drives with an unknown file system to be copied (including from console
game machines, data recorders, Mac etc). The program has a built in data recovery
function which will attempt to recover data from bad sectors to ensure all the
available data is restored from the drive. This program is designed to run under
nt/xp/2000 or later operating systems. It will run under Windows 95/98/Me operating
systems but only Windows logical drives can be copied."
Roadkil's Disk
Image Supported Software Versions or File
Systems - FAT16/32/NTFS
Developer Provided Description -
Comment - "Creates and writes disk images
files to hard and floppy disks. Great for writing boot disk images download
from the internet or creating a perfect copy of a disk to email to someone else."
- HDCopy
Developer
Provided Description - "With HDCopy you can make an identical copy of a
hard drive onto another hard drive. If you buy a new hard drive and don't wish
to change your Windows configuration in any way, you can use HDCopy to copy
your old hard drive completely to the new one (hidden files as well."
- Restorer2000 Free
DEMO
Developer
Provided Description - "Restorer2000 Free DEMO 2.0 allows you to evaluate
Restorer2000 products and displays your hard drive structure with deleted files
and folders. Also, with Restorer2000 Free DEMO 2.0 you can create an Image file
for an entire disk, partition or its part. Then the Image file can be used like
regular disk." Comment
- Interestingly the Demo's disk imaging feature works in unlimited for free
but the undelete only shows you what can be undeleted. Thus free disk
imaging. :-)
- Diskman
Supported Software Versions or File Systems
- FAT16/32/NTFS
Developer Provided Description - "Diskman is free for noncommercial
use. Diskman products may be licensed for commercial use and may be fully customized
to suit particular application requirements. The core Diskman library supports
a variety of file system and disk manipulation commands which can be used to
extract and modify information not normally available from the OS. Diskman is
currently supported by MS-DOS (and its clones) and Microsoft Windows NT/2000/XP
. A Linux version of Diskman may be developed in the future.
Diskman 4 is the latest MS-DOS compatible release:
Backup and restore VFAT (Windows 9X/nt/2000).
Long File Names (LFN). Archive compatible with DOSLFNBK, the leading LFN backup
utility. Support for disk image files up to 2GB (4GB coming soon). Support for
spanned image files up to 2TB. Mount and manipulate disk images (such as those
created for Rawrite). Export volumes or entire physical drives for later restore.
Quickly copy every file into image files for easy backup and later restore.
Directly edit disks at the sector level. Support for all BIOS supported disks,
DOS supported drives and Image files. Help repair disks after a virus attack
or rescue critical data."
-
recoverdm
Supported Software Versions or File Systems
-Mac, Unix File Systems
Developer
Provided Description - "This program will help you recover disks with bad
sectors. You can recover files as well complete devices. In case if finds
sectors which simply cannot be recovered, it writes an empty sector to the outputfile
and continues. If you're recovering a CD or a DVD and the program cannot read
the sector in "normal mode", then the program will try to read the sector in
"RAW mode" (without error-checking etc.). This toolkit also has a utility called
'mergebad': mergebad merges multiple images into one. This can be useful when
you have, for example, multiple CD's with the same data which are all damaged.
In such case, you can then first use recoverdm to retrieve the data from the
damaged CD's into image-files and then combine them into one image with mergebad."
- Roadkil's
Unstoppable Copier
Supported Software Versions or File Systems
- FAT16/32/NTFS
Developer
Provided Description - "Recovers files from disks with physical damage.
Allows you to copy files from disks with problems such as bad sectors, scratches
or that just give errors when reading data. The program will attempt to recover
every readable piece of a file and put the pieces together. Using this method
most types of files can be made useable even if some parts were not recoverable
in the end."
This paper describes a utility named
ruf that reads
files from an unmounted file system. The files are accessed by reading disk
structures directly so the program is peculiar to the specific file system employed.
The current implementation supports the *BSD FFS, SunOS/Solaris UFS, HP-UX HFS,
and Linux ext2fs file systems. All these file systems derive from the original
FFS, but have peculiar differences in their specific implementations.
The utility can read files from a damaged file system. Since the utility
attempts to read only those structures it requires, damaged areas of the disk
can be avoided. Files can be accessed by their inode number alone, bypassing
damage to structures above it in the directory hierarchy.
The functions of the utility is available
in a library named libruf.
The utility and library is available under the BSD license.
Introduction
There are many important reasons for being
able to access unmounted file systems, the prime example being a damaged disk.
This paper describes a utility that can be used to read a disk file without
mounting the file system. The utility behaves similar to the regular
cat utility, and was originally
named dog, but
was renamed to ruf
for reading unmounted filesystems to avoid a name conflict
with an older utility.
In order to access an unmounted file system, the utility must read the disk
structures directly and perform all the tasks normally performed by the operating
system; this requires a detailed understanding of how the file system is implemented.
Implementing this utility for a particular file system is an interesting academic
exercise and a good way to learn about the file system. The original work on
this utility was in fact done in Evi Nemeth's system administration class.
- As computers get smaller and powerconsume friendlier the trouble of booting
and installing Linux gets more tiresome. Here's a
Custom RedHat installation through PXE netboot which i did on a
VIA EPIA mini-ITX board.
Also other mini appliances like the
Soekris net4501 board
can benefit by adding the natsemi.o (National Semiconductor DP83815 PCI Ethernet
NIC) driver in a analog fashion.
- A Open Source
patch which
add DVD extensions to cdrtools-2.0. As a convenience also SRPM and RPM packages
for several RPM based Linux distro's are given.
- Test your computer's crypto speed. The CRK 2.4.18 based
RSA speed benchtest measures your PC's encrypting power. basicly proceed
as with any CRK, i.e. login as root, install-cdrom, install-utils and next do
install-openssl. The RSA benchtest should be run at least twice. To run the
test run: # openssl speed rsa
Misc
Rather strange article that still contains useful info. especially in user comments
section. Actually there are several partition boundary finders. so dd is not necessary,
but the idea of using a universal tool is not without its merits.
My friend's e-mail went on to explain:
The original configuration was Windows
98SE with GoBack installed. GoBack is a utility that
is supposed to help disaster recovery by rolling back
to earlier checkpoints. I disabled GoBack and set up
a dual boot of Windows98 and
XP on her PC since my daughter wanted to run a school
program that only works on XP. Unfortunately, the school
program did not work. So I deleted the XP partition
with Partition Magic 7 and disabled the BootMagic. Then
I re-enabled GoBack. Everything seemed to work fine
for a couple of weeks.
Murphy's law dictates that disaster
would strike while I was in Toronto. Norton SystemWorks
was scheduled to run on Friday nights. No problem during
the first couple of weeks. But when I was visiting my
brother last week in Toronto, Norton reported a lost
cluster. My daughter OKed the fix and, from that time
on, the system would not boot.
In particular, when booting from the hard
disk drive (HDD), the NT Loader (NTLDR) wasn't found. Trying
to boot win98 from floppy produced a message about no FAT or
FAT32 partition being found. Diagnostic programs pronounced
the hardware healthy. My friend continued:
To my horror, I found that GoBack
wrote on the MBR (Master Boot Record) using its proprietary
format. The disk was originally divided into 4 partitions.
But GoBack made the whole disk appear as a single partition
of 40GB now since the software cannot access the partition
tables in the MBR.
As sometimes happens, the vendor's recovery
instructions didn't work. My friend was a little desperate,
and I thought I could help, so I accepted the challenge. He
told me that if we could recover only the files in the "data"
partition, that would be enough: "I told her to back up her
data every week, but...". You know the rest. Anyway, my friend
handed over the disk drive, and I considered how to make use
of tools I had on hand to help him out.
Can My Extra Linux PC Read the Drive?
I was lucky enough to have a "spare" desktop
PC, which had been rescued from the dumpster a few months before.
From loading SuSE 8.0 on it, I remembered that the hard drive
was on /dev/hda (IDE0 "master") and a CD-writer was at /dev/hdc
(IDE1 "master"). (See Sidebar 1 below for a brief review of
IDE addressing.) This setup was good, because it meant two
IDE ribbon cables were in the box--one for IDE0 and one for
IDE1--and one might have a spare connector in a convenient physical
location.
... .... ....
So, what did fdisk think of my friend's HDD?
% sudo fdisk -l /dev/hdd
Disk /dev/hdd: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 5005 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hdd1 * 1 5005 40202631 44 Unknown
%
Sure enough, it found a single partition of
type 0x44. I was unable to find any reference that explained
this type of partition. I then examined the partition table
directly.
% dd if=/dev/hdd bs=512 count=1 | od -x
... 0180
0000700 0001 fe44 ffff 003f 0000 e30e 04ca 0000
0000720 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000
*
0000760 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 aa55
The infamous od
program prints 16-bit quantities as big-endian "short" ints.
Because x86 architecture is little-endian, I should not have
used od. I would have done better to issue hexdump -C.
Then, the offsets would have been in hex rather than octal,
and the bytes would have been printed one at a time.
That said, let's dissect this partition table.
It has only one entry, at bytes 0676-0715 (0x1be-0x1cd), with
contents
80 01 01 00 44 fe ff ff 3f 00 00 00 0e e3 ca 04
Looking at a site that describes the partition
table, such as
this one, we see the breakdown is:
80: bootable flag (YES)
01,01,00: starting C/H/S
44: filesystem descriptor
fe,ff,ff: ending C/H/S
3f,00,00,00: starting logical sector (32-bit)
0e,e3,ca,04: ending logical sector (32-bit)
where the starting C/H/S is head 1, sector
1, cylinder 0, and the ending C/H/S is head 0xfe (254), sector
0x3f (63), cylinder 0x3ff (1023). The cylinder number is suspicious,
because all available bits are set to 1. I guess that's what
happens when you try to represent cylinder number 5004 in ten
bits. (Sidebar 2 contains a brief refresher on C/H/S addressing;
Wikipedia probably has a better one.)
Looking at the 32-bit logical sector numbers
shows that the disk should have 0x04cae30e (80405262) sectors,
which exactly matches the 40202631 blocks of "1K" or 1024 bytes
each that are shown above.
Sure enough, this partition table was useless.
It should have been simple enough to fix using fdisk or cfdisk
or sfdisk. The old fdisk is my favorite, but that's only because
I'm a dinosaur; you don't have to follow my example. All I needed
was the original cylinder numbers, and I could just plug them
in.
Do you remember this bit of advice your distro's
installation manual: "Keep a hardcopy of your output from
fdisk -l"? This situation is exactly why you're advised
to save that printout. If that information had been available,
a few commands could have restored everything on my friend's
HDD.
When No Cylinder Numbers Are Available
But, of course, the cylinder number information
wasn't available, as I soon found out from my friend:
Windows does not give you the cylinder
and block numbers. The original first partition C was
8G. I think I shrank it to 6G (or 4GB) and created an
XP partition of 2G (or 4GB). Then I deleted the XP partition
but did not expand the C partition back to original
due to lack of time (I had to leave her apartment).
The second partition D (for applications) is 8G. The
third one E (for data) is 2G. Then the rest 20G for
drive F (for multimedia).
What to do? Should I add up the amount of
space my friend told me and pray that the partition began right
there? This option didn't seem safe to me. Although the data
partition probably began about 16GB from the start of the disk,
I didn't know if a GB here was 1000MB or 1024MB? For that matter,
what's an MB--1000KB or 1024KB? Worse, my friend's memory of
partition sizes didn't seem to be 100% rock solid either.
I was hoping that there might be a telltale
sign at the beginning of each FAT partition. I wasn't sure what
exactly to look for, although I knew each partition had a "boot
sector" containing the filesystem parameters, such as the super
block of ext2 and other filesystems. But what did it look like?
Figuring that I'd have to look at a lot of
sectors, I hacked together a script, which would print out the
contents of
* head 0, sector 0
* head 0, sector 1
* head 1, sector 0
I chose these because the partition's boot
sector probably would be in one of those positions in some cylinder
or another. At this point, I must apologize because I refer
to the first sector as 0, whereas traditionally it's referred
to as 1.
The first 3,000 cylinders would cover over
20GB, which ought to include completely the desired data partition.
The script deduces the size of each track and cylinder by looking
at the fdisk output. I stored the results in a rather large
disk file, where I was hoping to find some commonalities regarding
where each partition was likely to begin. Then, I hoped, it
would be obvious exactly where partition E began, as that was
the important one. Anyway, here's the script:
#!/bin/bash
cyl=0 # let's start at the very beginning
disk=/dev/hdd
climit=3000 # about 3/5 of the disk
# I am gonna take it for granted that the disk sector size is "1b" or 512.
SECTS=`fdisk -l $disk | sed -n '/^Disk/s/^.* \([1-9][0-9]*\) *sector.*$/\1/p'`
CYLSIZE=`fdisk -l $disk | sed -n '/^Units/s/^.*cylinders of *\([1-9][0-9]*\) *\*.*$/\1/p'`
((count=SECTS+1))
echo on disk $disk, cylinder size is $CYLSIZE blocks
echo I am going to make $climit passes, each time reading $count sectors
echo and printing sectors 0, 1, and $SECTS
echo 'Is this OK? Hit ctrl-C if not.'
read X
echo -n 'OK, abandon hope all ye who proceed. Start in five seconds.'
sleep 5
echo Done.
while [[ $cyl -lt $climit ]] ; do
((skip=cyl*CYLSIZE))
dd if=$disk of=/tmp/x bs=1b skip=$skip count=$count 2>/dev/null
echo Cylinder $cyl sector 0:
dd if=/tmp/x bs=1b count=1 conv=swab 2>/dev/null | od -Ax -x
dd if=/tmp/x bs=1b count=1 2>/dev/null | od -Ax -c
echo Cylinder $cyl sector 1:
dd if=/tmp/x bs=1b skip=1 count=1 conv=swab 2>/dev/null | od -Ax -x
dd if=/tmp/x bs=1b skip=1 count=1 2>/dev/null | od -Ax -c
echo Cylinder $cyl sector $SECTS:
dd if=/tmp/x bs=1b skip=$SECTS count=1 conv=swab 2>/dev/null | od -Ax -x
dd if=/tmp/x bs=1b skip=$SECTS count=1 2>/dev/null | od -Ax -c
((cyl=cyl+1))
done > out
Looking at the potential boot sectors on my friend's
disk, I found out that I was very lucky. Not only was there
a boot sector at each partition, there was another partition
table at each partition. These partition tables announced their
presence by the tell-tale byte pattern 55,AA at the end of the
sector. The swab in the script means I could search for
55AA *$ in the file and see exactly where this nice pattern
was located.
According to Werner Almesberger's excellent
LILO User's Guide, this is what happens when all partitions
are logical partitions. His guide, which contains a detailed
description of the disk layout, is located at /usr/doc/packages/lilo/user.ps.gz
on my distribution. Or you can Google on "lilo user guide",
without the quotes, of course.
If the disk had been repartitioned many times,
I might have found a bunch of residual 55AAs lying around. Instead,
I found only one extra occurrence--where my friend had deleted
the XP partition.
The partition table closest to 16GB from the
beginning of the disk happened to be 2073 cylinders in. From
the fdisk output above, a cylinder is 16065 * 512 bytes. So
2073 cylinders is fairly close to 17GB, if a GB is 1000*1000*1000
bytes:
% dc
2073 512* 16065*p
17051005440
But if a GB is 1024MB, and if an MB is 1024KB,
then 16GB would be
16 1024*1024*1024*p
17179869184
This seemed about right. Looking at the partition
table, I discovered that the partition began 33302808 sectors
from the start of the disk. This works out to 63 sectors from
the beginning of cylinder 2073, or cylinder 2074 if you start
counting with cylinder 1.
The size of the partition, translated into
decimal, was 2040192 sectors. This works out to be 63 sectors
shy of 127 cylinders. That is, 127 * 16065 - 63 = 2040192. So
it looked like my friend's E drive occupied 127 cylinders. But
I wasn't 100% sure this was true, and I didn't want to write
on his disk until I was 100% sure.
Another thing: as alert readers may have noticed,
2040192 sectors works out to about 1GB for the size of the E
partition, rather than the 2GB my friend remembered.
Performing a Sanity Check
From here, I copied out a subset of the disk
onto a spare area on my disk, something like this:
# dd if=/dev/hdd of=/extra/diskimage bs=512 skip=33302808 count=2040192
# mount -t vfat -o ro,loop /extra/diskimage /mnt
# ls /mnt
And it worked! This step provided me with
a sanity check without actually writing on the disk drive. I
even ran a du and sent the results to my friend. He
was very encouraged that I was able to get to this point.
Burning a Windows-Visible CD
I burned a Windows-visible
CD from the data on the partition, but I had trouble with
one file. It had a very long name, well beyond the 64-character
limit on the Joliet extension.
At the time, I don't think I knew about the
-joliet-long option to mkisofs. Anyway, I told mkisofs to hide
that file from the Joliet directory and then e-mailed the file
to my friend separately, using mpack(1).
Exactly how did I burn the Windows-visible
CD? True confession: I don't remember. But the process probably
was similar to the way I described in
this earlier article.
Not being completely confident in my ability
to burn a Windows-visible CD, I took the CD with me to the office,
where the corporate Windows laptop was able to read it just
fine. I e-mailed my friend a Windows Explorer screenshot and
told myself that even if I later trashed the disk drive, at
least I had the CD to give him.
Fixing the Partition Table on the Hard Drive
My friend was delighted that his daughter
would soon have her data back. He told me that if I was short
on time--and I was--that it would be enough simply to get the
data partition back. So I contented myself with only partitioning
the drive that far.
Remembering that fdisk numbers the cylinders
starting at 1 rather than 0, I told the HDD to
- delete the old 0x44 partition
- create a primary partition of about
16GB (2073 cylinders)
- create an extended partition starting
at cylinder 2074
- create a FAT32 partition starting
at cylinder 2074, occupying 127 cylinders and ending
at the end of cylinder 2200
like this:
Command (m for help): m
Command action
a toggle a bootable flag
b edit bsd disklabel
c toggle the dos compatibility flag
d delete a partition
l list known partition types
m print this menu
n add a new partition
o create a new empty DOS partition table
p print the partition table
q quit without saving changes
s create a new empty Sun disklabel
t change a partition's system id
u change display/entry units
v verify the partition table
w write table to disk and exit
x extra functionality (experts only)
Command (m for help): p
Disk /dev/hdd: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 5005 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hdd1 * 1 5005 40202631 44 Unknown
Command (m for help): d
Partition number (1-4): 1
Command (m for help): n
Command action
e extended
p primary partition (1-4)
p
Partition number (1-4): 1
First cylinder (1-5005, default 1):
Using default value 1
Last cylinder or +size or +sizeM or +sizeK (1-5005, default 5005): 2073
Command (m for help): n
Command action
e extended
p primary partition (1-4)
e
Partition number (1-4): 2
First cylinder (2074-5005, default 2074):
Using default value 2074
Last cylinder or +size or +sizeM or +sizeK (2074-5005, default 5005):
Using default value 5005
Command (m for help): n
Command action
l logical (5 or over)
p primary partition (1-4)
l
First cylinder (2074-5005, default 2074):
Using default value 2074
Last cylinder or +size or +sizeM or +sizeK (2074-5005, default 5005): 2200
Command (m for help): p
Disk /dev/hdd: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 5005 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hdd1 1 2073 16651341 83 Linux
/dev/hdd2 2074 5005 23551290 5 Extended
/dev/hdd5 2074 2200 1020096 83 Linux
Command (m for help): t
Partition number (1-5): 5
Hex code (type L to list codes): L
0 Empty 1c Hidden Win95 FA 65 Novell Netware bb Boot Wizard hid
1 FAT12 1e Hidden Win95 FA 70 DiskSecure Mult c1 DRDOS/sec (FAT-
2 XENIX root 24 NEC DOS 75 PC/IX c4 DRDOS/sec (FAT-
3 XENIX usr 39 Plan 9 80 Old Minix c6 DRDOS/sec (FAT-
4 FAT16 <32M 3c PartitionMagic 81 Minix / old Lin c7 Syrinx
5 Extended 40 Venix 80286 82 Linux swap da Non-FS data
6 FAT16 41 PPC PReP Boot 83 Linux db CP/M / CTOS / .
7 HPFS/NTFS 42 SFS 84 OS/2 hidden C: de Dell Utility
8 AIX 4d QNX4.x 85 Linux extended df BootIt
9 AIX bootable 4e QNX4.x 2nd part 86 NTFS volume set e1 DOS access
a OS/2 Boot Manag 4f QNX4.x 3rd part 87 NTFS volume set e3 DOS R/O
b Win95 FAT32 50 OnTrack DM 8e Linux LVM e4 SpeedStor
c Win95 FAT32 (LB 51 OnTrack DM6 Aux 93 Amoeba eb BeOS fs
e Win95 FAT16 (LB 52 CP/M 94 Amoeba BBT ee EFI GPT
f Win95 Ext'd (LB 53 OnTrack DM6 Aux 9f BSD/OS ef EFI (FAT-12/16/
10 OPUS 54 OnTrackDM6 a0 IBM Thinkpad hi f0 Linux/PA-RISC b
11 Hidden FAT12 55 EZ-Drive a5 FreeBSD f1 SpeedStor
12 Compaq diagnost 56 Golden Bow a6 OpenBSD f4 SpeedStor
14 Hidden FAT16 <3 5c Priam Edisk a7 NeXTSTEP f2 DOS secondary
16 Hidden FAT16 61 SpeedStor a9 NetBSD fd Linux raid auto
17 Hidden HPFS/NTF 63 GNU HURD or Sys b7 BSDI fs fe LANstep
18 AST SmartSleep 64 Novell Netware b8 BSDI swap ff BBT
1b Hidden Win95 FA
Hex code (type L to list codes): b
Changed system type of partition 5 to b (Win95 FAT32)
Command (m for help): p
Disk /dev/hdd: 255 heads, 63 sectors, 5005 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hdd1 1 2073 16651341 83 Linux
/dev/hdd2 2074 5005 23551290 5 Extended
/dev/hdd5 2074 2200 1020096 b Win95 FAT32
Command (m for help): w
The partition table has been altered!
Calling ioctl() to re-read partition table.
WARNING: If you have created or modified any DOS 6.x
partitions, please see the fdisk manual page for additional
information.
Syncing disks.
pav23:/home/collin # mount -t vfat -o ro /dev/hdd5 /mnt
pav23:/home/collin # ls /mnt
[[DELETED... it worked]]
pav23:/home/collin #
I congratulated myself, disconnected the drive
from the ribbon cable, put my spare desktop back together and
cleaned up the den. I then returned the disk drive to my friend,
along with the CD I had burned.
Sidebar 1. Review of IDE/ATA Nomenclature
A typical PC has two IDE buses, allowing four
separate disk or CD drives to be connected:
IDE bus 0
+-------- "master" = /dev/hda
+-------- "slave" = /dev/hdb
IDE bus 1
+-------- "master" = /dev/hda
+-------- "slave" = /dev/hdb
Note that one drive on a given IDE bus is
the so-called "master" and one is the "slave." These are traditional
misnomers, but the thing to remember is that conflicts must
be avoided. For example, two masters on a single bus equals
bad medicine.
If you have only one disk or CD drive on a
given IDE bus, it used to be important to make sure this one
drive was configured as master. It may or may not be necessary
for your particular controller. I've violated this rule at times
and nothing bad has happened. But, if you have a slave-without-master
configuration and things are flaky or don't work at all, it
might be worth a try to make the slave into the master.
What determines whether a particular drive
is a master or a slave on the bus? Every ATA drive I've seen
answers this question with one word: jumper. Depending on the
position of the jumper(s), a drive can declare itself to be
master, declare itself to be slave or say cable select. Cable
select means the drive's orientation depends on which connector
on the cable it's plugged into. Apparently there is a wiring
trick on the cable that allows the drive to know which connector
it's plugged into and, hence, whether it should respond to commands
directed at the master or the slave drive. I don't recommend
the cable select (CS) setting, because of past reports of flaky
behavior.
Sidebar 2. Review of Disk Addressing
Here is a brief tutorial for those unfamiliar
with C/H/S addressing. More elegant explanations probably are
available elsewhere on the Web, but here's my take on the topic.
Imagine your disk drive as a set of platters
stacked one above the other and spinning in unison. The platters
are divided into concentric tracks, with track 0 typically nearest
the outer rim. One point in the platters' rotation is arbitrarily
defined as "sector 0".
Each platter is coated on both sides with
magnetic material. Just micro-inches from each surface is a
head that can read or write data. The heads can move toward
the outer rim or toward the center of the platters, but they
do not spin. To read and write data on a particular sector on
a particular track, the heads must "seek" to the appropriate
track, settle into place and then wait for the desired sector
to pass under the heads so that the data can be read or written.
In the old days, disk drives could be accessed
in "surface mode" or "cylinder mode". In surface mode, head
0 track 0 is followed by head 0 track 1, then head 0 track 2,
and so on. At the end of each track, you have to move the head
to the next track. This makes surface mode slow, but it was
useful for disk drives with one fixed and one removable platter.
In cylinder mode, head 0 track 0 is followed
by head 1 track 0 and so on. That is, once sector 0 is under
the heads, you don't have to move the heads right away. Instead,
you switch to using the next read/write head. Only when you've
read track 0 with all heads do you need to move the heads to
track 1. This group, track 0 on all heads, collectively is referred
to as cylinder zero.
The BIOS on most PCs and utilities such as
fdisk refer to blocks on the disk in terms of cylinder, head
and sector numbers. For historical reasons, the heads are numbered
starting at 0, and the number is represented in 8 bits. Sectors
are numbered starting at 1, and the numbers are represented
in 6 bits. Cylinders are numbered from 0 and are represented
in 10 bits. Older BIOSes could address the disk using only this
C/H/S method; thus, they could address only the first 1024 cylinders
on a drive. This is why it used to be important to put your
Linux kernel on a partition that was contained entirely within
the first 1024 cylinders.
When you buy a disk drive today, you likely
will see "255 heads, 63 sectors, N cylinders" written on it.
There are not really 255 heads in such a disk drive, but the
drive identifies itself that way to the BIOS to allow C/H/S
addressing to get at the largest possible area on the disk.
Although the cylinders are fictional nowadays,
the BIOS and the partitioning utilities still want disk partitions
to begin at cylinder boundaries.
By the way, newer BIOSes aren't restricted
to C/H/S addressing, in particular to the old 1024-cylinder
limit. Instead, every 512-byte block on the disk drive can be
addressed using a 32-bit linear address space. This is what
"lba32" in lilo.conf means. Newer BIOSes thus can access over
a terabyte (1000 gigabytes), which ought to be enough for at
least a few more months.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Wed, 2005-11-09
01:09.
Numerous times I've had to recover lost partition tables
for windows machines.I usually boot from a
Knoppix live cd and then take it from there.
I once even wrote a script to search for the start
of the NTFS partition based on the NTFS signature (which worked, but
took few moments to do.)
The I learned there's the same functionality in
GNU Parted:
info parted
===============================================================
2.4.12 rescue
-------------
-- Command: rescue START END
rescue a lost partition that used to be located approximately between
START and END. If such a partition is found, Parted will ask you if
you want to create a partition for it. This is usefulif you accidently
deleted a partition with parted's rm command, for example.
Example:
(parted) print
Disk geometry for /dev/hdc: 0.000-8063.507 megabytes
Disk label type: msdos
Minor Start End Type Filesystem Flags
1 0.031 8056.032 primary ext3
(parted) rm
Partition number? 1
(parted) print
Disk geometry for /dev/hdc: 0.000-8063.507 megabytes
Disk label type: msdos
Minor Start End Type Filesystem Flags
OUCH! We deleted our ext3 partition!!! Parted comes
to the
rescue...
(parted) rescue
Start? 0
End? 8056
Information: A ext3 primary partition was found at 0.031MB ->
8056.030MB. Do you want to add it to the partition table?
Yes/No/Cancel? y
(parted) print
Disk geometry for /dev/hdc: 0.000-8063.507 megabytes
Disk label type: msdos
Minor Start End Type Filesystem Flags
1 0.031 8056.032 primary ext3
It's back! :)
===============================================================
It even recognizes way more file system types.
Search. In this scenario, we will search the unallocated space of the
"wd0e.dd" image for the string "abcdefg". The first step is to extract the unallocated
disk units using the "dls" tool (as this is an FFS image, the addressable units
are fragments).
# dls -f openbsd
images/wd0e.dd > output/wd0e.dls
Next, use the UNIX strings(1) utility to extract all of the ASCII strings
in the file of unallocated data. If we are only going to be searching for one
string, we may not need to do this. If we are going to be searching for many
strings, then this is faster. Use the '-t d' flags with "strings" to print the
byte offset that the string was found.
# strings -t d output/wd0e.dls
> output/wd0e.dls.str
Use the UNIX grep(1) utility to search the strings file.
# grep "abcdefg"
output/wd0e.dls.str | less
10389739: abcdefg
We notice that the string is located at byte 10389739. Next, determine what
fragment. To do this, we use the 'fsstat' tool:
# fsstat -f openbsd
images/wd0e.dd
<...>
CONTENT-DATA INFORMATION
--------------------------------------------
Fragment Range: 0 - 266079
Block Size: 8192
Fragment Size: 1024
This shows us that each fragment is 1024 bytes long. Using a calculator,
we find that byte 10389739 divided by 1024 is 10146 (and change). This means
that the string "abcdefg" is located in fragment 10146 of the "dls" generated
file. This does not really help us because the dls image is not a real file
system. To view the full fragment from the dls image, we can use dd:
# dd if=images/wd0e.dd
bs=1024 skip=10146 count=1 | less
Next, we will identify where this fragment is in the original image. The
"dcalc" tool will be used for this. "dcalc" will return the "address" in the
original image when given the "address" in the dls generated image. (NOTE, this
is currently kind of slow). The '-u' flag shows that we are giving it an dls
address. If the '-d' flag is given, then we are giving it a dd address and it
will identify the dls address.
# dcalc -f openbsd
-u 10146 images/wd0e.dd
59382
Therefore, the string "abcdefg" is located in fragment 59382. To view the
contents of this fragment, we can use "dcat".
# dcat -f openbsd
images/wd0e.dd 59382 | less
To make more sense of this, let us identify if there is a meta data structure
that still has a pointer to this fragment. This is achieved using "ifind". The
'-a' argument means to find all occurrences.
# ifind -f openbsd
-a images/wd0e.dd 59382
493
Inode 493 has a pointer to fragment 59382. Let us get more information about
inode 493, using "istat".
# istat -f openbsd
images/wd0e.dd 493
inode: 493
Not Allocated
uid / gid: 1000 / 1000
mode: rw-------
size: 92
num of links: 1
Modified: 08.10.2001 17:09:49 (GMT+0)
Accessed: 08.10.2001 17:09:58 (GMT+0)
Changed: 08.10.2001 17:09:49 (GMT+0)
Direct Blocks:
59382
Next, let us find out if there is a file that is still associated with this
(unallocated) inode. This is done using "ffind".
# ffind -f openbsd
-a images/wd0e.dd 493
* /dev/.123456
The leading '*' identifies the file as deleted. Therefore, at one point,
the file '/dev/.123456' allocated inode 493, which allocated fragment 59382,
which contained the string "abcdefg".
If "ffind" returned with more than file that had allocated inode 493, it
means that either both were hard-links to the same file or that one file (chicken)
allocated the inode, it was deleted, a second file (egg) allocated it, and then
it was deleted. The string belongs to the second file, but it is difficult to
determine which came first. On the other hand, if "ffind" returns with two entries
where one deleted and one not, then the string belongs to the non-deleted file.
As previously mentioned, Autopsy will do all of this for you when you do
a keyword search of unallocated space.
Smart
Tip for installing Windows with NTFS
Windows NT, 2000, 2003, and XP with the NTFS (New Technology File System)
cannot always be installed using the Repair Console, so creating a third drive
is a smart idea. The following only pertains to those people who wish to use
NTFS. The following will elimate the need for formatting and losing all your
files the next time you install Windows.
Without a FAT or FAT32 drive the DOS Setup program will not be able to copy
files to the hard drive, even if you install from the CD-ROM. Windows NT, 2000,
and XP need a FAT or FAT32 to copy files to. It cannot see the NTFS partition
yet. This is not the case if you install Windows from inside of Windows NT,
2000, 2003, or XP.
Lets say you currently have only the C
drive and a CD-ROM, you will need to fdisk and format the C drive into at least
two drives, a C and a D. Make a D drive that is NTFS and a C drive in FAT32
that is large enough to hold your I386 folder times 2.5 times the size of the
I386 folder. You will need the C drive large enough for the I386 folder and
the copying of files for the Windows installation. Just copy the entire I386
folder to the C drive , do not make it a sub folder. You now can make your D
drive NTFS for added security. If you only have a Recovery Cd, you can create
either a CD with the I386 folder on it or move the I386 to a partition that
is FAT ot FAT32 while you are setting up you new partitions. If you are coping
the I386 folder that was installed to your hard drive by a recovery CD then
read the section
How to make a Windows CD.
Now you need only to change the settings in the Registry so Windows can find
them when it needs them if you already had Windows installed to a different
drive other than the C drive. You will need to go to the Registry Key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Setup
and change the location for "SourcePath" to the new Drive letter (E:) Also change
the setting at "Installation Sources". You should also change the setting "SourcePath"
at the Key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion
Now when you need to reinstall Windows you can use a Windows 9x or
ME startup disk to get to the command prompt, or the XP / 2000 Repair console.
If you use a 9x or ME disk you will go to the C drive at the Command prompt.
Windows 9x can only see FAT or FAT32, DOS cannot see any NTFS drives.
You can go to the C:\I386 folder and type "Winnt" without the quotes. This will
start the installation, and all files will be copied to the C drive. When you
reboot to finish the installation, setup will then ask you where to install
Windows to
Making a Windows Installation CD from a Recovery Disk
I have been asked many times "I have Windows XP, how can I install Windows
without having to lose all my files. I only have a Recovery Disk". Well it is
really very simple, so long as you have a CD burner; or at least a second hard
drive.
If you have a Recovery CD from your computer manufacturer, the Recovery CD
will install the Windows installation files to a folder, normally to C:\I386
or C:\Winnt\I386 or C:\Windows\I386 . Open the Windows Explorer and look for
them. Make sure you have the file Winnt.exe, Winnt32.exe and EULA.txt. Each
version of Windows has a different number of files and almost all the files
will be compressed so they will have an underscore at the end of the file extension
like "Shell32.dl_"
You can do a search for the folder I386. You will need to copy the entire
folder to your CD burner. Do not change the name of the folder and do
not make it a sub folder as in E:\Windows\I386 , it must be E:\I386. This folder
will contain about 1000 or more files, in some cases nearly 1500 files.
Be sure to review the section
A little updated
info before
making the CD.
Now comes the tough part, getting the Windows CD Key. The NT platform does
not store the CD Key in the Registry in plain text as on the Windows 9x platform.
It stores only the Product ID, which is different each time you reinstall windows.
So you will need to check your computer for it. My laptop has a Windows CD Key
pasted to the bottom of it. Your Recovery CD may have it on its label, or your
paper work has it written somewhere. If you cannot find the key you can modify
the file I386\Setupp.ini
For Windows 9x
click here.
To modify the Setupp.ini file, open it
in notepad. It will look like this:
[Pid]
ExtraData=6376796F71737A76767385CA66F124
Pid=51873OEM
Change the OEM to 270 on the Pid
Value so it looks like this:
[Pid]
ExtraData=6376796F71737A76767385CA66F124
Pid=51873270
This should work on most CDs.
This will allow you to install Windows 2000 without a serial
number, this will NOT work on evaluation versions of Windows, or Windows
2003.
For those who do not know how to start the installation of Windows for NT,
XP, 2000, and 2003 there are two files available in the I386 folder. The file
Winnt.exe will start the installation from a DOS prompt, and Winnt32.exe will
start it within Windows. If you have a problem with Winnt32.exe when in Windows
you can use the Winnt.exe instead, however it is much slower.
- Zero Assumption Recovery is a suite of highly effective data recovery software.
- Our tools can help you recover your data if it is lost due to accidental
reformatting, power spike, virus attack, hardware malfunction or some other
reason.
- The toolkit contains several tools, allowing the following tasks to be performed:
- Data
recovery for Windows (ZAR32).
ZAR32 recovers FAT16/FAT32/NTFS file systems.
- Recover data from a damaged FAT16/FAT32 volume (ZARFAT).
- Recover
data from a damaged NTFS volume (ZARNTFS).
- Additionally, we developed a free tool to:
Recover digital camera images (Zero
Assumption Digital Image Recovery).
-
Norton Utilities
-
Optimizes and defragments files for faster hard drive performance.
-
Detects and fixes many Windowsr and disk problems automatically.
-
Can monitor your PC continuously to spot problems before
they occur.
-
Norton GoBack
-
NEW! SafeTry Mode creates a temporary environment that allows
you to test new programs and accept or reject changes to your system.
-
NEW! Familiar, intuitive search bar makes it easy to find
the files or folders you want to restore.
-
Restores your disk drive to a previous healthy state after
a system crash, failed software installation, user error, virus attack,
or other problem.
-
Allows you to restore just the files or folders you need,
or an entire drive.
CHKNTFS command
You are probably familiar with the chkdsk command, but you may not know that
there is a new command available with Win2000: chkntfs. Here is
the usage and syntax:
C:\>chkntfs /?
Displays or modifies the checking of disk at boot time.
CHKNTFS volume [...]
CHKNTFS /D
CHKNTFS /T[:time]
CHKNTFS /X volume [...]
CHKNTFS /C volume [...]
volume Specifies the drive letter (followed by a colon), mount point,
or volume name.
/D Restores the machine to the default behavior; all drives are checked
at boot time and chkdsk is run on those that are
dirty.
/T:time Changes the AUTOCHK initiation count down time to the specified
amount of time in seconds. If time is not specified, displays the current setting.
/X Excludes a drive from the default boot-time check. Excluded drives
are not accumulated between command invocations.
/C Schedules a drive to be checked at boot time; chkdsk will run if
the drive is dirty.
If no switches are specified, CHKNTFS will display if the specified drive
is dirty or scheduled to be checked on next reboot.
How to run disk Error Checking in Windows 2000 Professional WinBook
Tech Article For more information visit www.winbookcorp.com
NOTE: You, the customer, are
solely responsible for data security. WinBook strongly recommends that you perform
a backup of all personal data contained on your system prior to performing this
procedure. Warning: WinBook will NOT be held responsible for any data
loss incurred during this process.
Basic error checking
- Double left click on the My Computer icon
- Right click on the “C:” drive
- Left click on Properties
- Left click on the Tools tab
- Left click on Check Now … under Error-checking
- Left click Start
If you want to do a more in-depth error checking there are 2 other options
available:
First option is to Automatically fix file system errors (choosing
this option will require a restart of the computer to run). When choosing
this option you will see a box pop up that says, "The check disk could not be
preformed because exclusive access to the drive could not be obtained.
Do you want to schedule this disk check to occur next time you restart the computer?"
When prompted for this you would choose Yes if you want it to run
on the next reboot of the system.
The second option for error checking is Scan for and attempt recovery
of bad sectors (this will not require a restart of the system)
Failing
Disk Imagers Several disk imagers with the capability of skipping errors.
HDDRecovery...data recovery for failed hard drives - dead disk
Partition (computing) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
****
System recovery with Knoppix
***
NewsForge/Linux to the Rescue A Review of Three System Rescue Cds. The author
did not mentioned
rip (R)ecovery (I)s (P)ossible Linux rescue system. Here is some information
from
rip-55.readme
The bootable cd image `rip-55.iso.bin' can be written to a cd/dvd disk, using
cdrecord/dvdrecord etc.
The kernel has IDE and SCSI support. The kernel also has RAID and Ethernet/cable/dsl
networking support.
These are some of the programs it contains (partimage, parted, reiserfsck, cfdisk,
sfdisk, mke2fs, e2fsck, tune2fs, debugfs, mkfs.xfs, jfs_mkfs,jfs_fsck, xfs_repair,
cdrecord/dvdrecord, mkisofs, growisofs, ntfsresize, mkntfs, convertfs, losetup
+ AES encryption, lynx, mutt, fetchmail, ncftp,
irc, tin, telnet, wget, zgv).
It also includes the DVD udf filesystem packet writing tools (cdrwtool, mkudffs,
pktsetup).
The 'reiserfsck' program is used to check and repair a linux reiserfs
filesystem.
The 'xfs_repair' program is used to repair a linux xfs filesystem.
The 'jfs_fsck' program is used to check and repair a linux jfs filesystem.
The 'e2fsck' program is used to check and repair a linux ext2 or ext3 filesystem.
The 'ntfsresize' program non-destructively resizes Windows XP/2000/NT4 or Windows
Server 2003 NTFS filesystems. Read /usr/doc/ntfsresize.txt on the rescue system.
The partition image program 'partimage' saves partitions in the ext2, ext3,
reiserfs, jfs, xfs, ufs, ntfs, fat16, and fat32 formats to an image file. Only
used blocks are copied to save space and increase the speed. The image file
can be compressed, in gzip or bzip2 formats.
Google Directory - Computers Software Disk Management Error Checking and Repair
Open Directory - Computers Software Disk Management Error Checking and Repair
***** Sysinternals Freeware
The Sysinternals web site provides you with advanced utilities, technical information,
and source code related to Windows NT/2000/XP/2K3 and Windows 9x, Windows Me internals
that you won't find anywhere else. Mark Russinovich and Bryce Cogswell alone write
and update everything here.
SourceForge.net
Project Info - Linux Disk Editor
lde is a disk editor for linux, originally written to help recover deleted
files. It has a simple curses interface that was supposed to resemble an old
version of Norton Disk Edit for DOS. Works well with ext2, minix, xiafs. Not
so hot w/fat and iso9660
Norton Systemworks 2003 (Full Product) (Symantec-10025223) - PC World.com Product
Finder
Norton System Works review
NTFS.com
Hard Drive Data Recovery Information
Data Recovery Software - File
System Utilities
Partition Recovery Software and NTFS Recovery - NTFS Undelete and FAT Recovery
How I recovered
an unbootable NTFS Windows System
Hard Drive Data Recovery
Software Tools, Disk Recovery Utilities -Stellar
Easy recovery, Easyrecovery, FAT recovery, NTFS recovery, Undelete fat, Undelete
NTFS, Undelete utilities
Free Programs, Useful Tools (If you're a tech at heart or an Assembly programmer,
then read my page on
The MBR in Detail here. )
http://www.phystechsoft.com/en/index
Download:
PTSDE104.ZIP now!
V.1.04 (30 NOV 1998) [162 kb .zip]
NOTE: Direct disk access is not allowed
under Win2k/XP. Therefore you must use a DOS boot diskette!
For a Review of PTS-Disk Editor and SCREENSHOTS click here.
PTS Disk Editor: CAUTION: Do NOT attempt to WRITE
to (Edit) any portion of your hard drive while MS-Windows ( or any other 'active'
Operating System that randomly writes to your disk ) is running!
NORTON Disk Edit doesn't have 3 separate detailed WARNING Screens about this
for nothing!! They're protecting themselves every way they can! As a matter
of fact, Norton tells the Windows-dependent novice who knows nothing of DOS
consoles, that it's impossible to run Disk Edit with Windows running (NOT true)!
There are NO warning messages at all before the PTS-Disk
Editor pops-up ready to go !! But, hey, that's the main reason I like
it! If I ever wanted to make a change without having to shut-down the OS, then
PTSDE gives me NO hassle. Saving any data DISPLAYED by PTSDE as a binary or
text file is, unfortunately, a difficult thing to do! Although you could use
a DOS-Window to copy and then paste what you see into a text file, this version
of PTS-DiskEditor does NOT allow you to 'dump' sectors to a file like NORTON's
DISKEDIT does! ( Note: This is the ONLY free program available from this company,
and there are no help files included. SEE my
Review of the PTS-Disk Editor for usage instructions! Or, see
PTSDE's readme file - PTSde104.txt right now.)
FAT32 or NTFS Making the Choice
Choosing the file system to use on a Windows XP system is seldom
easy, and frequently it's not just a one time decision.. Different factors can
blur the decision process, and some tradeoffs are more than likely. No matter
what method you choose to adopt Windows XP, you will have to face the FAT32
versus NTFS decision. Clean and upgrade installs both require you to address
the situation early on in the process. Later on, if you add a drive or repartition
an existing drive the decision process faces you yet again. Circumstances may
dictate the choice for you, but in most cases the options have to be weighed
and the tradeoffs of using each method analyzed. Let's look at the available
choices.
File System Choices
Most articles discussing file system choices look at FAT32 and
NTFS as the two available choices. In reality, there are three systems which
could be selected. FAT, FAT32, and NTFS. Granted, FAT32 and NTFS are the primary
choices, but on occasion you'll still find the need for a FAT volume. A FAT
volume has a maximum size of 2GB and supports MS-DOS as well as being used for
some dual boot configurations, but backward compatibility is about the
only reason I can think of that FAT should ever be used, other than for the
occasional floppy diskette. That said, let's move on to FAT32 and NTFS.
Which File System to Choose?
As much as everyone would like for there to be a stock answer
to the selection question, there isn't. Different situations and needs will
play a large role in the decision of which file system to adopt. There isn't
any argument that NTFS offers better security and reliability. Some also say
that NTFS is more flexible, but that can get rather subjective depending on
the situation and work habits, whereas NTFS superiority in security and reliability
is seldom challenged. Listed below are some of the most common factors to consider
when deciding between FAT32 and NTFS.
The Naked PC Newsletter
This article concludes a series on Norton Utilities ("NU"), and covers Rescue
Disk, Registry Tracker, Registry Editor, Integrator, and the DOS-based Disk
Editor.
(Note: Of these tools, only Integrator is Windows 2000 compatible.)
Rescue Disk can produce two different types of disk sets. A "basic rescue
set" is a set of floppies, at least one of which is bootable to a DOS prompt,
that also includes tools to help you investigate and repair whatever problem
has caused the PC to need rescuing. A "Norton Zip rescue set" writes data to
an Iomega Jaz or Zip cartridge, along with one bootable floppy. A Norton Zip
rescue set will boot you back to Windows (not MS-DOS), at which point the Rescue
Recovery Wizard starts automatically. Personally, although I make a basic rescue
set whenever I upgrade NU (that's maybe once a year), I don't take Symantec's
advice to keep my rescue set updated. I don't even bother to make a Norton Zip
rescue set even though I have a nice Iomega Zip 250 drive.
Why? If a PC is so out of whack that it can't boot, in my opinion it's time
for a scorched-earth reformat/reinstall (note that I *do* keep all my data religiously
backed up; otherwise of course I'd be inviting misery by not at least trying
to do a rescue).
Registry Tracker monitors changes that either programs or you make to your
PC's Registry keys, INI files, startup files (like autoexec.bat and config.sys),
and data files and folders. (Registry Tracker can't show you the exact changes
made to data files but it can keep snapshots of them so you can restore from
a previous version.) If you elect to track a folder, the tool takes a snapshot
whenever the folder contents change so you can see what files were added or
deleted.
I find Registry Tracker's user interface
very awkward and confusing. To me, it does not makes sense to tie up system
resources with this type of tool constantly monitoring the Registry et al. I
don't install suspect applications on my system, and if for some reason I have
to, I do that on a test PC (or a test partition on my production PC) that I
can quickly and easily delete and recreate. What do I do if a program really
wrecks a PC under my care? I roll back to the previously known- good version
of the Registry using the free, built-in Windows Registry Checker. For more
information on using the Registry Checker to roll back the Registry, see pp.
321-323 of our ebook "The Book That Should Have Come with Your Computer."
http://www.TheNakedPC.com/t/419/tr.cgi?lee1
Norton Registry Editor offers two conveniences not provided by Windows' own
built-in Registry Editor tool (Regedit.exe). First, Norton's version has an
interface for making a backup (select File, Backup Entire Registry, enter a
filename, Save). Second, Norton's version supports bookmarks so you can mark
your most frequently visited Registry keys. Unfortunately this feature is not
name-based so you can't assign your own names to Registry bookmarks. Instead
there is a tree-style listing of all the bookmarks you've created. It's easy
to traverse the list if you only have a few bookmarks but with more than about
10 the list can quickly become overwhelming. I'd prefer that NU offer a name-
based system so that I could bookmark the key "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\10.0\Outlook\Today"
with the name "Outlook_Today_Disable".
Integrator is just a fancy wrapper interface for all of NU's tool. It is
a helpful control panel, and that's all there is to say about that.
Disk Editor is a tool for advanced users. It allows you to view and edit
a hard disk down at the sector and byte level, from inside a DOS window. You
can *really* get yourself into trouble with this tool, but it can occasionally
come in handy, say, if you wanted to study the binary file structure of a Word
document. Not something any of us are likely to do on a daily basis, but you
never know.
Copyright © 1996-2009 by Dr. Nikolai Bezroukov.
www.softpanorama.org was
created as a service to the UN Sustainable Development Networking Programme (SDNP)
in the author free time.
Submit
comments This document is an industrial compilation designed and created
exclusively for educational use and is placed under the copyright of the
Open Content License(OPL).
Site uses AdSense so you need to be aware of Google privacy policy. Original materials copyright belong to respective owners. Quotes are made
for educational purposes only in compliance with the fair use doctrine.
Disclaimer:
- The statements, views and opinions presented on
this web page are those of the author and are not endorsed by, nor do they necessarily
reflect, the opinions of the author present and former employers, SDNP or any other
organization the author may be associated with.
- We do not warrant the correctness of the information provided or its
fitness for any purpose
- In no way this site is associated with or endorse cybersquatters
using
the term "softpanorama" with other main or country domains (e.g. softpanorama.com) with
bad faith intent to profit from the goodwill belonging to
someone else.
Last modified:
August 12, 2009
od -t x1