|Contents||Bulletin||Scripting in shell and Perl||Network troubleshooting||History||Humor|
|News||Job schedulers||Recommended Links||Unix System Monitoring||Perl Admin Tools and Scripts||Cron and Crontab commands|
|Tivoli Workload Scheduler||CA Unicenter||Control-M from BMC Software||OpsWise Automation Center||UC4 Automation Engine||Tidal Enterprise Scheduler|
|Open Source Job Scheduler||Oracle Scheduler||Gartner scheduling review||Humor||Etc|
UC4 V8ô combines classical job scheduling, conditional business processing, and an awareness of application data and drive your business' processing based on calendars, events, dynamic data changes, message queues, database triggers, file arrivals, thresholds, resource availability and more.
Operations Manager is the UC4 legacy product that was first developed to support mainframe and data center operations at UC4's headquarters in Austria. It is written primarily in C. Applications Manager is a newer product that UC4 obtained with its 2007 acquisition of Appworx. The product is written in Java, and provides hooks into applications such as SAP and database management systems.
Founded in 1985, UC4 developed and marketed enterprise job scheduling solutions that serviced the datacenter market; the company has 260 employees; over $70 million in revenue; more than 1,600 customers; and 11 offices worldwide. In late 2005, The Carlyle Group acquired 80% of the shares of UC4, with the rest being principally owned by employees. In 2007, UC4 merged with AppWorx, a company with solutions in the area of application automation and integration.
UC4 Workload Automation Suite has a centralized repository and interface for information collected from multiple, specialized application job schedulers automating the control and management of workload across the enterprise. As IT organizations adopt workload automation, UC4 has integrated with SAP and many other packaged applications for efficient batch administration. Other critical features, and the roles they support, are the following:
IT operations managers who run and monitor key processes
All job scheduling vendors on the market provide basic automation capabilities. UC4 has built its market-leading reputation on this set of strong fundamental base automation components which are highly integrated. Additionally to these base functions UC4 offers unique functionality in each basic automation field, listed below in detail.
|Bulletin||Latest||Past week||Past month||
April 7, 2009
by Alex Woodie
In response to today's increasingly complex enterprise computing environments, job scheduler developer UC4 has released the first iteration of its new "rapid automation" technology that it says can significantly ease the burden of developing integrated job schedules that touch multiple platforms and applications. The version 8.0 release of the Workload Automation Suite also includes a new graphical workload analyzer aimed at making it easier for users to understand what jobs are running and which resources are being consumed.
As the only software company focused entirely on job schedulers, UC4 is well positioned to understand the unique roles that job schedulers play in the data centers of mid size and large companies. According to Marc Carkeek, UC4's vice president product development, job scheduling is becoming a more critical function as the result of the growing complexity of enterprise computer systems and the increasing reliance on IT to accomplish business tasks.
"Complexity is really driving it. Technology has become so central to everything we do," Carkeek says. "We need to be sure everything is happening, from folks closing [books] to orders being processed. And not only does this need to happen on a schedule, but on a dynamic schedule that changes as the business grows."
UC4 is responding to this increased complexity and enterprise reliance on IT by seeking to make job scheduling an easier and more intuitive task. To that end, the company released its Workload Automation Suite version 8.0, which begins a multi-year march to eventually unite the suite's two main components, Operations Manager and Applications Manager.
Operations Manager is the UC4 heritage product that was first developed to support mainframe and data center operations at UC4's headquarters in Austria. It is written primarily in C. Applications Manager is a newer product that UC4 obtained with its 2007 acquisition of Appworx. The product is written in Java, and provides deeper hooks into applications such as SAP and today's database management systems.
With version 8.0 of the Automation Suite, UC4 has introduced a new scheduling development paradigm it calls rapid automation, or RA. This Java-based tool is designed to provide a common integration methodology across Operations Manager and Applications Manager, and to shield developers from the complexity of hooking specific applications or interfaces into the suite for enterprise scheduling.
"We've given them almost a programming model so they don't have to worry about what's doing the work behind it. They just know they have this job that can run and it does this function," Carkeek says. "So all the technology behind it doesn't matter as long as they know this is its place in the business or data center process."
With this release, UC4 has delivered RA interfaces for a handful of applications, including FTP/sFTP, VMware's hypervisor, and SunGard Banner, an ERP application for schools. Future releases will bring more RA advances, including support for more virtualized environments, and cloud and SaaS computing.
Future releases of the Automation Suite will further integrate with virtualization offerings to provide rapid provisioning of virtual servers to handle new workloads, "on the fly, without thinking about it," Carkeek says. "That's where we're expected to go, and we're definitely poised for that." UC4 is focused primarily on the X64 virtualization market, but could add support for IBM's Power Systems LPAR virtualization if the need arose.
UC4 has a decent following on the System i (iSeries, AS/400), with more than 40 customers, including the Computer Research Institute (an implementation we covered last month), American Suzuki Motor Corp., Con-Way, and Cracker Barrel. However, Power Systems (eServer i5) shops account for just a fraction of UC4's total installed base of 1,600.
Another timesaving device in the current version 8.0 release is the new Graphical Workload Analyzer. This interface is designed to provide a comprehensive view of all managed jobs, as well as critical path and predictive analysis capabilities to help users trace problems and anticipate resource demand. Gantt views are employed to give users a more nuanced view of their job scheduling environment.
Displaying this information visually can save customers a lot of time, Carkeek says. "Given that some companies are running thousands of jobs, they can't parse through the information like that. They can't read through it fast enough," he says.
The Workload Automation Suite runs on Unix, Linux, or Windows servers, and deploys agents to all major operating systems, including IBM i (OS/400), mainframe, BS2000, OpenVMS, and others. The software allows users to schedule processing to occur in several ways, including by calendars, by events, by dynamic data changes, according to resource thresholds or resource availability, or when message queues, database triggers, or file arrivals occur.
Workload Automation Suite version 8.0 is available now. Pricing was not provided by the vendor. To contact UC4 for more information, go to www.uc4.com.
Financial System Outsourcer Taps UC4 to for Job Automation
UC4 Sales Rocket Skyward in the United States
Groupthink : Two Party System as Polyarchy : Corruption of Regulators : Bureaucracies : Understanding Micromanagers and Control Freaks : Toxic Managers : Harvard Mafia : Diplomatic Communication : Surviving a Bad Performance Review : Insufficient Retirement Funds as Immanent Problem of Neoliberal Regime : PseudoScience : Who Rules America : Neoliberalism : The Iron Law of Oligarchy : Libertarian Philosophy
War and Peace : Skeptical Finance : John Kenneth Galbraith :Talleyrand : Oscar Wilde : Otto Von Bismarck : Keynes : George Carlin : Skeptics : Propaganda : SE quotes : Language Design and Programming Quotes : Random IT-related quotes : Somerset Maugham : Marcus Aurelius : Kurt Vonnegut : Eric Hoffer : Winston Churchill : Napoleon Bonaparte : Ambrose Bierce : Bernard Shaw : Mark Twain Quotes
Vol 25, No.12 (December, 2013) Rational Fools vs. Efficient Crooks The efficient markets hypothesis : Political Skeptic Bulletin, 2013 : Unemployment Bulletin, 2010 : Vol 23, No.10 (October, 2011) An observation about corporate security departments : Slightly Skeptical Euromaydan Chronicles, June 2014 : Greenspan legacy bulletin, 2008 : Vol 25, No.10 (October, 2013) Cryptolocker Trojan (Win32/Crilock.A) : Vol 25, No.08 (August, 2013) Cloud providers as intelligence collection hubs : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2010 : Inequality Bulletin, 2009 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2008 : Copyleft Problems Bulletin, 2004 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2011 : Energy Bulletin, 2010 : Malware Protection Bulletin, 2010 : Vol 26, No.1 (January, 2013) Object-Oriented Cult : Political Skeptic Bulletin, 2011 : Vol 23, No.11 (November, 2011) Softpanorama classification of sysadmin horror stories : Vol 25, No.05 (May, 2013) Corporate bullshit as a communication method : Vol 25, No.06 (June, 2013) A Note on the Relationship of Brooks Law and Conway Law
Fifty glorious years (1950-2000): the triumph of the US computer engineering : Donald Knuth : TAoCP and its Influence of Computer Science : Richard Stallman : Linus Torvalds : Larry Wall : John K. Ousterhout : CTSS : Multix OS Unix History : Unix shell history : VI editor : History of pipes concept : Solaris : MS DOS : Programming Languages History : PL/1 : Simula 67 : C : History of GCC development : Scripting Languages : Perl history : OS History : Mail : DNS : SSH : CPU Instruction Sets : SPARC systems 1987-2006 : Norton Commander : Norton Utilities : Norton Ghost : Frontpage history : Malware Defense History : GNU Screen : OSS early history
The Peter Principle : Parkinson Law : 1984 : The Mythical Man-Month : How to Solve It by George Polya : The Art of Computer Programming : The Elements of Programming Style : The Unix Haterís Handbook : The Jargon file : The True Believer : Programming Pearls : The Good Soldier Svejk : The Power Elite
Most popular humor pages:
Manifest of the Softpanorama IT Slacker Society : Ten Commandments of the IT Slackers Society : Computer Humor Collection : BSD Logo Story : The Cuckoo's Egg : IT Slang : C++ Humor : ARE YOU A BBS ADDICT? : The Perl Purity Test : Object oriented programmers of all nations : Financial Humor : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2008 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2010 : The Most Comprehensive Collection of Editor-related Humor : Programming Language Humor : Goldman Sachs related humor : Greenspan humor : C Humor : Scripting Humor : Real Programmers Humor : Web Humor : GPL-related Humor : OFM Humor : Politically Incorrect Humor : IDS Humor : "Linux Sucks" Humor : Russian Musical Humor : Best Russian Programmer Humor : Microsoft plans to buy Catholic Church : Richard Stallman Related Humor : Admin Humor : Perl-related Humor : Linus Torvalds Related humor : PseudoScience Related Humor : Networking Humor : Shell Humor : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2011 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2012 : Financial Humor Bulletin, 2013 : Java Humor : Software Engineering Humor : Sun Solaris Related Humor : Education Humor : IBM Humor : Assembler-related Humor : VIM Humor : Computer Viruses Humor : Bright tomorrow is rescheduled to a day after tomorrow : Classic Computer Humor
The Last but not Least
|You can use PayPal to make a contribution, supporting hosting of this site with different providers to distribute and speed up access. Currently there are two functional mirrors: softpanorama.info (the fastest) and softpanorama.net.|
The statements, views and opinions presented on this web page are those of the author and are not endorsed by, nor do they necessarily reflect, the opinions of the author present and former employers, SDNP or any other organization the author may be associated with. We do not warrant the correctness of the information provided or its fitness for any purpose.
Last modified: November 04, 2013